No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hemingford Care Center

605 Donald Avenue, Hemingford, NE 69348 · For profit - Corporation · 39 certified beds · (308) 487-3301 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (308) 487-3301 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Dec 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
232 N Main St · (308) 638-4551 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
508 Niobrara Ave · (308) 487-5212 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
814 Box Butte Ave # 16 · (308) 487-3819 · Call to confirm hours
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%19.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.2%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%4.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.0%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.8%19.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.9%25.9%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table56.2%20.7%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 81% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.4–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.681.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
55.3%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 32.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-02)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-27 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensed Reference Number 175 12-006.05 (J) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to give residents, family members, legal representatives of the resident, visitors, and the public access to the most recent survey results or plan of correction. The facility identified a census of 29 residents.An observation on 4/21/26 at 1:20 PM revealed a 3-ring binder in the lobby of the facility labeled Hemingford Care Center Survey Results.Record review of this survey results book revealed the newest survey results were from from the survey ending December 2024. The book did not include the results of the most recent survey which ended 2/2/26, or the plan of correction written for that survey. Record review also revealed there were no citations related to complaints following the previous survey included the book. An Interview on 4/21/26 at 1:29 PM with the administrator confirmed the required documents were not included in the survey book.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02 (H)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse or neglect to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 1 (Resident 7) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 29. Record review of a facility document titled, Final investigation report dated [DATE], revealed that the Administrator (ADM) received an allegation of neglect on [DATE] from a family member of Resident 7. The document also revealed the family member alleged the facility had caused Resident 7's death through medical neglect.Record review of Nursing Notes dated [DATE] at 3:50 PM revealed the following:Resident 7's family member was in the facility when Resident 7 died.The nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse-C (LPN-C), assessed Resident 7 for signs of life and no heartbeat was detected at 2:39 PM.A provider had ordered a hospice consult for Resident 7, however the consult had not occurred yet.The administrator (ADM) was updated at 3:03 PM on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 (F) (iii) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise Resident 5's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP, a document that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment) to reflect care changes made following Resident 5's grievances. This affected one of three sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 29.Findings are: Record Review of Resident 5's census data revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 5's diagnoses list revealed a diagnosis of unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, sequela (current, long-term complications arising from a past head injury) was added on 5/4/2023. A diagnosis of personal history of traumatic brain injury (a brain injury that is caused by an outside force and affects how the brain works) was added on 5/1/2025. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10 (D) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a narcotic pain medication was administered as ordered for 1 (Resident 5) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 29. Findings Are: A record review of facility policy Administering Medications with a revision date of April 2019 revealed medications were to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frames. A record review of Resident 5's undated Care Plan revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), Epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes recurring, unprovoked seizures), Spina Bifida Occulta (a condition where a baby is born with a gap between the vertebrae in their spinal cord), muscle spasms, restless leg syndrome, and a history of a traumatic brain injury. The Care Plan revealed a focus area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-02 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 sampled nurse aides (NA) completed the required 12 hours of ongoing training annually based on their date of hire. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility identified a census of 33. Findings Are: A record review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed the in-service training for nurse aides would be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, provided training must be no less than 12 hours per year. A record review of an Employee Contact List dated 10/26/2026 revealed the following:-NA-I was hired on 10/2/2024,-NA-J was hired on 12/17/2024,-NA-A was hired on 8/30/2024, and-NA-L was hired on 5/8/2022. A record review of NA-I's ongoing training participation from 10/2/2024 through 10/2/2025 revealed the NA had completed 8.25 hours of ongoing training. A record review of NA-J's ongoing training participation from 10/17/2024 through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11 and 12-006.11(D) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow recipes to conserve nutritive value, palatability, and proper temperatures of the foods served to the residents. This had the potential to effect all 33 residents served food out of the facility kitchen. Observation of food preparation on 1/27/26 from 10:00 AM to 10:45 AM with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) revealed the CDM preparing beef tips and gravy and peas with pearled onions. The CDM retrieved the recipes as requested but at no time during preparation, referenced them. The CDM opened 2 bags of peas that were labeled as 2.5 pound bags, there were no pearled onions in these peas. The CDM then cuts open an unknown size bag of beef tips with a scissors and used bare hands to pry open and pour the meat into a pan of water, the CDM touched the bare meat with unclean hands. Interview with the CDM on 1/27/2026 at 10:07 AM revealed that the CDM was preparing enough food for all 33 residents and always made extra about 40 servings. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E)Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to use or dispose of expired foods, failed to perform hand hygiene and utilize gloves to prevent the potential for food borne illness and cross contamination. The facility also failed to test the sanitizing solution as required for dishwashing and cleaning services. This had the potential to effect all 33 residents that ate food out of the kitchen. Findings are: A Observation during initial kitchen tour on 1/26/2026 from 8:25 AM to 9:20 AM revealed the following: Dish room- There was food splattered on the wall behind the garbage disposal area, beside and behind the sink. There was a black substance behind the loose trim board. The dishwasher had dried white and gray particles all over the top of it. Stove- The lower cover was open and has dark substance build up on it and dry particles of food on it and the front and handles of the oven had a brown build up on it as well. The stove hood- Had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(A) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure the light fixtures throughout all halls of the facility were free of deceased bugs. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility identified a census of 33. Findings are: A record review of the facility policy Environmental Safety and Infection Prevention Policy dated [DATE] revealed the facility will maintain all resident care areas, common areas, and support spaces in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition at all times. An observation on [DATE] at 9:40 AM revealed the light fixtures in the hallway outside administrator's office and in common area outside the main dining room had numerous dead bugs in them. An observation on [DATE] beginning at 9:31 AM revealed deceased bugs in the following light fixtures:-The light fixture in the hallway outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER],-The light fixture in the hallway outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER],-The light fixture in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise care plans when necessary for 2 (Residents 11 and 20) of 12 sampled residents, and failed to ensure 1 (Resident 21) of 1 sampled resident representative was able to participate in the development of their care plan. The facility census was 33. Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of [DATE] revealed assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. A. A record review of Resident 11's Baseline Care Plan revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review conducted on [DATE] of Resident 11's undated Care Plan revealed a focus area dated [DATE] of Advanced Directives which stated that the resident was a full code and the facility was to perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the event that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.08(B) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a clinical rationale from the provider to continue as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications beyond 14 days as required for 2 (Residents 6 and 13) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 33. Findings Are: A record review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy dated July 2022 revealed that for psychotropic medications that are not antipsychotics if the prescriber or attending physician believes it is appropriate to extend the PRN (as needed) order beyond 14 days, he or she will document the rationale for extending the use and include the duration for the PRN order. A. A record review conducted on 1/29/2026 of Resident 13's January 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was an order for lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (MG) to be given every 8 hours as needed for anxiety. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit their investigation to the state agency for 1 (Resident 6) of 3 sampled residents within the required 5 working days for Resident 6. The facility reported a census of 33Record review of a facility-provided document titled Initial report revealed that Resident 6 was found to be wearing a brief that was overly wet and soiled at 6:00 AM on 1/2/26. The document further revealed that Nurse Aide-A (NA-A) from the shift prior was suspected of leaving the resident in the soiled brief for an extended period. The document revealed that this incident was reported to the state agency on 1/2/26.Record review of Resident 6's facesheet revealed they were admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses of cancer of the pancreas, rhabdomyolysis (a condition in which muscles break down rapidly and release harmful substances into the body), diabetes mellitus type 2 (a disorder where the body is unable to regulate blood sugar effectively), and a traumatic brain injury.Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled resident and their representative in writing regarding the reason for their transfers to the hospital. The facility identified a census of 33.Findings Are: A record review of Resident 1's Progress Notes dated 1/2/2026 revealed the resident was transported to the emergency room at 3:11 PM and the facility confirmed at 5:14 PM the same day that the resident had been admitted to the hospital. A record review of a Bed Hold Agreement for Resident 1 confirmed the resident was placed on a bed hold on 1/2/26. A record review of Resident 1's Progress Note dated 1/19/2026 revealed the resident was sent to the emergency room at 7:10 PM. A record review of Resident 1's Progress Note dated 1/20/2026 confirmed the resident had been admitted to the hospital. A record review of a Bed Hold Agreement for Resident 1 confirmed the resident was placed on a bed hold on 1/19/2026. A record review of Resident 1's electronic medical records revealed no evidence of a written notice of the reason for transfer being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(B) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) was accurately coded in relation to the Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a process which requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be given a preliminary assessment to determine whether they might have Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability) for 1 (Resident 20) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 33.Findings Are: A record review of Resident 20's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 20's Level II PASRR dated 10/28/25 revealed documentation under PASRR Determination:-Meets the federal definition of Serious Mental Illness? Yes.-Meets for Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident 11) of 12 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 33.Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of March 2022 revealed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. A record review of Resident 11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 9/29/2025 revealed in Section F, the following activities that were very important to the resident:-Being around animals, such as pets.-Keeping up with the news.-Going outside to get fresh air when the weather is good.-Participating in religious services or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide peri-cares as required to Resident 3 and failed to ensure Resident 21's lab work was obtained as ordered by the provider. The facility reported a census of 33. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 3's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with urinary tract infection, mood disorder, paralytic syndrome (loss of motor function, generalized muscle weakness, neurogenic bowel (an impaired ability to control bowel movements due to damage of the nervous system), and diabetes mellitus type 2 (a disorder where the body is unable to regulate blood sugar effectively). An interview with Resident 3 on 1/26/26 at 11:08 AM revealed the resident was upset about being left waiting for assistance to on prior occasions. Resident 3 revealed that on several prior occasions, they had been left to wait in their room for staff to help them with incontinence care. Resident 3 stated staff had answered their call light,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent and alleviate the formation and worsening of pressure injuries for Resident 23. The facility identified a census of 33. A record review of Resident 23's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure.A record review of Resident 23's nursing progress notes revealed the following:On 12/11/25, Resident 23 had a peeling skin/small open area to coccyx (tailbone). The area was cleaned and a nurse aide was educated to apply barrier cream with each brief change, and staff should attempt to reduce pressure to buttocks while in bed.On 12/15/25, the same area to Resident 23's coccyx split open and measured 3.2 x 0.5 centimeters (cm). Treatment and dressing were applied, and the resident's primary care provider was notified.On 12/20/25, the open area measured 2.4 by 0.2 cm.On 12/25/25, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(iii)Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 21) of one sampled resident received adequate fluid according to dietary recommendations based on resident weight and medication orders. The facility identified a census of 33. Findings are:Record review of Resident 21's clinical census sheet indicated the resident went to the hospital on 1/13/2026 and returned to the facility on 1/15/2026 with a diagnosis of Influenza A and hypoxia (low oxygen levels). A history of essential hypertension. Chronic kidney disease stage 3, unspecified urinary incontinence, and urinary tract infections.Record review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandatory assessment that identifies cares needed for the resident) dated 11/15/2025 revealed the following: Section C The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) a score of 7, which indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 6) of 5 sampled residents was seen by a primary care physician as required by the federal regulation, which is every 120 days when alternating visits with a non-physician practitioner (NPP). The facility identified a census of 33. Record Review of Resident 6's admission record reveals that resident 6 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis of unspecified injury of head, diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of 30 minutes or less, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, other dissociative and conversion disorders, dissociative identity disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Record Review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment to help guide cares for a resident) dated 10/2/2025 revealed the following: Section C- Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)(a brief screener that aids in detecting cognition impairment) a score of 7 indicating moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.08 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the provider reviewed and documented what, if any, actions had taken place to address the pharmacist recommendations made during their monthly medication regimen review for 2 (Residents 6 and 13) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 33.Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Medication Utilization and Prescribing- Clinical Protocol with a revision date of July 2016 revealed in the Treatment/Management section that the physician and staff will adjust existing medications based on their efficacy and the continued presence of relevant conditions and risks. A record review of the facility policy Tapering Medications and Gradual Drug Dose Reduction with a revision date of July 2022 revealed that periodically the staff and practitioner will review the continued relevance of each resident's medications. A. A record review of Resident 13's January 2026 Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(H)(i) Based on an interview and record reviews, the facility failed to employ a Registered Dietitian full-time or have a certified Food Service Director. This had the potential to affect 27 residents who ate from the kitchen. The facility census identified a census of 27. Findings are: Record review of a facility document titled, Hemingford Care Center Facility Assessment - 2024, section 3.2: Staffing Plan, revealed that the facility identified the need for one, Dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. An interview with the Kitchen Supervisor (KS) on 12/3/24 at 10:40 AM revealed KS had been the supervisor for several months but had not completed any special certifications and was not a certified FSD. An interview with the Administrator on 12/03/24 at 1:01 PM, revealed that the dietitian had resigned and no longer worked at the facility as of 11/29/24.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to store, label, cover, and use or discard food and drink items in a manner that prevented the potential for foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing at the facility. Findings are: An observation on 12/2/24 at 8:49 AM during the initial kitchen tour revealed the following: Refrigerated items: -1 open half-full 32-ounce container, manufacturer-labeled garlic in water covered with foil and labeled AR 10/30, OPD 11/5. -1 unlabeled package of ground meat-like substance in tubular casing. -1 1-gallon ziplock bag of loose raw meat-like substance labeled 11/29, 12/3. -1 fiberglass tray with 3 1-gallon size ziplock bags of diced meat sitting in liquid on tray, labeled (a)8/23 [NAME], (b)diced chicken, arrive frozen 11/21 LO 11/28, and (c) diced turkey out 11/29. In the dry storage room, 1opened gallon-sized container [NAME] cooking wine, labeled with open date of 8/18 and Best-if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to handle contaminated linens for all residents who were residing within the facility in a way that prevented the potential for cross contamination; and the facility failed to complete hand hygiene between distributing laundry for Residents 11, 21, 130, and 131. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A. An observation on 12/09/24 at 10:10 AM revealed Housekeeping/Laundry-G (HSKP-G) distributing personal laundry to residents on the 100 hall of the facility. HSKP-G exited Resident 21's room and returned a plastic bin to the linen cart. HSKP-G zipped the protective plastic covering closed on the cart, pushed the cart down the hall, then unzipped the plastic covering. HSKP-G removed hanging clothing from the cart, carried it into Resident 11's room, exited the room with empty hangers, retrieved a small plastic bin from the cart, returned to Resident 11's room, then exited the room again, recovered the cart, then moved down the hall. HSKP-G performed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-10 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(i) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Nurse Aide (NA)-F) of 6 sampled employees had completed initial orientation with training on abuse. This had the potential to affect all 27 residing in the facility. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program with a revised date of April 2021 indicated the facility's process to prevent abuse, neglect, or exploitation included providing staff orientation that included topics such as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, and handing verbally or physical aggressive resident behavior. An interview on 12/10/2024 at 10:00 AM with NA-F revealed NA-F was unable to verbalize any types of abuse or when and whom to report to. NA-F revealed they had been employed with the facility since October 2024, but did not recall having had any initial orientation on abuse. An interview on 12/10/2024 at 11:40 AM with the Administrator revealed the Administrator had no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission and provide a copy to the resident or resident's representative for 5 (Residents 13, 15, 16, 20, and 22) of 8 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 27. A record review of a facility policy Care Plans - Baseline with last revised date of March 2022 revealed under the policy statement that a baseline care plan is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission. The policy also revealed the facility would provide a copy of the summary to the resident and/or resident representative and be documented in the medical record. A. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 13 on 6/14/2024 with diagnoses of adult failure to thrive (decline in older adults that manifests as a downward spiral of health and ability,) seizures, atrial fibrillation (a common heart condition that causes an irregular and rapid beating of the heart,) Diabetes, depression, left femur (thigh…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12- 006.09(I) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to protect 4 (Residents 9, 16, 17, and 20) from Resident 15's adverse behaviors. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program with a revised date of April 2021 indicated the facility would protect residents from abuse including from other residents. A record review of a facility policy, Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol with a revise date of March 2018 indicated the physician and staff will address appropriately causes of problematic resident behavior where possible. A. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 15 on 2/21/2024 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, agitation, mood disorder, wandering, and chronic pain. A record review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), revealed Resident 15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report alleged misappropriation of resident property to a state agency within 24 hours and submit an investigation within 5 working days of the incident as required for 1(Resident 12) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: Record review of a facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, last revised September 2022, revealed if misappropriation of resident property is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. The policy also indicated that immediately was defined as within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Record review of an undated facility document titled, Investigation report, Misappropriation, revealed the following: -On 8/7/24 at 10:30AM, the dialysis center called the facility to report that (Resident 12) had alleged that someone stole 4 million…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on record reviews and an interview, the facility failed to accurately code active diagnoses, medication use, and Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) information on the Minimum Data Sets (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) for 2 (Resident 9 and 17) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual with a date of October 2023 revealed the following: -Code medications for anticoagulants if a resident is taking warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin. -Code medications for antiplatelet use if a resident is taking clopidogrel or dipyridamole. -If a GDR has been determined clinically contraindicated, enter the date. -Code active diagnoses if that disease has a direct relationship to resident's current functional, cognitive, mood or behavior status, medical treatments, nursing monitoring, or risk of death. A. A record review of Resident 9's annual MDS with a date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12- 006.09(G)(i) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to develop and provide a discharge summary that included a recapitulation (a brief review or summary) of stay for 1 (Resident 79) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Discharge Summary and Plan with a revision date of October 2022 revealed the following: - 1. The discharge summary includes a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge. - 12. A copy of the following is provided to the resident and will be filed in the resident's medical record: an evaluation of the resident's discharge needs, the post discharge plan, and the discharge summary. A record review of an admission Record revealed Resident 79 was discharged from the facility on 10/7/2024. A record review of a Discharger Planning Review v1.1 with a date of 10/7/2024 revealed section Recap of the resident's stay was left blank. An interview on 12/4/2024 at 12:00 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure two prophylactic antibiotics had stop dates and had indications for use for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review of an undated policy Antibiotic Stewardship - Order for Antibiotics indicated if an antibiotic is indicated, prescribers will provide complete antibiotic orders including the drug name, dose, frequency, duration of treatment (start and stop date or number of days of therapy), route and indication. A record review of Resident 2's Order Summary with an active order date of 12/5/2024 revealed orders for Macrobid (an antibiotic), with directions to give one capsule by mouth in the morning for prophylactic with a start date of 11/14/2024 and did not have a stop date or duration. It also revealed an order for bacitracin-polymyxin ophthalmic ointment, an antibiotic for the eye, with directions to instill one ribbon in the right eye at bedtime for supplement with a start date of 4/13/2024 and did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(D) Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the nutritive value of pureed food. This had the potential to affect 2 residents (Residents 5 and 15). The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: An observation of meal service on 12/3/24 at 11:46 AM revealed the following: -Cook-A measured three foods into three separate blender containers: (a) chicken and dumplings, (b) boiled seasoned peas, and (c) cornbread. -The foods were blended by Cook-A with an electric blender attachment. -Cook-A added unmeasured hot water from a coffee carafe to each container, then re-blended to achieve a pureed consistency for the chicken and the peas, and a slurry for the cornbread. -The three blended foods were each distributed to two separate plates, and a serving of cooked canned sweet potatoes was also put on each plate. A record review of the undated facility recipe, Chicken and Dumplings, revealed no guidance for mechanical soft or pureed diet modifications. No recipe was available for the peas or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(A)(iv) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food in the texture ordered by the medical provider for two affected residents (Residents 5 and 15). The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review of active physician's orders for Resident 5 revealed an order for, regular diet, mechanical soft texture, thin consistency liquids, ordered on 7/30/2024. A record review of active physician's orders for Resident 15 revealed an order for, liberalized diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency liquids, ordered on 9/23/2024. An observation of meal service on 12/3/24 at 11:46 AM revealed the following: -Cook-A measured