No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Imperial Manor Nursing Home

933 Grant Street, Imperial, NE 69033 · Government - City/county · 58 certified beds · (308) 882-5333 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (308) 882-5333 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Oct 2024$7,903 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $7,903 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-30)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
71434 Highway 25 · (308) 334-5241 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
513 Broadway St · (308) 882-4949 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
110 E 12th St · (308) 882-5389 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased33.7%19.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.0%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.4%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%4.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.2%18.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.1%19.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.0%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control46.4%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.0%20.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission4.6%20.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.0%11.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.371.811.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.321.921.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.1%CMS range 19.9–45.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 5.9–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.741.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 27.7 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.62 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-20)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(D) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene to prevent the potential for cross contamination during meal preparation. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 30.Findings are:An observation on 10/01/2025 at 9:17 AM revealed three bags of half frozen potatoes in the sink defrosting. Cook-B while wearing gloves opened the bags with a knife and poured the potatoes into a colander. Cook-B then grabbed a bowl and a spoon and began spooning the frozen chunks into the bowl and chopping at the potatoes to separate them. Cook-B grabbed a large chunk of potatoes and used hands to break the pieces apart. Cook-B rinsed their gloved hands in the sink the potatoes were sitting in. While still wearing the same gloves Cook-B poured the potatoes into the pan on the stove. An observation of kitchen on 10/01/2025 at 10:49 AM revealed while wearing gloves, Cook-B moved two bowls of raw chicken from the refrigerator to the counter. Cook-B gathered three large baking pans and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) & (D)Based on Observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination while scooping ice into resident drinking cups. The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene to prevent the potential for cross contamination during hydration preparation in the dining room This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 30.Findings are:An observation on 9/29/2025 at 12:19 PM revealed Dietary Aide (DA)-A serving juice out of the cart with bins sitting on ice in the dining room. DA-A observed a soiled spot on the counter, grabbed a rag and began to wipe down the counter while wearing gloves. DA-A then resumed serving drinks to residents while still wearing the same gloves and without performing hand hygiene. An observation on 9/29/2025 at 12:20 PM revealed DA-A wearing the same gloves while they resumed serving drinks. DA-A picked up an empty glass off the cart and without using an ice scoop, used the glass to scoop ice out of the blue ice chest sitting on a chair in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-20 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a qualified infection preventionist. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. The facility census was 30.Findings Are: An interview on 9/29/2025 at 10:25 AM with the administrator revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C was the facility's Infection Preventionist. A record review of facility provided documents revealed no evidence that LPN-C had completed specialized training for infection control and prevention. An interview on 9/29/2025 at 11:36 AM with the administrator confirmed LPN-C had not completed specialized training for infection control and prevention and that the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) had been covering the duties of the Infection Preventionist in addition to their DON job duties.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of 1 (Resident 35) of 1 sample resident's discharge from the facility. The facility census was 30. Findings Are: A record review of Resident 35's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record also revealed the resident discharged to another nursing facility on 8/19/2025. A record review of Resident 35's electronic medical records revealed no evidence of the Ombudsman being notified of the resident's discharge from the facility. An interview on 9/30/2025 at 2:32 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident was discharged from the facility. The DON stated that the Social Services Director (SSD) was responsible for notifications to the ombudsman. An interview on 9/30/2025 at 2:35 PM with SSD revealed the SSD was only aware of the requirement to notify the Ombudsman of emergency transfers therefore, no notification had been sent regarding Resident 35's discharge from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plans were comprehensive for 2 (Residents 17 and 26) of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Findings Are: A record review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy with revision date of 9/12/2024 revealed it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychological needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. A.A record review of Resident 17's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of migraine and polyneuropathy. An interview on 9/29/2025 at 4:38 PM with Resident 17 revealed the resident had chronic pain and suffered from near constant migraines. A record review of Resident 17's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure foods were not stored on the floor and meats were not thawed above fresh vegetables. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 36. Findings are: Record review of the policy and procedure Food Receiving and Storage with a revised date of 10/1/2024 revealed the policy is so food shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. The purpose is to ensure the quality of food and ensure it is stored and handled properly. Refrigerated foods will be stored in such a way that promotes adequate air circulation around food storage containers. The freezer must keep foods frozen solid. Uncooked and raw animal products and fish will be stored separately in drip proof containers and below fruits, vegetables, and other ready to eat foods. An observation on 2/4/2025 at 10:45 AM revealed in the walk-in refrigerator two boxes of lettuce stored on the floor, one non-drip container of chicken thawing on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that outdated food items were not available for use, failed to ensure clean and sanitary surfaces were maintained throughout the kitchen, and failed to do proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination and prevent the spread of foodborne illness. The facility also failed to use pasteurized eggs when serving over-easy eggs to prevent foodborne illness and failed to follow package directions while preparing stuffing. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents served food out of the kitchen. Findings are: During the initial kitchen tour on 10/7/2024 from 10:30 AM to 11:24 AM revealed the following concerns: A cart with pots and pans on the bottom shelf had dust and food particles on it. Two shelves above the serving area had seven plastic canisters with cereal, no dates on the canisters. Dust, grime and food particles were also on this shelf that could fall into food being prepped in this area. The shelves below this prep area had bowls and plate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-00604(B)(ii) Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides had completed at least 12 hours of continuing education, including Dementia and Abuse training, as required for 4 (Nurse Aide G, F, D, and H) of 5 sampled employees. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents who reside within the facility. Findings are: A record review of the Imperial Manor Facility Assessment with a date of 8/5/2024, under Training and Education Section, indicated nurse aides must complete no less than 12 hours per year of continuing education, including Dementia and abuse. A record review of Nurse Aide (NA)-G's Relias Transcript with a date of 10/8/2024 revealed a hire date of 7/23/2021. It also revealed 0 hours of training for the year and no evidence of Dementia or abuse training. A record review of an undated list of in-services for NA-G revealed no in-services had been completed for the year and no evidence of Dementia or abuse training. A record review of NA-F's Relias Transcript,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)(3) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent elopement for 1 resident (Resident 26), ensure fall interventions were in place for 2 residents (Resident 3 and 22), and ensure a call light was within reach for 1 resident (Resident 15). The sample size was 4 out of 4 residents. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility policy Elopements and Wandering Residents with a date of 5/9/2023 indicated the facility's approach to monitoring and management of residents at risk for elopement included implementing interventions to reduce the hazard and risk of elopement. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 26 on 12/28/2023 with diagnoses of dementia with agitation and anxiety. A record review of Resident 26's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning,)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 1-005.01(G) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to report to the State Agency and submit an investigation within 5 working days of an elopement for 1 (Resident 26) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Reporting Alleged Violations with a date of 2/22/2023 revealed alleged violations must be reported to the administrator of the facility and to the State Survey Agency in accordance with state law. The policy did not include a timeframe. A record review of Resident 26's Progress Notes with a date of 1/27/2024, written by Registered Nurse (RN) - E revealed Resident 26 had eloped out the front door of the facility after breakfast. Staff were able to catch up to Resident 26 and redirect. Resident 26 attempted to leave the facility again about an hour later. An interview on 10/10/2024 at 11:00 AM with the Administrator confirmed a report to the State Agency within 5 working days regarding Resident 26's elopement had not completed.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(c)(ii) Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) within the required 14 days assessment within 14 days of the determination of a significant change for 1 (Resident 11) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: A record review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument Manual (RAI Manual, a document published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to facilitate accurate and effective resident assessment practices in long-term care facilities), Chapter 2.6 revealed, A significant change of status assessment (SCSA) is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program. The record also revealed that the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed prior to admission for one (Resident 15) of one sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: Record review of Residents 15's face sheet revealed a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental illness that combines symptoms of schizophrenia and a mood disorder, such as bipolar disorder or depression) dated the day of admission [DATE]. Record review of Resident 15's PASSR dated 12/15/21 on page two under section three where the form asks if the Resident has a suspected mental illness, the facility answered the question no and the Resident had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. On page four of the PASRR form where the facility would write in any suspicion of a mental illness, this was also marked no. Record review of Resident 15's care plan dated 9/26/24 revealed an additional diagnosis of psychotic disturbance, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan (a written strategy for how nursing home staff will help a resident receive the care they need) with the required information for 1 (Resident 30) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Baseline Care Plan with a date implemented of 10/7/2022 indicated baseline care plans would, at minimum, include initial goals, physician's orders, dietary order, therapy services, and social services. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 30 on 3/29/2024 with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and dementia. A record review of Resident 30's Interim Care Plan with a date of 3/29/2024 revealed no evidence of physician's orders, dietary orders, or social services. An interview on 10/8/2024 at 12:40 PM with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator confirmed the required information was not included on Resident 30's baseline care plan and should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observations, interviews, and record review; the facility failed to ensure that nasal cannula tubing was stored in a sanitary condition and failed to ensure oxygen settings were set at the prescribed rate for 2 (Resident 8 and 30) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility policy Oxygen Administration with a date implemented of 5/31/2023 indicated oxygen delivery devices are to be kept covered in plastic bags when not in use and oxygen is to be administered under orders of a physician. A record review on an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 30 on 3/29/2024 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD.) A record review of Resident 30's Order Summary with a date of 10/8/2024 revealed an order for oxygen at 2 Liters Per Minute (LPM) at bedtime and as needed. An observation on 10/8/2024 at 11:50 AM revealed Resident 30's oxygen tubing had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12- 006.09(H) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to have a stop date for an antibiotic for 1 (Resident 3) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: A record review of the facility's policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program with a last review/revised date of 10/8/2024 revealed all prescriptions for antibiotics shall specify the dose, duration, and indication for use. Antibiotic orders obtained upon admission to the facility shall be reviewed for appropriateness. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 3 on 8/1/2023. A record review of Resident 3's Order Summary with a date of 10/9/2024 revealed an order for Doxycycline (an antibiotic) once a day for chronic knee infection. The order had a beginning date of 8/1/2023 and no evidence of a stop date. An interview on 10/9/2024 at 1:00 PM with the Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed Resident 3's antibiotic had no stop date and no attempts to discontinue the antibiotic had been made.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Liscensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10 (D) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident 6) of 7 sampled residents received an extended-release medication per manufacturer directions. This resulted in a significant medication error. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: Record review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment that helps determine a plan of care) dated 8/20/24, under Section C the Brief Mental Interview (BIMS) (an interview to determine a resident's cognition) a score of 7 out of 15 indicating the resident has moderate cognitive impairment. Section I indicates a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer's dementia and dysphagia (a swallowing disorder). Record Review of Resident 6's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following medications were ordered: -Magnesium 400 milligram (mg) orally every day for dietary supplement. -Vitamin B12 1000 micrograms (mcg) orally every day for dietary supplement -Zinc 50 mg orally every day for dietary supplement -Calcium + D3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.18(D) Based on observations, interview, and record reviews; the facility failed to don (put on) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) of a gown during catheter cares and completed hand hygiene between glove use as required for 1 (Resident 26) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: A record review of Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a date of 5/3/2024 revealed initiation of enhanced barrier precaution will be implemented for those with indwelling medical devices (urinary catheters) during high-contact resident care activities of transferring, providing hygiene, changing briefs, or urinary device care. A record review of a facility policy Hand Hygiene with a date last revised of 6/12/2023 revealed if a task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves. A record review of Resident 26's Care Plan with a date of 8/14/2024 revealed Resident 26 had a urinary tract infection, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that prevents the potential for foodborne illness in residents who consume food from the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who ate from the kitchen. The facility census was 39. The findings are: A. An initial observation on 10/2/23 from 10:20 AM through 10:50 AM in the kitchen revealed the following: -The refrigerator contained two bowls of lettuce covered with plastic wrap with no dates on them - A clear plastic bag of cooked bacon with no date on it - A clear plastic bag of an unknown food with no label or date on it -Three flat metal pans were sitting on racks under the prep counter that had a significant amount of food debris on them -The Walk-in fridge contained the following items: an open bottle of prune juice that was not dated, and open bottle of Thirs-Tea that was not dated, and a large, opened Chipotle Ranch dressing container that was not dated. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C1c Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise 4 (Residents 26, 27, 33, and 38) of 4 sampled resident's care plans after a fall. The facility census was 39. The findings are: A. A record review of Resident 26's Facesheet revealed Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease, Unspecified. A record review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (an assessment completed to determine cares needed for the resident) dated 9/14/2023, Section C revealed Resident 26's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 9 out of 15 which indicates the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Resident 26's MDS Section G revealed Resident 26 required extensive assist from one staff for transferring, toilet use, and walking. A record review of an Event Report dated 7/6/23 at 7:15 PM revealed Resident 26 had an unwitnessed fall in their room. A record review of an Event Report dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12A Based on observation, record review, and interviews; the facility and its Contracted Pharmacy failed to ensure that medications were available to be administered as ordered for Resident 241. The facility identified a census of 39 residents at the time of the survey. Findings are: Observation of morning medication administration on 10/4/2023 at 8:53 AM revealed Registered Nurse (RN)-D was preparing Resident 241's medications. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) that was displayed on the medication carts computer screen revealed Resident 241 was supposed to receive bupropion HCL (Wellbutrin) extended-release (ER) 12-hour, 150 milligrams (MG) oral tablet, give one tablet by mouth every 24 hours; calcium 600-10 MG-micrograms (MCG), one tablet by mouth, one time a day; fish oil 1000 MG oral capsule, one time a day; Losartan Potassium 50 MG oral tablet, one time a day; multiple vitamin oral tablet, one time a day; zinc gluconate 100 MG oral tablet, give one tablet by mouth one time a day; and a nose and Nozin Nasal Sanitizer Nasal Kit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observations of 27 medication administration opportunities revealed 7 errors that resulted in an error rate of 25.93%. The errors affected Resident 241. The facility staff identified a census of 39 residents at the time of the survey. Findings are: Observation of morning medication administration on 10/4/2023 at 8:53 AM revealed Registered Nurse (RN)-D was preparing Resident 241's medications. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) that was displayed on the medication carts computer screen revealed Resident 241 was supposed to receive bupropion HCL (Wellbutrin) extended-release (ER) 12-hour, 150 milligrams (MG) oral tablet, give one tablet by mouth every 24 hours; calcium 600-10 MG-micrograms (MCG), one tablet by mouth, one time a day; fish oil 1000 MG oral capsule, one time a day; Losartan Potassium 50 MG oral tablet, one time a day; multiple vitamin oral tablet, one time a day; zinc gluconate 100 MG oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17D Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene when preparing and administering medications to 1 (Resident 11) of 1 resident sampled. The facility census was 39. A. Observation of medication administration on 10/3/2023 at 12:40 PM revealed that RN-E had washed their hands with soap and water for five seconds before administering a resident's medications. Prior to administering the medications, RN-E had gone back over to the medication cart, placed their hand in their pockets to retrieve a set of keys, opened drawers on the medication cart, and removed the resident's medications again. Observation at 12:45 PM revealed RN-E washed their hands with soap and water for 10 seconds, put gloves on, and administered the resident's eye drops and nasal spray. RN-E removed their gloves and washed their hands with soap and water for 12 seconds with soap and water. B. Observation of medication administration on 10/3/2023 at 1:15 PM revealed RN-E had primed Resident 11's insulin pen with two units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-10 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to submit data for the third quarter of 2024 for the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a collection of staffing information and a requirement of all long-term care facilities.) This had the potential to affect all resident residing within the facility. The facility identified a census of 32. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Payroll Based Journal with a last reviewed/revised date of 8/31/2024 revealed the facility shall submit information as per Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requirements and no later than the deadline specified for the specific quarter in which the data is to be reported. The policy states the deadline for submission for quarter three is August 14th. A record review of the PBJ report from CMS revealed the facility had failed to submit data for the third quarter (April 1 - June 30) in 2024. An interview on 10/10/24 at 08:20 AM with the Administrator confirmed the third quarter PBJ was not reported on time by the business manager as required.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$7,903 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $7,903 — penalty dated 2024-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CITY OF IMPERIALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/07/1968
BELAU, CATHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2022
COLTON, NICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
DAVIDSON, ROXIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
HAYES, SABRINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/15/2023
SALMON, HEATHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2024
YOUNGER, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/15/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 4%Other / private 68%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$350per resident / day
operating cost
$10,652per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$291per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285252. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next