No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Good Shepherd Lutheran Home

2242 Wright Street, Blair, NE 68008 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 84 certified beds · (402) 426-4663 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (402) 426-4663 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited May 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited May 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
810 N 22nd St · (402) 426-1239 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1260 Washington St · (402) 533-8444 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
238 S 8th St · (402) 426-4757 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N 16 ST · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%19.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.0%4.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%4.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.4%19.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.6%96.1%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.5%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.7%20.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.4%20.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.9%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.601.811.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.461.921.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.1%CMS range 33.2–59.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.5–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge26.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified84.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.8–15.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.40
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
70.3%
Total nursing turnover
88.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 66.1 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-01)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent potential accidents for 3 (Residents 37, 55, and 57) of 3 sample residents. The facility census was 62.Findings are: A. Record Review of the facility's undated policy Safe Resident Handling/transfers revealed the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize the risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable environment for the resident while keeping the employees safe in accordance with current standards and guidelines. Policy Explanation: All residents required safe handling when transferred to prevent or minimize the risk for injury to themselves and the employees that assist them. While manual lifting techniques may be utilized dependent upon the resident's condition and mobility, the use of mechanical lifts are a safer alternative and should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the posted nurse staffing information contained the required information related to the facility census, the total number of hours worked per discipline per shift and the total number of hours worked for the each shift. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings are:Record review of an undated facility policy entitled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers revealed the following information:Policy Explanation and Implementation:Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift nurse staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. 2. The information recorded on the form shall include the following:The name of the facility.The current date.The resident census at the beginning of the shift for which the information is posted.Twenty - four hour shift schedule operated by the facility.The shift for which the information is posted.Type RN, LPN, LVN or CAN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed between 2 (Residents 58 and 62) of 2 sampled residents during dining service and failed to perform hand hygiene when indicated during food prep. This had the potential to affect all residents but 1 resident in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings are: A. RR of the facility's undated Handwashing Guidelines for Dietary Employees policy revealed the following: 6. Frequency of Handwashing: Dietary employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single service and [NAME] use articles and also in the following situations: a. Every time an employee enters the kitchen; at the beginning of the shift; after returning from break; after using the toilet. b. After hands have touched anything unsanitary i.e.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-26 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the facility assessment included information related to staffing levels needed for specific shifts, a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff and a contingency plan for events that do not require the activation of the facility emergency plan but have the potential to impact resident care. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings are:A record review of the facility's undated Facility Assessment policy revealed The facility would conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The assessment would address or include the resident population including, but not limited to number of residents and the facility's capacity, staff competencies and skill sets, physical environment, equipment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006(F)(i)(5)Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the provider of weight change greater than 5 pounds on 1 (Resident 7) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 62.Findings are:A. Record Review of the facility's undated policy Following Physician Order revealed the following: PURPOSETo ensure all physician/practitioner orders are accurately received, transcribed, communicated, implemented, monitored, and followed in accordance with professional standards of practice, resident needs, and applicable federal and state regulations.POLICYThe facility shall ensure physician/practitioner orders are implemented as written unless clarified, modified, discontinued, refused by the resident, unavailable, clinically contraindicated, or otherwise unable to be completed. Any inability to follow an order shall be identified, documented, communicated, and addressed timely.Orders include but are not limited to: Medication orders Treatment orders Laboratory and diagnostic orders Therapy orders Dietary orders Activity orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to add oxygen interventions to 1 (Resident 22) of 2 sampled resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (a detailed roadmap outlining a resident's medical, physical, and daily living needs). The facility census was 62. Findings are:A record review of the facility's undated Comprehensive Care Plans policy revealed that the care plan would include the services to be furnished to the resident. A record review of Resident 22's Clinical Census dated 05/26/2026 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 22's Medical Diagnosis dated 05/26/2026 reveled the resident had diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction (stroke) and Morbid (Severe) Obesity. A record review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 05/15/2026 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)(a score of a resident's cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow practitioner orders to obtain a urinalysis for 1 (Resident 41) of 3 residents sampled, failed to follow physician orders to notify provider of oxygen saturation less than 90% for 1 of (Resident 22) of 2 residents sampled, and failed to obtain daily weights and notify the provider of a 5 pound or greater weight gain for 1 (Resident 7) of 2 residents sampled. The facility identified a census of 62.Findings are: Findings are: A. Review of an undated facility policy titled 'Following Physician Order' revealed the following: 'PURPOSE To ensure all physician/practitioner orders are accurately received, transcribed, communicated, implemented, monitored, and followed in accordance with professional standards of practice, resident needs, and applicable federal and state regulations. POLICY The facility shall ensure physician/practitioner orders are implemented as written unless clarified,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.10(D)The facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for 2 Residents (2 and 6) of 13 Residents sampled. The facility identified a census of 62.Findings are: Findings are: A. Review of a facility policy titled Medication Administration-Medications not available with no date revealed the following Policy Statement The facility shall maintain systems to ensure medications are available for timely administration as ordered. When a medication is unavailable at the time of administration, nursing staff shall immediately initiate actions to obtain the medication, minimize interruption of therapy, ensure resident safety, and appropriately document actions taken. Medications shall not be omitted without assessment, intervention, provider notification when indicated, and appropriate follow-up. Purpose To establish procedures for managing medications that are unavailable at the time of the administration while ensuring resident safety, continuity of care, regulatory compliance, and timely communication. Procedure Identification of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(S)Based on observation and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure privacy during care for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 66. Findings are:A record review of Resident 2's Clinical Resident profile revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE].A record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment tool used in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes to evaluate a resident's functional capabilities, health needs and clinical status) revealed Resident 2 had a Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS - a mandatory evaluation tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents upon admission into a long term care facility) of 5, indicating they were severely cognitively impaired.A record review of Resident 2's undated Care Plan revealed Resident had the following diagnoses: Lymphedema (a chronic condition causing fluid buildup and swelling in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1)Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of three medical air mattresses for pressure relief (mattresses designed to prevent and treat bedsores by inflating/deflating air cells to redistribute pressure and improve circulation) were inflated in accordance with the residents' weight (Resident 2 and Resident 3). The facility had a census of 66. Findings are:A.A record review of Resident 2's Clinical Resident profile revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE].A record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment tool used in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes to evaluate a resident's functional capabilities, health needs and clinical status) revealed Resident 2 had a Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS - a mandatory evaluation tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents upon admission into a long term care facility) of 5,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that wound care was being provided to residents in a manner that would prevent cross contamination of the wounds for 3 of 3 residents surveyed (Residents 2, 3 and 4). The facility had a census of 66. Findings are:A. A record review of the facilities Infection Control Guidelines for all Nursing Procedures, revised April 2013, revealed the following: Employees must wash their hands for ten to fifteen seconds using antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial soap and water under the following conditions:After handling items potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids or secretions In most situations, the preferred method of hand hygiene is with an alcohol-based hand rub. If hands are not visibly soiled, used an alcohol-based hand rub containing 60-95% ethanol or isopropanol for all the following situations:Before and after direct contact with residents;A record review of the facility's undated Handwashing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11 E The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and gloving were performed in a manner to prevent the potential for food borne illness and failed to maintain the cleanliness and condition of shelving units, serving windows, equipment, floors, ventilation systems, and storage carts in the facility kitchen. This had the potential to affect 66 residents in the facility that ate foods prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings are: A. Record review of a facility policy entitled Hand Washing dated 3/19/2020 revealed the following: Hand hygiene will be performed for a minimum of 20 seconds. Procedures: Guidelines on when to perform hand hygiene may include - before preparing or handling food. - - after removing personal protective equipment ( gloves) Perform hand hygiene as follows: a. If using soap and water, turn on faucet, holding fingertips downward to prevent water from running down the arm. Apply soap and work into a lather. b. Rub all surfaces of the hands for at least 20 seconds. c. i. Rinse hands under running…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(B) Based on record review observation, and interview, the facility staff failed to implement measures to prevent the potential contamination of resident supplies that affect all residents in the facility, the facility staff failed to change oxygen tubing per practitioner's order for Resident 26, and the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for Resident 50. The facility identified a census of 66. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility provided policy titled Storage Areas, Maintenance, dated December 2009 revealed, all storage areas must be kept free from accumulation of trash, rubbish, oily rags, paper, etc., at all times. Record review of a receipt of payment to dated 5/8/2024 to a roofing company for the amount of $4000.00 related to work that applied a patch to the roof. A record review on 4/30/2025 revealed a facility provided email dated May 10, 2024, indicating the management company was aware of the functional damage the campus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19A Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to repair leaks in the facility's roof. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. The Facility identified a census of 66. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy titled Storage Areas, Maintenance, dated December 2009 revealed, all storage areas must be kept free from accumulation of trash, rubbish, oily rags, paper, etc., at all times. A record review on 4/30/2025 of an email dated May 10, 2024 revealed the management company was aware of the functional damage the campus sustained. Record review of a receipt of payment to dated 5/8/2024 to a roofing company for the amount of $4000.00 related to work that applied a patch to the roof. An observation on 4/30/25 8:45 AM with the Administrator (ADM) revealed the office in the therapy gym had discolored water like stained ceiling tiles that are brown with black in the center, and the therapy gym above a TV that has portions of plaster substance missing with brick exposed behind…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-007.04 D Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a working ventilation system in 20 (302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 310, 311, 400, 401, 402, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411) of 28 occupied resident rooms on the 300 and 400 halls in the facility. The total number of occupied resident rooms in the facility was 52. The facility census was 66. Findings are: Observations of the facility environment on 05/01/25 between 8:30 AM and 9:15 AM with the facility Maintenance Director [MD] revealed that the ventilation system in resident bathrooms in rooms 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 310, 311, 400, 401, 402, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411 did not draw a 1 ply square of tissue to the surface of the ventilation covers in resident bathrooms. The fact that the tissue square was not drawn to the cover indicated that the system was non-operational at the time of the observation. Interview on 05/01/25 at 09:15 AM with the MD confirmed the ventilation system did not draw in bathrooms on the 300 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record reviews and interviews; the facility failed to notify the medical practitioner and family of 1 (Resident 52) of 5 residents sampled for refusal to take medications. The facility census was 66. Findings are: Record review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 03/28/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 99. The MDS manual identified a score of 99 as resident was unable to complete the interview. Record review of Resident 52's Order Summary dated 4/29/2025 revealed the following medications were prescribed by the practitioner: -Acetamin tab 325 milligrams (mg) twice daily for pain -Aspirin 81 mg for heart health -Atorvastatin 80 mg for hyperlipidemia (an elevated level of lipids - like cholesterol and triglycerides in your blood) -Carvedilol 10 mg extended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G) Based on record reviews and interview; the facility failed to ensure a rationale was documented for the continued use of PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication for 1 (Resident 42) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 66. The findings are: A record review of a facility policy entitled Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations dated revised August 2024 revealed: -D. Psychotropic PRN (as-needed) medication order (excluding antipsychotics): Order for PRN psychotropic medication will be time limited (i.e., 14 days) and only for specific clearly documented circumstances. -a. Order may be extended beyond 14 days if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner: -b. Believes it is appropriate to extend the order -and -c. Documents clinical rationale for the extension -and -d. Provides a specific duration of use. -e. Rationale should include effectiveness, ongoing specific diagnosed conditions, indication, and duration. A record review of Resident 42's admission Record identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(8) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse within the required timeframe to Adult Protective Services (APS) for 1 (Resident 119) of 4 facility self-report investigations reviewed. The facility census was 66. Findings are: Record review of an undated facility policy entitled Abuse and Neglect Reporting revealed the following information: All staff members, residents, visitors are required to immediately report any incidents or suspected incidents of resident mistreatment, abuse, or neglect, exploitation, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of properties. Procedure: 1. Any alleged violations involving abuse or negligence neglect including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of resident property must be reported. 3. Staff members aware of an incident or suspected incident of abuse or neglect must immediately report knowledge of such incidents to the charge nurse, department head or administration. 5. The staff person receiving the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05 Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to notify the resident and resident representative in writing of the reason for hospital transfer for 1 (Resident 20) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 66. The findings are: A record review of a facility policy entitled Bed-hold Agreement dated Revised 05/2023 revealed: -2. When an emergency transfer is necessary (e.g. ER transfer), the facility will provide the resident or his/her representative with a copy of the bed-hold agreement at the time of transfer. -3. A copy of the bed-hold agreement will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they can understand. The notice will include all of the following: -a. The specific reason and basis for the transfer or discharge. A record review of Resident 20's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/29/2023. Further review of Resident 20's admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(ii) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within 7 days of the completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) for 1 (Resident 219) of 21 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 66. The findings are: A record review of a facility policy entitled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 2001 revealed: -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required MDS assessment (Admission, annual or sig change) and no more than 21 days after admission. A record review of Resident 219's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 06/05/2024 identified the facility admitted the resident on 05/29/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observation of 25 medications administered revealed two errors resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. The medication errors affected 2 (Resident 39 and Resident 42) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 66. The findings are: A. Record review of Resident 39's Medication Administration Record (MAR) printed on 04/30/2025 revealed the following medications to be administered at 7:00 AM: -insulin lispro (a rapid-acting insulin) inject 5 units -insulin lispro inject per sliding scale -Omeprazole 40 milligrams (mg) An observation on 04/30/2025 at 6:55 AM of Registered Nurse (RN)-Y administering medication for Resident 39 revealed the RN-Y obtained Resident 39's blood sugar reading of 107 from a continuous glucose monitor and determined that sliding scale insulin was not required. RN-Y administered the oral medication with water. At 7:01 AM RN-Y injected 5 units of insulin lispro…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected 1 (Resident 45) of 4 sampled residents. The findings are: A record review of a facility policy entitled Medication Administration - Insulin dated 06/22/2014 revealed: -Rapid-acting insulin (e.g., Novolog, Humalog) Onset 10-15 minutes, Peak 0.5-3 hours, Duration 3-6 hours. -Important Points: -RAPID-ACTING insulin (or a rapid-acting insulin mixed with either an intermediate or long-acting insulin) would be injected immediately prior to a meal, or administered concurrent with food such as graham crackers. A record review of Resident 39's Medication Administration Record (MAR) printed 04/30/2025 revealed the resident was to receive 5 units insulin lispro (a rapid-acting insulin used to aid blood sugar control) before meals. An observation on 04/30/2025 at 7:01 AM revealed that Registered Nurse (RN)-Y injected 5 units of insulin lispro into the right upper arm after oral medications were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-23 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure that the designated infection preventionist was certified. This had the ability to affect all residents in the facility. The facility claimed a census of 70. Findings are: A record review of the facility Infection Control Program dated 7/2019 and revised on 10/11/2019 and 3/26/2020 revealed the following: Paragraph 2. A nurse (RN - Registered Nurse or LPN - Licensed Practical Nurse) will be designated as the facility Infection Preventionist and will complete required training related to the role of an Infection Preventionist. An interview on 04/22/2024 at 1:32PM with the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) revealed they are not currently a certified Infection Preventionist but expect to complete the required IP certification in May of 2024. An interview on 04/22/2024 at 3:34PM with the Facility Administrator confirmed the facility does not have a certified Infection Preventionist at this time but the designated IP is expected to be certified by May 2024.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to position a catheter bag in a manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination for 1 (Resident 20) of 2 residents observed with urinary catheters. The facility census was 70. Findings are: Record review of a facility policy entitled Catheter Care - Suprapubic [suprapubic catheter: a hollow flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder. It is inserted into the bladder through a cut in the stomach just below the navel] dated [DATE] revealed the following information: Residents with Suprapubic catheters will have routine catheter care performed in a manner to minimize the opportunities for infection. Policy Interpretation and implementation: Check the following items: Catheter bag is not laying on the floor. Record review of Resident 20's Clinical Census report revealed that Resident 20 was admitted [DATE]. Resident 20's Diagnoses report identified that Resident 20 had diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6). Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify responsible party of weight loss for 1 [Resident 3] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 69 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 3's admission Record revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. A review of Resident 3's 3/21/2024 annual MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] assessment revealed a BIMS [Brief Interview for Mental Status is used to get a quick snapshot of how well you are functioning cognitively at the moment] was not completed. Resident 3 was identified as having short-term and long-term memory problems. Resident 3 was identified as having a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or a loss of 10% or more in last 6 months. A review of Registered Dietitian annual assessment of Resident 3 dated 3/19/24 revealed the following: -Height 63 inches, weight 116.5 lbs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    175 NAC 12-006.04A3 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the required Background and Registry checks were performed prior to employees beginning to work independently in the facility. This affected 4 of 5 employees sampled for Background and Registry checks and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 51. Findings are: A review of lists provided by facility titled New Agency Staff Since Jan. 1, 2023 and All New Hires Since 01/01/2023 provided a sample of 5 new employees to review. A. A review of the employee file for Nursing Assistant (NA) A revealed a hire date of 3/23/23. Further review revealed the employee file contained a Background Check dated 3/21/23 that revealed a misdemeanor from 2007. The employee file also contained a Nebraska Central Registry Request [a request to check the Nebraska Child Abuse and Neglect Central Registry (CAN Registry)/ Nebraska Adult Protective Services Central Registry (APS Registry) for information regarding the employee] dated 3/27/23. This form revealed an Agency Substantiated incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) regarding medications for Residents 10, 13, and 4, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review [PASARR-a federal requirement to help ensure that residents are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. Level II screening is triggered by evidence of a serious mental illness (MI), Intellectual or Developmental Disabilities (IDD) or condition related to IDD (RC) as defined by state or federal] for Resident 41 and falls for Resident 4. This affected 4 of 14 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 51. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 10's active orders revealed orders for medications that include the following: METHENAM HIP (Methenamine Hippurate-an antibiotic) TAB (tablet) 1GM (gram) Take 1 table by mouth twice daily with a start date of 6/1/22. TRIPLE ANTIBIOTIC-OINT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10A Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a self-medication assessment had been completed prior to leaving medications at the bedside for 1 (Resident 41) of 1 resident sampled. The facility census was 51. Findings are: An observation on 4/30/23 at 1:25 PM revealed a tube of Diclofenac Gel 1% (a medication to help with pain control) in a basin on Resident 41's over bed table. An observation on 5/1/23 at 11:00 AM revealed a tube of Diclofenac Gel 1% in a basin on Resident 41's over bed table. A review of Resident 41's physician orders, dated 5/3/23, revealed an order for Diclofenac Gel 1%, apply topically (to skin) to affected area four times daily as needed may keep at bedside, start date 9/21/22. A review of the facilities Medication-Self Administration policy, dated 6/22/14, revealed the following: -The staff and/or practitioner will periodically reevaluate a resident's ability to continue to self-administer medications. It is recommended that this be done quarterly and with any significant change.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 175 NAC 12-006.05(5) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to Resident 47 and/or their representative upon transfer to the hospital. The facility census was 51. Findings are: Record review revealed Resident 47 was hospitalized on [DATE], 10/30/22, 2/3/23, 3/16/23, and 5/1/23. Record review revealed that there was no documentation that the facility notified the resident and/or representative of the transfer in a written notice and the reason for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. On 5/2/23 at 3:03 PM Interview with Social Services Director (SSD) confirmed that a hospital written transfer notice was not given to resident 47 and/or personal representative when transferred to the hospital on 9/19/22, 10/30/22, 2/3/23, 3/16/23 and 5/1/23. SSD confirmed that the facility has not been doing this.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a new PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, a screening to determine the presence of a mental illness or intellectual disability) review had been completed after a diagnosis of a mental disorder was identified for Resident 21. The facility census was 51. Findings are: Record review revealed PASARR I dated 12/22/22, 1/21/22 and 2/2/23 for Resident #21 with Diagnosis of Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. Record review revealed new diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder on 3/18/23. Interview on 5/2/23 at 2:50 PM with Social Service Director confirmed that the facility did not have a PASARR II for this resident. Record review of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Policy dated 6/22/19 revealed: 7) Any resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, ID, or a related condition (see F644) shall be referred by the facility to the appropriate mental health or ID authority for review.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to attempt a non-pharmacological intervention (NPI) prior to administration of an as needed medication for 1 (Resident 4) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. Findings are: A review of Resident 4's physician orders, dated 5/2/23, revealed the following order: -Hydromorphon (a medication to treat pain) tab 2 milligram (mg) take ¼ tablet (0.5mg) by mouth every 1 hour as needed (PRN) A review of Resident 4's March 2023, April 2023, and May 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed that Resident 4 received the Hydromorphon 26 times with no NPI attempted prior to administration. An interview on 5/2/23 at 8:48 AM, Medication Aide (MA)-I revealed that prior to a PRN pain medication being administered a NPI must be attempted and charted in the medication administration record (MAR) or progress notes. An interview on 5/2/23 at 10:35 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no NPIs charted in Resident 4's progress notes or MARs related to the PRN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to attempt a non-pharmacological intervention (NPI) prior to administration of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (a medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts or perception) for 1 (Resident 4) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 51. Findings are: A review of Resident 4's physician orders, dated 5/2/23, revealed the following orders: -Lorazepam (a medication to treat anxiety) Con 2 milligram (mg)/milliliter (ml) give 0.5ml by mouth/sublingually (under the tongue) every 1 hour as needed - Zolpidem (a medication to treat sleeplessness) tablet (tab) 5mg take 1 tab by mouth at bedtime as needed A review of Resident 4's March 2023, April 2023, and May 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed that Resident 4 received the PRN Lorazepam 39 times and PRN Zolpidem 50 times with no NPI attempted prior to administration. An interview on 5/2/23 at 8:48 AM, Medication Aide (MA)-I revealed that prior to a PRN psychotropic medication being administered a NPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    175 NAC 12-006.17B 175 NAC 12-006.17D Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination during wound care for 1 resident (Resident 10) of 3 sampled for wound care, and the facility failed to ensure storage and cleaning of respiratory equipment in a manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination for 2 residents (Residents 4 and 41) of 2 sampled for Respiratory Care. The facility census was 51. Findings are: A. During an observation of a dressing change to the coccyx (tailbone) wound for Resident 10 on 5/2/23 from 1:28 PM to 1:45 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F gathered wound care supplies and assisted a Nursing Assistant to get Resident 10 in bed. LPN F then removed gloves, did not perform hand hygiene, and adjusted Resident 10's pillow. Without performing hand hygiene, LPN F put on new gloves, then assisted Resident 10 to turn on the left hip. LPN F touched the resident's wound. With the same soiled gloves, LPN F got a clean washcloth out of the bathroom, opened the bottle of sterile saline, poured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.18b The facility failed to ensure that the kitchen walk in refrigerator door and walk in freezer door was in a safe working condution. The facility census was 51. Findings are: Observation on 4/30/23 at 8:20 AM of the walk in freezer reveal upon entering the freezer, the door to the walk in freezer shut. Further observations revealed upon attempting to exit the walk-in freezer, the freezer door would not open requiring knocking on the inside of the freezer door to obtain the attention of dietary staff. Observation on 4/30/2023 at 8:30 AM revealed the walk in refrigerator door did not close requiring dietary staff to push forcefully in order to get the door to close. On 4-30-2023 at 8:45 AM an interview was conducted with Dietary Aid (DA) A. During the interview DA A reported both the walk-in freezer and the walk-in refrigerator had not been working or repaired. On 5-01-2023 at 7:58 AM an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). During the interview the DM confirmed the walk-in freezer and walk-in refrigerator has not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HERZKA, MATISYOHUIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/23/2023
SCHREIBER, ABRAHAMIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/29/2023
GIBSON, CANDACEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/29/2023
SIMONSON, JOHNNIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/29/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$336K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 6%Other / private 26%

This home reported $336K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,163per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$340per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285148. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next