No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hillcrest Health & Rehab

1702 Hillcrest Drive, Bellevue, NE 68005 · For profit - Corporation · 151 certified beds · (402) 291-8500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (402) 291-8500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$33,248 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $33,248 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-30)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 33% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1002 W. Mission Ave. · (402) 291-4797 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1802 Galvin Rd S · (402) 291-8400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1510 Harlan Dr · (402) 291-7170 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1327 Englewood Dr · (402) 293-3122 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.0%19.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.5%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.7%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.8%4.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened40.1%18.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.6%19.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.3%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.8%20.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.5%75.9%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.2%20.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.6%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.821.811.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.831.921.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 896 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 484 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.7%CMS range 61.1–68.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 8.1–11.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.1%CMS range 3.5–6.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
41.6%
Total nursing turnover
23.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 110.0 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.20 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.77 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-17)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-12-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 175 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) and 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions for the prevention of pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident 2 and 4) of 4 residents sampled and failed to provide practitioner ordered wound care to promote healing of pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident 4) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 121. The findings are:Record review of the facility policy dated 07-25-2025 revealed all team members are responsible for preventing, caring for and providing treatment for any patient with altered skin integrity. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Braden Scale revealed the facility uses the Braden Scale as a tool to assess the resident's level of risk for development of pressure ulcers. The evaluation is based on six indicators: sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction or shear. A lower Braden Scale Score indicates a lower level of functioning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to evaluate change of condition for 1 [Resident 3] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 119. Findings are:A. A review of Resident 3's admission Record revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right hip prosthesis, chronic systolic heart failure [a condition in which the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood effectively], and presence of prosthetic heart valve. A review of Resident 3's Progress Note dated 8/22/25 revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status [an evaluation of cognitive status] score of 11. A review of MDS [Minimin Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] Manual revealed a score of 8-12 indicates moderately impaired cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 3's oxygen saturation levels [a percentage of oxygen carried by red blood cells in the blood stream] documented in the vitals section of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)(1) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented for 2 [Residents 4 and 7] of 4 sampled residents with falls. The facility had a total census of 142 residents. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 4's admission Record revealed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of displaced fracture of lateral end of right clavicle and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. admission Record indicated Resident 4 was discharged to an acute care hospital on 2/27/25. A review of Resident 4's MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] dated 2/10/25 revealed Resident 4 required partial/moderate assistance with transfer and supervision or touching assistance with walking 10 feet. Resident 4 was identified has having falls in the last month prior to admission and fall with fracture in the last 6 months prior to admission. Resident 4's Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the provider of blood sugars outside of parameters for 1 resident (Resident 151), medications provided outside of parameters for 3 residents (Resident 2, 146 and 151), failed to notify provider of a change in an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, a clinical tool used to detect and measure involuntary muscle movements, primarily Tardive Dyskinesia in patients taking neuroleptic or antipsychotic medications) score for 1 (Resident 30) and no Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP, a device primarily used to treat obstructive sleep apnea) available for 1 resident (Resident 32) of 6 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 120. Findings are: A. Record Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy dated 1/1/2023 revealed the following: Policy: A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer specifications, or accepted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(B) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned (put on) masks during a COVID-19 outbreak, ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed for Resident 2, and maintain vinyl coverings on six recliners to reduce the potential for cross contamination in the Magnolia Trail commons area. The facility census was 121. Findings are:Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(B) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned (put on) masks during a COVID-19 outbreak, ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed for Resident 2, and maintain vinyl coverings on six recliners to reduce the potential for cross contamination in the Magnolia Trail commons area. The facility census was 121. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) SNF Policy with an effective date 05/15/2023 revealed source control (wearing of a surgical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 and 12-006.09(H)(iv)(5).Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement neurological checks for an unwitnessed fall for 2 (Residents 1 and 2) of 3 sampled residents, and failed to monitor bowel movements and provider ordered interventions to prevent the potential for constipation for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 121.The findings are:A. Record review of a facility policy entitled Neuro Checks dated revised 3/31/2021 revealed: -A neuro check is a simple and standardized assessment to detect changes in level of consciousness. These may be performed on an individual with a post-fall head injury, or unwitnessed fall. Consciousness is the most sensitive indicator of neurological status. -1. Neuro checks will be completed per physician order or initiated by the nurse, at their discretion, based on physical assessment of the resident, guest, or elder. -2. Neuro checks will be completed on the resident, guest, or elder with an unwitnessed fall or fall with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    B. Record review of Resident 1's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 9/11/2025. Further review of the admission record identified the resident had diagnoses that included infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis, bacteremia (a blood stream infection of bacteria in the blood), myasthenia gravis (a chronic autoimmune disease causing fluctuating weakness in voluntary muscles such as the eyes, face, throat, and limbs due to nerve-muscle communication breakdown, where antibodies block signals, worsening with activity and improving with rest), essential tremors, abnormalities of gait, and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 9/17/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 15. According to the MDS Manual, a score of 15 indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(A) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic (a medication that affects how the brain works) PRN ( PRN - as needed) order had a rationale (a reason) for continued use and failed to identify target behaviors (specific actions) for an antipsychotic (a class of drug that treats psychotic symptoms and disorders) medication and an antianxiety (a drug that reduces anxiety) medication for 1 (Resident 50) of 5 residents. The facility had a census of 117. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 50's Order Summary sheet with active orders of 12/12/2024 revealed the following medication order: Lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg-a unit of measurement), give 0.5 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for panic disorder. A record review of a Note To Attending Physician/Prescribers from the consultant pharmacist and dated 4/24/24 revealed the following: -In order to comply with CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) regulations (official rule) PRN orders for psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure reference: 12-007.01A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were maintained and failed to ensure handwashing and glove changes were completed to protect from food borne illness. The facility had a total census of 113 of 113 residents that could be affected by the practice. Findings are: A. Observations on 10/11/23 at 12:09 PM at end of meal service in Magnolia Terrace dining room revealed the temperature of the goulash to be 116 F [Fahrenheit] taken by Dietary Aide A. In an interview on 10/11/23 at 12:09 PM, Dietary Aide A reported shutting off the steam table prior to service of the meal. Observations on 10/12/23 at 12:01 PM revealed the temperature of the egg salad to be 61.2 F taken by Dietary Aide A. The egg salad was observed to be sitting on top of the covered steam table well. In an interview on 10/12/23 at 12:12 PM, Dietary Director reported egg salad would be pulled and replaced with egg salad from the kitchen. In an interview on 10/17/23 at 10:50 AM, the Dietary Director reported hot foods on the steam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-17 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-007.04D Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a working ventilation system in 17 resident bathrooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 85, 86, 88, 91, 93, 95, 103, 105, 107, 111 and 113) of 99 occupied resident rooms. The facility census was 113. Findings are: Observations of the facility environment on 10/16/23 between 1:00 PM and 2:00 PM with the Administrator [ADM] , Director of Environmental Services [DES] and the Regional Director of Environmental Services revealed that the ventilation system in resident bathrooms rooms 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 85, 86, 88, 91, 93, 95, 103, 105, 107, 111 and 113 did not draw a 1 ply square of tissue to the surface of the ventilation covers in resident bathrooms. The fact that the tissue square was not drawn to the cover indicated that the system was non-operational at the time of the observation. Interview on 10/16/23 at 2:00 PM with the DES confirmed the ventilation system was not working in the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressures were taken in accordance with pharmacy recommendations for 1 [Resident 91] 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The facility had a total census of 113 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 91's electronic medical record revealed Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy [a condition in which proteins called amyloid build up on the walls of the arteries in the brain]. A review of Resident 91's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 7/13/23 for Midodrine HCL 5 mg [a medication to treat a kind of low blood pressure that causes severe dizziness and fainting], 1 tablet two times per day. A review of Resident 91's Pharmacist Consult/Medication Review dated 9/25/23 revealed a recommendation of having sit/stand blood pressures completed for 1 week to rule out orthostatic hypotension [a form of low blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 12-006.17 LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 12-006.17D Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of Covid-19 (a mild to severe respiratory illness that is caused by a coronavirus) related to incomplete screening of visitors and staff with no follow up. The facility failed to ensure Resident 28's Nebulizer Kit was cleaned every night and the Nebulizer Kit was replaced once a week. The facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination related to hand hygiene between residents during medication administration. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility identified a census of 115. FINDINGS ARE: A. A record review of the Covid-19 screening logs for visitors titled Visitor Sign In Sheet and dated 8/6/22 through 9/12/22 revealed the following: * an entry on 9/11/22 (document does not specify AM or PM of times) at 10:15 revealed a temperature documented of 86.7 * an entry on 9/11/22 at 2:20 (document does not specify AM or PM of times) revealed no temperature documented * an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-20 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure unvaccinated staff were tested twice weekly for Covid-19 per CMS (The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is a federal agency that administers the nation's major healthcare programs including Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP) guidelines. This had the potential to affect all residents. The sample size was 4. The facility census was 115. FINDINGS ARE: A record review of the facility Covid-19 staff testing logs dated 7/18/22 through 9/5/22 for unvaccinated staff, revealed that NA-B had tested on [DATE] and not again until 9/8/22. A record review of the timecard for NA-B covering dates 8/28/22 through 9/8/22 revealed NA-B had worked on 8/29/22, 8/31/22, 9/1/22, 9/2/22, 9/7/22 and 9/8/22 A record review of the facility Covid-19 staff testing logs dated 7/18/22 through 9/5/22 for unvaccinated staff, revealed that NA-C had tested on [DATE] and not again until 9/6/22. A record review of the timecard for NA-C covering dates 8/27/22 through 9/6/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 5 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-20 · tag F0888 — widespread
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility contingency plan for staff that were unvaccinated for Covid-19 (a mild to severe respiratory illness that is caused by a coronavirus) to wear N95 (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) face masks was followed. The sample size was 2. The facility census was 115. FINDINGS ARE: An interview on 09/15/22 at 09:53 AM with unvaccinated staff, NA-C (Nurse Aide), revealed no difficulties related to having an exemption and that (gender) had been fit tested to an N95 (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) mask. An interview on 09/15/22 at 10:00 with staff member DA-F (Dietary Aide) who was noted to be wearing a surgical mask during the interview, when questioned about what extra measures (gender) was required to follow due to being unvaccinated, responded I'm supposed to wear the white mask like you, referring to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D2 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Practioner's orders were followed for Edema Ware (special stockings used to reduce swelling caused by excessive fluid in the body) and wound prevention for 2 (Residents 42 and 98) of 6 sampled residents. Total census was 115. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Skin Integrity, Wound, Ulcer (open sore or wound) Assessment Prevention Treatment Documentation Policy dated 08/09/2018 revealed the facility was to identify at risk residents for potential altered skin integrity and utilize prevention techniques and pressure redistribution surfaces on residents at risk. A record review of Resident 42's Physician's Order dated 09/15/2022 revealed an order to elevate legs daily at 12:00 PM and daily 07:00 PM to 9:59 PM. A record review of Resident 42's Care Plan dated 09/15/2022 revealed Resident 42 had a diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD)(a condition that reduces blood flow to the arms and legs due to fatty deposits and calcium…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7b(3) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7a Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Fall Mat was in place and that the bed was not an entrapment risk for 1 (Resident 42) of 1 sampled residents. Total census was 115. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 42 Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a comprehensive assessment of a person's functional, medical, and cognitive status) dated 06/27/2022 revealed Resident 42 had a diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD)(a condition that reduces blood flow to the arms and legs due to fatty deposits and calcium building up on the walls of the arteries), high blood pressure, Metabolic Encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a imbalance in the blood), and generalized muscle weakness. The MDS revealed the resident had 1 past fall with injury since admission. The MDS indicated the resident had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7. A record review of Resident 42's Care Plan revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09S Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 92 was free from unnecessary medications related to giving medications when outside of ordered parameters. The sample size was 2. The facility census was 115. FINDINGS ARE: A record review of the Physician's Orders ran 9/19/22 revealed Resident 92 to have an order which read DOXAZOSIN (a medication used for high blood pressure) 4MG TABS 1 TAB PO (by mouth) TWICE A DAY *HOLD FOR SBP (systolic blood pressure, the top number) <100 OR PULSE <60 A record review of the MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated August 2022 and the MAR dated September 2022 for Resident 92 revealed that on the following days, the DOXAZOSIN was not held despite pulses being below parameters: -9/13/22 AM dose, pulse 52 -9/12/22 AM dose, pulse 56 -9/10/22 AM dose, pulse 55 -9/8/22 AM dose, pulse 57 -9/9/22 PM dose, pulse 52 -8/30/22 AM dose, pulse 58 -8/31/22 AM dose, pulse 56 A record review of the policy titled Medication Administration and Provision with a reviewed date of 11/27/2017,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-12-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(A)(vi) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) Policy included the required procedural steps. Findings are: A record review of the facility MRR policy dated 1/1/2023 revealed the following: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: -1. The nurses should review and follow-up on recommendations from Pharmacist's (a healthcare professional who is an expert in the science and use of medications) admission Regimen Review (a process that involves evaluation a patient's current medications to identify potential issues). -2. Recommendations by the consultant pharmacist (a pharmacist who provides expert clinical advice to healthcare providers on medication usage) per the monthly medication regiment review should be reviewed by the primary care provider and carried out by a licensed nurse. -3. The consultant pharmacist should be consulted on any patient that the licensed nurse or Director of Clinical Services feels would benefit from a review due to changes in medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$33,248 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $33,248 — penalty dated 2025-12-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
JANICKI, JAMESIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
MULHEARN, KEVINIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/06/2013
OESTMANN, MATTHEWIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
RIPPLE, REGGIEIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
HILLCREST HEALTH SYSTEMS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2026
ASWEGE-MEZENBERG, DEBRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
HATCHER, ANTHONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
KENDALL, AMBERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2025
MALLOY, TIMOTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GEIS, HEATHERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
INNOVATE REHAB AND WELLNESS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
JORO, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/28/2012
CLARK, ANTHONYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2021
CRUZAT, STACIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2018
DIEHL, LEAHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2017
MILLER, MICHELEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2019
SHOEMAKER, VICKIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/1996
STRATMAN, ELIZABETHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.3M
Related-party expense33% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 35%Medicare 32%Other / private 34%

This home reported $6.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$430per resident / day
operating cost
$13,063per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$429per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285133. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next