Arbor Care Centers-Countryside LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 35.5 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident 4) of 4 sampled was free of significant medication errors. The facility had a census of 36. Findings are:A. Review of the facility policy Medication Error dated September 2024 revealed a medication error was the preparation, provision, or administration of medications that was not in accordance with the following:-Physician Orders;-Manufacturer's specifications regarding the preparation or administration of the drug;-Accepted professional standards that apply to professionals providing services; and-The five rights which included the right resident, the right drug, the right dosage, the right route and the right time. B.Review of the facility policy Medication Administration dated September 2024 revealed medications were administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who were legally authorized as ordered by the physician and in accordance with standards of practice. Compliance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D2a Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent Resident 1's pressure sore from developing and worsening and failed to implement interventions to prevent the potential development of a pressure sore for Resident 8. The sample size was 2. The facility census was 31. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Pressure Ulcer Prevention Plan dated 2/2020 revealed the following: -Identify high-risk residents by performing comprehensive skin assessments upon admission and re-admission. -Complete a Braden scale (an assessment tool used to determine a person's risk of developing a pressure ulcer) on admission, re-admission, and with a significant change of condition. -Complete daily skin checks by a licensed nurse for high-risk residents or a resident with a current pressure ulcer. -All residents will have a minimum of weekly skin checks by a licensed nurse with documentation on the Weekly Pressure Ulcer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to follow 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents' consent to not publish photographs of the resident. The facility census was 32.Findings are:A. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights reviewed 3/20 revealed the following:- The facility would inform the resident both orally and in writing in a language that the resident understands his or her rights and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility.-The facility would provide the residents with prompt notice (if any) of changes in any State or Federal laws related to resident rights or facility rules during the resident's stay in the facility. Receipt of any information must be acknowledged in writing.-The resident had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident. B. Review of Resident 1's admission Agreement signed by the resident's legal representative on 12/9/25 revealed the following:-Attachment J, Consent to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(i)(2)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to accurately account for narcotic medications. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving narcotic medications in the facility. The facility sample size was 4 and the census was 36.Findings are:A.Review of the facility policy Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability Policy dated April 2025 revealed the following:-It was the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility would have safeguards in place to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure of controlled substances.-Inventory verification for areas without automated dispensing systems would be completed by two licensed nurses accounting for all controlled substances and the nurses would exchange keys at the end of each shift.B.Review of the Controlled Drug-Count Record form (signatures verified that staff had counted the narcotics and the count had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 12-006.10(A)(ii) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(A)(iii) Licensure Reference Number 175 12-006.10(C) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 4) of 4 sampled residents records had accurate documentation of medication administration. The facility census was 36. Findings are:A.Review of the facility policy Medication Administration dated September 2024 revealed medications were administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who were legally authorized as ordered by the physician and in accordance with standards of practice. Compliance Guidelines included:-Ensure the six rights of medication administration were followed which included the right resident, the right drug, the right dosage, the right route, the right time, and the right documentation;-Review the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to identify the medication to be administered;-Compare the medication with the MAR to verify the resident name, medication form, dose,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09G and 175 NAC 12-006.02(A) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the required discharge notifications to the State Ombudsman when residents were transferred or discharged from the facility and complete discharge summaries for Residents 37 and 39. The sample size was 2 and the facility census was 38. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 37's Care Plan dated 10/10/25 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with pneumonia and pancreatic cancer. Review of Resident 37's Progress Notes revealed the following: -On 10/10/25 at 7:14 PM the resident was admitted to the facility from a hospital on with increased weakness, a cancer diagnosis and the resident's family was in hopes the resident could have Physical Therapy and return home. -On 10/12/25 at 8:22 AM revealed, the resident was sent to the Emergency Room. -On 10/12/25 at 1:00 PM the resident's family reported the resident would most likely not return to the facility and return…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B)(D) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP-involved gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a multidrug resistant organism (MDRO-bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics) as well as those at increased risk for MDRO, residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices) during toileting assistance for Resident 2, catheter cares for Resident 10 and wound care for Resident 7; failed to provide cleaning of resident care equipment to prevent cross-contamination and or potential infections for Resident 10 and failed to complete gloving and hand hygiene at appropriate intervals during the provision of care for Residents 1,7,10 and 41. The sample size was 13 and the facility census was 38.Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised May 20, 2024, revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(i)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure 4 out of 5 staff had the required initial training within 2 weeks of employment which included resident rights, emergency preparedness, abuse and neglect and dementia care. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 38.Findings are:Review of the Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy dated September 2024 revealed new employees would be educated on abuse, exploitation (treating someone unfairly) and misappropriation (unauthorized use of someone's property) of resident property during initial orientation. Training topics would include: prohibiting all forms of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation; identifying what constituted as abuse; recognizing signs of abuse; the reporting process; and understanding behavioral symptoms that may increase the risk of abuse. Review of the Nursing Assistant (NA)-Q's file revealed a hire date of 11/3/25. There was no evidence the initial training had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(21)Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure Resident 10's dignity by not covering the urinary drainage bag. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 38.Findings are:A. Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care dated September 2024 revealed the following:- It was the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters received appropriate care and maintained dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters were in use. - Privacy bags would be available and catheter drainage bags would always be covered while in use. B. Review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop resident care plans) dated 12/13/25 revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident 10's Care Plan dated 11/29/25 revealed Resident 10 had an indwelling catheter and the urinary catheter bag and tubing was to be placed away from the entrance of the door to the room. The following observations revealed Resident 10's urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12Based on record review and interview; Residents 8 and 9 did not have the required consent for the use of psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety and hypnotics). The sample size was 13 and the facility census was 38.Findings are:A. Review of the facility policy Use of Psychoactive Drugs with a review date of 2/2020 revealed the following:-Residents and their representatives should be educated on the risk and benefits of drug use as well as alternative treatments and non-pharmacological interventions. B. Review of Resident 8's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of December 2025 revealed the resident received Sertraline (antidepressant) 100 milligrams (mg) daily for Depressive Disorder.Review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 25 received the required face to face physician evaluations to continue the use of PRN (as needed) antipsychotic (used to treat psychotic disorders/symptoms) medications. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 38. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Use of Psychoactive Drugs dated 2/2020 revealed the following: -Residents were not given psychotropic (mind altering) drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record and the medication was beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication. -A psychotropic drug was any drug that affected brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic drugs included but were not limited to the following categories: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety and hypnotics. -The indications for use of any psychotropic drug were documented in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide bathing assistance to Resident 45 at intervals to meet the resident's needs. The sample size was 13 and the facility census was 38. Findings are: Review of the undated facility Bathing Policy Statement revealed the facility provided each resident with bathing services at a frequency that met the residents' individual needs and preferences. Additional baths were provided as needed for incontinent episodes, skin care needs, or physician's orders Review of Resident 45's Care Plan dated 9/28/25 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], had dementia, bladder incontinence and self-care deficits related to a recent hip fracture, infections, and dementia. The resident was unable to bear weight on the left leg and staff were to provide the resident with assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) including bathing. Review of Resident 45's Bathing Records revealed bathing occurred on 10/10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$26,750 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,735 — penalty dated 2026-03-24
• $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-03-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE