East Carolina Health and Rehabilitation Center
2575 W 5th Street, Greenville, NC 27834 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (252) 830-9100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $61,585 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.9% | 15.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.4% | 7.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 5.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.3% | 18.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.1% | 21.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 94.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 5.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.4% | 20.7% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.6% | 14.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.4% | 78.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.1% | 22.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.26 | 1.78 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.08 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.7%CMS range 29.1–52.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.2–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 21.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 36.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 4.6–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 90.0 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with resident, staff, and a representative from the company that manufactures the mechanical lifts used at the facility, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred by a mechanical lift. A mechanical lift sling broke while Resident # 3 was being transferred resulting in Resident # 3 sustaining a fractured humerus (large bone of the upper arm). This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident # 3).The findings included:Resident # 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included stroke and chronic pain.Resident # 3's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/18/25, coded Resident # 3 as cognitively intact and as totally dependent on staff for transfers.Resident # 3's care plan, last updated on 8/29/25, included the information that Resident # 3 required total staff assistance for transfers.On 1/7/25 at 12:33 PM Nurse # 4 documented the following information. Two Nurse Aides were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff, Physician, Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, and the facility's Pharmacy Consultant the facility failed to 1) analyze Resident #2's falls to determine causative factors and implement interventions to reduce the risk for further falls and 2) ensure a paraplegic resident (Resident # 1) did not roll out of bed during care. Resident # 2 was identified to have an impacted arm fracture (a fracture that generally occurs following a fall). This was for two of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The findings included: 1. Resident # 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 2's diagnoses in part included vascular dementia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. Resident # 2's quarterly Minimum Dat Set assessment, dated 1/11/24, coded Resident # 2 as the following. The resident was severely cognitively impaired; dependent on staff for bathing and dressing; required substantial to maximum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews with staff, residents, and a family member, the facility failed to ensure linens were available for 4 of 4 residents who were interviewed or their family member was interviewed regarding linens (Residents # 9, # 10, # 11, and # 12).The findings included:a. Record review revealed Resident # 9 was last admitted on [DATE] and a readmission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/12/26, coded Resident # 9 as cognitively intact. Resident # 9 was interviewed on 5/12/26 at 10:35 AM and again on 5/14/26 at 8:42 AM and reported the following. Within the last two to three weeks, her bed linens needed to be changed because she had gotten jelly on the linens during breakfast. The staff did not have any bed linens to change them, and she had to wait for them to be replaced until later that night. Resident #9 indicated obtaining washcloths and towels was also a problem. She had watched the nurse aides cut up towels to make washcloths and therefore she purchased her own towels or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, Responsible Party (RP), Physicians, and Wound Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to obtain supplies and implement the Wound Nurse Practitioner's treatment plan for a resident with a pressure sore. This was for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure sores (Resident # 4).The findings included:Record review revealed Resident # 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included a history of surgery and radiation treatment for a brain tumor in 2015 which resulted in aphasia (inability to speak) and quadriparesis (muscle weakness in arms and legs.) Additionally, Resident # 4 had diagnoses of seizure disorder, hypertension, dysphagia (trouble swallowing), and gastrostomy placement (a tube inserted into the stomach for liquid nutrition to be given).Review of Resident # 4's care plan, last updated on 4/20/26, revealed staff identified Resident # 4 was at risk for pressure sores due to decreased mobility, incontinence, and being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with staff and Responsible Party, the facility failed to 1) identify in their accident investigation that an assigned staff member had not been on duty when Resident # 2 fell and thereby evaluate how this might have contributed to the accident occurring in order to take corrective action and 2) failed to toilet Resident # 2 at bedtime as directed by the resident's care plan in order to try and prevent future falls. This was