Knife River Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 83.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.23 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #5) who experienced a burn related to hot coffee. Failure to ensure appropriate coffee/water temperatures resulted in Resident #5 sustaining burns and placed all residents at risk for serious burns/injuries. During the on-site facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, the team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) and determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 07/03/24. A nursing progress note, dated 07/03/24 at 1:03 p.m., stated, . Resident fell asleep at the table and spill [sic] hot coffee on her lap. Taken back to her room, pants removed. Large area of redness to bilateral thighs (top and inner) with blistering noted. The IJ resulted from temperature readings obtained from the coffee/hot water machine, a lack of temperature monitoring by staff, and an injury to a resident. This finding placed residents in immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility reported incident and investigation documents, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remain free from abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who experienced physical abuse. Failure to immediately investigate an incident of physical abuse and provide necessary services to protect residents from harm resulted in an unsafe environment and the potential for further harm. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following the incident. Findings include: This surveyor determined a deficient practice existed on 08/10/24. The facility implemented corrective action and completed on 08/13/24. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy occurred on 08/14/24. This policy, revised November 2023, stated, . Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and/or monitoring to prevent elopements from the facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) Failure to provide adequate supervision and monitoring and respond to door alarms immediately resulted in Resident #1's elopement from the facility and may result in injury from prolonged exposure to cold temperatures. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the elopement. Findings include:The surveyor determined a deficient practice existed on 11/22/25. The facility implemented immediate corrective action and completed additional action/education on 11/27/25. Review of the facility's elopement policy, titled Knife River Care Center Resident Elopement and Wandering Policy, and dated 03/13/25, stated, Policy: This facility ensures that residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility cleaning logs, and family and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #32 and #65) who required a wheelchair. Failure to maintain a safe, clean, and sanitary environment may lead to injury from unsafe equipment, does not provide a homelike living area for residents, and fails to promote quality of life. Findings include: - Observation on 02/24/25 at 9:57 a.m. showed Resident #32's wheelchair in disrepair, with the vinyl of the armrest pads cracked, missing pieces, and flaking. During an interview on 02/26/25 at 11:28 a.m., a staff member (#4) confirmed the armrest pads need replacement. - During an interview on 02/24/25 at 4:50 p.m., a family member (#1) of Resident #65 stated staff do not clean his Broda chair (special type of wheelchair) or his room, noting tissues and a lollipop stick on the floor. The family member pointed to dried feces on the frame of the Broda chair. Observation showed a dried brown substance with the odor of feces on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of manufacturer's instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #40) observed during a ceiling lift transfer. Failure to ensure proper use of the ceiling lift, including use of the sling/straps, placed the resident at risk for a fall and injury. Findings include: Review of the manufacturer's instructions for the Maxi Sky 2 (ceiling lift) stated, . Method 1-Cross-through, legs closed with crossing straps . Review of Resident #40's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The current care plan stated, . The resident has limited physical mobility r/t [related to] contractures, weakness . requires a ceiling track for transfers . Observation on 02/24/25 at 10:28 a.m. showed a certified nurse aid (CNA) (#3) transferred Resident #40 from the wheelchair to the bed. The CNA attached the leg strap loops of the sling to the spreader bar and failed to use the cross-through method. During an interview on 02/26/25 at 9:34 a.m., a nursing supervisor (#4) confirmed staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility reported incident and investigation documents, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) who experienced physical abuse. Failure to ensure an environment free from abuse placed Resident #2 and all other residents residing in the memory care unit at risk for abuse, fear, anxiety, and/or psychosocial harm. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented following the incident. Findings include: The surveyor determined a deficient practice existed on 11/12/24. The facility implemented and completed corrective action on 11/12/24. Review of the facility policy titled ABUSE PROHIBITION POLICY occurred on 11/26/24. This policy, dated 09/05/24, stated, . Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, . other residents . Abuse shall be defined as follows . 