Missouri Slope

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 317 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 193 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 192 beds and averages 185.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.94 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.79 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-10-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility reported incident and investigation reports, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from mental and/or physical abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who was witnessed receiving physical and verbal abuse. Failure of facility staff to immediately report a witnessed incident of staff to resident abuse to the appropriate supervisor delayed the removal of the accused abuser, the start of the facility investigation, and assessment of the resident for injury. This delay placed Resident #1 at risk for further abuse, fear, anxiety, and/or psychosocial harm and placed other residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse occurred on 10/15/24. This policy, reviewed September 2024, stated, . All employees receive education during orientation and at least annually throughout their employment on what constitutes abuse, neglect . and their responsibilities to protect the resident from these crimes. Abuse is defined as . intimidation, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI), review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who sustained a fall with fracture. Failure to utilize the whirlpool seat belt resulted in an avoidable fall and fracture for Resident #1 and placed all residents at risk for falls and/or injuries. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bathing Procedure occured on 06/12/24. The policy, dated November 2023, stated, Resident Safety - Safety Strap Usage Whirlpool: Transfer resident to whirlpool seat. Attach seat belt around resident. Ensure seat belt does not get caught in the door when closing the door. The facility failed to provide instruction on when it is safe to remove the bath chair seat belt. Review of the FRI report, submitted to the state agency on 06/10/24, identified Resident #1 . slipped from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 4 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #50, #61, #139, #154) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #30) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to glove use, hand hygiene, catheter care, equipment disinfection, and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Isolation, Standard Precautions, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 05/14/26. This policy, revised December 2025, stated, . Perform hand hygiene with hand sanitizer or soap and water upon entering and leaving a resident's room . remove gloves after use, before touching noncontaminated items and environmental surfaces and environmental surfaces . Wash hands immediately after [glove] removal to avoid transfer of microorganisms . Linen should be bagged at the point of use. Enhanced Barrier Precautions . Use gowns and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #61) observed during a mechanical sit to stand lift transfer. Failure to secure the leg strap and the abdominal strap of the lift sling placed the resident at risk for falls.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Transfer/Locomotion occurred on 05/14/26. This policy, revised September 2025, stated, . Slings are to be placed according to proper procedure.Review of Resident #61's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnosis included left sided weakness and paralysis, history of falling, unsteadiness on feet and abnormal posture. The current care plan stated, Transfers with PAL [Patient Assist Lift] with assist x 2. Per shared risk agreement, [Resident #61's name] can choose where he wants the hook strap length at and where the abdominal strap is located (prefers it above abdomen).Observation on 05/11/26 at 11:39 a.m. showed two certified nurse aides (CNAs) (#8 and #9) assisted Resident #61…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored securely for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #24) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #109) with medications at the bedside. Failure to securely store medications may result in unauthorized use, adverse reactions, or ineffective treatment. Findings include: - Observation on 05/11/26 at 10:45 a.m. showed a tube of a topical analgesic (pain relief cream) on Resident #24's bedside table. - Observation on 05/12/26 at 8:15 a.m. showed three Refresh Tears eye drop bottles and one Systane eye drop bottle on Resident #24's bedside table. During an interview on 05/14/26 at 7:49 a.m., an administrative staff member (#5) confirmed nursing staff were not aware of the medications in Resident #24's room.- Observation on 05/11/26 at 11:55 a.m. showed a box of Lidocaine patches (topical pain relief patches) and Genteal eyes drops (lubricating eye drops) at Resident #109's bedside.- Observation on 05/12/26 at 10:08 a.m. showed Lidocaine patches, Genteal eyes drops, generic psyllium husk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that maintains or enhances residents' quality of life for 5 of 9 residents (Residents #3, #44, #45, #70, and #112) observed during medication administration and in 3 of 8 dining rooms (1st floor C/D wing, 2nd floor C/D wing, and 4th floor C/D wing). Failure to refer to residents by their preferred name and dispose of bags containing trash/dirty linens prior to entering dining rooms does not promote resident dignity or respect. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Promoting Dignity and Resident Rights occurred on 03/27/25. This policy, dated December 2024, stated, . All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights . Staff members should converse with the resident while doing cares . Speak respectfully to residents . Observations of medication administration on 03/26/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is stored in accordance with professional standards for food service sanitation in 6 of 8 nutrition stations (first floor A/B and C/D, second floor A/B and C/D, and third floor A/B and C/D). Failure to ensure food is safe from contamination by resident ice packs has the potential to result in a foodborne illness or adverse effects for residents, visitors, and staff. Findings include: When requested, the facility failed to provide a policy for storage of ice packs. Observation of the nutrition stations on 03/24/25 showed the following items stored with food items: - 2:25 p.m. First floor A/B nutrition station freezer, two blue gel cooling packs with a resident label, alongside ice cream cups. First floor C/D nutrition station freezer, two unlabeled blue gel cooling packs alongside a box of snack breads. - 2:38 p.m. Second floor A/B nutrition station freezer, one unlabeled blue gel cooling pack alongside ice cream cups. Second floor C/D nutrition station freezer, one unlabeled blue gel cooling pack alongside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team assessed the appropriateness to self-administer medications (SAM) for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #70) observed during medication administration. Failure to determine whether SAM is a safe practice has the potential to result in a medication error and/or harm to a resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications occurred on 03/27/25. This policy, revised May 2024, stated, . Missouri Slope is committed to respecting resident's rights to self-administer medication, after an interdisciplinary assessment, when and if they desire and are able to. In order to facilitate this each resident will be evaluated for their ability to do so safely. Review of Resident #70's medical record occurred on 03/26/25 and identified a physician's order for Genteal Tear Solution (artificial tears) 1 drop in both eyes twice a day. The current care plan stated, . [Resident name] has impaired cognitive function/dementia .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, policy review, professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for 1 of 9 resident's observed during medication administration. Failure to document medications after administration, does not reflect the actual time of administration or any refusals which may cause adverse effects for the resident. Findings include: Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing: Concepts, Process, and Practice, 11th Edition eText, 2021, Pearson, Boston, Massachusetts, page 836, stated, . Administering Medications Safely . Document medication administration after giving it, not before. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration occurred on 03/27/25. This policy, dated December 2024, stated, . Proper steps for identification of medication and identification of resident should be carried out each time medications are administered. Medications should not be pre-dished for future medication passes . Right documentation . - Observation on 03/26/25 at 8:09 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of manufacturer's instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #44 and #70) observed during medication administration. Four medication errors occurred during staff administration of 41 medications, resulting in a nine percent error rate. Failure to properly prepare and administer medications may inhibit the effectiveness of the medication and may have a negative impact on the resident's overall health. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration occurred on 03/27/25. This policy, dated December 2024, stated, . Medications included in this definition may include those administered orally . optic . c. right dosage d. right route. e. right time. f. right documentation . A resident may refuse a medication. This should be documented on the eMAR [electronic medication administration record] and the nurse notified. The physician should be notified of repeated refusals. Review of administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #116 and #164) requiring enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Failure to practice infection control standards related to EBP and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene, Artificial Nails occurred on 03/27/25. This policy, revised December 2024, stated, . Hand hygiene is considered the single most important procedure for preventing the spread of health-care associated infections. The use of gloves does not eliminate the need for hand hygiene. Indications for Hand Hygiene . 7. After removing gloves. Review of the facility policy titled Isolation, Standard Precautions, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 03/27/25. This policy, dated September 2024, stated, . In addition to Standard Precautions, use Enhanced Barrier Precautions when providing high contact cares for residents at increased risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the current status for 2 of 36 sampled resident (Resident #69 and #138). Failure to review and revise the care plan limited staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan (Plan of Care), occurred on 02/15/24. This policy, dated August 2023, stated, . The plan of care is reviewed at least monthly by nursing, quarterly with completion of MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment and annually at interdisciplinary care conferences. Nursing plans of care are to be kept current by licensed staff members and remain consistent with the attending physician's plan of medical care, and the changing needs of the residents. - Review of Resident #138's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included hemiplegia. The current care plan identified the following: . Restorative therapy to Assist to move through tolerated range, supporting joints…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$39,404 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $30,580 — penalty dated 2024-10-15
• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-06-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ND