for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls (Resident # 2).The findings included:Resident # 2's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], noted Resident # 2 was alert and oriented times two (indicating she knew who she was and where she was). Resident # 2 had diagnoses, which although not inclusive, included Alzheimer's disease and multiple myeloma.Record review revealed Resident # 2 resided at the facility from 4/23/26 until her discharge on [DATE].Record review revealed Resident # 2's admission Minimum Data Set assessment had not been completed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff and Physician, the facility failed to have effective systems in place to ensure ordered medications were acquired from the pharmacy and available for administration and the backup supply of medications was utilized for medications that had not been received from the pharmacy for 1 of 1 resident whose medications were reviewed (Resident #1).The findings included:Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included panhypopituitarism (a rare disorder when the pituitary gland stops producing most or all its essential hormones) and sleep apnea for which he was documented as wearing a CPAP (a continuous positive airway pressure) machine.Review of Resident # 1's orders, dated 3/23/26, revealed he was ordered to receive dexamethasone one (1) milligram (mg) every day for his panhypopituitarism. (Dexamethasone suppresses the immune system.)Review of Resident # 1's May Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on 5/6/26, Nurse # 5 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours for 2 of 142 days reviewed for staffing (12/28/25 and 1/24/26).The findings included: Review of the facility's daily nurse staffing sheets from 11/1/25 through 3/22/26 revealed the following: a. On 12/28/25 the daily nurse staffing sheet indicated a daily census of 85. Review of the daily nurse staffing sheet revealed there was no RN working on any shift that day. b. On 1/24/26 the daily nurse staffing sheet indicated a daily census of 77. Review of the daily nurse staffing sheet revealed there was no RN working on any shift that day. In an interview with the Scheduler on 3/25/26 at 10:10 am, she stated she used the schedule to complete the daily nurse staffing sheets. The Scheduler stated if she had no RN coverage she would leave the RN space blank on the daily nurse staffing sheet for the number of RNs scheduled to work. She stated did not have RN coverage for 12/28/25 and 1/24/26. The Scheduler further stated she was unaware there could be no blank…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Medical Director, and Consultant Pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessments for potential adverse reactions to antipsychotic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #3).The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with severe behavioral disturbance and agitation.Review of Resident #3's physician orders revealed she had an order dated 4/21/25 for haloperidol lactate (a first-generation antipsychotic injection used for the rapid treatment of acute psychosis, schizophrenia, and severe agitation) 2 milligram (mg)/ milliliter (ml) give 0.5 ml by mouth two times a day for behaviors.Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the last AIMS assessment on file was dated 7/29/25. There were no other AIMS assessments found in the Resident #3's EMR after that date. Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and facility staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 62 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments (Resident #84). The findings included:Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke).Review of a physician order dated 1/16/26 for Resident #84 documented [brand name of formula] enteral nutrition (delivery of nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal tract, typically through a feeding tube) at 60 milliliters (ml) per hour every 12 hours from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. and 200 ml water flush every four hours. Review of Resident #84's February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed [brand name of formula] enteral nutrition at 60 ml per hour per feeding tube every 12 hours from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. and 200 ml of water flush every 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and an interview with the Pharmacy Consultant, the Pharmacy Consultant failed to identify and report irregularities when conducting monthly drug regimen reviews for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #3).The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with severe behavioral disturbance and agitation.Review of Resident #3's physician orders revealed she had an order dated 4/21/25 for haloperidol lactate (a first-generation antipsychotic injection used for the rapid treatment of acute psychosis, schizophrenia, and severe agitation) 2 milligram (mg)/ milliliter (ml) give 0.5 ml by mouth two times a day for behaviors.Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the last AIMS assessment on file was dated 7/29/25. There were no other AIMS assessments found in the Resident #3's EMR after that date. Review of the Pharmacy Consultant monthly drug regimen reviews for Resident #3 dated 10/10/25, and monthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Dialysis Dietician/Nurse Practitioner, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #7).The findings included:Resident #7 latest admission date to the facility was 10/8/2025 following a hospitalization from 10/3/2025 to 10/8/2025 for dialysis access complications and anemia. Resident #7 admitting diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. A care plan dated 10/08/2025 addressed ESRD and fluid volume management, including administering medications as ordered, monitoring vital signs, and providing diet as ordered. The care plan was revised on 03/05/2026 to include activities of daily living (ADL) assistance needs. The care plan did not include interventions addressing medication availability,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was functioning properly for 3 of 97 residents observed for resident call system (Resident #78, Resident #4, and Resident #94).The findings included:Record review of maintenance related purchase orders revealed on 2/9/26 light bulbs were ordered and a delivery date of 2/10/26 was noted.a. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included inflammatory and immune myopathies (a group of rare, chronic diseases where the body's immune system mistakenly attacks its own healthy muscle fibers), generalized weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 was cognitively intact. Resident #78 required substantial/maximal assistance for oral hygiene, upper body dressing, personal hygiene, rolling left and right, and wheeling 150 feet. She was dependent on others for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff and Physicians the facility failed to notify the physician when residents developed pressure sores for 2 of 3 sampled residents with pressure sores (Residents # 1 and Resident #8).The findings included:1. Resident # 1 resided at the facility from 3/11/25 until her discharge to the hospital on 8/29/25. Resident # 1's diagnoses included cellulitis of the lower extremities, lymphedema, venous insufficiency, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and gout.Resident # 1's electronic record included pictures as part of the documentation regarding Resident # 1's sacral pressure sore development and assessment. The first picture was recorded on 4/4/25. In the documented picture, the sacral pressure sore appeared to have both black and yellow slough tissue in the wound bed.The electronic record did not include orders on 4/4/25 for the treatment of the pressure sore or that the physician was contacted.The Wound Care Nurse was interviewed on 9/9/25 at 4:15 PM and on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff and physicians the facility failed to 1) ensure Nurse Aides reported skin breakdown to a nurse prior to the wound bed being unstageable (Resident # 1); 2) ensure effective communication amongst nursing staff and the Wound Physician to ensure orders were obtained, initiated, and carried out for pressure sore treatments per the Wound Care Physician's plan of care (Resident # 1 and Resident #8); 3) ensure further diagnostic studies were completed per the Wound Care Physician's directions when a wound continued not to heal (Resident # 1), and 4) ensure the settings of a pressure relieving air mattress were set correctly for pressure relief (Resident # 8). This was for 2 of 3 of three sampled residents with pressure sores (Residents # 1 and # 8). The findings included:1. Resident # 1 resided at the facility from [DATE] until her discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident # 1's diagnoses included cellulitis of the lower extremities, lymphedema, venous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, Resident Representative (RR), and staff interviews, the facility failed to invite a resident to participate in the development of his plan of care for 1 of 3 residents were reviewed for care planning (Resident #271). The findings included: Resident #271 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and his diagnosis included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, renal insufficiency, diabetes, and hypertension. Resident #271's care plan dated 11/22/24 revealed a goal to discharge to the community by the next review period with a target date of 12/11/24. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident #271 was cognitively intact. An interview with Resident #271 was held on 12/16/24 at 2:18 PM during which he stated he had never been invited to participate in the development of his plan of care. An interview with Resident #271's Resident Rrepresentative was held on 12/18/24 at 2:02 PM, she stated she had not ever been invited to participate in the development of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days following the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, last day of the assessment period) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for assessments (Resident #48). Findings included: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #48's MDS assessments revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 11/15/24 in the electronic health record with the status of in progress. During an interview on 12/17/24 at 12:45 PM MDS Nurse #1 and MDS Nurse #2 stated quarterly MDS assessments were to be completed no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. Due to staffing challenges, they were behind with Resident #48's quarterly MDS assessment and it was not completed timely according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual requirements as the assessment was still in progress. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 8:23 AM the Administrator stated MDS assessments should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for antipsychotic use, hospice status, and wound status for 3 of 18 resident assessments reviewed (Resident #50, Resident #58, and Resident #173). Findings included: 1. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was assessed to have received an antipsychotic medication during the 7-day look back period. Review of Resident #50's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2024 revealed Resident #50 did not receive an antipsychotic medication in November 2024. During an interview on 12/17/24 at 12:54 PM MDS Nurse #1 and MDS Nurse #2 stated due to staffing difficulties they were pulling answers forward from the previous assessment and then validating the information to save time when completing MDS assessments. Risperdal was discontinued on 10/2/24 for Resident #50 but the question was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident that exhibited aggressive verbal behaviors, a resident prescribed an antipsychotic medication, and a resident that had a surgical wound, for 3 of 18 residents reviewed for development and implementation of a comprehensive care plan (Resident #55, Resident #62 and Resident #58). The findings included: 1. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included cerebral infarction, encephalopathy, and cognitive communication deficit. A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 10/3/23 and last revised on 7/30/24 did not reveal a comprehensive care plan about behaviors. A review of Resident #55's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he was mildly cognitively impaired and did exhibit verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others. An interview with the Social Worker on 12/17/24 at 1:37 PM, revealed Resident # 55 was referred to Psychiatric Therapy for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store the wet syringe separately from the barrel when Nurse #3 did not separate a bolus enteral feeding syringe (a large 2 part syringe used to administer oral medications or liquid feedings) used for medication administration through a gastrostomy tube (a hollow tube inserted directly through the skin of the abdomen into the stomach to deliver nutrition, hydration, and medication) for one of one resident (Resident #21). The deficient practice occurred for one of one staff member observed for medication administration via a gastrostomy tube. Findings included: During an observation of medication administration on 12/18/24 at 1:52 PM Nurse #3 entered Resident #21's room to administer medications via a gastrostomy tube. Nurse #3 administered the medication using a 2-part piston and barrel bolus enteral feeding syringe through a gastrostomy tube, rinsed the piston and barrel syringe with water and replaced the piston into the barrel and then placed the wet syringe back into a plastic storage bag. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when Nurse #3, the Wound Nurse, and the Wound Physician failed to apply a gown before entering residents' rooms to provide high contact care activities for two of two residents (Resident #21 and Resident #58). The deficient practice occurred for three of three caregivers observed for infection control practices. These deficient practices placed residents at risk for infection. Findings included: Review of the facility policy on EBP, dated 4/1/2024, revealed in part EBP was an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employed the use gloves and gowns during high contact resident care activities. The policy further stated EBP use included care for residents with indwelling medical devices during high contact resident care. High contact care was further defined to include feeding tubes. 1. During an observation of medication administration on 12/18/24 at 1:52 PM Nurse #3 entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy and procedure to ensure facility staff received infection control training on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to know what required EBP and when to implement EBP for 1 of 1 staff reviewed for infection control training (Wound Care Nurse). The findings included: The facility Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy stated in part: East Carolina Rehab and Wellness will educate all employees on the reason for EBP. In an interview with the Wound Care Nurse on 12/18/24 at 2:19 PM, she stated she had worked at the facility since May of 2024, she had not been trained on EBP and was unaware that the facility used EBP. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/18/24 at 2:29 PM revealed she did not know if the Wound Care Nurse had been educated on EBP. She further stated the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) provided the education and the DON did not know where those education documents were located. The SDC was no longer employed at the facility. The DON was not able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for physical environment (Resident #6). The findings included: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included essential hypertension (high blood pressure) and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). A review of Resident #6's medical record on 9/17/24 at 3:32 PM did not reveal comprehensive care plans had been developed and implemented. In an interview with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse on 9/18/24 at 8:38 AM she looked for Resident #6's care plan in the EMR and stated he did not have one. She further stated he had been here for about 6 weeks and should have had a comprehensive care plan done within the first 21 days after admission. She felt that it was not completed as the previous MDS nurse left the facility around the time of his admission. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/18/24 at 8:40 AM revealed the MDS nurse was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and an emergency room physician interview the facility failed to provide care to a feeding tube site for one (Resident #1) of three sampled residents reviewed for feeding tube care. Findings included: Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility after a hospital admission from 2/8/2024 to 2/13/2024. Resident #1 had cumulative diagnoses, one of which included oropharyngeal dysphagia status post percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement. Documentation on a skin assessment dated [DATE] by Nurse #10 did not reveal a description or any representation of what the gastrostomy tube site looked like upon the return of Resident #1 from the hospital. Nurse #10 no longer worked for the facility at the time of the