Parkside Lutheran Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 36.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.14 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 5 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2, #4, #5, #8, and #41). Failure to update care plans limited the staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Planning – Interdisciplinary Team occurred on 12/10/25. This policy, revised in December 2008, stated, . Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to: Incorporate identified problem areas; Incorporate risk factors . Reflect treatment goals . objectives . Aid in preventing or reducing declines in the resident's functional status . assessments of resident are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change. Review of the facility policy titled Smoking - Residents occurred on 12/11/25. This policy, revised April 2012, stated, . Any smoking-related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of professional reference, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure safe food practices and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen environment for 1 of 1 kitchen and 2 of 2 freezers on the Cozy Cottage Unit. Failure to properly store food items and maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen, food preparation, and storage areas has the potential for contamination of food and may result in a foodborne illness to residents, visitors, and staff. Findings Include: The 2022 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, Chapter 3-16, Section 3-305.11 Food Storage, stated, . FOOD shall be protected from contamination by storing the FOOD: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination . Annex 3 Page 100, stated, . 3-305.12 Food Storage, Prohibited Areas. Pathogens can contaminate and/or grow in food that is not stored properly. Drips of condensate . can be sources of microbial contamination for stored food. Chapter 4-6, Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to identify an incident of verbal abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #8) who was subjected to name calling and sworn at by a staff member. Failure to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse resulted in Resident #8's experiencing emotional distress and placed him and other vulnerable residents at risk of potential and/or continued verbal abuse.Findings include:Review of the facility policy Resident Abuse and Reporting occurred on 12/11/25. This policy, revised on 04/16/24, stated, . The resident has the right to be free from verbal . abuse . Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff . Verbal Abuse: Refers to any use of oral . language that includes disparaging and derogatory terms directed towards residents . regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. If abuse is witnessed . By the charge nurse or any member of the management team, the Administrator by means of this policy authorizes them to immediately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to immediately report an incident of verbal abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #8) subjected to name calling and sworn at by a staff member. Failure to report the incident to the state survey agency (SSA) placed Resident #8 and other vulnerable residents at risk of potential and/or continued verbal abuse. Findings include:Review of the facility policy Resident Abuse and Reporting occurred on 12/11/25. This policy, revised on 04/16/24, stated, . Any staff . witnessing . any act . involving mistreatment . or abuse . must immediately notify the charge nurse. The charge nurse will immediately notify the Administrator, Social Services Designee and/or Director of Nursing. The ND Department of Health will also be notified of reports of allegations of abuse and that an investigation is pending. The facility will notify the ND Department of Health the results of the investigation with [sic] 5 working days. A memo, dated 11/11/25 at 8:30 a.m., stated, . Writer heard hollering and banging…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an incident of verbal abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #8) who was subjected to name calling and sworn at by a staff member. Failure to thoroughly investigate the incident placed Resident #8 and other vulnerable residents at risk of potential and/or continued verbal abuse. Findings include:Review of the facility policy Resident Abuse and Reporting occurred on 12/11/25. This policy, revised on 04/16/24, stated, . All allegations must be thoroughly investigated by the designated department managers under the general direction of the Administrator. This may include, but is not limited to, interviewing all persons associated with the situation . The investigators will complete a written report and forward it to the Administrator or designee within 48 hours. A memo, dated 11/11/25 at 8:30 a.m., stated, . Writer heard hollering and banging coming from CC [Cozy Cottage Unit] DR [dining room], [Resident #8] and [certified nurse aide (CNA) (#2)] were having a loud disagreement. Alot of name…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide medication in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #31) with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube inserted through the skin and abdominal wall directly into the stomach) observed during medication administration. Failure to accurately transcribe provider's orders may result in adverse health effects. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Physician Orders/Transcribing for New and re-admitted Residents occurred on 12/11/25. This undated policy, stated, . Each medication order must have a route, dose, frequency and related diagnosis. The nurse who received the orders, checks that all of the above have been followed through . A second nurse will check all the orders written in the computer to the orders received from the MD [medical doctor] and queue that they are correct.Review of Resident #31's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified a PEG placement. A physician order, dated 12/08/25, included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) with a pressure ulcer. Failure to complete weekly assessments with measurements of pressure ulcers per facility policy, may result in new pressure ulcers, the deterioration of existing pressure ulcers, and delay healing.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Documentation of Wound Treatments occurred on 12/11/25. This undated policy, stated, . Wound assessments are documented upon admission, weekly, and as needed . The following elements are documented as part of a complete wound assessment: a. Type of wound . Stage of the wound . Measurements: height, width, depth . Description of wound characteristics . Weekly progress towards healing .Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the right heel. Wound clinic assessments of Resident #2's right heel pressure injury showed the following:* 11/06/25 - 0.4 centimeter (cm) x…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, review of a professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #31) who required staff assistance with toileting. Failure to provide toileting may result in a loss of dignity and placed the resident at risk for skin breakdown, poor grooming/hygiene, decreased self-esteem, urinary tract infections, and at risk for falls and/or injuries. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Incontinence occurred on 12/11/25. This undated policy, stated, . Residents that are incontinent of bladder or bowel will receive appropriate treatment to prevent infections and to restore continence to the extent possible.Review of Resident #31's medical record occurred on all days of survey and included a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke) and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, frequently…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #2 and #31) in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Failure to practice infection control standards related to EBP and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 12/11/25. This policy stated, . Initiation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: . An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: i. Wounds . and/or indwelling medical devices . Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: . PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities . High-contact resident care activities include: . c. Transferring. d. Providing hygiene. f. Changing briefs or assisting with toileting. g. Device care or use: . feeding tubes . Enhanced barrier precautions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 5 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #11, #14, #25, #90, and #139) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions, urinary catheters, and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: ENHANCED BARRIER PRECAUTIONS Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 08/08/24. This undated policy stated, . 'Enhanced barrier precautions' (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] that employs targeted gown and gloves [sic] use during high contact resident care activities. An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following . Wounds . chronic venous stasis ulcers . and/or indwelling medical devices . feeding tubes . catheters . even if the resident is not known to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ND