Person Memorial Hospital

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 46.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff, Family Member, and Physician Assistant interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner when a resident rolled off the raised bed while incontinence care was being provided. The resident had a history of stroke with residual left side weakness. Nurse Aide #1 turned the resident away from her onto her left side with the resident holding the upper side rail with her right hand. While care was being provided Resident #1 stated she could not hold on anymore and rolled out of the bed landing on her knees and immediately complained of pain in her knees, back and legs. Resident #1 was transferred to the local hospital by emergency medical services (EMS) for evaluation and a CT scan (computed tomography scan) confirmed distal right femur (thigh bone just above the knee joint) fracture. It was determined that the resident required a higher level of care and she was transferred to a local trauma center for further evaluation and treatment. CT scans of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to limit the duration of psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) ordered on an as-needed (PRN) basis to 14 days and/or indicate the duration and rationale for extending the PRN order beyond 14 days. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #36). Findings Included:Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder.On 5/9/25, the physician ordered one (1) milliliter (ml) of Lorazepam Intensol Oral Concentrate (Lorazepam) 2 milligrams/milliliter (mg/ml) to be administered via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube every 2 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety. Lorazepam is a psychotropic and controlled substance medication.The resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #36 was severely cognitively impaired with no behaviors or rejection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff, consultant pharmacist, and physician interviews, the facility failed to act on recommendations made by the consultant pharmacist and failed to document a response to the pharmacist's findings and recommendations in the resident's medical record for 2 of 5 residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #36, and Resident #4).Findings included:1. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder. On 5/9/25, the physician ordered one (1) milliliter (ml) of Lorazepam Intensol Oral Concentrate (Lorazepam) 2 milligrams/milliliter (mg/ml) to be administered via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube every 2 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety. Lorazepam is a psychotropic medication and a controlled substance. Resident #36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated that the physician's PRN Lorazepam order (dated 5/9/25) remained active through the review date of 12/17/25. A review of Resident #36's Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain 2 of 2 double-door ovens and 1 of 1 grill clean and free of grease. The facility also failed to label and date leftover food in 1 of 1 reach-in refrigerator and 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerator. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents.Findings included:a. The initial kitchen tour was conducted with the Dietary Aide #1 on 12/14/25 from 9:25 AM to 9:50 AM. Observations of double-door oven #1 and double-door oven #2 on 12/14/25 at 9:35 AM revealed black burnt food stains inside the ovens. The oven floors had a black layer of crust that appeared to be burnt food. The oven doors had dark brown oil stains. b. Observation of the grill on 12/14/25 at 9:40 AM revealed the top grill plate had a thick black layer of burnt grease and food, along with some freshly cooked, yellow-colored leftover food.During an interview with the Dietary Aide#1 on 12/14/25 at 9:40 AM, he indicated the grill had been used earlier that morning and the thick burnt layer was due to cooking food that morning. He stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to schedule a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 2 of the 33 days reviewed for staffing. The findings included: A review of the daily posted nursing staff forms, daily nursing staff assignment sheets, and staff clock-in sheets from 8/17/24 through 9/18/24 was conducted on 9/19/24. A. On 8/24/24 the daily staff posting indicated 1 RN working day shift (7 AM - 3PM). Daily posting also indicated 2 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and 2 NA working night shift (11PM - 7 AM). Review of the nursing staff assignment sheet for 8/24/24 indicated the RN, Nurse #9, working from 7 AM - 7 PM. The RN, Nurse #9, was also assigned to work as a Nurse Aide from 11 PM to 7 AM. Review of the staff clock-in sheet revealed no RN working from 7 AM - 3 PM shift. Further review revealed there was no RN working for the period of 3 PM -11 PM. An RN, Nurse #9, had clocked in at 11:00 PM. There was only one NA clocked in at 11 PM. During an interview on 9/19/24 at 3:15 PM, Nurse #9 indicated she was a Registered Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing information for residents and visitors on 1 of the 4 days of the survey period. The facility also failed to update the daily staffing information to reflect actual staffing changes for 6 of 33 days reviewed for posted nurse staffing information. Finding included: 1. On 9/15/24 (Sunday) during the facility initial tour at 9:20 AM and for multiple observations throughout the day including 1:30 PM and 3 PM, the daily nurse staffing sheet posted near the facility elevator was dated 9/13/24 (Friday). The posting was not updated to reflect the current date, census, and staffing information. During an interview on 9/17/24 at 8:09 AM, the scheduler stated she was responsible for posting the daily staff posting during the weekdays. The scheduler stated she completed the staffing form for the weekend and left the posting sheet in a folder near the nurse's station. She explained the weekend nurses were responsible for posting and updating the daily staffing sheets on the weekend. During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove an expired multi-dose vial of insulin for 1 of 3 medication administration carts, failed to date opened multi-dose vials of insulin medication for 2 of 3 medication administration carts, and discard loose pills in the medication cart drawer for 2 of 3 medication administration carts (rehabilitation hall, short and long halls). Findings Included: 1a. On 9/15/24 at 9:15 AM, an observation of the medication administration Rehabilitation Hall cart with Nurse #1 revealed one opened and undated multi-dose vial of Insulin Glargine. A review of the manufacturer's literature indicated to discard Glargine multi-dose vial 28 days after opening. 9/15/24 at 9:40 AM, during an interview, Nurse #1 indicated that the nurses, who worked on the medication carts, were responsible to discard expired multi-dose vials. The nurse stated that she had not checked the date of opening on insulin vials in her medication administration cart at the beginning of her shift. The nurse did not administer expired insulin this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a written grievance summary for 1 of 1 residents (Residents #24) reviewed for grievances. Finding included: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the Resident #24 was assessed as severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Grievance /Concern Form dated 6/24/24 indicated a concern that was reported by Resident #24's responsible party (RP) regarding bruising of the resident's left arm, left hand and right forearm. Action indicated was the management was notified, abuse investigation sheet completed, law enforcement was notified and the staff member in question was taken off of the schedule. The form indicated the grievance was under investigation. This was signed by Administrator indicating the grievance was received. There was no indication on the form that indicated the complainant, resident, or family was contacted to inquire if the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernails and toenails care for 2 of 2 residents, dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) care. (Resident # 37 and Resident #24) Findings included: 1. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson disease. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated that Resident #37 was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) including personal hygiene, toileting and showers/ bathe self. Review of the care plan dated 6/27/24 indicated the resident was care planned for ADL self-care performance deficit due to impaired balance, activity intolerance, and confusion. Interventions for bathing and showering included checking nail length, trimming and cleaning on bath day and as necessary. The resident was totally dependent on staff to provide bed bath…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an on-going activity program that met the individual interest and needs for 3 of 3 cognitively impaired residents reviewed for activities(Resident #22, Resident #27 and Resident #28). The findings included: 1.Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] . The diagnoses included cognitive impairment and dementia. Resident #14 was coded on the annual Minimum Data Set(MDS) dated 8/24/24 as having cognition impairment and she needed assistance with activities. The MDS also coded Resident 22 's activity interest as very important to participate in favorite activities to include music, religious service and outside events. The resident was coded for total assistance with transfers and locomotion. The annual activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #'22s preference with interest in listening to music, religious services, and outside events. A focus area on the care plan dated 8/25/24 revealed Resident #22 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-23 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews and review of resident council minutes, the facility failed to provide regular resident council monthly meetings (February 2023, March 2023, April 2023, and May 2023) for 4 consecutive months. The findings included: Review of resident council meeting minutes revealed no evidence that resident council meetings were conducted from February through May 2023. The resident council meeting was held on 8/22/23 at 2:00 PM. There were 10 residents identified as alert and oriented who participated in the meeting. The members of the group reported they were regular attendees of the resident council meetings. The residents reported the facility did not have any activity staff for four months to hold resident council meetings (February through May 2023). An interview was conducted on 8/22/23 at 4:00 PM with the Activity Director. The Activity Director stated she started working in the activities department in June 2023. The Activity Director further stated there was no documentation resident council meetings were held from February 2023 through May 2023.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$43,074 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $16,153 — penalty dated 2025-11-25
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $4,196 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-25 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEPOINT HEALTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NC