Meadowbrook Health & Rehabilitation
635 Statesville Boulevard, Salisbury, NC 28144 · For profit - Corporation · 185 certified beds · (704) 633-7390 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $46,529 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-02)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.4% | 15.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 7.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 5.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.9% | 18.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.9% | 21.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.4% | 94.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 5.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.3% | 20.7% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.5% | 14.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 39.1% | 78.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 1.78 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.24 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.2%CMS range 31.7–58.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.1–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 4.4–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 185 beds and averages 108.2 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner, and the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to provide effective supervision for a resident who had cognitive impairment, alcohol induced dementia, and a court appointed Guardian. On 12/2/2024 Resident #120 told the Director of Nursing he was upset because he had been told by a staff member that he was going to be moved to the secured unit. Later that same day Resident #120 stacked patio furniture in the enclosed courtyard and then proceeded to climb onto an awning, then up to the roof of the facility. Resident #120 was observed by staff to be running around on the roof and sitting on the edge of the roof with his legs dangling over the edge of the roof. To ensure safe rescue of the resident, the local fire department was called, and the resident was assisted off of the roof by firemen and the firemen aided in returning the resident to the ground. The Guardian stated when she saw Resident #120 at the hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-01-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and resident, staff, Police Officer, Nurse Practitioner and Medical Doctor interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from employee to resident physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents investigated for abuse (Resident #7). Resident #7 reported to the facility that Nurse Aide (NA)#1 had punched her in her right eye. Resident #7 revealed that Nurse Aide #2 was present during this incident and witnessed the allegation. After this incident Resident #7 had a circular reddish, purple bruise below her right eye and reported she felt angry and upset at the time of the incident. The findings included: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, schizophrenia, dementia, cerebellar stroke syndrome, glaucoma, and peripheral vascular disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #7's cognition was moderately impaired and she required extensive to total assistance with activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from misappropriation of narcotic medication for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property (Resident #22 and #6). On 11/6/2025 the facility discovered Resident #22 had a medication card of 30 Oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication) 5 milligram tablets missing from the medication cart's locked narcotic box and on 11/10/2025 the facility discovered Resident #6 had a medication card of 28 Oxycodone 5 milligram tablets missing from the medication cart's locked narcotic box. Findings included:The facility's abuse policy which was revised on 10/20/2022 was reviewed and the policy stated misappropriation was the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful use of the resident's money or belongings. The abuse policy further stated the resident has the right to be free of misappropriation of their property.a. A review of Resident #22's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a 5-day investigation report to the State Agency for Resident #22 and Resident #6 for misappropriation of narcotic medication. In addition, the facility failed to report Resident #6's missing narcotics to Adult Protective Services or submit an initial allegation report to the State Agency. The deficient practice occurred for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation (Resident #22 and Resident #6). Findings included:The facility's Abuse Policy dated 10/20/2022 stated the facility would report allegations of misappropriation to the State Agency, Adult Protective Services, and Law Enforcement agencies within 24 hours if the event that caused the suspicion did not result in bodily harm. The facility's Diversion of Medications Policy dated 5/2022 indicated the facility would report to any agencies required by state regulation.1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of immobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-02 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to submit a request for an evaluation for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for residents previously determined to have a Level I status for a PASRR after a new serious mental disorder was identified for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #14, Resident #83, Resident #107 and Resident #9). The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed a PASSR Level I was completed on 1/18/13 prior to admission with a recommendation to resubmit paperwork for PASSR Level II if a new mental health diagnosis was suspected or if there was a significant change in the resident's condition. Resident # 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The electronic medical record revealed Resident #14 was diagnosed with dementia with behavioral disturbance on 02/23/24, schizophrenia on 8/21/24, and anxiety on 10/09/24. Review of the medical record revealed there was no documented evidence a request for an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove expired leftover and unopened food items stored for use in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler, 1 of 1 dry goods storage room, and 2 of 2 nourishment rooms (100 and 200 Hall nourishment rooms), and failed to remove dented cans stored for use in the dry goods storage room. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents.Findings included: 1a. An observation and interview with the Dietary Manager of the dry goods storage room was conducted on 12/15/25 at 10:20 AM. There were products that were expired and unlabeled. The expired products included:- thirteen thickened orange juice cups with a manufacturer's expiration date of 11/21/25.- one case of one hundred-fifty packages of animal crackers with a manufacturer's expiration date of 9/21/25.- one and a half cases of twelve-cup ground coffee packets with a manufacturer's expiration date of 11/20/24.- three containers of vegetable soup base with a manufacturer's expiration date of 11/8/25.- dozens of single use creamy French dressing packets in a storage bin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to allow a resident who was assessed as safe to smoke without supervision the choice to smoke at preferred times for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #50).The findings included:Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #50's admission Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was coded for tobacco use.Review of Resident #50's care plan created on 08/16/25 revealed the resident preferred to smoke. The goal was Resident #50 would smoke safely through the review period. Interventions included Resident #50 could smoke unsupervised.Review of Resident #50's smoking assessments revealed a smoking assessment was completed on 10/08/25. The assessment further revealed Resident #50 was safe to smoke without supervision.An interview with Resident #50 on 12/17/25 at 1:00 PM revealed she was an independent smoker and was able to smoke anytime from 7:00 AM until 8:00 PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to place survey results in a location readily accessible to residents and visitors and available to review without asking.The findings included:A Resident Council group meeting was conducted on 12/15/25 at 3:00 PM. During the meeting, Resident #13, Resident #18, Resident #25, Resident #30, and Resident #99 indicated they did not know where the survey results were located. An observation conducted on 12/18/25 at 12:20 PM revealed a sign was located on the receptionist desk that stated, Survey Binder Is Located at Front Desk. The survey results book was located behind the reception desk in the lobby area near the facility entrance. The area where the survey results book was located was in a small room that was restricted by walls and a desk that was closed off to residents and visitors. The survey results book was observed to be visible behind Receptionist #1 but was not in reach from the front of the desk. An interview with Receptionist #1 on 12/18/25 at 1:35 PM revealed she had worked in the facility for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews with the facility staff, rehabilitation (rehab) therapy staff, and Medical Director, the facility failed to identify a reclining Broda wheelchair (a specialized type of seating that allows for tilt-in-space positioning) as a restraint that was reclined in a position that prohibited the resident from rising independently and without medical justification for its use in this manner. This occurred for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #119) reviewed for restraints. The findings included: Resident #119 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was discharged home with a family member on 11/12/25. The resident had a second admission to the facility on [DATE]. Her cumulative diagnoses included emphysema, a history of a cerebral infarction (a type of stroke) and repeated falls. Resident #119's electronic medical record (EMR) included a Nursing re-admission Assessment Tool completed by Nurse #3 and dated 12/13/25. This document contained information on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Nurse Practitioner, and Guardian interviews, the facility failed to allow 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge to return to the facility after transfer to the hospital (Resident #120). Findings included:Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of alcohol abuse and dementia.A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #120 was severely cognitively impaired.A discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set assessment was dated 12/11/2024.On 12/11/2024 at 1:59 pm the Social Worker's Note indicated the Guardian was notified of Resident #120 being issued a 30-day discharge notice for behaviors the facility was unable to manage and the facility was going to proceed with involuntary committal as they were no longer able to keep Resident #120 safe.A Progress Note dated 12/11/2024 at 7:15 pm written by Nurse #7 indicated Resident #120 was transferred to the hospital for evaluation after aggressive behavior and extreme exit seeking.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for PASRR.The findings included: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with cumulative diagnoses which included non-Alzheimer's dementia; anxiety disorder; bipolar disorder; and psychotic disorder. A PASRR Level II Determination Notification letter for Resident #15 (dated 11/14/23) was reviewed. This letter noted Resident #15 had a PASRR number ending with the letter H, which indicated a halted PASRR Level II determination was made due to the resident having a primary diagnosis of dementia. The results of the evaluation, including the determination of a PASRR Level II status, are used for formulating a determination of need, an appropriate care setting, and a set of recommendations for services to help develop an individual's plan of care. Resident #15's most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to submit a request for an evaluation for a level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a resident previously determined to have a Level II PASRR status after a significant change in physical and/or mental status was identified. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for PASRR.The findings included:Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with cumulative diagnoses which included non-Alzheimer's dementia; anxiety disorder; bipolar disorder; and psychotic disorder. A PASRR Level II Determination Notification letter dated 11/14/23 for Resident #15 was reviewed. This letter noted Resident #15 had a PASRR number ending with the letter H, which indicated a halted PASRR Level II determination was made due to the resident having a primary diagnosis of dementia. The results of the evaluation, including the determination of a PASRR Level II status, are used for formulating a determination of need, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission for 1 of 11 newly admitted residents reviewed (Resident #119).The findings included: Resident #119 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was discharged home with a family member on 11/12/25. The resident had a second admission to the facility on [DATE]. Her cumulative diagnoses included emphysema, a history of a cerebral infarction (a type of stroke) and repeated falls. Resident #119's electronic medical record (EMR) included a Nursing re-admission Assessment Tool completed by Nurse #3 and dated 12/13/25. This document included information on the resident's mental and physical health, a pain tool, Braden Scale, Patient Record of Tuberculosis Screening, Fall Risk/Medication, Smoking Safety Screen, Device / Air Mattress Safety Observation, and an Elopement Evaluation. Further review of Resident #119's EMR revealed there was no baseline care plan completed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to obtain a provider's diet order for a resident after her admission to the facility. This occurred for 1 of 11 newly admitted residents reviewed (Resident #119).The findings included: Resident #119 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diet order (dated 10/15/25) was a Regular diet with mechanical soft textures and regular, thin liquids. On 10/22/25, Med Pass 2.0 (a high calorie, high protein nutritional supplement) was added to her diet order as 120 milliliters (ml) to be given at bedtime daily. Resident #119 was discharged to her home with a family member on 11/12/25. Resident #119 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 12/12/25. Her hospital Inpatient Discharge summary dated [DATE] included Diet and Nourishment Orders for a pureed diet with thin liquids. The resident was admitted a second time to the facility on [DATE]. Her cumulative diagnoses included emphysema, a history of cerebral infarction (a type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a urinary catheter drainage bag off the floor to prevent the risk of infection for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter (Resident #8). The findings included:Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of Resident #8's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8's cognition was severely impaired and was totally dependent for most activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS further revealed Resident #8 was coded for having an indwelling urinary catheter.Review of Resident #8's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/09/25 for an indwelling urinary catheter for neurogenic bladder with urinary retention.Review of Resident #8's care plan revised on 12/16/25 revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital with a catheter for neurogenic bladder with urinary retention.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to enter a physician's order for oxygen delivery for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #101).The findings included: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tobacco use, and anemia. On 12/15/25 at 3:55 PM Resident #101 was observed asleep in bed and wearing oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 Liters/minute (L/min) connected to portable oxygen next to her bed. The resident did not show any signs of discomfort or difficulty breathing. Review of the nurse progress note date 12/15/25 2:52 PM progress note revealed Nurse #8 notified the provider that Resident #101 had abnormal vital signs: blood pressure 159/101, pulse 104, and oxygen saturation level of 64% on room air. A normal oxygen saturation level is at, or above, 90%. Nurse #8 documented she was ordered to start Resident #101 on 2L/min of oxygen. Nurse #8 wrote that she communicated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 2 medication errors out of 26 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.6% for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #35 and Resident #105) observed during the medication administration. The findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 8:16 AM, Medication Aide (Med Aide) #1 was observed as she prepared and administered fifteen (15) medications to Resident #35. A review of Resident #35's current orders revealed a medication order was initiated on [DATE] for 200 - 25 micrograms (mcg) per actuation of Breo Ellipta aerosol powder to be given as one puff by mouth one time a day for shortness of breath / wheezing. Breo Ellipta is an inhaled medication used for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or asthma. Resident #35's Breo Ellipta was scheduled for administration at 8:00 AM once daily in accordance with the physician's orders. This medication was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff, Resident, Pharmacy Consultant and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for pain management. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's hospital record indicated she had a right ankle Computed Tomography (CT) Scan on 12/23/2024 which showed a new minimally displaced fracture involving the right ankle and a knee x-ray that showed a mildly displaced fracture involving the distal femur which forms the knee joint. The hospital record also indicated Resident #2 had surgical repair of the right ankle on 1/25/2025. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with fractures to her left knee and right ankle. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was cognitively intact and had moderate pain frequently. A Physician's Order dated 1/8/2025 at 8:00 pm indicated Resident #2 should receive Oxycodone Hydrochloride (a narcotic pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transported to a scheduled urologist appointment on 1/2/2025 to have their suprapubic indwelling urinary catheter changed. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medical related social services (Resident #3). Findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes, obstructive uropathy and chronic kidney disease. Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was severely cognitively impaired and required an indwelling urinary catheter. A Visit Summary from the Urologist dated 12/2/2024 stated Resident #3 was scheduled for a 31-day suprapubic catheter change at the urologist's office on 1/2/2025. There was no evidence in the medical record that Resident #3 attended the urology appointment scheduled for 1/2/2025. During an interview with the Appointment Coordinator on 1/29/2025 at 3:40 pm he stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Nurse Practitioner, Pharmacy Consultant, and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) had pain medication available that was ordered on admission to the facility. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's hospital record indicated she had a right ankle Computed Tomography (CT) Scan on 12/23/2024 which showed a new minimally displaced fracture involving the right ankle and a knee x-ray that showed a mildly displaced fracture involving the distal femur which forms the knee joint. The hospital record also indicated Resident #2 had surgical repair of the right ankle on 1/25/2025. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with fractures of her left knee and right ankle. A Physician's Order dated 1/8/2025 at 8:00 pm indicated Resident #2 should receive Oxycodone Hydrochloride (a narcotic pain medication) 10 milligrams (mg) two times a day for pain beginning 1/8/2026 and would be discontinued on 1/10/2025. Resident #2's Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to repair a sink drain and pipe which resulted in the kitchen having a large amount of water in the floor which had the potential to be hazardous for staff. Also observed in the kitchen were multiple ceiling vents that were dusty and dirty, and four bags of cereal not labeled or stored properly. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: An observation conducted on 09/24/23 at 10:35 AM revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #1 pulled the lever to drain the sink, but the water did not drain properly and ran across the kitchen floor resulting in a large area of standing water. Dietary Aide #1 turned the sink back on and the pipe running under the sink was leaking water continuously. Observations of ceiling vents above the dry station and stove area were observed to be dusty and dirty. Also observed next to the tea and coffee station were four bags of unlabeled cereal that were folded and not clipped or stored properly. An interview conducted with DA #1 on 09/24/24 at 10:45 AM revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to remove loose garbage and debris from around 2 of 2 trash receptacles located outdoors behind the kitchen. This practice had the potential to impact sanitary conditions and attract pests/rodents. The findings included: An observation of the outdoor trash receptacle area on 9/24/24 at 4:30 PM revealed masks, water bottles, debris, gloves, and a bag of trash on the ground. The facility staff break area was located off from the trash receptacle area which also was observed with food wrappers and drink bottles on the ground. An observation of the outdoor trash receptacle area on 09/25/24 at 12:15 PM revealed masks, water bottles, debris, gloves, and a bag of trash on the ground. The facility staff break area was located off from the trash receptacle area which also was observed with food wrappers and drink bottles on the ground. An observation of the outdoor trash receptacle area on 09/26/24 at 7:35 AM revealed plastic drink bottles, gloves, masks, debris, and two bags of trash ripped open around the dumpster area. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete smoking assessment for 2 of 3 residents reviewed or smoking (Resident # 67 and Resident #91). The findings included: a. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] which included heart failure and diabetes. Review of Resident #67's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS further revealed the resident was coded for smoking. Review of Resident #67's care plan revised on 08/14/24 revealed the resident was a smoker. The goal was for Resident #67 would not suffer injury from unsafe smoking practices through the review date. Interventions included the resident could smoke unsupervised. Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed the resident did not receive a quarterly smoking assessment from 04/07/23 until 7/24/24. The smoking assessment completed in 7/24/24 indicated Resident #67 was an unsupervised smoker. b. Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify a residents Responsible Party (RP) for refusals of his prescribed insulin. This was for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for notification. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Blindness, Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Review of Resident #1's undated admission Record (face sheet) read his sister was his designated RP and emergency contact. Review of Resident #1's November 2023 insulin orders included the following: *Humalog insulin sliding scale: Inject as per sliding scale subcutaneously before meals for Diabetes: if 201 - 250 = 1 unit; 251 - 300 = 2 units; 301 - 350 = 3 units; 351 - 400 = 4 units; 401+ = 5 units If blood glucose greater than 400, give 5 units and call the Physician, *Solostar insulin: Inject 14 units subcutaneously two times a day at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM *Humalog insulin: Inject 14 units subcutaneously before meals.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan in the area of resident's refusal of medications. This was for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for comprehensive care planning. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Review of Resident #1's August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and a nursing note dated 8/10/23 at 12:43 PM read he refused in lunch time dose of his prescribed insulin. Another nursing note dated 8/16/23 at 11:50 PM read he refused his 8:00 PM prescribed dose of insulin. Review of Resident #1's October 2023 MAR and a nursing note dated 10/18/23 at 12:28 AM read he refused his 8:00 PM prescribed dose of insulin. Review of Resident #1's November 2023 MAR and nursing notes dated 11/18/23 at 10:13 PM , 11/19/23 at 9:44 PM and 11/24/23 at 12:12 PM, he refused his prescribed dose of insulin. His quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain implemented effective procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following a complaint investigation dated 9/3/21 for two deficiencies in the area of comprehensive care planning at F656 and notification of changes at F580. Also, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain implemented effective procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification survey dated 5/6/22 for one deficiency in the area of notification of changes at F580. The continued failure of the facility during three federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI program. Findings included. This tag is cross referenced to: F656- Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan in the area of resident's refusal of medications. This was for 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure dietary staff contained facial hair for staff members with beards serving residents food for the preparation of resident's lunch meal trays. The result of the failure to contain facial hair during meal tray preparation and serving had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who would receive a lunch meal tray, and 138 of 139 residents received meal trays. Findings included: On 4/3/2023at 11:35 am an observation of the dietary staff preparing and serving the lunch meal trays for residents revealed the dietary staff failed to contain facial hair for staff with beards, during the observation: The Dietary Manager was preparing trays for plates and handling the plates after the cook served food onto the plates with his facial hair not contained. The Dietary Manager had a full beard and mustache that was approximately 2-inches long. Dietary Aide #1 did not have his facial hair contained throughout the observations. Dietary Aide #1 was handling uncovered lunch meal plates and placing condiments on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee (QAPI) failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor these interventions the committee put into place in following the complaint investigation of 11/9/2021, the recertification survey of 05/06/22, the complaint investigation of 11/17/2022, and the complaint investigation of 3/2/2023. This was for 4 re-cited deficiencies, E0001, F655, F696, and F812, which were originally cited on 5/6/2022, 1 re-cited deficiency F584 originally cited on 11/9/2021 and 11/17/2022, and 1 re-cited deficiency F677 originally cited on 3/2/2023. The continued failure of the facility during the 4 federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program. The findings included: This tag is cross referred to: 1. E0001: Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a facility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean safe and homelike environment by the failure to cover fluorescent tube lighting in 1 of 18 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]), failed to secure television cable outlet covers and electrical outlet covers in 4 of 33 resident rooms (rooms 107, 320, 326 and 333), failed to maintain window blinds that were in disrepair with missing and bent slats in 2 of 18 rooms (rooms 109 & 116), failed to provide a window blind in 1 of 18 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]), failed to maintain intact sheetrock and clean walls for 1 of 18 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) failed to maintain resident cabinetry in 2 of 18 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] bed 2 & room [ROOM NUMBER] bed 1), failed to maintain the interior bathroom cabinet where residents' belongings were stored which was rusted and peeling in 1 of 18 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]), failed to repair a leaky bathroom sink 1 of 30 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]), failed to secure a bathroom handrail 1 of 30 rooms,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide palatable food for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #51 and Resident #107). Resident #51 was upset because he received gravy without sausage, and his oatmeal was served on his meal plate without a bowl and without sugar or butter. Resident #107 received gravy without sausage and could not eat her oatmeal because it was served on her meal plate without a bowl and without sugar or butter. Findings included: 1. A. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease and dementia. An annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #51 was moderately cognitively impaired and was able to feed himself with set up of his meals. The assessment further indicated Resident #51 had no significant weight loss. The facility's menu for Wednesday, 4/5/2023, indicated the residents would be served sausage and gravy, oatmeal, and fruit. On 4/5/2023 at 8:46 am an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to implement their abuse policy in the areas of reporting allegations of abuse to the state regulatory agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 5 abuse allegation reports reviewed for reporting alleged violations. (Resident #128, #52). The findings included: Review of the facility policy revised on 10/22/22 titled Abuse-Neglect and Exploitation, read in part: Section VII. Reporting/Response: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later that 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident, and staff interview the facility failed to provide nail care for one of 26 residents (Resident # 69) who was dependent on staff for nail care. The findings included: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depressive disorder. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] coded Resident #69 as being cognitively intact, had no rejections of care and required extensive assistance of one staff member to complete personal hygiene. A review of Resident #69's care plan revised on 3/23/23, included a focused area for self-care needs. The intervention included checking nail length, trim and clean nails on bath day as necessary and report any changes to the nurse. The care plan did not include any refusals for resident care. An observation was completed on 4/3/23 at 11:03 AM of Resident #69 who was lying in bed with a jacket on and covered with sheets, his hands were on top of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff, resident and Nurse Practitioner interviews the facility failed to manage a resident's pain for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for pain. Findings included: Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of arthritis. Resident #74's Physician's Orders indicated he had an order for Oxycodone HCI 10 milligrams 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for severe pain dated [DATE] for 14 days. Resident #74's physician's orders did not include any other medications for pain. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #74 was cognitively intact. The assessment further indicated Resident #74 rated his pain at 5 on a scale of 1 to 10, and stated his pain was occasional. A Care Plan dated [DATE] stated Resident #74 would maintain acceptable level of comfort, but the interventions did not include pharmacological or nonpharmacological interventions for pain. A Physician's Order written [DATE] indicated Resident #74…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide documentation in the medical record regarding vaccination status, education on the benefits and potential side effects before being offered the COVID vaccination or refusal for 1 of 5 residents (#47) reviewed for infection control. The findings included: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #47 had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the immunizations section of Resident #47's electronic medical record, indicated no documentation related to COVID-19 vaccinations. During a telephone interview on 4/10/23 at 1:32 PM the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/ Infection Preventionist indicated she started working at the facility in February 2023 and the previous Infection Preventionist records were incomplete, whereas some staff entered documentation into the immunizations tab of the medical record and some staff did not. She further indicated she was unable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-02 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing sheets accurately reflected the nursing staff who worked for 6 of 7 days reviewed (12/11/25, 12/12/15, 12/13/25, 12/14/25, 12/15/25, and 12/17/25).The findings included:Review of the facility's daily nurse staffing sheet revealed underneath the facility's name was a space to specify the date and resident census along with columns to specify the number of staff and hours worked for Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Certified Medicine Aides (CMAs), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) for each 8-hour shift, 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM (first shift), 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM (second shift) and 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM (third shift).a. The nursing staff schedule dated 12/11/25 revealed on the1st shift (6:00 AM to 2:00 PM) there were 5 LPN's and 11 CNAs. On the 2nd shift there was one (1) LPN, 8 CNAs, and 3 CMAs. Review of the daily nurse staffing sheet dated 12/11/25 revealed that for the 1st shift, the facility had 4 LPNs and 9 CNAs. On the 2nd shift (2:00 PM to 10:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan on admission for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #30) reviewed for hospice services. Findings included: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pain, and hospice services. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #30 was cognitively intact, was on hospice services and had occasional pain which required pain medication; and he received an opioid pain medication for 7 days of the 7 day assessment period. A review of Resident #30's medical record revealed a baseline care plan was not initiated for Resident #30. The Hospice Nurse was interviewed on 4/5/2023 at 9:55 am and stated Resident #30 had hospice services before he came to the facility and continued on hospice services starting from the time he was admitted to the facility. The Hospice Nurse also stated she visits Resident #30 weekly, and he has a home health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-04-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to include documentation in the medical record of education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #138, #53, and #47). The findings included: 1.a. Resident #138 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #138 had moderate cognitive impairment, and the influenza as well as the pneumococcal immunizations were checked as not up to date or offered (section O300). A review of the immunization section of the medical record profile for Resident #138, revealed no documentation related to influenza or pneumococcal immunization status. b. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #53 was cognitively intact, and the influenza as well as the pneumococcal immunizations were checked as not up to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$46,529 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $13,250 — penalty dated 2026-01-02
- $33,279 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345115. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.