Clarkson Community Care Center Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 31.4 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.49 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.9 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to follow Resident 1's physician orders regarding fluid consistency. The sample size was 3. The facility census was 27. Findings are: Record review of the facility's policy titled Thickened Liquids dated 2022, revealed that thickened liquids are needed for individuals with difficulty swallowing. Definitions included Nectar like liquids are mildly thick and Honey like liquids are moderately thick. Record review of the facility's Accident/Unusual Occurrence report completed on 10/27/24 at 8:30 PM revealed that Resident 1 was sent to the emergency room after noted to be coughing after drinking thin liquids. The resident's diet was nectar thick liquids. Record review of Resident 1's undated facility admission record revealed an original entry to facility on 1/16/2019 and that the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of pneumonitis (swelling and irritation, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to investigate and submit a completed investigation report related to abuse and neglect to the State Agency within the required time frame for Residents 1 and 2. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 29.Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation with an implementation date of 9/2017 revealed each resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. In response to allegations of abuse, neglect exploitation or mistreatment, the facility was to: -ensure all alleged allegations were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury. But not later than 24 hours if the advents that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury. To be reported to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(l)(i) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to identify causal factors of falls and to revise and/or develop interventions based on those factors to prevent ongoing falls for Residents 1 and 3. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 29. Findings are:A. Review of the facility policy Fall Risk Assessment with an implementation date of 10/21/25 revealed it was the policy for the facility to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility has control and provides supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. An explanation and compliance guidelines included the following: -a risk assessment was to be completed upon admission, quarterly or when a significant change was identified. -the risk assessment was to identify environmental hazards and individual risks, including the need for supervision and to evaluate and analyze hazards and risks. -an at risk care plan was to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.04D(i) Based on record reviews and interviews; the facility failed to provide full time hours for the designated Director of Nursing (DON) who was working as a Charge Nurse. This failure had the potential for affecting nursing care to all the residents. The total sample size was 15 and the facility census was 30.Findings are: Review of an undated Job Description for the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the DON was responsible for effective overall management of the Nursing Department and coordination with other disciplines to provide quality care to all residents. The following duties and responsibilities were identified:-ensure nursing interventions meet the physical, personal, and cognitive needs of each resident as well as maximize their self-care capacities, identify, independence, choice, and opportunity for social interaction. -monitors the outcomes of nursing service activity by evaluating the performance of nursing staff, ensuring compliance with all facility and regulatory agencies standards, coordinating the facility committees,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-03 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(E)Based on record review and interview; the facility fails to obtain informed consent for the use of psychotropic (medications that effect the brain and alter mental processes, emotions, and behavior) medications for Residents 12,16, 17, and 29. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 30. Findings are: A. Review of the facility undated policy Use of Psychotropic Medication revealed the following;-Residents were not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication was beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). -The indications for use of psychotropic drugs were documented in the medical record. -Targeted symptoms for monitoring were documented in the resident record.-Residents and/or their representative/s were educated on the risks and benefits of psychotropic drug…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to review and revise Care Plans to accurately reflect Residents 5 and 6's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control strategy that involves the use of gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities to reduce the spread of drug resistant organisms in settings such as nursing homes) and Residents 7, 12, 16, and 24's fall interventions. The sample size was 12 and the facility census was 30. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Baseline Care Plan undated revealed the following:-The facility developed and implemented a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents that met professional standards of quality. Review of the undated facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans revealed the following;-The facility developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to review for causal factors and implement measures to prevent ongoing falls for Resident's 12, 16, 7, and 24. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 30. Findings are: A. Review of the undated facility policy Accidents and Supervision revealed the following;-The resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible.-Each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. -The facility established and utilized a systematic approach to address resident risk and environmental hazards to minimize the likelihood of accidents through Identification, Evaluation and Analysis, Implementation of Interventions, and Monitoring and Modification. Review of the undated facility Fall Checklist revealed the following;-The fall and an intervention were to be added to the resident care plan.-The investigation included a root cause analysis of the fall and an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to report a fall with injury for Resident 24 and an injury of unknown origin for Resident 7 as potential allegations of abuse and/or neglect. The sample size was 2 and the facility census was 30. Findings are: A. Review of the undated facility policy Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation revealed it was the policy of the facility to report all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown origin and misappropriation of resident property. Allegations were to be reported immediately to the Administrator and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within the prescribed timeframes. The Administrator or designee was to notify the appropriate agencies immediately; as soon as possible, but no later than 24 hours after the discovery of the incident. In the case of serious bodily injury, no later than 2 hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to investigate and to submit the results of the investigation to the State Agency within the required time frame a fall with significant injury for Resident 24 and an injury of unknown origin for Resident 7. The sample size was 2 and the facility census was 30. Findings are: A. Review of the undated facility policy Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation revealed it was the policy of the facility to report all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown origin and misappropriation of resident property. Allegations were to be reported immediately to the Administrator. The Administrator or designee were to ensure all alleged or suspected violations were thoroughly investigated and were to prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress. The results of all investigations were to be reported to other officials in accordance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 1Number of residents cited: 1Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive discharge summary for completed for Resident 35. Licensure Reference Number NAC 175-12 006.09(G)(i)7Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to document a recapitulation (a complete summary of the residents stay in nursing facility from admittance to discharge) for a resident-initiated discharge for 1 (Resident 35) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 30. Findings are: A. Review of the facility Discharge Summary and Plan with a revision date of 12/2016 revealed when a resident's discharge was anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan were to be developed to assist the resident to adjust to their new living environment. The discharge summary was to include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge. The summary was to include the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(C)(ii)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop resident care plans) was completed for Resident 12 for a hospice admission. The sample size was 12 and the facility census was 30.Findings are: Review of the undated facility policy MDS 3.0 Completion revealed the following;-The residents were assessed, using a comprehensive assessment which used core elements for use in assessing nursing home residents.-According to Federal regulation, the facility conducted initial and periodic comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity, using the resident assessment instrument specified by the State. -Assessments completed included initial/admission assessment, annual assessment, and significant change assessment.-All disciplines followed the guidelines used in the current Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI-a standardized,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-09-26
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-28 for 42 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-28 for 35 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE