Christian Homes Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 24.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 70.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to label and date foods stored in the kitchen and failed to ensure that foods were prepared and served in a manner to prevent food-borne illnesses. The facility also failed to ensure hand hygiene was followed during meal service. This had the potential to affect all individuals who received foods from the kitchen and dining rooms. The facility census was 71. Findings Are: Record review of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2022 Food Code dated 01/18/2023 revealed that the Food Code addresses risk factors of food borne illnesses and identified risk factors of improper temperatures, proper hygiene, contaminated equipment, inadequate cooking times, and foods from unsafe sources. The Food Code addresses several controls for risk factors and further establishes 5 key public health interventions to protect consumer health. Specifically, these interventions are demonstration of knowledge, employee health controls, controlling hands as a vehicle of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(S)Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to consecutively serve meals to all residents seated at the same table to maintain resident dignity for 10 of 12 residents observed (Residents 62, 41, 27, 35, 72, 47, 36, 70, 31, and 12). The facility census was 71.Findings are:Record review of the facility admission Agreement dated 8/6/24 revealed that the facility will provide the resident with three meals a day. The resident and responsible person acknowledge being informed orally and in writing of Resident Rights. Record review of the facility Resident Handbook dated March 2024 revealed that the nutritional services department is directed by a Dietary Manager under the direction of a Consulting Registered Dietician. Meals are prepared in the facility and are served at established meal times. The section titled Resident Rights revealed that it is the facility policy to protect and promote the rights of each resident. The facility will care for residents in a manner and an environment that promotes maintenance or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(D)&(E) Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative, in advance of care, of the risks and benefits and possible alternatives of treatment for 5 of 6 residents sampled (Residents 1, 4, 10, 53, and 60). The facility census was 71.Findings Are: Record review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medication Checklist dated May 2021 revealed that upon receiving physician orders staff must have permission from the Designated Power of Attorney (DPOA) (a legal document that authorizes a trusted person (the agent or attorney-in-fact) to manage the financial, legal, or medical affairs of another (the principal) person when that person is no longer able to make decisions) or the resident before administering medications. Verbal permission with a new order or order change may be obtained. Staff must give information to the DPOA and/or resident about possible side effects and benefits and place a care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an baseline care plan (a written plan required to be developed within 24 hours of admission detailing the instructions needed for staff to provide initial effective and person-centered quality care for a resident) was completed within 24 hours of admission for 7 (Residents 18, 60, 11, 53, 70, 2, and 9) of 10 sampled residents and failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan to the resident or their representative for 9 (Residents 18, 74, 60, 11, 53, 3, 70, 2, and 9) of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Care Plans dated January 2026 revealed that a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission (24 hours in Nebraska). The preliminary care plan will be used until the staff can conduct a comprehensive assessment and develop an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was informed of all resident discharges and transfers. This affected 2 (Residents 74 and 76) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 71. In an interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) on 03/10/2026 at 11:20 AM it was revealed that the SSD sent a list of emergency transfers to the ombudsman monthly. A.Record review of Resident 74's Progress Notes dated 1/2/2026 revealed the resident had an emergency transfer to the hospital on that date at 7:45 AM.Record review of the Emergency Transfers from Facility for January 2026 revealed there were three residents listed on the form, which was provided to the ombudsman. Resident 74 was not included on this form. B.A record review of Discharge Instructions dated 2/9/2026 for Resident 76 revealed the resident was transferred from the facility on 02/09/2026.Record review of the Emergency Transfers from Facility dated February 2026 revealed there were two residents listed on the transfer form, which was provided to the ombudsman. Resident 76 was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) for 2 (Residents 1 and 63) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 71.Findings are:Record review of a facility policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/2021 revealed it was the responsibility of the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) to complete both section H: Bladder and Bowel and Section N: Medications of the MDS as well as the submission of the MDS. Record review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI Manual, a document published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to facilitate accurate and effective resident assessment practices in long-term care facilities) dated 10/2025 revealed:-Coding Instructions for H0100C to code if the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP, a document that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment) reflected a discharge plan and goals for 1 (Resident 11) sampled resident, and accurately reflected a therapeutic diet and antipsychotic medication use for 1 (Resident 53) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Findings are:Record review of a facility policy titled Care Plans dated 01/2026 revealed it was the policy of the facility that the Interdisciplinary team was responsible for the development of an individualized person centered comprehensive care plan for each resident. Record review of a facility policy titled admission of a Resident dated 01/15/2026 revealed the interdisciplinary plan of care should be developed within 21 days of admission. A.Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician/providers orders for the administration of an as needed medication for 1 (Resident 11) of 1 sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Findings are:Record review of a Clinical Census dated 03/09/2026 revealed that the facility admitted Resident 11 on 01/19/2026 with diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension (a significant drop in blood pressure that occurs within 3 minutes of standing up, leading to dizziness, lightheadedness, or fainting). Record review of Resident 11's undated Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP, a document that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment) revealed a focus of the resident being at risk for falls due to hypotension with the latest revision date being 02/19/2026. Record review of Resident 11's Physician Order Summary dated 03/10/2026 revealed an order for Midodrine (a medication used to treat orthostatic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.15 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to identify a resident's preference to, or not to, have dental services on admission to the facility for 1 (Resident 53) of 1 sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Findings are:Record review of a facility policy titled Dental Services and dated 01/2026 revealed it was the policy of the facility to assist the residents to obtain routine and emergency dental care. The resident and or their representative during the admission process are notified of dental services available under the State Plan, and of the potential charges that may apply in case of routine or emergency dental care provided by outside resources. An interview completed on 03/09/2026 at 2:41 PM with Resident 53 revealed that the resident was getting a food texture that they did not like due to not having any teeth. The resident stated that they previously had dentures for a long time and was not sure how long it had been since they used dentures. The resident stated the dentures stopped fitting a while ago so…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(D) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes during completion of catheter care and wound care for 1 (Resident 11) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 71. Findings are:Record review of a facility policy titled Hand Hygiene dated 01/2026 revealed it is the policy of the facility that all staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection, and it applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. The policy stated that hand hygiene should be performed after removing gloves and prior to applying new gloves. Record review of a Clinical Census on 03/10/2026 revealed that the facility admitted Resident 11 on 01/19/2026 with a diagnosis of stage 3 pressure ulcer (which is a severe, full thickness wound extending through the skin into the subcutaneous fatty tissue often appearing as a deep crater). Record review of Resident 11's Order Summary revealed the resident had provider orders dated 01/19/2026 stating to complete a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE