Crowell Memorial Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 67.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 90% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions identified on the care plan to prevent falls for 3 (Resident 1, 2 and 4) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 77. Findings are:Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Fall Prevention Program revealed the following:-each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. -the facility uses a standardized risk assessment for determining a resident's fall risk.-the risk assessment categorizes residents according to low, moderate or high risk.-for program purposes the facility utilizes High Risk protocols and Low/Moderate risk protocols. -upon admission the nurse will complete a fall risk assessment to determine the resident's level of risk.-the nurse will indicate the resident's fall risk and initiate interventions on the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-12-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication error for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 59 residents. Findings are: Record review of Resident 3's undated Face Sheet revealed, the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease and unspecified dementia. A review of Medication Error Report dated 11/27/23 revealed, Resident 3's Lasix 80 mg one time per day was held on 11/21/23, 11/22/23, and 11/23/23. According to Medication Error Report, Resident 3 was taken to emergency room for assessment on 11/26/23. A review of Resident 3's 11/2023 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed, order for Lasix (a diuretic that may cause dehydration and electrolyte imbalance) 80 mg (milligrams) with start date of 10/24/23. Resident 3's Lasix 80 mg once per day was not administered on 11/21/23, 11/22/23, 11/23/23 and 11/25/23 as medication was unavailable according to 11/2023 MAR.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a significant injury to the state agency in appropriate time frames for 1(Resident 2) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 77. The findings are:Record review of the facility's policy dated 09-23-2022 titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Under section Identification of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation:-the facility will have procedures to assist staff in identifying the different types of abuse.-possible indicators of abuse include but are not limited to: --Resident, staff or family report abuse,--Physical marks such as bruises --Physical injury of a resident of unknown source--Resident reports theft of property--Verbal abuse of a resident is observed--Physical abuse of a resident is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement assessed interventions to prevent falls for 1 (Resident 4) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 66. Findings are:Record review of Resident 4's Face Sheet dated 9/15/2025 revealed Resident 4 had the diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, Spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces between spinal bones) of the Lumbar area, Radiculopathy ( a pinched or pressed nerve) in the spine of the lumbar area, hypertension, muscle weakness and Depression.Record review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 7/24/2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, method to evaluate cognitive status) was a 10. According to the MDS Manual, a score of 8 to 12 indicates moderately impaired cognition.-Required partial to moderate assistance with eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing, personal hygiene, sitting to standing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(5)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of bowel function for 1 [Resident 3] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 63 residents.Findings are:A. A review of the facility Bowel Program dated 12/10 revealed the following procedure:- 1. The charge nurse is to monitor the BM [bowel movement] sheet and or caretracker every shift.- 2. On day 1 with no bowel movement, give 4 oz. of Prune juice to resident. Do not give to diabetics or no Concentrated (NCS) diets.- 3. On day 2, with no bowel movement, give prune juice and oral laxative (MOM [Milk of Magnesia], Sorbitol, Cascara, etc.) per MD [Medical Doctor] orders.- 4. On day 3 with no bowel movement, give prune juice and suppository (Dulcolax or Bisadocyl) per MD Orders. - 5. If no BM, notify the resident's physician for possible new orders.- 6. [NAME] meds given on MAR every shift.- 7. Monthly, complete the Bowel Assessment on every resident. B. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide a rationale for not conducting a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR, Stepwise tapering of a dose to determine whether or not symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or whether or not the dose or medication can be discontinued) for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 62. Findings are: Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 5/11/2025 revealed Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 13/15. The MDS manual identified a score of 13 as cognitively intact. Record review of Resident 2's medication order summary revealed Risperidone solution 1 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL) was ordered and the amount to be administered was 0.5 mL to be taken 3 times per day for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation within the required timeframe to Adult Protective Services [APS] and the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] for 1 (Resident 39) of 5 facility investigations reviewed. The facility census was 61. Findings are: Record review of facility policies and procedures entitled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and dated 9/23/22 revealed the following information: The definition of an alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has yet to be investigated and , if verified, could be an indication of noncompliance with the federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property. Reporting and response: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the admin, state agency, adult protective services and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation for 1 (Resident 39) of 5 facility investigations reviewed. The facility census was 61. Findings are: Record review of facility policies and procedures entitled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and dated 9/23/22 revealed the following information: The definition of an alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has yet to be investigated and , if verified, could be an indication of noncompliance with the federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property. Investigation of abuse, neglect and exploitation: a. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(v) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide services as care planned to help prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 (Residents 40 and 8) out of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 61. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 04/25/2025, revealed Resident 40 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) blank score. The MDS manual identified a score of blank as resident was unable to complete the interview. Record review of Resident 40's diagnoses revealed muscle wasting and atrophy, contracture of left hand and anoxic brain damage. Record review of Resident 40's restorative care plan dated 05/12/2025 revealed staff should be performing bed mobility and passive range of motion (PROM, range of motion that is performed by the staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) & 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to date oxygen tubing for 1 (Resident 11) of 1 sampled resident. The facility also failed to utilize Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, includes clothing, gloves, face shields, goggles, facemask's, respirators, and other equipment to protect front-line workers from injury, infection, or illness) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices) for 1 (Resident 51) of 5 sampled residents and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves during the provision of medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure individualize use of restraints to include identification of medical symptoms for use, duration of use, evaluation of less restrictive alternatives, review of risk and benefits, and re-evaluation of need for a restraint in accordance with facility policy for restraint use for 3 [Residents 1, 2, and 5] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 63 residents. Findings are: A. A review of undated facility policy titled Restraint Free Environment revealed the following: -Physical Restraint: refers to any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Physical restraints may include, but are not limited to: .Placing a resident in an enclosed framed wheeled walker, in which the resident cannot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used in care planning] related to use of restraint for 2 [Residents 1 and 2] of 3 sampled residents utilizing a Merry Walker. The facility had a total census of 63 residents. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 1's Face sheet revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. A review of Resident 1's quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used in care planning] dated 3/28/25 revealed the following -Resident 1 had a BIMS [Brief Interview for Mental Status] score of 4. A review of the MDS manual revealed a score of 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment -Resident 1 required supervision or touching assistance for walking -Resident 1 used a bed alarm, chair alarm, and wander/elopement alarm daily -Resident 1 was not identified as utilizing a restraint A review of Resident 2's Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-17 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE