Bethel Lutheran Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 75.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.09 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.16 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  1. Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #85) with an identified breast lump. Failure to ensure follow up on the identified breast abnormality prevented timely treatment interventions.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bethel Lutheran Nursing & [and] Rehabilitation Center-Wound Treatment Management occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, dated February 2026, stated, Procedure . 2. In the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify physician to obtain treatment orders. This may be the wound care consultant, treatment nurse, or the assigned licensed nurse in the absence of the treatment nurse. 5. Treatment decisions will be based on: . a. Etiology of the wound: . iv. Atypical (i.e. dermatological or cancerous lesion, pyoderma, calciphylaxis) . c. Location of the wound . 8. The effectiveness of treatments will be monitored through ongoing assessment of the wound.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility investigation, review of the facility policies, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3) who required staff assistance and sit to stand mechanical lift transfers. Failure to provide adequate assistance as care planned for transfers may have resulted in Resident #3's fracture and placed all residents requiring assistance for transfers at risk for injuries. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans occurred on 02/07/24. This undated policy, stated, . It is the policy of [Facility Name] to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, . to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental . needs . 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policies, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained, enhanced, and respected the resident's dignity for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #18 and #47) and 2 supplemental residents (Resident #74 and #76) observed during meals and 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #56) who requested assistance in their room. Failure to treat residents with dignity and respect has the potential to affect the residents' psychosocial wellbeing and does not enhance their quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, revised 2025, stated, . It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. Respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner. - Observations during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #3, #12 and #77) observed during medication administration. Four medication errors occurred during staff administration of 27 medications, resulting in a 14 percent error rate. Failure to follow physician's orders and/or pharmacy recommendations may inhibit the effectiveness of the medication, cause subtherapeutic levels, and may have a negative impact on the resident's overall health.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Crushed Medications occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, dated June 2022, stated, . Medications shall be crushed in accordance with standard of practice for safety and accuracy in medication administration. Medications shall be crushed in accordance with physician orders.Review of the facility policy titled Insulin Pen occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, revised March 2026, stated, . Prime the insulin pen. i. Dial 2 units by turning the dose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 4 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #1, #3, #12, #34, and #56) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #77) observed during toileting cares and medication preparation and administration. Failure to practice infection control standards related to hand hygiene, glove use, and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, revised September 2025, stated, . implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: i. Wounds (e.g. chronic wounds such as . diabetic foot ulcers .) and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g. urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician or resident's representative for 1 of 1 closed records (Resident # 85) reviewed for change in breast tissue. Failure to notify the resident's representative and physician of an identified breast abnormality does not allow the representative or physician to be fully informed of the resident's care, current status, and to make informed decisions regarding medical care. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, reviewed March 2026, stated, 2. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident. the Neighborhood Nurse Manager (or designee) or Social Worker will notify the resident's next of kin or representative (sponsor) when: . b. There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. c. There is a need to alter the resident's treatment significantly. -Review of Resident's #85 medical record occurred on April 15-16, 2026 and identified a right breast lump…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #48) reviewed for abuse. Failure to provide the necessary services to protect residents from physical abuse resulted in a bruise to Resident #48's arm. Failure to protect all residents from physical abuse placed all residents at risk for psychosocial harm and/or injury.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, dated February 2026, stated, . 'Physical Abuse' includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. 'Sexual Abuse' is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident . The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse. that achieves . the identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect. Review of Resident #48's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from restraints for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #9) reviewed for restraints. Failure to ensure staff refrained from using a manual method of restraining a resident placed Resident #9 at risk for increased behaviors, fear, anxiety, and injury.Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Use of Physical Restraints occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, dated February 2026, stated, . all residents have the right to be free from any physical restraints . Within 72 hours the interdisciplinary team must be notified of the application of the restraint so that they may complete a follow-up evaluation and determine the need to initiate the non-emergency physical restraint procedure.Review of Resident #9's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses include irritability, anger, and dementia with agitation and psychotic disturbances. The current care plan stated, . I have potential to demonstrate physical and verbal behaviors. And at times will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report incidents of potential abuse to officials including the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9, #42, and #48) with allegations of physical or sexual abuse. Failure to report incidents of potential physical or sexual abuse to the State agency placed all residents at risk of abuse, mental and emotional distress, and or physical injury. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, dated February 2026, stated, . The facility will have written procedures that include . Reporting of all alleged violations to the . state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies . within specified timeframes . Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse .- Review of Resident #9's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dementia with agitation, depression,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate alleged violations of possible abuse for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9, #42, and #48) subjected to physical abuse, sexual abuse, and restraint use. Failure to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse, implement corrective actions, and evaluate the effectiveness of those actions, placed all residents at risk of abuse, mental/emotional distress, and physical injury.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, dated February 2026, stated, . An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse . or reports of abuse . occur. Taking all necessary actions as a result if the investigation, which may include, but are not limited to, the following . analyzing the occurrence(s) to determine why abuse . occurred, and what changes are needed to prevent further occurrences. Defining how care provision will be changed and/or improved to protect residents receiving services .-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the State Long Term Care Ombudsman with a written notice of discharge for 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #81) reviewed for facility discharge. Failure to notify the State Ombudsman does not provide residents with access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights, and to provide them with protection from being discharged inappropriately.Findings include: Review of Resident #81's medical record occurred on 04/14/26. A progress note dated 02/12/26 at 2:17 p.m., stated, Resident seen for rounds today . will be discharging home on 2/18/26 as therapy complete. The record failed to include evidence the facility notified the State Ombudsman of the discharge. During an interview on 04/14/2026 at 3:35 p.m. an administrative staff member (#2) confirmed Resident #81's medical record lacked the required notification to the State Ombudsman.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #9). Failure to update care plans limited the staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans occurred on 04/16/26. This policy, dated March 2026, stated, . The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment. Review of Resident #48's medical record occurred on all days of survey. A nurse's note, dated 12/04/25 at 7:12 p.m., stated, Writer was doing evening med pass when writer heard a scream coming from the unit's lounge. Writer ran and saw [CNA's name] in between residents [Resident #48] and [Resident #9]. CNA informed writer that resident was yanked on left wrist and was slapped on left side of face x [times] 2 by [Resident #9]. Noted resident's left cheek was reddish in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ND