three foods into three separate blender containers: (a) chicken and dumplings, (b) boiled seasoned peas, and (c) cornbread. -The foods were blended by Cook-A with an electric blender attachment. -Cook-A added unmeasured hot water from a coffee carafe to each blender container to achieve a pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit an accurate investigation report to the state agency following an elopement for 1 (Resident 1) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 25. The Findings Are: A record review of a facility provided document titled New Investigation Report revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) submitted an investigation report to the State Agency on 7/11/24 regarding the elopement of Resident 1. The report stated that the facility called the incident in to Adult Protective Services (APS) on 7/6/24 at 9:32 PM, and that the facility administrator was notified of Resident 1's elopement on 7/6/24 at 6:57 PM. In the section labeled Describe the incident, the document stated that Resident 1's elopement occurred on 7/6/24 at 6:57 PM and that the NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) was notified of the incident on 7/5/24 around 5:12 PM. In the Outcome of the Facility Investigation section, the document stated that Resident 1 had been outside the facility from approximately 5:37 PM or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)(3) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent elopements for 1 (Resident 1) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 25. The Findings Are: A record review of facility policy Wandering and Elopements with revision date of March 2019, revealed that if a resident was identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. The policy did not contain information regarding implementing new interventions after an elopement occurred and did not contain examples of interventions that could be put into place if a resident was at risk for wandering or elopements. A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 3/12/24 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a resident's change in condition for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 27. The Findings Are: A record review of facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with a last revised date of February 2021, revealed in #2 A 'significant change' of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: a. will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions., in #4 Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: b. there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status., and in #8 The nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. A record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to assist a dependent resident with toileting. This affected Resident 2. The facility identified a census of 27. The findings are: A record review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 5/4/2023 with diagnoses of: left side hemiplegia, paraplegia, epilepsy, Spina Bifida, and muscle weakness. A record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), dated 2/22/2024 revealed Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed the resident had impairment of upper and lower extremities and required total assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs.) A record review of Resident 2's undated Care Plan revealed Resident 2 required two-person total assistance for toileting. An observation on 3/26/2024 at 11:57 AM revealed Resident 2 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D8b Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to identify a significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 27. The findings are: A record review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention with last revised date of September 2008, revealed in the Weight Assessment section, #3 Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. Verbal notification must be confirmed in writing. and #6 The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria: a. 1 month- 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe. b. 3 months-7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe. c. 6 months- 10% weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is severe. A record review of facility policy Change in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and administer the correct dosage for 2 (Resident 8 and Resident 12) of 11 sampled residents. The medication error rate was 7.69%. The facility identified a census of 27. The findings are: An observation on 3/26/2024 at 12:18 PM revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) - A prepare an unmeasured amount of Resident 8's Dicolfenac Gel 1%. An interview on 3/26/2024 at 12:20 PM with LPN-A revealed [gender] was not knowledgeable of how to measure Diclofenac Gel 1%. A record review of Resident 8's order revealed Diclofenac Gel 1% with a direction to apply 2 grams to both knees. A continuous observation on 3/26/2024 at 12:23 PM revealed LPN-A had administered 17 grams or a converted measurement of 1.1497 tablespoons of Miralax to Resident 12. An interview on 3/27/2024 at 10:43 AM with LPN-A revealed [gender] follows the orders to know the correct amount to administer and had acknowledged the dosage varies for each resident. A record review of Resident 12's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent the potential for elopement to 2 (Residents 2 & 4) of 5 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect 5 of 5 residents who resided in the facility's Memory Care Unit. The facility census was 25. The Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Emergency Procedure-Missing Person, with a last revised date of August 2018, Policy Interpretation and Implementation #1 revealed Residents at risk for wandering and/or elopement will be monitored and staff will take necessary precautions to ensure their safety. A record review of the facility's resident roster on 1/30/24 revealed there were 5 residents residing in the Memory Support Unit (MCU). A. A record review of Resident 4's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar type. A record review of Resident 4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04D2 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a Qualified Dietary Manager. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate food served by the kitchen. The facility census was 22. A record review of the facility's dietary department staff list revealed no evidence of a Certified Dietary Manager being employed by the facility. A interview on 12/12/2023 at 10:15 AM was conducted with Registered Dietician (RD) M. During the interview RD M reported being new to the facility with plans of being at the facility monthly. RD M reported the facility did not have a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and was in the process of hiring one, likely from in house. RD M reported the internal candidate did not a CDM currently.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation and record review; the facility kitchen staff failed to store food, failed to complete hand hygiene during food preparation and failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in a clean manor to prevent the potential for food borne illness. This had the potential to effect all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility staff identified a census of 22. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure equipment in the kitchen was fu. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 22. The findings are: A. An initial observation of the kitchen tour on 12/06/2023 from 8:50 AM to 9:25 PM revealed the following: -A one gallon container of vegetable oil opened and undated. -A container of Raisin Bran cereal with a preparation dated of 9/20 and did not identify a use by date or expiration date. -A container of [NAME] Krispie's with a preparation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18A Based on observation and interview; the facility staff failed ensure ventilation system vents were maintained in a clean functional condition for 6 rooms (rooms 103, 201, 207, 211, 305, and 307) affecting Residents 5, 6, 8, 10, 13, 14, 15, and 20 and 2) and failed to ensure bathroom vents were in working order in 2 rooms (307 and 311) affecting Residents 13 and 125. The facility staff identified a census of 22 residents at the time of the survey. Findings are: An observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 12/6/2023 at 8:30 AM revealed the bathroom vent was not in working order. An observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 12/7/2023 at 8:49 AM revealed the bathroom vent had thick chunks of a grey-color build-up of what appeared to be dust and debris. Some of the build-up was protruding from the vent. An observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 12/7/2023 at 9:00 AM revealed the bathroom vent had a grey-in-color build-up that appeared to be dust that was covering the vent. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05 (8) Based on record review, observations, and interviews; the facility failed to identify a positioning wedge as a restraint for 1 (Resident 3) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 22 residents at the time of the survey. Findings are: A record review of Resident 3's admission Record with a printed date of 12/7/2023 revealed the resident had diagnoses of unspecified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness and aphasia. A record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment tool used to develop a resident's Care Plan) with a date of 8/1/2023 revealed Section C-Cognitive Patterns, the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a test to evaluate how well an individual is cognitively functioning) did not have a score, but under C100. Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making, Made decisions regarding tasks of daily life: Resident 3 had a score of 3 Severely impaired-never/rarely made decisions. A record review of Resident 3's MDS with a date of 10/24/2023 revealed Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference number 175 NAC 12-006.05 (5) Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to provide notice to the state ombudsman of resident transfer or discharge. This failure affected 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 17). The facility identified a census of 22 residents at the time of the survey. A record review of Resident 17's face sheet revealed they were admitted on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD). Further review of Resident 17's face sheet revealed Resident 17 had a power of attorney (POA). Record review of Resident 17's Progress Note (PN) dated 7/17/2023 at 2:59 PM revealed Resident 17 was taken to the Emergency Department (ER). A record review of Resident 17's PN dated 8/4/2023 revealed Resident 17 was sent to the ER. A record review of Resident 17's PN dated 8/23/202 revealed Resident 17 was sent to the hospital. A record review of Resident 17's PN dated and 9/27/2023 revealed Resident 17 was sent to the ER. A record review of Resident 17's PN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B1 (2) Based on record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment within 14 days of determining the status change was significant for 1 (Residents 21) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 22. Findings are: A record review of Resident 21's admission Record with a printed date of 12/13/2023 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Malignant neoplasm of the brain, unspecified with an onset of 9/11/2023 and Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting the right dominant side. Record review of Resident 21's Hospice admission Orders revealed the Resident was admitted to Hospice on 11/7/2023 with an admitting diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the brain. A record review of Resident 21's a list of Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) revealed there had not been a significant change MDS completed. An interview with the MDS Coordinator on 12/11/2023 at 3:35 PM. During the interview the MDS Coordinator had confirmed Resident 21 had been placed on Hospice care on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to identify mental illness diagnoses on a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- an evaluation used to identify the presence of mental illness, intellectual disability, or related condition) for 1 resident (Resident 6) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 22 residents at the time of the survey. Findings are: A record review of Resident 6's PASARR level 1 with a date of 5/5/2023 revealed Section III: PASARR Conditions Number 1. MI (mental illness) or suspected MI: No mental health diagnosis is known or suspected. Under Section V: PASARR Screen Completion A PASARR Level II Evaluation and Determination is not required at this time. It was marked, No diagnosis or suspicion of serious Mental Illness (SMI) or intellectual disability or related condition (ID (intellectual disability/RC (related condition) were indicated. A record review of Resident 6's admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a (5) Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 14) of 2 sampled resident who received dialysis services had care plan interventions for dialysis monitoring. The facility census was 22. The Findings Are: A record review of Resident 14's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). A record review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning), dated 11/13/23 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 14 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of a 10. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 8 to 12 indicates a person has moderately impaired cognition. An observation on 12/06/23 at 10:30 AM of Resident 14 revealed the resident had a white dressing with a clear covering to on right upper chest. Resident 14 stated this was their dialysis catheter site. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER:175 NAC 12-006.09D2b Based observations, record reviews and interview; the facility staff failed to identify, obtain treatment and monitor the development of a pressure ulcer for 1 (Resident 20) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 22. Findings are: A record review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 20 on 7/17/2023 with diagnoses of paraplegia, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, history of traumatic brain injury, and a pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Required total assistance with transfers and bathing. -Required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toilet use. -Required supervision with personal hygiene and locomotion. -Brief Interview of Mental Status BIMS) was a 15. According to the MDS [NAME], a score of 13 to 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to utilize bath chair seatbelts during the use of the whirlpool bathing system according to the operational procedures manual for 1 (Resident 20) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 22. The findings are: A record review of the undated Operational Procedures Manual for Century Whirlpool Bathing System, under Section II Transfer In, read B. Transfer the patient into the Saf-[NAME] seat using the proper nursing transfer techniques. Secure the seatbelt around the patient's lap. The operations manual also read under Section II Transfer In, Warning: Failure to secure the patient properly with the seatbelt could result in injury to the operator or patient. A record review of the Bath, Shower/Tub policy, last revised in February of 2018, revealed the facility policy did not include information regarding the required safety feature of a bath chair seatbelt during whirlpool use. The policy did not follow the operation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide assessment and monitoring for 2 ( Resident 14 and 17) of 2 residents who was receiving Hemodialysis (A method used to treat kidney disease by clearing metabolic waste products, toxins, and excess fluid from the blood). The facility staff identified a census of 22. The Findings Are: A. Record review of Resident 14's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). A record review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 11/13/23 revealed the facility assessed Resident 14 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of a 10. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 8 to 12 indicates a person has moderately impaired cognition. Further review of Resident 14's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 14 received dialysis services. An observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-12-10 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(A)(iii) Based on record reviews and an interview, the facility failed to conduct nurse aide registry checks for adverse findings as required for 4 of 5 sampled employees. This had the potential to affect all 27 residing within the facility. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program with a revised date of April 2021 indicated the facility would conduct employee background checks including state nurse aide registry checks for any adverse findings. A record review of a facility provided list of staff that included date of hire and position revealed the following: - Cook- A was hired on 8/29/2024. - Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) - B was hired on 10/24/2024. - Nurse Aide (NA) - C was hired on 10/17/2024. - NA - D was hired on 10/21/2024. A. A record review of Cook-A's personnel file revealed no evidence that a nurse aide registry check had been completed. B. A record review of LPN - B's personnel file revealed no evidence that a nurse aide registry check had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$345K
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 7%Other / private 23%

This home reported $345K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$309per resident / day
operating cost
$9,388per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$277per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285306. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next