Community Memorial Health Center
1015 F Street, Burwell, NE 68823 · Non profit - Corporation · 64 certified beds · (308) 346-4440 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.9% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 28.7% | 5.1% | 5.4% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 5.8% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.4% | 2.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.4% | 4.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 4.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.9% | 18.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.9% | 19.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.5% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.1% | 20.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.0% | 75.9% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.82 | 1.81 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.81 | 1.92 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.9%CMS range 22.5–44.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.1%CMS range 5.8–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.7%CMS range 2.4–9.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 60.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(D)Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to obtain temperatures for all food items prepared by the dietary department and ensure that temperatures of food or drink items were at a palatable safe level. This had the potential to affect all of the residents' receiving food or drink items from the dietary department. The facility census was 59.Findings are:Record review of the Federal Food Code dated 2022 revealed Microwave cooked items should be heated to a temperature of at least 165 degrees Fahrenheit.Record review of a facility policy titled Record of Food Temperatures dated 10/2025 revealed Food temperatures will be checked on all items prepared in the dietary department. Ready to eat foods that require heating before consumption should be heated to at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit.A.In an observation completed on 02/24/2026 at 12:30 PM Dietary Aide I (DA-I) removed a cellophane covered plate with a grilled cheese sandwich on it from the mobile hot cart and placed it in the serving area. The DA removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hair restraints were worn to keep hair from possibly contacting food and food service items and failed to utilize the approved technique when completing hand hygiene during meal preparation. This had the potential to affect all of the resident's receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 59.Findings are:A.Record review of a facility policy titled Dietary Employee Personal Hygiene dated 10/2025 revealed all dietary staff must wear hair restraints (eg., hair net, hat and or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting food.In an observation completed on 02/23/2026 at 9:00 AM, Dietary Aide J (DA-J) was observed to be rinsing dishes and placing them in the automatic dish machine. DA-J was observed to have blue hair cap covering their head. The DA had a full beard and did not have a beard covering on- preventing the beard hair from possibly contacting food or food surfaces.In an observation completed on 02/24/2026 at 9:03 AM DA-J was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05 (D&E)Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident and resident POA (Power of attorney who can make decisions for Resident if Resident is unable)/or their personal representative was informed of the risks and alternate treatment available before initiating antipsychotic/psychotropic medications (medications used to treat psychotic/behavior disorders). This affected 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 41, 4, 7, and 24), and the facility failed to notify the resident POA when a change in skin condition occurred for 1 resident (Resident 24). The facility census was 59. Findings are:A. Record Review of Resident 41's admission Record dated 2/23/2026 revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with listed diagnoses: -Delusional Disorders (Mental illness characterized by one or more persistent, false beliefs) -Restlessness and Agitation -Dementia -Anxiety Disorder Record review of Resident 41's admission record revealed a Power of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-005.026(D)Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that staff performed hand sanitization (hand hygiene- washing the hands using soap and water or an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) to remove germs for reducing the risk of transmitting infection among residents and health care personnel) between resident rooms during laundry delivery for 4 residents (Residents 54, 41,13, and 66); failed to ensure that laundry was carried in a sanitary manner to prevent the potential for cross-contamination (this had the potential to affect 15 of 15 residents); and failed to ensure that gloves were changed between contaminated surfaces and hand hygiene between glove changes for 1 resident. (Resident 17). The facility census was 59.Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene dated 12/15/25 revealed that all staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Staff will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(E)Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents and or family members had a method to file grievances anonymously and were provided on information on how to file grievances anonymously. This had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 59.Findings are:Record review of an undated facility policy titled Resident and Family Grievances revealed information on how to file a grievance or complaint will be available and a grievance may be filed anonymously.Record review of an undated admission Agreement revealed in section 6 letter M the resident is encouraged to voice their grievances and suggestions to the administrator, director of nursing, social service director, or to the resident council. There is no information provided on how to file grievance anonymously.In an interview completed on 02/26/2026 at 10:45 AM with the facility Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD confirmed that they are the facility's grievance officer. The SSD stated that if a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a PRN (when needed) order for antipsychotics (psychiatric medications primarily used to treat psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe agitation by regulating brain neurotransmitters) were limited to 14 days and the practitioner evaluated the resident for renewal of the PRN medication. This affected 1 resident (Resident 34) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 59. Findings are:Record review of a facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, dated 10/12/2025 revealed, residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s).-9. PRN orders for psychotropic drugs shall be used only when the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i)Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a written summary of the baseline care plan (a written plan required to be developed within 24 hours of admission detailing the instructions needed to provide initial effective and person-centered quality care for a resident) was reviewed and provided to the resident/resident representative as required for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 37 and 60); and the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed within 24 hours for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 60). This prevented the resident/resident representative from identifying additional resident needs and goals for the resident care plan. The facility census was 59.Findings are: A.Record review of the facility policy titled Interim/Baseline Care Plan dated 9/17/25 revealed that the facility will develop and implement an interim baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure dosing information is included in prescribed medications for 1 (Resident 17) out of 5 sampled residents. Facility census was 59. Record review of Resident 17s admission Summary Revealed an admission date of 1/12/2021 with the following diagnoses-Cervicalgia (medical term for pain localized in the neck)-Unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified siteRecord Review of Resident 17's order summary dated 2/25/2026 revealed Diclofenac Sodium External Gel 1% apply to neck, back topically every day and night shift related to primary osteoarthritis (Diclofenac Sodium Gel (or Voltaren) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used to help relieve arthritic pain).Record review of manufacturers instructions for Diclofenac sodium topical gel revealed The proper amount of Diclofenac gel should be measured using the dosing cards supplied in the drug product carton. One dosing card should be used for each application of drug product. The gel should be applied within the oblong…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accidents and hazards for 2 residents (Resident 17 and Resident 24) of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 59. Findings are:An observation on 2/23/26 at 9:50 AM revealed Resident 17 and Resident 24 are roommates residing in a secure unit within the facility for concerns related to dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain) and or wandering tendencies. During the observation of the environment, the bathroom designated to be used by Resident 17 and Resident 24 was found to contain the following prescribed medications:- Diclofenac Sodium External Gel 1 % (percent) (Topical) prescriber order date 11/26/25- Eucerin External Cream (Skin Protectant) Apply to feet topically prescriber order date 11/26/25- Miconazole Nitrate Powder (Topical)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-00609(H)Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to replace respiratory equipment for 1 resident (Resident 7) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 59.Record review of a facility policy titled CPAP/BiPAP (which is a non-invasive ventilator used to treat breathing difficulties by delivering pressurized air through a mask) Cleaning dated 02/25/2026 revealed it was the policy of the facility to replace equipment routinely to prevent the occurrence or spread of infection. The face mask and tubing should be replaced once every three months and the head gear, non-disposable filters, and humidifier once every six months.Record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 7 on 06/14/2023 with diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts because throat muscles relax, causing the airway to collapse during sleep).Record review of Resident 7's Order Summary on 02/25/2026 revealed Resident 7 had a provider order for a BiPAP to be applied…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 (H) iii Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete skin assessments per facility policy and standards of practice for 1 resident (Resident 3), of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 62. Findings are: A record review of a document from the Wound Care Education Institute and titled Best Practices for Wound Assessment and Documentation dated 04/17/2025 revealed that a foundational element of wound assessment is accurate wound measurements using a standardized method like length, width, and depth. To be time sensitive and consistent documenting the wound assessment at consistent intervals based on facility protocol. A record review of a facility policy titled Skin Assessment and dated 06/12/2025 revealed it is the facility policy to perform skin assessment weekly if the resident has a notable wound or has a Braden assessment score deemed as high risk. Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 3 on 03/05/2024 with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to implement and/or revise Residents 1, 29, 54, and 59's current care plans to reflect the resident's current status. The sample size was 22 and the facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans with a revision date of 12/14/2022 revealed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. The care planning process will include resident's strengths and needs, -The care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) assessment, -The care plan will describe services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11D Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure meals served in the Special Care Unit (SCU) were palatable and served at the proper temperature. This had the potential to affect all 16 residents that resided on the SCU. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Record of Food Temperatures (undated) revealed it was the policy of this facility to record food temperatures daily to ensure food was served at the proper temperature. The following guidelines were to be followed: -food temperatures were to be recorded on all items prepared in the dietary department. -hot food items were to be maintained at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or higher. -potentially hazardous food that was cooked and then cooled was to be reheated so that all parts of the food reached an internal temperature of 165 degrees (F) for at least 15 seconds before service. -ready to eat foods that required heating before consumption were to be taken directly from a sealed container of an intact package from an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.18(B), and 175 NAC 12.006.18(D) Based on observations, record review and interview: the facility staff failed to utilize gloves and to wash hands and/or perform hand hygiene at appropriate intervals during the provision of toileting and catheter cares for Residents 1, 26 and 54 and to implement enhanced barrier precautions when providing direct cares for Residents 29 and 59. The total sample size was 22 and the facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Hand Hygiene (undated) revealed hand hygiene was defined as the general term for cleaning hands by handwashing with soap and water or the use of an antiseptic hand rub also known as alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR). Hand hygiene was to be completed when: -hands were visibly soiled with blood or other body fluids. -between resident contacts. -after handling contaminated objects. -before applying and after removing personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves. -before preparing or handling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)5 Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to notify the primary care practitioner (PCP) and the Registered Dietician (RD) of weight loss for 2 (Residents 27 and 12) of 3 residents reviewed. The facility identified a census of 58. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Notification of Changes with a revision date of 12/220/22 revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure prompt notification to the resident's physician and the resident's representative when there was a change requiring notification. Circumstances which required notification included: -accidents resulting in injury or physician intervention. -significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition. -circumstances that required a need to alter treatment. -a transfer or discharge from the facility. -a change in the resident's rights. -a change in the resident's roommate. B. Review of a Weights and Vitals Summary Sheet (form used to document a resident's weights, blood pressure, respirations, temperature, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(A) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure Level 1 Preadmission Assessment and Resident Review (PASARR-screening process required to be completed prior to admission to ensure residents with Serious Mental Illness (SMI), Intellectual Disability(ID), Development Disability(DD) or Related Disorders (RD) met the criteria for Nursing Home admission and had any additional services needed) screens were completed accurately prior to admission for Residents 48 and 44. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program with a revision date of 7/18/24 revealed the following: -The facility coordinated assessments with the PASARR program under Medicaid to ensure that all individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. -All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure Resident 59's Bowel and Bladder management plan was coordinated and addressed in cooperative with the Hospice Care provider. The sample size was 1 with a census of 58. Findings are: A. Review of the undated facility policy Bowel Elimination revealed the following: The facility developed and implemented a process to assure that constipation was prevented/addressed in a timely fashion. Daily documentation of bowel elimination was reviewed. The night shift ran a report showing no Bowel Movement (BM) in the last 48 hours and no BM in the last 72 hours. The following steps were followed for all residents of Community Memorial Health Center: - If no BM in 48 hours the dietary staff was notified and the resident was offered bran flakes, prune juice or both. - If no BM in 72 hours the resident was offered Milk of Magnesia (laxative), 30 cubic centimeters (cc) by mouth. - If no BM for 4 days the resident was offered a Dulcolax Suppository (laxative) Rectally. - If no BM for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.I(i) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure Residents 14 and 16's falls were reviewed for causal factors, fall prevention interventions were based on causal factors, and reviewed and revised to prevent ongoing falls. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Fall Prevention Program dated 8/3/23 revealed the following: -Each resident was assessed for fall risk and received care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. -The facility used standardized risk assessment to determine a resident's fall risk, and initiated interventions that decreased the risk of falling including but not limited to a clear pathway to the restroom, locking of bed wheels, leaving call lights accessible, providing adequate lighting, and keeping equipment in good repair. In addition, the facility implemented routine rounding, monitoring residents for changes in condition, encouraged residents to wear shoes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were given in accordance with the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP-program for optimizing treatment of infections and reducing adverse events from the use of antibiotics) for Resident 16. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Review of the facility undated Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy revealed the following: -It was the policy of the facility to implement and Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) as part of the facilities overall infection prevention and control program. -The purpose of the program was to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. -The Infection Preventionist, with oversight from the Director of Nursing served as the leader of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program and received support from the Administrator and other governing officials of the community. -The Medical Director, Consultant Pharmacist, and Attending Physicians…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(A) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of Residents 24, 26, and 29's psychotropic medications (medications which alter consciousness, mood, and thoughts) or to have a documented clinical rationale for continued use. The sample size was 5. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Use of Psychotropic Medications, implemented on 10/6/23 revealed the following: -a psychotropic drug was any drug that affected brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic drugs included: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics, -the indications for the use of the medications would be determined by assessing the underlying condition, current signs, symptoms, expressions, and preferences and goals for treatments, and identifying of underlying causes, when possible, -the attending physician would assume leadership in medication management by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12B Based on record review and interview; the facility pharmacist failed to ensure emergency and immediate use medications were available. This had the potential to affect all residents in the building. The facility staff identified a census of 60. Findings are: A. Review of a Pharmacy Services policy and procedure (undated) revealed it was the policy of this facility to ensure pharmaceutical services; were provided to meet the needs of each resident, were consistent with state and federal requirements, and reflected current standards of practice. The pharmacist was responsible for helping the facility obtain and maintain timely and appropriate pharmaceutical services that supported the residents' healthcare needs, were consistent with current standards of practice and met state and federal requirements. B. Observation on 10/18/23 at 11:47 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-H revealed there was not an emergency medication supply for the facility staff to use. During an interview on 10/18/23 at 11:50 AM, LPN-H confirmed the facility did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY B. Review of Resident 57's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 9/9/23 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of: unspecified dementia, non-Alzheimer's dementia, bipolar depression, and psychotic disorder. Resident 57 had severe cognitive impairment and displayed hallucinations and delusions. In addition, the resident had verbal behaviors directed at others, other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, disrobing in public, verbal/vocal symptoms such as screaming or making disruptive sounds), the resident wandered daily and had episodes in which the resident rejected cares. Review of a Nursing Progress Note dated 7/21/23 at 4:35 PM revealed Resident 57 had attempted to have sexual interactions with another resident on the secured unit. Resident 57 insisted the other resident was their spouse but the other resident refused these gestures. Interview with the Administrator on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11D Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure foods were served at palatable temperatures to the residents on the secured unit. This had the potential to affect all 16 residents served in the secured unit dining room. The facility staff identified a census of 60. Findings are: A. Review of a Meal Temperature Log dated 10/2023 revealed the following food temperatures were obtained on the secured unit during the meal services. Further review revealed no foods were identified at each of the meals, only a temperature: -10/1 for breakfast 121 degrees, 138 degrees for the noon meal and no temperatures were obtained for the evening meal; -10/2 for the breakfast meal 130 degrees, the noon meal was 130 degrees, and the evening meal was 133 degrees; -10/3 for the breakfast meal a temperature of 125 degrees, the noon meal was 136 degrees and no documentation for the evening meal; -10/4 breakfast was 121 degrees, the noon meal was 118 degrees and no documented temperature check for the evening meal; -10/5 no food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (The Long-Term Care Minimum Data Set (MDS) which is a standardized, primary screening and assessment tool of health status that forms the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for all residents in a Medicare and or Medicaid-certified long term care facility) was accurately coded for 1(Resident #34) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 60. Findings are: Record review of Resident #34 Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] Section N 0410 letter E anticoagulants (a blood thinner medication) had instruction to indicate the number of days the resident received the medication during the last seven days. Seven was entered as the response to this question. Record review of Resident #34 physician orders dated 10/18/23 showed order for Plavix 75 MG which is an antiplatelet drug taken to prevent blood clots. It keeps platelets in your blood from coming together and making clots. This is ordered to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D5b Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility failed to provide individualized activities for 1 (Resident 55) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 60. Findings are: Review of Resident 55's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment used in the development of the resident's care plan) dated 8/26/23 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of seizure disorder, depression and psychotic disorder. The resident's cognition was assessed as moderately impaired and the resident had behaviors which included hallucinations, delusions, verbal behaviors directed at others and other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, disrobing in public, verbal/vocal symptoms such as screaming or making disruptive sounds). Review of an admission Questionnaire dated 5/25/23 revealed Resident 55 enjoyed watching television, attending religious events and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow a provider order for 1 (Resident #34) of 1 sampled resident. Resident #34. Facility reported census of 60. Findings are: A record review of Resident #34's resident demographic record reflected facility admitted Resident #34 on 1/12/2021 with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes mellitus which is a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar (glucose). A record review of Resident #34's physician orders dated 10/18/23 revealed an order for HbA1c (a blood test that measured the average blood sugar levels over the past 3 months. It is one of the main laboratory tests that can help a health care team manage diabetes.) This was a routine order to be completed every 120 days with the most recent to be collected on 7/12/23. A record review of Resident #34's laboratory results labeled Final Cumulative dated 3/8/23 revealed a value of HbA1c 7.0 and was signed by provider on 3/09/2023. A record review of Resident #34's care plan reflected care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility failed to assure a safe environment as the staff failed to: 1) assess causal factors and to develop and/or revise fall interventions to prevent ongoing falls for 2 ( Resident 54 and 1) and implement interventions to prevent potential choking and/or aspiration for Resident 1. The sample size was 8 and the facility census was 60. Findings are: Review of a Fall Risk Assessment policy with a revision date of 8/22/23 revealed each resident was to be assessed for fall risk to identify and evaluate environmental hazards. The resident's Care Plan would then include interventions consistent with their needs and goals to reduce the risk for accidents. The facility would monitor the effectiveness of interventions and then modify or develop new interventions as necessary. A. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 9/2/23 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 12-006.09D8b Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to identify a significant weight loss and notify the Provider for 1 of 4 (Resident 21) sampled. The facility census was 60. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Weight Monitoring, dated 2022 revealed the following: -the facility would ensure all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight, or desirable body weight range, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that was not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise, -significant unintended weight changes (loss or gain) could indicate a nutritional problem, -a nutritional assessment was completed upon admission to identify those at risk for unplanned weight loss/gain, -information gathered from the nutritional assessment and current dietary standards of practice was used to develop an individualized care plan to assess the resident's specific nutritional concerns and preferences, -interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006-19D Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 21) of 5 sampled resident's as needed (PRN) psychotropic (a type of psychoactive medication which alters chemicals in the brain to effect changes in behavior, mood, and emotions) medication was limited to 14 days. The facility census was 60. Findings were: A. Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medication, dated 10/6/2023 revealed the following: -psychotropic drugs included antipsychotics (used to treat psychotic disorders), antidepressants (used to treat depression), anti-anxiety (used to treat anxiety), and hypnotics (used to induce sleep), -non-pharmacological interventions were attempted, and the target symptoms for monitoring were included in the documentation, -residents who used psychotropic drugs also received non-pharmacological interventions, -PRN orders for all psychotropic drugs were used only when necessary and for a limited duration of 14 days, -if the attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10E Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews: the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less then 5 percent (%) which affected 2 (Residents 19 and 34) of 3 sampled residents. The medication error rate was 13.79%. The facility census was 60. Findings are: A. During an observation on 10/16/23 at 11:04 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)- C removed an insulin pen from the medication cart, removed the cap from the insulin pen, and screwed on a needle cap to the pen. LPN C then turned the dial on the pen to the ordered dose of 2 units insulin. LPN C did not prime the insulin pen prior to setting the ordered dose of insulin. LPN C applied gloves to both hands, cleansed Resident 19's site of injection and administered the injection and immediately withdrew the insulin pen from Resident #19's abdomen. LPN C then returned to the cart. LPN C obtained another insulin pen from the cart and screwed on needle cap. LPN C then turned the dial on the pen to the ordered dose of 43 units. LPN C did not prime the insulin pen prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to provide safe storage of drugs as medications were left on top of the medication cart unattended. The total sample size was 16 and the facility census was 60. Findings are: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage dated 12/20/22 revealed the following: -all drugs and biologicals were to be stored in locked compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) and under proper temperature control; -only authorized personnel were to have access to the keys to locked compartments; and -during a medication pass, medications were to be under the direct observation of the person administering the medications. During observation of the Medication Pass on the secured unit by Medication Aide (MA)-B on 10/17/23 at 8:57 AM, the following was observed: -the medication cart was parked in the medication room adjacent to the dining area of the secured unit; -MA-B prepared medications which consisted of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, record review, and interview: the facility staff failed to clean a multi-resident use glucometer with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved cleanser for Resident 19 and failed to perform hand hygiene to prevent potential cross contamination when performing procedures for Residents 34, 37, and 19. Facility census was 60. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy labeled Glucometer Disinfection dated 09/16/2023 revealed the following: -the facility will ensure blood glucometers will be cleaned and disinfected after each use for multi-resident use. -the glucometers will be disinfected with a wipe pre-saturated with a EPA registered healthcare disinfectant that is effective against HIV, Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B virus. A. Observation on 10/16/23 at 11:04 AM of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C revealed LPN-C completed a blood glucose check for Resident 19 with the blood glucometer. LPN-C then returned to the cart and removed a multi-purpose alcohol wipe from a package on top of the cart. LPN-C used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROSHANS, HAYLEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/31/2022 |
| GARNER, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2011 |
| HOLMQUIST, BRENDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2013 |
| SCHERE, MELISSA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2010 |
| GROSHANS, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285257. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.