Eventide Crete

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 32.1 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.22 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.21 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.20 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(G)(ii).Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document a recapitulation (a complete summary of the resident stay in the nursing home from admittance to discharge) for one (Resident 38) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 32. A record review of admission record reveals that Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on 7/25 with the diagnosis of Heart failure, pericardial effusion (where excessive fluid accumulates in the pericardial sac, the thin membrane surrounding the heart), Coronary artery disease (where the arteries that supply blood to the heart become narrowed or blocked), Acute-on-chronic kidney disease (where an acute decline in kidney function that occurs in individual with chronic kidney disease), and Hypertension (high blood pressure). A record review of Resident 38 progress notes revealed that on 8/15/25 Resident 38 was discharged to the hospital due to critically high potassium levels. Resident 38 representative was present and a bed hold policy was given to the representative and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to complete a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) assessment for one resident (Resident 28) of 5 sampled residents after a new diagnosis of a mental disorder, after admission to the facility, to determine if Resident 28 was receiving the necessary services indicated for the disorder. The facility census was 32. A record review of Resident 28 admission record dated 9/17/25 reveals that Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a progressive neurological disorder that affects movement), Dementia with mood/psychotic disturbance (includes depression, anxiety while psychotic symptoms include hallucinations, and delusions), Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness), Hallucinations (something that seems real to the person but has no actual external stimulus or physical source), Delusional disorders (false beliefs that persist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility's dishwashing machine for House 2 reached the required water temperature to prevent the potential for food borne illnesses, failed to clean range hoods and ice machines in Houses 1 and 2, and ovens in House 1 in a manner to prevent the potential for food borne illnesses, failed to ensure food was covered to prevent cross-contamination while transported through the hallway for Resident 2 and Resident 13, and failed to implement hand hygiene practices in House 2 to prevent cross contamination and the potential for food borne illnesses. These practices had the potential to affect all residents who ate food that was prepared in one of the kitchens. The facility census was 34, and there was one resident who received nutrition through a feeding tube, and did not eat. Findings are: A. A review of the 2017 Nebraska Food Code 4-501.110 Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Wash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 (C)(ii) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Stats Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities. An SCSA is required when a resident has a major improvement or decline in condition that will not resolve itself.) was completed within 14 days of a significant change for 1 (Resident 17) of 12 residents sampled. The facility census was 34. Findings are: A record review of Resident 17's admission Record dated 08/08/2024 revealed an admission date of 08/18/2023, and diagnoses of heart failure, chronic kidney disease, poor circulation in the legs, dementia, and a history of a heart attack. The resident had a diagnosis of pneumonia with an onset date of 05/19/2024. A record review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual v1.18.11 effective October 2023: Some Guidelines to Assist in Deciding If a Change Is Significant or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) after a change for Resident 22 regarding code status (the type of treatment a person would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) and for Resident 33 regarding a urinary catheter (tube to drain the bladder). This affected 2 of 12 residents reviewed for care plan revision. The facility census was 34. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 22's Clinical Census dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was admitted to hospice services on 06/06/2024. A record review of Resident 22's Medical Diagnosis List dated 08/13/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference number 175 NAC 1-005.06 (D) Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff performed hand hygiene between glove changes prevent cross contamination during catheter care for 1 (Resident 19) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 34. Findings are: Record review of Resident 19's medical record of clinical census revealed Resident 19 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of MDS (Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) dated 5/4/24 revealed Section H: scored 9 indicating resident had a catheter. Observation of catheter cares for Resident 19 on 8/12/24 at 8:33 AM with MA-F, revealed MA-F donned (put on) surgical mask, gloves, and gown. Observation did not revealed that MA-F performed hand hygiene prior to donning gloves. MA-F pulled resident's sweatpants down to ankles and opened the brief on the resident. MA-F then changed [gender] gloves and did not complete hand hygiene. Next MA-F…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE