NC State Veterans Home - Salisbury

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 83.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.14 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.19 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.39 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff and the Physician's Assistant (PA), facility staff used a shared blood glucose meter located in the medication cart without cleaning and disinfecting it before and after each use. This occurred while there were two residents identified with a known bloodborne pathogen in the facility with 1 of the 2 residents requiring blood glucose monitoring. Shared blood glucose meters can be contaminated with blood and must be disinfected after each use with an approved product and procedure. Failure to use an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered disinfectant in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions to disinfect a shared blood glucose meter has a high likelihood of exposing residents to the spread of blood borne infections. This deficient practice affected 2 of 2 residents who were observed to have their blood glucose checked (Resident #26 and #37) and involved 2 of 2 nurses observed performing blood glucose checks (Nurse #2 and the Assistant Director of Nurses [ADON]).Immediate jeopardy began on 12/09/2025 when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's request for a shower to be stopped when the resident told Nursing Assistant (NA) #3 to stop because he was man handling him. Resident #13 stated he was fearful of NA #3 and felt like no one was listening to him when he told staff about the incident. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by not placing a privacy/ dignity cover over his urine collection bag exposing his urine which was visible from the hallway to other residents, staff and visitors. This occurred for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #13 and Resident #3).The findings included: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pain and dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS documented the resident as having behavioral symptoms not directed towards others for 4-6 days…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, Consultant Pharmacist and Physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had a diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medication and the as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication, Haldol, used to regulate mood, behaviors, and thoughts, had a stop date of 14 days. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #1 had a diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medication and antidepressant medication. This occurred for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #2, and Resident #1).The findings included:1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mild dementia with agitation, brief psychotic disorder and anxiety. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS documented Resident #2 had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others for 1 to 3 days during a 7-day period. The resident was not documented as receiving an antipsychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and resident, Resident Representative, Physician Assistant, and Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to follow and implement their abuse policy and procedures in the areas of protecting and reporting to the Administrator for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #13). Resident #13 told Nursing Assistant (NA) #3 that the NA was treating him roughly and man handling him and to stop care. NA #3 did not stop the care. NA #9 heard Resident #13 state that NA #3 treated him roughly and was man handling him during his shower. Neither NA #3 or NA #9 reported the incident to administration or the charge nurse on duty allowing NA #3 to finish his shift and to return to work the next day. This failure resulted in a lack of protection for other residents. The findings included:The facility's policy Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property reviewed on 12/7/22 stated any allegation, suspicion, or identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to administer lidocaine 4% external pain patches per the Physician order for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication regimen review (Resident #34).The findings included:Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pain in right hip and low back pain.A review of Resident #34's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/13/2025 for four (4) 4% Lidocaine adhesive patches to the skin daily. Special Instructions on order read: Apply to bilateral hips/ bilateral lower back daily.A review of Resident #34's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Nurse #8 signed the MAR for the four Lidocaine patch administration on 12/11/2025. The MAR specified for four (4) 4% Lidocaine adhesive patches to the skin daily. Special Instructions on order read: Apply to bilateral hips/ bilateral lower back daily.A record review and interview with Nurse #6 on 12/11/2025 at 11:00 am revealed that she had only…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a smoking safety screen in August 2025 for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking (Resident # 48).The findings included:An undated facility policy titled, Tobacco, Vapes, and Alcohol Use in the North Carolina State Veterans Home, stated Staff will evaluate each resident's ability to safely use cigarette lighters, lit cigarettes, cigars, pipes, and Vape devices to determine if a resident can be permitted to use these without direct supervision (independently) or if the resident must be directly supervised in order to safely use them. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included tobacco use, cerebral vascular accident, and vascular dementia.A review of Resident #48's Nursing Quarterly Assessment that included the smoking safety screen dated 5/19/25 indicated the resident was a supervised smoker and did not have the ability to hold his own cigarette or extinguish it.Review of Resident #48's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff, and Physician Assistant interviews, the facility failed to keep a urinary catheter collection bag from touching the floor to reduce the risk of infection for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #51).The findings included:Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stage four kidney disease, and obstructive and reflux urinary disease.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #51 was coded for an indwelling urinary catheter.Resident #51's care plan revised 11/21/2025 indicated Resident #51 had a goal that she would not develop any complications or injury associated with urinary catheter usage.An initial observation was conducted on 12/08/2025 at 9:19 am of Resident #51 while she was sitting up in her chair in the dining area. Her urinary catheter collection bag was observed to be laying on the floor under her chair. It had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with staff, Consultant Pharmacist, and the Physician Assistant, the Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify drug irregularities related to the indicated use and scheduled stop date of an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic, and the indicated use of an antidepressant for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #1) reviewed for drug regimen review.The findings included:1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included mild dementia with agitation, brief psychotic disorder and anxiety. A physician order dated 11/3/25 revealed Resident #2 was ordered Haldol lactate solution (antipsychotic) 5 milligrams (mg)/1 milliliter (ml), administer 2 mg intramuscular (IM) every 4 hours PRN for agitation. The order indicated the end date was 1/3/26.A monthly pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated 12/5/25 read per hospice, haloperidol 2 mg IM every 4 hours PRN agitation for 60 days. The pharmacist review did not document any recommendations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record related to documentation of medication administration for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accurate medical records (Resident #34).The findings included:Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pain in right hip and low back pain. A review of Resident #34's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/13/2025 for Lidocaine (an over-the-counter pain reliever) adhesive patch, medicated; 4%; amount: 4; apply to skin. Special Instructions on order read: Apply to bilateral hips/ bilateral lower back daily.a. An observation and interview with Nurse #6 and Resident #34 on 12/10/25 at 12:00 pm revealed Nurse #6 had two lidocaine patches in her hand. Nurse #6 proceeded into Resident #34's room and when she returned from the room, she said that she had placed the two patches on Resident #34's low back and no patches were placed to Resident's bilateral hips. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to (1) document that education of the influenza vaccine was provided for Resident #20 and (2) failed to obtain Resident #72's signature on the influenza vaccine consent/refusal form prior to administering the influenza vaccine. This occurred for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations.Findings included:1. Resident #20 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the facility's document titled, Resident Influenza (Flu) Vaccine Consent/Refusal Form, revealed Resident #20 consented to receive the influenza vaccine and signed the form on 6/12/25. A Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) form for the influenza vaccine was not attached to the consent form.The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #20 was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #20's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #20 received the influenza vaccine at the facility on 11/4/25. The vaccine education section did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove unlabeled items from 2 of 2 nourishment rooms. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: An observation and interview conducted with Dietary [NAME] #1 on 08/05/24 at 11:10 AM revealed the nourishment room located on the second floor had a bottle of 12 fluid ounce (fl. oz) lactose free milk 20 fl. oz orange Gatorade, and an opened half full 20 fl oz. bottle of cherry coke located in the refrigerator that were unlabeled. Dietary [NAME] #1 further revealed they were not sure if the items belonged to a resident or nursing staff but should not have been located the refrigerator unlabeled. Dietary [NAME] #1 indicated it was nursing staffs' responsibility to label items that belong to residents and staff items were not allowed in the nourishment rooms. An observation and interview conducted with the Dietary [NAME] #1 and Nurse #2 on 08/05/24 at 11:20 AM revealed the nourishment room located on the first floor had two push-up ice cream cones and two 16 oz. containers of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,444 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,444 — penalty dated 2025-12-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC