Eventide Lincoln Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 645 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 292 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 197 beds and averages 135.3 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.32 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.36 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 174 NAC 12-006.11 (A) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the correct therapeutic diet for one resident (Resident 3) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 142.Findings are: A record review of the admission Record with the printed date of June 25th, 2026 revealed that Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, Dementia (a decline in mental abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids). A record review of the Care Plan (Comprehensive Care Plan that is a written instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) revealed the focus: Nutrition, increased risk of suboptimal nutrition ( occurs when your body receives adequate calories but fails to get the specific balance of macronutrients, vitamins, or minerals it needs to function…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise post fall care plan interventions for Resident 2, Resident 5, and Resident 6 of five residents sampled . The facility reports a census of 141.A. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 06/08/2026 with diagnoses that included dementia and repeated falls. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/14/2026, revealed Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes revealed fall documentation for 06/08/2026 and 06/22/2026. Review of Resident 1' s Care Plan initiated on 06/08/2026, revealed the resident had a potential for falls and had fallen on 06/08/2026 and 06/22/2026. Interventions included moved Resident 1 to a room closer to the nurses station, initiated on 06/08/2026 and no new interventions were identified for 06/22/2026 fall. During an interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E), 12-007.01(A) Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored were not expired, had been sealed and dated when opened, and the facility failed to prevent cross-contamination between spices and the meat products. This had the potential to affect all residents who had meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 140. Findings are: A. An observation of the kitchen on 4/27/26 at 7:30 AM revealed: In the prep refrigerator -a bag of flour tortilla opened with no date on the bag and the bag had slits on the front of the bag -Caesar dressing opened with no date on the bottle. An observation of the freezer on 4/27/26 at 7:35 AM revealed: - a bag of sweet potatoes fries opened with no date and not sealed, - a bag of mixed vegetables opened with no date, - a bag of potatoes chunks with no date on it, - a bag of Broccoli opened not sealed with no date, -a bag of chopped onions with no date on it, - a bag of celery opened not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number NAC 175 12-006.07(C) Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to reevaluate and revise the plan of corrective action to prevent recurrence of past performance issues. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The facility census was 140. Findings are: A record review of the facility provided, undated Current List of Active Performance Improvement Plans (PIP's) on 4.27.2026 included Client Satisfaction, Skin/Wound Documentation, Psychotropic Medications, and Falls. A record review of the facility's Statement of Deficiencies dated 12.17.2024 revealed deficient practice areas including care planning, medication errors, and infection control practices. A record review of the Medication Administration facility task for the survey ending 4.30.2026 revealed a medication error rate of 12.82%, according to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the acceptable rate for medication errors is <5%. A record review of the facility citations for the survey ending 4.30.2026 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D)Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than 5%. There were 39 opportunities for error and five errors observed, for a total medication error rate of 12.82%. The facility census was 140.Findings are:A record review of the facility's Medication Administration and Storage policy dated 02/16/2026 revealed that medications will be considered as given at the correct time if administered one hour before or one hour after the scheduled time. A. An observation on 04/28/2026 at 8:52 PM revealed Medication Aide (MA) C administering the following medications to Resident 54: Pravastatin (a cholesterol medication) 10 mg (milligrams). A record review of Resident 54's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order for pravastatin tab 10 mg take 1 tablet by mouth every evening. The time scheduled for administration was 7:00 PM. An interview on 04/28/2026 at 8:54 PM with MA C confirmed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(i)(1)Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to store medications securely for Residents 5, 7, 14, 26, 43, 54, 55, 78, 83, 96, 108, and 154; and the facility failed to ensure medication carts were kept locked when unattended. The facility census was 140.Findings are: A record review of the facility's Medication Administration and Storage policy and procedure dated 02/16/2026 revealed that medications should be stored in a designated and secured (locked) area. A. An observation on 04/28/2026 at 8:04 PM revealed Medication Aide C walked away from the medication cart with the cart unlocked and multiple medication cards, topical creams, and eye drops left on top of the cart. There were no other staff around the cart. A review of the medication cards, topical creams, and eye drops left unattended on the cart revealed the following list of medications and residents: Resident 5 Sertraline (an antidepressant) 25 mg (milligrams) tablets.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC St. 71-6022(2) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman (an independent official who investigates complaints against organizations-typically government agencies or specific industries like healthcare-to resolve disputes and protect rights) of the hospitalizations on 2/8/26, 3/9/26, 4/4/26 and 4/17/26 for Resident 123, and 2/27/2026 for Resident 5, out of 28 residents sampled. The facility census was 140. Findings are: Findings are: A. A record review of the Clinical Census for Resident 5 revealed an admission date of 12.15.2025. A record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (this comprehensive assessment evaluates each resident's functional capabilities) with a target date of 3.10.2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A record review of the Clinical Census for Resident 5 revealed a Hospital Leave on 2.27.2026. A record review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.09C1a Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan (BCP, a plan of care for the resident that includes the minimum information needed to provide effective, person-centered care immediately upon admission) had interventions to address healthcare needs for Resident 125 who had an indwelling suprapubic urinary catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder that remains there to provide continuous urinary drainage. The tube is inserted into the bladder through a hole in the lower abdomen) This failure had the potential to affect 1 of 2 sampled residents recently admitted to the facility. The facility census was 147. Findings are: An observation and interview on 04/27/2026 at 07:48AM revealed Resident 125 in their room with a catheter present hung at the side of their chair. They reported that they had a suprapubic catheter for many years due to medical reasons. Record review of the Order Summary Report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 12- 0006.09(E) (iii) Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to care plan the services that are provided to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable well-being for two residents (Resident 16 and Resident 110) out of eight residents sampled. The facility census was 140 at the time of the survey. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (this comprehensive assessment evaluates each resident's functional capabilities) with a target date of 2.15.2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. An observation on 4.27.2026 at 10:24 AM revealed Resident 16 with an oxygen nasal cannula (a lightweight, flexible tube used to deliver supplemental oxygen to people with breathing conditions), and a nebulizer machine (a medical device that converts liquid medication into a fine mist for direct inhalation into the lungs) at the bedside. During an interview on 4.28.2026 at 7:50 AM with Medication Aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Physicians orders were followed for one (Resident 9) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 140. Findings are: A record review of the admission Record with the printed date of 4/27/26 revealed that Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Bipolar (a chronic mental health condition characterized by intense, fluctuating mood shifts, including extreme highs (mania/hypomania) and severe lows (depression), Type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition where the body resists insulin or fails to produce enough, causing high blood sugar) , Essential tremors (involuntary, rhythmic shaking, most commonly in the hands during movement), Post-Traumatic Stress disorder (condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing terrifying events, such as assault, disasters, or combat), Attention-Deficit hyperactivity (characterized by persistent patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference number 175 12-006.09D3(1) Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an active physician's order for the continued use of an indwelling suprapubic urinary catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder that remains there to provide continuous urinary drainage. The tube is inserted into the bladder through a hole in the lower abdomen) and associated maintenance care was established for 1 (resident 125) of 1 resident reviewed. The facility census was 147. Findings are: An observation and interview on 04/27/2026 at 07:48AM revealed Resident 125 in their room with a catheter present hung at the side of their chair. They reported that they had a suprapubic catheter for many years due to medical reasons. Record review of the Order Summary Report (a listing of the physician orders for a resident) dated 04/28/2026 for Resident 125 revealed that they admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (occurs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE