Brook Stone Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 66.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident, staff, Responsible Party (RP) and law enforcement officer interviews, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) from physical abuse from an employee when Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 was witnessed by another employee, Personal Care Assistant (PCA) #1, with both hands around Resident #1's neck in response to the resident being combative with care. Resident #1 did not have the cognitive capacity to express an adverse outcome. A reasonable person would have been traumatized by being physically abused by their caregiver in their home environment. This occurred for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for abuse. Immediate Jeopardy began on 08/09/23 when the facility failed to protect Resident #1's right to be free from abuse. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/11/23 when the facility implemented an acceptable credible allegation for Immediate Jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at a lower scope and severity level of a D (no actual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to accurately code mood for 1 of 18 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments reviewed (Resident #32). The findings included: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including mood disorder. Resident #32's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was rarely/never understood, and a staff assessment for mood should be conducted but was not. During an interview with the facility Social Worker on 6/3/25 at 4:17 PM she stated she was responsible for conducting the mood section on Resident #32's MDS assessment. She further stated if a resident was not interviewable a staff assessment should have been completed. The Social Worker stated it was not done, and it was an oversight. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 6/4/25 at 12:29 PM who stated staff should have completed the assessment for mood to correctly complete Resident #32's MDS assessment.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to equip 1 of 1 designated resident smoking area with a fire extinguisher and fire blanket. The findings included: The designated resident smoking area was observed on 6/2/25 at 3:00 pm. The designated resident smoking area was located in the courtyard and had an approximate 10 by 10 feet of covered patio on a concrete pad with an approximate 15-inch brick border. The resident designated smoking area contained 3 red metal self-closing trash containers approximately 11 inches in diameter by 15 inches tall in size and 4 round metal tables with 3 to 4 metal chairs at each table. On each table were a minimum of 2 ashtrays, and a large beige cylindrical plastic trash receptacle was next to one of the tables . No fire extinguisher or fire blanket was observed. On 6/3/25 at 12:24 pm, one resident and two staff members were observed smoking in the designated resident smoking area. No fire extinguisher or fire blanket was observed. During an interview with the Administrator on 6/4/25 at 12:45 pm, she stated the designated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to remove expired medications from the refrigerator for 2 of 2 med rooms. Findings included: 1a. An observation on 05/01/24 at 1:31 PM in the presence of the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the medication room [ROOM NUMBER] (100 hall) refrigerator had 5 expired antibiotics. There were 2 expired Intravenous (IV) antibiotic infusion doses for a resident who was no longer in the facility with the expiration date of 4/8/24. An additional 3 expired IV antibiotic infusion doses were found for another resident with an expiration date of 4/19/24. 1b. Per the manufacturer's recommendation for Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) storage, PPD vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation which may affect potency. An observation on 05/01/24 at 1:52 PM in the presence of the DON revealed the medication room [ROOM NUMBER] (300 hall) refrigerator had 2 multidose vials of Tuberculin Purified Protein…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and resident and staff interview the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put into place following the 10/6/21 recertification survey and the 1/20/23 recertification and complaint investigation survey. This was for 3 recited deficiencies on the current recertification and complaint survey of 5/1/24 in the areas of accuracy of assessment (F641), development/implement comprehensive care plan (F656), and label/store drugs and biologicals (F761). The continued failure during three federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA program. The findings included: This tag is cross-referenced to: F 641 Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the current tobacco use status on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #50) reviewed for smoking. During the 10/6/21 recertification survey the facility failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain shared resident bathrooms in good repair (Rooms #112 and #114) and maintain clean resident bathrooms (Rooms #308 and #310) for 2 of 12 shared resident bathrooms reviewed for environment. The findings included: a. Observation of the shared resident bathroom for Rooms #112 and #114 on 4/29/24 9:08 AM revealed the wall around the plumbing behind the toilet had missing