'Abuse' shall mean the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect residents' current status for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1). Failure to update Resident #1's care plan limited staffs ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on 11/26/24. The nursing progress notes stated the following: * 03/19/24 at 2:37 p.m., . Resident struck another resident. Resident kicking unit doors stating he is going to hell, resident told staff he was going to hang himself. * 03/25/24 at 10:26 p.m., . Resident had behaviors tonight, mentioned about committing suicide . * 04/06/24 at 3:32 p.m., . CNA [certified nurse aid] reported . res [resident] sitting in his wheelchair . began talking about his bandages on his hands to the CNA, he became increasingly verbally agitated and then stated, '. I'm just gonna commit suicide!' . Resident #1's care plan failed to include history of suicidal ideation.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility reported incident (FRI), record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report an incident of abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who experienced physical abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) . Failure to report an event of physical abuse in the prescribed time frame does not comply with regulations established to protect residents. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following the incident. Findings include: This surveyor determined a deficient practice existed on 08/10/24. The facility implemented corrective action and completed on 08/13/24. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy occurred on 08/14/24. This policy, revised November 2023, stated, . Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, review of resident council meeting minutes, and resident interviews, the facility failed to respect each resident's dignity and individuality and care for residents in a manner and an environment that promotes, maintains, or enhances the quality of life for 2 of 21 sampled residents (Residents C and E) and 2 supplemental residents (Residents A and D). Failure to provide cares in a respectful manner and respect personal property does not preserve the residents' personal dignity or enhance their quality of life. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity occurred on 12/21/23. This policy, dated December 2022, stated, . All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain dignity and respect resident rights. Respect the resident's living space and personal possessions. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes occurred on 12/20/23. August 2023 Resident Council meeting minutes stated, It was mentioned by [Resident name] that CNAs should be limited to the amount of time they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, facility staff failed to offer fluids to 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #63) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #43) during cares who required staff assistance for fluid intake and failed to provide water consistently for 4 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #6, #23, #27 and #67) and 2 supplemental residents (Resident #13, and #66). Failure to provide water to all residents consistently and provide assistance with fluid intake may result in dehydration, constipation, and urinary tract infections (UTIs). Findings include: - Review of Resident #63's medical record occurred on all days of survey. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified Resident #63 required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, in which the helper does more than half the effort. A dietary note, dated 11/21/23, stated, . Staff assist resident with intake - green mug with handle is used to aid in self-feeding - staff report occasionally resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of menus, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to serve food according to prepared menus for 3 of 3 units observed ([NAME] Lane, Harvest Lane, and Whispering Winds) during meals. Failure to serve food according to the portion sizes listed on the menu may result in inadequate nutrition and either weight loss or gain. Findings include: During a interview on 12/18/23 in the afternoon, (Resident B) stated, My only concern is portion sizes of meals are not enough. Observation of [NAME] Lane's breakfast tray line on 12/19/23 showed the following portion sizes served to residents and what the menu required: - Oatmeal #8 scoop, 1/2 cup (Menu: #6 scoop, 2/3 cup) - Cream of Wheat cereal #8 scoop, 1/2 cup (Menu: #6 scoop, 2/3 cup) Observation of Harvest Lane's lunch tray line on 12/19/23 showed the following portion sizes served to residents and what the menu required: - Chicken Fajita #16 scoop, 2 ounces (Menu: 3 ounces) - Pureed Chicken #12 scoop, 1/3 cup (Menu: #8 scoop,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner for 2 of 3 kitchenettes ([NAME] Lane and Harvest Lane). Failure to change gloves when the type of food being handled has changed or after touching the face and prior to handling ready-to-eat food has the potential to result in cross-contamination and/or food borne illness. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Maintaining a Sanitary Tray Line occurred on 12/21/23. This policy, dated 08/10/23, stated, Policy: To provide an organized tray line that provides food . in a manner to prevent the spread of bacteria that may cause food borne illness. Compliance Guidelines: . 3. During tray assembly, staff should: a. Use gloves when handling food items. b. Use utensils such as tongs, serving spoons, etc. to handle food as much as possible. c. Wear gloves when direct contact with the hands and food occur. d. Wear gloves before handling ready-to-eat foods such as salads, fruits, sandwiches,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$35,890 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $35,890 — penalty dated 2024-07-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ND