investigation and contact information was not available for an interview. Resident #1 had an active February 2024 enteral feed order initiated on 9/9/2022 for, every night shift clean tube site daily with normal saline, pat dry, and apply drain sponge if drainage noted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, Medical Director/Physician interview, and Pharmacist interview the facility failed to remove narcotic pain medications from the medication cart within the parameters set by the physician's orders for narcotic medication; failed to follow procedures for disposal of wasted narcotic medication; and failed obtain an order for narcotic pain medication prior to removing narcotic pain medication from the medication cart. Additionally, the facility failed to have effective safeguards and systems in place to control for, account for, and periodically reconcile controlled medications to protect the residents right to be free from potential drug diversion. This was for three residents, (Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for pharmacy services for narcotic medication. Findings included: 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses some of which included benign neoplasm of the pituitary gland, history of cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and Pharmacist interview the facility failed to document the administration of narcotic medication in the medication administration record for 3 (Resident #6, Resident #7, and Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of documentation of narcotic medication. Findings included: 1. Resident #6 had a current March 2024 physician's order for Oxycodone with Acetaminophen 5-325 milligram (mg) tablets to be administered by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe pain at the 8 to 10 level. Documentation on the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition form dated as initiated on 2/26/2024 recorded the removal of a dose of Oxycodone with Acetaminophen 5-325 mg tablet for Resident #6 on the following dates and times by Nurse #5: 3/1/2024 at 6:00 PM, 3/1/2024 at 10:10 PM, 3/4/2024 at 4:10 PM, and 3/4/2024 at 10:05 PM. There was no corresponding documentation on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) of Resident #6 for the administration of the doses of Oxycodone with Acetaminophen on 3/1/2024 and 3/4/2024 removed from the cart by Nurse #5.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, hospice staff interview, physician interview, pharmacy consultant interview, and psychiatric nurse practitioner interview the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification and complaint investigation of 4/13/2021, the recertification and complaint survey of 6/30/2022, the recertification and complaint investigation of 11/2/2023, and the complaint investigation of 2/27/2024. This was for 3 repeat deficiencies in the areas of supervision to prevent accidents, hospice services, and pharmacy services. The continued failure of the facility during four federal surveys showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assessment and Assurance Program. The findings included: This citation is cross referenced to: F689: Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff, Physician, Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, and the facility's Pharmacy Consultant the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, resident interviews, Medical Director interview, and Pharmacist interview the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from potential diversion of a total of seventeen narcotic tablets for two (Resident #7 and Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for diversion of narcotics. Findings included: Documentation on the facility abuse prevention program policies and procedures, dated as last reviewed on 3/6/2023, revealed the facility residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse. The documentation further stated the following definition for misappropriation of property, is the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a patient's belongings or money without a patient's permission. 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses some of which included an ankle fracture, osteoarthritis, polyneuropathy, and fibromyalgia. Documentation on admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, hospice staff interview, and physician interview the facility failed to communicate and coordinate with hospice to identify a resident had sustained a dislocated finger. This was for one (Resident # 3) of two sampled hospice residents. The findings included: Resident # 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses in part included a history of stroke, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, and advanced dementia. According to a hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], Resident # 3 had been hospitalized from [DATE] until 1/19/24. The hospital discharge summary also included the following information. The resident had pulled out his gastrostomy tube and nasogastric tube multiple times. A discussion was held with the family and he was to be made hospice with comfort care provided. According to the facility record, on 1/19/24 Resident # 3 was transferred to the facility as a hospice resident. On 1/25/24 a significant change Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, pharmacy consultant interview, and pharmacy operations manager interview the facility failed to provide pharmacy services within the time frame for a scheduled dose of a medication for one (Resident #6) of four residents observed during a medication pass observation. Findings included: 1.Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] and had cumulative diagnoses including seizures. On Saturday 2/24/2024 at 7:57 AM, Nurse #1 was observed and interviewed as she prepared and administered medications to Resident #6. Nurse #1 indicated Resident #6 had an order for Levetiracetam oral solution and that the bottle was almost empty. Nurse #1 explained that in the electronic medication administration record she could see the Levetiracetam solution had already been ordered from the pharmacy and did not come in. Nurse #1 further explained she would administer what was left of the Levetiracetam in the bottle to Resident #6 and call the pharmacy to obtain more. Nurse #1 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, resident, and staff interview the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 11/2/2023, the recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 6/30/2022, and the recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 4/13/2021. This was for one repeat deficiency in the area of catheter care originally cited on 11/2/2023 during a recertification survey and complaint investigation, for one repeat deficiency in the area of infection control that was cited on 6/30/2022 during a recertification survey and complaint investigation, and for one repeat deficiency in the area of infection control cited during a recertification survey and a complaint investigation completed on 4/13/2021. The continued failure of the facility during three federal surveys showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mistreatment when an employee (Housekeeper #2) hit Resident #5 with a cell phone charging cord causing pain. This was for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Resident #5 had multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and hypertension. Documentation on a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was coded as having moderately impaired cognition with no moods or behaviors. He was also assessed as using a wheelchair. An interview was conducted with Resident #5 on 2/23/2024 at 1:04 PM. Resident #5 stated that in January he was sitting in his wheelchair talking with other residents in the hallway when Housekeeper #2 came up to him, swung a cell phone charging cord, and hit him in the leg. Resident #5 stated he hollered and cussed because of the pain. Resident #5 stated Housekeeper #2 tried to say she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse by not obtaining a written statement from the perpetrator for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse investigations. The findings included: Documentation in the facility Abuse Prevention Program Policies and Procedures, dated as last reviewed on 3/6/2023 revealed a policy on investigation of incidents and allegations. The policy stated, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Documentation under the procedures stated, 5. The following actions may be taken to investigate an allegation of abuse or neglect . Interview staff members (on any shift) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident. Documentation in a facility reported incident dated 1/19/2024 revealed in the results of the 5-day investigation in part, On 1/16/2024 it was reported that [Resident #5] was stating that someone had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to use the urinary tract prevention method of keeping the drainage bag and tubing off the floor for 1 of 3 (Resident #4) residents reviewed for indwelling catheter care. Findings included: Resident #4 had multiple diagnoses some of which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting right dominant side and urinary retention. Resident #4 had a physician's order initiated on 12/7/2023 for an indwelling catheter for the diagnosis of urinary retention. Documentation on a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was coded as severely cognitively impaired, dependent for activities of daily living care, had an indwelling catheter, and a urinary tract infection in the last 30 days. Resident #4 was observed on an initial tour on 2/23/2024 at 9:55 AM. Resident #4 was lying in a low bed that was positioned almost to the floor. The catheter drainage bag and tubing were hooked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with staff and the consultant pharmacist and record reviews the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 2 medication errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 8% for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #8) of 4 residents observed during the medication administration observation. The findings included: 1.Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] and had cumulative diagnoses including seizures. On 2/24/2024 at 7:57 AM, Nurse #1 was observed and interviewed as she prepared and administered medications to Resident #6. Nurse #1 indicated Resident #6 had an order for Levetiracetam oral solution and that the bottle was almost empty. Nurse #1 explained that in the electronic medication administration record she could see the Levetiracetam solution had already been ordered from the pharmacy and did not come in. Nurse #1 further explained she would administer what was left of the Levetiracetam in the bottle to Resident #6 and call the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for the cleaning and disinfecting of a glucometer during a medication pass observation for one (Nurse #1) of two nurses observed for infection control procedures during medication pass. Finding included: A review of the facility's policy entitled Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level dated October 2011 included in part: 18. Clean and disinfect reusable equipment between uses according to the manufacturer's instructions and current infection control standards of practice. A review of an additional facility policy entitled Glucometer Cleaning Instructions (not dated) included the following instructions: -Perform hand hygiene before handing the meter, then don gloves. -Use [Name Brand] Germicidal Disposable Wipes to wipe down Glucometer. -Then, allow 2 minutes wet time. -Do not allow cleaning solution to run into the meter through areas such as around the buttons or the meter's test strip or data ports. -This will be performed after each use of a glucometer. -Disinfection will also be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident (Resident # 47), who was assessed as a supervised smoker, while Resident #47 was smoking in the designated smoking area, secure Resident #47's smoking materials and complete quarterly smoking assessments for a resident (Resident #7 ), who was assessed as not requiring supervision when smoking, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: 1. The facility's undated Smoking Policy stated a safe to smoke with supervision-assisted smoker: a. Must request smoking items, which are to be stored at the nursing station, form staff daily and return them to the station at end of day. b. All tobacco products must be lit by either a staff member of a responsible adult. c. May not possess or use matches, lighters, or any other flame producing device. d. Must smoke in designated areas. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5-day admission Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess cognitive patterns, anticoagulant medication use, and mood for 3 of 20 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments reviewed (Resident #55, Resident #47, and Resident #62). Findings included: 1. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #55 spoke clearly, made herself understood and had the ability to understand others. The assessment for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicated an interview was not conducted because the resident is rarely/never understood. A staff assessment for Resident #55's cognitive pattern was completed and noted short- and long-term memory problems and moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. During an interview with Resident #55 on 10/30/2023 at 12:10 p.m., she was observed understanding questions asked and clearly speaking, making herself…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screening for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR (Resident #51). Findings included: Review of Resident #51's PASRR dated [DATE] revealed her PASRR number ended in an 'E' (which was a level II PASRR) and expired on [DATE]. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her active diagnoses included schizophrenia. Review of Resident #51's significant change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was assessed as not being considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Review of North Carolina Medicaid Uniform Screening Tool (NC MUST) documentation on [DATE] at 10:34 AM with Social Worker #1 revealed Resident #51's most recent PASRR screen was on [DATE] and her PASRR number ended in an 'E' and was expired on [DATE]. Resident #51 did not have a current PASRR. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an individualized person-centered care plan was accurate for smoking for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan (Resident #47). Findings included: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #47 was moderately cognitive impaired and did not use tobacco products. The smoking assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #47 was safe to smoke with supervision based on Resident #47 cognitive loss, visual deficits, and dexterity problems. The smoke assessment further indicated Resident #47 needed adaptive equipment (smoking apron) when smoking, and the facility was to store Resident #47's cigarette and lighter. The care plan dated 10/4/2023 indicated Resident #47 wished to smoke cigarettes and had been assessed as safe to smoke independently. Interventions included Resident#47 was informed on the facility's smoking policy and encouraged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to attach an indwelling urinary catheter tubing to a secure device to prevent tension and possible injury, to position the urinary collection bag at a lower level than the urinary bladder to allow gravity drainage of urine into the collection bag, to ensure the urinary tubing was not touching the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter (Resident #47). Findings included: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and diagnoses included obstructive uropathy. The 5-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #47 was moderately cognitively impaired and used an indwelling catheter for urination. Physician orders dated 9/13/2023 included using an indwelling catheter to bedside drainage for urinary retention. In reviewing the electronic medical record from 9/13/2023 to 11/2/2023, there was no nursing documentation indicating the use of a catheter secure device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer supplemental oxygen as prescribed by the physician and failed to place signage indicating the use of oxygen for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen use (Resident #269). Findings included: Resident #269 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The baseline care plan dated 10/20/2023 indicated Resident #269 was cognitively intact, received oxygen therapy while a resident in the facility and had COPD. Interventions included setting oxygen at 3 liters per minute by nasal prongs continuously and humified (increased moisture level). Physician orders dated 10/20/2023 included oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute every shift for shortness of breath. Nursing documentation dated 10/20/2023 at 5:40 p.m. by Nurse #2 reported Resident #269 was receiving oxygen at 4 liters via nasal cannula on admission. There was no further documentation in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and resident and staff interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee had previously put in place following the recertification and complaint surveys of 6/30/22 and 4/13/21. This was for 5 recited deficiencies in the areas of Accuracy of Assessments (F641), Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (F644), Baseline Care Plans (F655), Care Plan Timing and Revision (F657), and Free of Accident Hazards/ Supervision/Devices (F689). The continued failure during 2 or more federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assurance Program. The findings included: The tag is cross-referenced to: F641-Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess cognitive patterns, anticoagulant medication use, and mood for 3 of 20 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments reviewed (Resident #55, Resident #47, and Resident #62). During the recertification and complaint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-03-25 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing sheets were complete and accurate for 36 of 53 days reviewed for 12/1/25 through 3/22/26 (12/12/25, 12/17/25, 2/2/26, 2/4/26, 2/5/26, 2/6/26, 2/9/26, 2/10/26, 2/11/26, 2/13/26, 2/15/26, 2/16/26, 2/17/26, 2/18/26, 2/19/26, 2/21/26, 2/24/26, 2/25/26, 2/26/26, 2/27/26, 2/28/26, 3/3/26, 3/4/26, 3/5/26, 3/7/26, 3/9/26, 3/10/26, 3/11/26, 3/12/26, 3/13/26, 3/14/26, 3/15/26, 3/17/26, 3/18/26, 3/21/26, 3/22/26). The findings included:Review of the facility's daily nurse staffing sheets for 12/12/25, 12/17/25, 12/28/25, 1/24/26, 2/2/26, 2/4/26, 2/5/26, 2/6/26, 2/9/26, 2/10/26, 2/11/26, 2/13/26, 2/15/26, 2/16/26, 2/17/26, 2/18/26, 2/19/26, 2/21/26, 2/24/26, 2/25/26, 2/26/26, 2/27/26, 2/28/26, 3/3/26, 3/4/26, 3/5/26, 3/7/26, 3/9/26, 3/10/26, 3/11/26, 3/12/26, 3/13/26, 3/14/26, 3/15/26, 3/17/26, 3/18/26, 3/21/26, 3/22/26 revealed the following:On 12/12/25 the total number for each staff discipline (Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Nursing Assistant (NAs) and total hours worked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain bathroom and closet doors in good repair in 5 of 13 rooms (Rooms 302, 304, 306, 313 and 316) on the 300 hallway. Findings included: a. During a tour of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 11/1/23 at 3:08 PM, an observation revealed a horizontal length of splintered wood at the bottom of the bathroom door. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom door was observed with the Environmental Services Director on 11/2/23 at 9:21 AM. In an interview with the Environmental Services Director on 11/2/23 at 9:22 AM, he stated the splintered wood at the bottom of the bathroom door was ten to twelve inches in length. b. During a tour of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 11/1/23 at 3:10 PM, an observation revealed a horizontal length of splintered wood at the bottom of the bathroom door. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom door was observed with the Environmental Services Director on 11/2/23 at 9:23 AM. In an interview with the Environmental Services Director on 11/2/23 at 9:24 AM, he stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and Responsible Party (RP) interviews, the facility failed to notify the RP of pressure ulcer changes and newly identified pressure ulcers for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for notification of change (Resident #2 and Resident #3). The findings included: 1. Record review of the hospital wound documentation dated 6/15/23 revealed Resident #2 had a right foot deep tissue pressure injury (DTI) which included the heel, plantar (arch), and ankle that was purple in color, a left ankle DTI that was maroon in color, and a left buttock abrasion upon discharge from the hospital on 6/15/23. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included kidney stone with stent placement and kidney failure. The admission Skin Assessment completed by the Wound Treatment Nurse dated 6/15/23 revealed Resident #2 had a right heel deep tissue injury (DTI), a left heel DTI, and an unstageable (unable to visualize the wound bed) pressure ulcer injury to her sacrum. The Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$61,585 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $9,620 — penalty dated 2025-09-11
- $51,965 — penalty dated 2024-02-27
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-03 for 7 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-26 for 14 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAST CAROLINA OPERATOR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2025 |
| BRIDGEWATER NC HOLDINGS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 31% | since 11/01/2025 |
| JBK NC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 31% | since 11/01/2025 |
| MILANO NC HOLDINGS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 31% | since 11/01/2025 |
| BAKER, JUANITA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| BOYD, SHERRI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| COLE, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| CRICKMORE, REID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| GRADY, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| HARRIS, PAMELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| RAJCHENBACH, MOSHE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| RIVERS, ABBIGAIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| IB MIMI 2022 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| JK 2022 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| ML MILANO 2022 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| 2575 WEST 5TH STREET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| ISVA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| JKVA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| MLVA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| WILLIAMSPORT PROPERTY HOLDINGS II LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $963K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345377. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.