drywall. A black, brown, and green substance was observed to surround the missing drywall around the plumbing to the toilet. The baseboard behind the toilet was observed to be pulled back from the wall and exposed missing drywall. On 5/01/24 at 1:03 PM an observation of the shared resident bathroom for Rooms #112 and #114 revealed the wall around the plumbing behind the toilet had missing drywall. A black, brown, and green substance was observed to surround the missing drywall around the plumbing to the toilet. The baseboard behind the toilet was observed to be pulled back from the wall and exposed missing drywall. b. Observation of the shared…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the current tobacco use status on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #50) reviewed for smoking. The findings included: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact and coded No for current tobacco use. On 4/28/24 at 3:05 pm Resident #50 was observed smoking a cigarette unsupervised in the designated smoking area. An interview with Resident #50 on 4/30/24 at 12:01 pm revealed he kept on his person his smoking supplies which included his cigarettes and a lighter. The resident further indicated he had been a smoker for over 40 years. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 4/30/24 at 3:12 pm she stated Resident #50 was a smoker and smoking had not been coded correctly on his MDS assessment. An interview with the MDS Corporate Consultant on 4/30/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident that smoked for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #50) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents. The findings included: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact and coded for no tobacco use. Review of Resident #50's comprehensive care plan dated 6/20/23 and last updated 9/20/23 revealed he was not care planned for smoking. Nursing progress notes dated 8/15/23, 9/21/23, and 9/26/23 indicated Resident #50 was a current smoker. Observation of Resident #50 on 4/28/24 at 3:05 pm in the smoking area of the facility, revealed he was smoking unsupervised. Interview with Resident #50 on 4/30/24 at 12:01 pm revealed he kept his smoking supplies to include his cigarettes and a lighter on his person. The resident further indicated he had been a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to smoke independently and retain smoking materials for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking. (Resident #50) The findings included: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, with other behavioral disturbance. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact and coded for no tobacco use. Review of Resident #50's comprehensive care plan dated 6/20/23 and last updated 9/20/23 revealed he was not care planned for smoking. A review of the medical record revealed no smoking assessment completed for Resident #50. A nursing progress note written by the Administrator dated 8/15/23 indicated Resident #50 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Resident #50 was able self-propel from one unit to another and was a current smoker. Review of nursing progress note written…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to administer oxygen (O2) in accordance with the physician's order and they failed to have cautionary signage for O2 use for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #35) reviewed for respiratory care. The findings included: 1a. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #35 was severely cognitively impaired. She had received oxygen therapy and tracheostomy (trach) care during the MDS assessment period. Resident #35's care plan dated revealed 4/26/24 revealed the resident had a tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. The goals revealed the resident would have clear and equal breath sounds in both lungs and that the resident would be monitored for breath sounds each shift. The intervention stated the oxygen would be delivered by a trach mask at 6 liters per minute (lpm). A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-01-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, consultant Registered Dietitian (RD) interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve a nourishing snack at bedtime when the time between dinner and breakfast was greater than 14 hours for residents residing on 2 of 2 resident hallways (100 Hall and 300 Hall). The findings included: A review of the facility's Brook Stone Living Center Meal Times indicated the food line start times were scheduled as follows: -The meal line for the 300 Hall was scheduled to begin at 4:45 PM for Dinner and at 7:15 AM for Breakfast (indicative of a 14 hour and 30 minute time span between the two meals); -The meal line for the 100 Hall Cart 1 was scheduled to begin at 4:50 PM for Dinner and at 7:30 AM for Breakfast (indicative of a 14 hour and 40 minute time span between the two meals); -The meal line for the 100 Hall Cart 2 was scheduled to begin at 5:00 PM for Dinner and at 7:45 AM for Breakfast (indicative of a 14 hour and 45 minutes time span between the two meals); An interview was conducted on 1/18/23 at 4:48 PM with the facility's Dietary Manager. When asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,600 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $18,600 — penalty dated 2023-08-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $695K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC