Cascades at Skyview
505 O Street, Bridgeport, NE 69336 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 48 certified beds · (308) 262-0725 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $141,424 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-17)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 33% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.7% | 19.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.7% | 18.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.9% | 19.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.4% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.7% | 25.9% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.9% | 20.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.91 | 1.81 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.77 | 1.92 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 80% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.7%CMS range 26.7–56.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.1–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 8.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 3.2–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 25.0 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kdisputed · IDR2025-06-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 Based on observations, record review, and interview; the facility failed to have sufficient staff on duty to prevent the potential for serious harm or injury while performing transfers via Hoyer or sit-to-stand mechanical lifts, this had the potential to affect 11 (Residents 1, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) of 11 residents sampled. The facility failed to have sufficient staff on duty to ensure residents receive assistance with their Activities of Daily Living per their plan of care for 6 (Resident 1,2,3,4,12,and 19). The total survey sample was 19. The facility identified a census of 36. The facility administrator was notified on 6/7/2025 at 9:20 PM of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 5/5/2025. The IJ was removed on 6/7/2025, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Findings Are: A record review of a facility provided document SCARAB (Skyview Care and Rehab at Bridgeport) Facility Assessment- 2025 dated 6/4/2025 revealed under the staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews; the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for 1 (Resident 6) of 1 sample resident and the failed to implement interventions and complete wound care treatments as ordered for 4 (Resident 2, 3, 6, and 18) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 25.Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, (dated March 2005) revealed the following: - Pressure ulcers are usually formed when a resident remains in the same position for an extended period of time causing increased pressure or a decrease of circulation (blood flow) to that area and subsequent destruction of tissue. - The most common site of a pressure ulcer is where the bone is near the surface of the body including the back of the head around the ears, elbows, shoulder blades,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect by ensuring adequate supplies to meet residents' needs for 2 (Resident 2 and Resident 14) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 25.Findings are:A record review of the SCARAB (Skyview Care and Rehab at Bridgeport) Facility Assessment - 2025 (dated 11/10/2025) revealed the following:- Services offered include pressure injury prevention and wound care.- The nurse management team assesses medical supplies weekly to ensure availability.A.A record review of the facility's policy, Wound Care (dated December 2011) in preparation for wound care, assembled all equipment and supplies needed. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 2 on 1/20/2017. Resident 2 had diagnoses of dementia (a usually progressive condition marked by the development of multiple cognitive deficits such as memory impairment, aphasia, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-17 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to identify and address uncontrolled pain and withdrawal symptoms when the resident could no longer reliably swallow their oral medications for 1 (Resident 6) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 25.Findings are: A record review of the facility's policy, Pain - Clinical Protocol (dated October 2022) revealed the following:- Nursing staff will identify any situation or interventions where an increase in the residents' pain may be anticipated.- Nursing staff will reassess the resident's pain at regular intervals, at least every shift for acute pain or significant changes in levels of chronic pain.- Nursing staff will evaluate and report on the residents' use of standing and as needed pain medications.- There was no evidence of how pain should be evaluated for residents who are non-verbal. A record review of Resident 6's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 6 on 12/11/2018. Resident 6 had diagnoses of dementia and generalized muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 4) did not develop pressure ulcers (also known as bed sores, areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for too long, commonly formed under boney prominence's) that were unavoidable and failed to provide monitoring, treatment and care as ordered to promote healing for 3 (Residents 4, 6, and 18) of 3 sampled residents' pressure ulcers. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A record review of an undated facility policy Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment, revealed if pressure ulcers are not treated immediately upon discovery, they can quickly get larger and become very painful and infected for the resident. Pressure ulcers are a serious condition for the resident and once developed, can be extremely difficulty to heal. Resident's skin should be routinely assessed and the condition of the resident's skin documented per the following: -A pressure ulcer risk assessment will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(D)(i)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit a director of nursing continuous coverage notification to the state agency as required. This had the potential to affect all residents.Findings are: Record review of the Change of Director of Nursing Notification Form submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services by the facility revealed no Director of Nursing (DON) coverage between the dates of 4/29/2026 and 5/4/2026. Interview with Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) at 6/16/2026 at 11:35 AM revealed that RNC was the DON during the gap stated above, but it was not recorded on paper to confirm. Interview with Administrator (ADM) at 6/16/2026 at 11:35 AM confirmed that the Change of Director of Nursing Notification Form does show a gap of DON coverage between 4/29/2026 and 5/4/2026. ADM confirmed the facility does not have written proof of DON coverage in that time frame.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
175 NAC 12-006.11(E)Based on observations and record reviews, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene with soap and water for a minimum of 20 seconds. The facility failed to ensure cleanliness of the kitchen to prevent the potential for cross contamination. The facility also failed to label and seal stored foods. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility showed a census of 25.Findings are: Observations made beginning at 8:20 AM on 6/11/2026 revealed in the dry storage area, there were 4 boxes of baking soda on the shelf, each with an expiration date of July 2024. Also, in the dry storage there was 1 large bag of macaroni noodles that were open and unsealed with no open date on the packaging. Inside the storage area there were 3 separate freezers. Inside one of the freezers there was 1 bag of hashbrowns that were not sealed and did not have an open date listed on the packaging. That same freezer also had a package of frozen corn tortillas that did not have an expiration or best by date. Inside another freezer there was one more bag of hashbrowns that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure number 175 NAC 12-006.05Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed of and consented to treatment prior to the administration of psychotropic medications for 2 (Resident 4 and Resident 21) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 25 residents.Findings include: A. Record review of Resident 4's admission Record dated June 10, 2026 revealed Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Record review conducted on June 10, 2026, of Resident 4's Doctor's Progress Note dated December 5, 2025, revealed Resident 4 was prescribed Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication used to treat major depressive disorder). Record review of Resident 4's medical record revealed no evidence of informed consent being obtained prior to the first dose of their Seroquel being administered. B. Record review of Resident 21's admission Record dated June 10, 2026 revealed Resident 21 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D)Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS was coded accurately to reflect wandering behavior for one (Resident 16) of twelve sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 25.Findings are: Record review of Resident 16's admission Record dated 6/15/2026 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 16's Diagnosis Information dated 6/15/2026 revealed a diagnosis of Dementia (a usually progressive condition marked by the development of multiple cognitive deficits [such as memory impairment, aphasia, and the inability to plan and initiate complex behavior]) was added on 2/10/2025. A diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy (when the brain has trouble working because of a chemical, or metabolic, problem in the body which can cause confusion and memory loss) was added on 2/10/2025. A diagnosis of Restlessness and Agitation (involve feelings of inner tension, mental distress,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide behavioral health care and services to one sampled resident (Resident 5). The facility identified a census of 25 residents. Findings are:Record review of a facility document titled, admission record, revealed Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of arthropathy (arthritis) in their left shoulder, chronic bronchitis, protein-calorie malnutrition, obstructive bladder dysfunction, history of falling, and depression. Record review of Resident 5's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities) dated 3/4/26 revealed the following:Section C revealed Resident 5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score 15 of a possible 15 points, indicating they were cognitively intact.Section I (Active diagnoses) revealed Resident 5 had an active diagnosis of depression within the last 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(vii) Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a secure disposal of medication for 1 (Resident 4) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 23. Findings are: Record Review of Resident 4's care plan, revised on 11/11/2024 revealed an admission date of 5/27/2022.Record review of Resident 4's order summary dated 2/18/2026 revealed an order for Potassium Chloride with an indication of nutritional supplement and a start date of 4/16/2025.Record Review of the facility's Discarding and Destroying Medication policy revised November 2022 revealed Non-controlled and Schedule V (non-hazardous) controlled substances are disposed of in accordance with state regulations and federal guidelines regarding disposition of non-hazardous medications.Observation made on 2/18/2026 at 9:42 AM revealed that MA-A prepared Resident 4's AM (morning) medications, which included their Potassium Chloride, and carried the medications into Resident 4's room in a medication cup. MA-A then mixed the medications into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than 5%. Out of 31 medication administration opportunities, there were 6 medication errors affecting 2 (Residents 6 and Resident 4) of 3 sampled residents, resulting in a 19.35% medication error rate. The facility identified a census of 23.Findings are:A.Record review of Resident 6's order summary dated 2/1/2026 revealed an order for Calmoseptine External Ointment 0.44-20.6% with an indication of Apply to bilateral buttocks topically four times a day for barrier protection with a start date of 1/7/2025. Record review of Resident 6's order summary also revealed and order for Multivitamin Oral tablet with an indication of Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to pressure ulcer of sacral region with a start date of 5/22/2025. Record Review of Resident 6's care plan, revised 5/23/2025, revealed an admission date of 6/11/2025. Observation at 8:30 AM on 2/18/2026 of medication administration revealed Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the provider of a change in condition for 3 (Residents 2, 6, and 14) of 6 sampled residents and failed to notify the provider of the inability to follow provider orders for diabetic care for 3 (Residents 14, 7, and 17) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 25.A record review of the facility's policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status (dated February 2021) revealed the nurse would notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a significant in the resident's physical/emotion/mental condition or the need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly within 24 hours. A. A record review of Resident 6's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 6 on 12/11/2018. Resident 6 had diagnoses of dementia and generalized muscle weakness. A record review of Resident 6's quarterly MDS with a date of 8/12/2025 revealed Resident 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assist residents with bathing for 3 (Resident 2, 6, and 18) of 3 sample residents. The facility identified a census of 24.Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 6's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 6 on 12/11/2018. Resident 6 had diagnoses of dementia (a usually progressive condition marked by the development of multiple cognitive deficits such as memory impairment, aphasia, and the inability to plan and initiate complex behavior) and generalized muscle weakness.A record review of Resident 6's quarterly MDS with a date of 8/12/2025 revealed Resident 6 was fully dependent on staff for bathing and required total assistance for transferring in and out of the tub/shower. A record review of Resident 6's Documentation Survey Report v2 for September 2025 revealed Resident 6 received a bath on 9/26/2025. A record review of Resident 6's Documentation Survey Report v2 for October 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)&(iv)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to follow their bowel protocol to prevent constipation for 1 (Resident 6) of 4 sampled residents, and failed to implement orders as written by the provider for 4 (Residents 1, 3, 11, and 17) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 25. A. A record review of a facility policy titled Bowel and Bladder program and Toileting Program dated October 2010 stated every night shift, the charge nurse is responsible for reviewing the Clinical Dashboard Alerts and completing the Bowel Movement (BM) Monitoring Form: -Interventions for no BM x 3 days: Milk of Magnesia 30 ml (Milliliter), by mouth (po) -monitor for effectiveness. -Interventions for no BM x 4 days: Bisacodyl suppository 10 mg (Milligrams) per rectum PRN (as needed) -monitor for effectiveness. -Interventions for no BM x 5 days: Fleets Enema 1 unit per rectum PRN-Monitor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide and report timely laboratory services for 4 (Residents 7, 8, 14, and 17) of 7 sampled residents and failed to perform blood glucose monitoring per the provider's orders for 3 (Residents 7, 14, and 17) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 25.A. A record review of Resident 7's face sheet revealed Resident 7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the body cannot regulate blood sugar effectively), obesity, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm that is irregular in the chambers of the heart are out of sync). A record review of a facility document scanned into Resident 7's electronic medical record dated 10/3/25 revealed a new provider order from the Nurse Practitioner (NP) to obtain a BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel, a blood test that measures 8 substances in the blood that relate to chemical balance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure significant medication errors did not occur for 2 (Residents 10 and 14) of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 25.A.A record review of Resident 10's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of postlaminectomy syndrome (a complication after spinal surgery involving persistent pain), chronic pain syndrome and muscle spasms of the back. A record review of Resident 10's Provider Visit note dated 10/23/2025 revealed the resident was seen due to recent drowsiness and dizziness. The resident had described these symptoms as emerging after their Baclofen (a muscle relaxer) dose was increased from 10 milligrams (mg) to 15 mg, in addition to their ongoing use of tizanidine (a muscle relaxer). In the treatment section of this note, it stated the provider was going to change the resident's Tizanidine 2 mg to PRN (as needed) every 6 hours. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observations, interviews, and record review; the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination during wound care for 2 (Residents 3 and 6) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 25.Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Wound Care with revision date of December 2011 revealed in the Steps in the Procedure section that Step 1 was to use a disposable cloth (paper towel is adequate) to establish clean field on resident's overbed table. Place all items to be used during procedure on the clean field. Arrange the supplies so they can be easily reached. A.A record review of Resident 3's Order Summary Report dated 11/12/2025 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The report also revealed the resident had the following wound care orders:-Cleanse right posterior thigh proximal and distal sites with wound cleanser, apply skin prep, apply hydrogel, cover with border dressing. This order had a start date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(D) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a) implement contact precautions as ordered by the physician, b) implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and adhere to infection control standards during wound care, c) and adhere to infection control standards during medication administration for 3 residents (Residents 3, 12 and 18.) These lapses created a risk of cross-contamination and potential transmission of infection to all residents residing within the facility. The facility identified a census of 28.Findings are: A. A record review of the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) article Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: A Serious Public Health Threat revealed pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria are a common cause of infection in the healthcare setting. They can cause pneumonia, bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections (UTI), and surgical site infections, and they are particularly dangerous for patients with chronic lung disease. The bacteria…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-00604(D)Nebraska Revised Statute 71-6018.02(a) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable documentation (timecards, time sheets, payroll information) that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for a minimum of 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, as required. This had the potential to affect all 28 residents by limiting access to RN-level assessment, oversight, and decision-making related to resident care.Findings are: A record review of a facility provided document SCARAB (Skyview Care and Rehab at Bridgeport) Facility Assessment- 2025 dated 6/4/2025 revealed under the staffing type section, nursing services of the Director of Nursing (DON), RN, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Nurse Aides (NA), and Medication Aides (MA) were needed to provide support and care for the facility's residents. Under the staffing plan section, it was revealed that a total of 5 licensed nurses providing direct care were needed. There was no evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3) Based on observations, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with their Activities of Daily Living per their plan of care for 6 (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, and 19) of 6 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting with a revision date of March 2018 revealed that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. An interview on 6/7/25 at 10:14 PM with Nursing Assistant ( NA)-L and NA-M revealed both NA's worked the night shift. NA-M stated that three nights earlier, it was after midnight before the staff finished getting the residents into bed for the night due to the lack of staff that had been available to provide cares for the residents on the evening shift. A. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent the potential for serious harm or injury while performing transfers via Hoyer or sit-to-stand mechanical lifts, this had the potential to affect 11 (Residents 1, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) of 11 residents sampled. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical with revision date of July 2017 revealed in the General Guidelines that at least two nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. The policy also revealed that the types of lifts that may be available in the facility are a floor-based full body sling lift, an overhead full body sling lift, and a sit to stand lift. A record review of the facility provided Resident List dated 6/7/25 revealed Residents 4, 9, 10, 14, and 16 were marked as utilizing a Hoyer lift. The list also revealed Residents 1, 6, 11, 12, 13, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(3) Based on observations, interviews, and record review; the facility failed to implement interventions of repositioning and failed to re-evaluate and revise ineffective interventions for 1 (Resident 9) of 1 sampled resident with Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD, a condition that occurs when skin is repeatedly exposed to various sources of bodily secretions or effluents, often leading to irritant contact dermatitis with inflammation, with or without denudation of affected skin). The facility identified a census of 28. Findings are:A record review of the facility policy provided when the policy related to skin assessments was requested, Prevention of Pressure Injuries with a revision date of April 2020, revealed in the Mobility/Repositioning section the staff were to reposition all resident with or at risk of pressure injuries on an individualized scheduled, as determined by the interdisciplinary team. The policy also revealed in the Monitoring section,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on observations, record reviews and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observations of 25 opportunities of medication administration revealed 5 medication errors resulting in a medication error rate of 20%. The medication errors effected 2 (Resident 4 and 17). The survey had a total sample size of 19. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Administering Medications with a last revised date of April 2019 revealed medications are to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The individual administering the medication should check the label three times to verify the right resident, medication, dosage, time, and route prior to administering the medication. A record review of a facility policy, Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors with a last revised date of February 2023 revealed examples of medication errors include omission (when a drug is ordered but not administered),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three doses of an intravenous (IV) antibacterial medication were not omitted for 1 (Resident 7) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors with a last revised date of February 2023 revealed examples of medication errors include omission (when a drug is ordered but not administered), unauthorized drug (when a drug is administered without a physician's order), wrong dose, wrong route, wrong drug, wrong time, or failure to follow manufacturer's instructions and /or accepted professional standards. The policy defined signification medication-related errors as the requirement for the medication to be discontinued or modified, required hospitalization, resulting in disability, requiring treatment with a prescription medication, resulting in cognitive deuteriation, life threatening, or resulting in death. A record review from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-17 · tag F0729 — widespreadVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(A)(iii)(2)(a) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to complete a nurse aide registry check prior to hire as required for 5 [Nurse Aide (NA) - E, NA-O, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Dietary Aide (DA) - A, and Dietary Supervisor (DS)] of 5 sampled employees. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside within the facility. The census was 36. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Background Screening Investigations with a last revised date of March 2019 revealed for any individual applying for a position of a NA, the state NA registry is contacted to determine if any findings of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or theft have been entered into the applicant's file. There was no evidence of a nurse aide registry check being completed prior to hire if the employee has direct, unsupervised access to residents. A record review of a facility staff list, with a date of 3/10/2025, revealed the following: -NA-E was hired on 12/6/2024. -NA-O was hired on 10/30/2024. -The ADON was hired on 11/20/2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-17 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure 12 hours of ongoing training had been completed for the year for 5 [Nurse Aide (NA) - G, NA-H, NA- F, MA-I, and NA- K] of 5 sampled employees. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside within the facility. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A record review of the facility's SCARAB Facility Assessment with a last revised date of 1/15/2024 revealed nurse aides will complete at least 12 hours of ongoing training per year, including dementia and abuse. A record review of a facility staff list, with a date of 3/10/2025, revealed the following: - NA-G was hired on 8/11/1989. - NA-H was hired on 9/1/2018. - NA-F was hired on 8/30/2023. - MA-I was hired on 1/13/2023. - NA-K was hired on 12/17/2018. A. A record review of an In-Service Quiz - Infection Control with a date of 3/8/2024 had been completed by NA-G, however, at the time exit, the facility had not provided evidence of hours completed for this training. A record review of in-services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175-NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired foods, clean dry storage area and freezer, failed to implement hand hygiene practices to prevent the potential for cross contamination, use hair and beard restraints, and obtain food temperatures prior to serving to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate from the kitchen. The facility census was 36 . Findings are: A. An observation during the initial kitchen tour on 3/10/2025 from 7:30 AM to 8:18 AM revealed the two upright freezers with dried old food particles in the bottom and dark stains with black smears on the outside of the freezers. One freezer with approximately 3 inch ice build up around inside on the sides and top, the inside of the door with yellow stains from a food spillage and dried old food particles on the bottom. The dry food storage area revealed 1 bag of spiral rotini unsealed and no date, 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing services in order to maintain good hygiene for 3 (Residents 13, 15, and 16) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Activities of Daily Living, Supporting with a last revised date of March 2018 revealed appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), including hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care) independently, with consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care. A. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 16 to the facility on 1/20/2017 with diagnoses of a cerebral aneurysm (a weakened area in the wall of a blood vessel in the brain that bulges.) Resident 16 also had diagnoses of dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09 (I) Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.19(A) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: develop and implement interventions for Resident 32's falls, failed to ensure Resident 17's carpet was free from buckling to prevent the potential for an avoidable accident. The sample size was 4. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility policy, Assessing Falls and Their Causes with a last revised date of October 2010 revealed after a resident falls, appropriate interventions to prevent future falls will be recorded in the resident's medical record. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 32 on 8/4/2023 with a diagnosis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (a caner of the blood and bone marrow.) Resident 32 also had diagnoses of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a heart rhythm disorder that can cause rapid, irregular heartbeats, shortness of breath, dizziness, and fatigue),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of staff-to-resident abuse to the required State agency within 2 hours involving 1 (Resident 33) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, with a last revised date of July 2017, revealed all alleged violations involving abuse will be reported to the State agency and Adult Protective Services (APS) within two hours of the alleged violation. A record review of a facility policy, Identifying Types of Abuse, with a last revised date of September 2022, revealed mental abuse is the use of verbal or non-verbal conduct which causes (or has the potential to cause) the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. Verbal abuse may be considered to be a type of mental abuse. Verbal abuse includes the use of verbal, written or gestured communication, or sounds, to residents within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify 1 (Resident 17) of 1 sampled resident's representative in writing, as required, of the reason for Resident 17's transfer to the hospital. The facility census was 36. Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated with revision date of October 2022 revealed in the Policy Statement, Facility-Initiated transfers and discharges, when necessary, must meet specific criteria and require resident/representative notification. A record review of Resident 17's Progress Notes dated 3/7/25 revealed the resident had a change in condition, the facility had received an order from the provider to transfer the resident to the hospital for evaluation, and the facility called the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) and notified them that Resident 17 was being transferred. The Progress Notes also revealed that Resident 17 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with sepsis. A record review of Resident 17's electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify 1 (Resident 17) of 1 sampled resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of Resident 17's transfer to the hospital. The facility census was 36. Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Bed-Holds and Returns with a revision date of October 2022 revealed that all residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence. Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: -notice 1: well in advance of any transfer; and -notice 2: at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). A record review of Resident 17's Progress Notes dated 3/7/25 revealed the resident had a change in condition, the facility had received an order from the provider to transfer the resident to the hospital for evaluation, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan (BCP, a document that serves as initial instruction and guidance for the resident's care) within 48 hours as required by state regulations for 1 (Resident 139) of 7 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A record review of an undated facility policy, Care Plans - Baseline revealed BCPs should be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission and include initial goals, physician's orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services and Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a process which requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be given a preliminary assessment to determine whether they might have Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability) recommendations - if applicable. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 139 on 3/4/2025 with diagnoses of cancer of the tongue and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(5) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow their bowel protocol orders to prevent constipation for 2 (Residents 16 and 27) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 16 to the facility on 1/20/2017 with a diagnosis of a cerebral aneurysm (a weakened area in the wall of a blood vessel in the brain that bulges.) Resident 16 also had diagnoses of dementia and constipation. A record review of Resident 16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/22/2025 revealed Resident 16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screening that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 9, which indicated Resident 16 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 (H)(vi)(3) Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician to 1 of 1 (Resident 19) residents. The facility identified a census of 36. Findings are: A review of Resident 19's admission Record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of respiratory failure. A record review of Resident 19's physician orders revealed an order dated 2/11/25 for oxygen to be administered by nasal cannula at 1 liter per minute continuously. Record review of Resident 19's care plan revealed an entry dated 2/12/25 which read, Continuous oxygen via nasal cannula at 1 liters per minuete. An observation of Resident 19 on 3/12/25 at 11:05 AM revealed the resident not wearing oxygen by nasal cannula or any other means. An interview with Resident 19 on 3/12/25 at 12:27 PM confirmed they have not been wearing oxygen in the facility continuously. An interview on 3/12/25 at 12:14 PM with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02 (H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit their investigation of an incident within 5 working days as required for 1 (Resident 1) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 37. Findings Are: A record review of a facility document titled Abuse, Neglect, or Misappropriation and dated 10/23/24, revealed Resident 1 had a fall with injury on 10/15/24 at 10:00 PM. The document further revealed the investigation was submitted to the State Agency on 10/23/24. An interview on 1/6/25 at 1:15 PM with the Administrator confirmed the facility did not submit their investigation of Resident 1's fall with injury that occurred on 10/15/24 to the State Agency within 5 working days as required.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to develop new interventions for falls for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 37. Findings Are: A record review of a facility policy, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, with a last revised date of March 2018 indicated if falls recur despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 5/27/2022 with diagnoses of history of falling, dystonia (a brain condition that causes uncontrollable muscle movement,) hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body,) muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A record review of Resident 2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning), with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/8/2024 indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screening that aids in detecting cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.11D Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prepare foods following the recipe to ensure nutritive value. This had the potential to affect all 41 facility residents that ate food prepared in the kitchen. The facility identified a census of 41. Findings are: A continuous observation of meal preparation of French Onion Pork Chop on 4/23/2024 from 7:09 AM to 8:00 AM revealed the following: - The Dietary Supervisor (DS) had measured three boneless pork chops. The first porkchop was six ounces, the second was three ounces, the third was three ounces. - The DS did not measure the remaining prepared porkchops - The DS had grabbed four fresh onions from the pantry. Once the DM had began to cut the onions, threw away two of the onions, which were bad. - The DS had placed a bag of French onion soup mix on top of porkchops - No stock chicken and soup base had been used An interview on 4/23/2024 at 7:15 AM with the DS revealed the porkchops were to be about four ounces. An interview on 4/23/2024 at 7:52 AM with the DS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 12-006.11E Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled, dated, and served within best by dates, and prepare food under sanitary conditions, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous foods of meat and dairy products were held at 135 degrees or higher on the steam table. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents that ate food prepared in the kitchen. The facility identified a census of 41 residents. Findings are: A. An initial kitchen observation on 4/18/2024 at 7:02 AM revealed the following in the kitchen: - Several saran wrapped pieces of cornbread, without preparation or use by dates on the kitchen counter - A bin of sugar with a label including a prepared date of 2-1-24 but no use by date - A bin of flour with a label including a prepared date of 2-1-24 but no use by date An initial kitchen observation on 4/18/2024 at 7:02 AM revealed the following in the refrigerator in the kitchen: - An opened Sysco chicken base…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than 5%, which affected 3 (Resident 8, Resident 16, and Resident 34) of 9 sampled residents. The medication error rate was 11.11%. The facility census was 41. A record review of facility policy Administering Medications with a last revised date of April 2019 revealed the following: - Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time. - Verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right route. - The charge nurse must accompany new nursing personnel on their medication rounds for minimum of 3 days to ensure established procedures are followed and proper resident identification methods are learned. A. An observation on 4/22/2024 at 12:17 PM revealed Medication Aide (MA)-D had administered Resident 8's Sinemet at this time. A record review of Resident 8's Medication Administration Record revealed the medication was scheduled for 1100. B. An observation on 4/22/2024 at 12:35 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure to notify the physician of low blood pressures for 1 (Resident 2) of 5 residents who was on blood pressure medication. The facility census was 41 at the time of survey. Findings are: A record review of Resident 2's undated facility admission Record revealed an admission date of 11/15/16 to the facility with a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD). A record review of Resident 2's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS -a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) dated 10/10/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's cognitive function, scored from 0-15, the higher the score, the higher the cognitive function) score of 2 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident 2's Comprehensive Careplan initiated on 11/21/19 revealed: -problem Cardiovascular/Circulatory: I have an altered cardiovascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure completion of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) within the required time for 1 (Resident 95) resident. This affected 1 of 6 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census at the time of the survey was 41. Findings are: A record review of Resident 95's undated facility admission Record revealed an admission date of 3/26/24 to the facility with a primary diagnosis of unspecified dementia. A record review of Resident 95's admission MDS revealed an admission date of 3/26/24 and an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/5/24. A record review of Resident 95's admission MDS revealed an ARD (marks the end of a 7 day period during which a resident is observed and assessed) of 4/5/24. A record review of Resident 95's admission MDS revealed a completion date of 4/23/24. Record review of the Resident Assessment Instrument manual (RAI- instruction manual to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C1a Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure that the written summary of the baseline care plan (written plan required to be developed within 48 hours of admission detailing the instructions needed to provide initial effective and person centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) for 1 (Resident 94) of 6 sampled residents. The facility census at the time of survey was 41. Findings are: Record review of Resident 94's undated Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) revealed an admission date to the facility on 4/15/24 with a primary diagnosis of Osteomyelitis. Record review of Resident 94's Electronic Medical Records revealed no baseline careplan. Interview on 04/23/24 at 5:51 PM with the MDS coordinator confirmed there was not a baseline careplan completed for Resident 94 and there should have been, it was also confirmed that the resident was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09D7b Based on interviews and record reviews; the facility failed to identify causative factors and implement new interventions to prevent falls for 1 (Resident 13) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 41. Findings are: A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 13 on 5/26/2015 with diagnoses of muscle weakness, edema, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, hypertension, and Major Depressive Disorder. A record review of a significant change Minimum Data Set with a date of 5/15/2023 revealed Resident 13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12/15, which indicated Resident 13 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 13 also required moderate assistance with bathing, supervision with oral hygiene, and was dependent from toileting and dressing. A. A record review of Resident 13's Care Plan with a date initiated of 9/18/2019 revealed Resident 13 was at risk for falls. Interventions were as follows: - Anticipate and meet my needs (initiated on 9/18/2019) - Be sure my call light is within reach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observations and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices during medication administration for 3 (Resident 16, Resident 31, and Resident 95) of 9 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 41. An observation on 4/22/2024 at 12:02 PM revealed Registered Nurse (RN) -C had prepared a insulin syringe with 6 units of insulin. RN-C then applied gloves. RN-C then touched the inner rim of the trash to throw away an empty box of gloves and did not change gloves after touching the inner rim of the trash can. RN-C then injected the insulin into Resident 16. An observation on 4/22/2024 at 12:12 PM revealed RN-C had dialed a insulin pen with 10 units of insulin. RN-C then applied gloves. RN-C had knocked and attempted to enter the room by turning the doorknob with the gloved hand. RN-C was asked to wait one minute by nursing. While waiting, RN-C touched RN-C's hair. The nursing staff then stated they were ready. RN-C had again opened the door with RN-C's gloved hand. RN-C then injected Resident 31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$141,424 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $94,536 — penalty dated 2025-11-17
- $46,888 — penalty dated 2025-06-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-17 for 38 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-11 for 39 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285224. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.