Bethany Home, Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

17.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 59.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to ensure meals were served within the allotted time frames set forth by the facility staff. This had the potential to affect all residents served from the kitchen. The facility census was 62. Findings were: Record review of the facility policy Serving of Meal Trays copyright date 2000, revealed there was no specific time frame in which meals had to be served but did state that hot foods should be hot when they reached the resident and cold trays should be cold. Record review of the mealtimes posted for the facility stated that lunch will be served at 12:00 PM. Interview on 06/23/2025 at 1:50 PM with Resident 42 who revealed that it isn't uncommon to have to wait an hour to be served for lunch and supper meals. Observation of the noon meal served on 06/24/2025 between the hours of 11:35 AM and 12:50 PM: Frequent observations were made of Cook-A standing and waiting to dish up more meals as Cook-A awaited the dietary staff who were serving meals to return with the meal carts which were used to carry the meals…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(A) Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure that all individuals with beards and moustaches wore beard and moustache coverings, and the facility failed to ensure a safe and effective cleaning routine and process for changing the filtration system of the facility ice machine. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The Census was 62. Findings are: A. Record review of the Policy for Hair Nets and Facial Hair last reviewed on 01/20/2026 revealed that everyone working in the dietary department must be cleanly shaved (this does not include eyebrows or eyelashes). The procedure section revealed staff must be clean shaven, no one or two-day growths without wearing a beard guard or mask that covers the whole area. Observation on 06/23/2025 at 8:30 AM revealed the Cook-A who was serving the breakfast meal had on a hair net but did not have a beard and moustache covering in place. Observation on 06/24/2025 at 8:15 AM revealed that Cook-A was not wearing a beard and moustache…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(D) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(E) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that the resident/resident representative was informed of the risks, benefits, and alternative treatments for the use of antipsychotic medication (any medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception used to manage psychotic disorders) as required for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents 59 and 42). The facility census was 62. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use dated March 2015 revealed that antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional, psychiatric, social, and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed. Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications had approved indications for use for 2 (Residents 58 and 42) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 62. Findings are: A. Record review of a facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use dated March 2015 revealed a Policy Statement of: Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed. Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed: 1. Resident will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. 5. Residents who are admitted from the community or transferred from a hospital and who are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the ombudsman (a state appointed advocate for residents of nursing homes) of resident discharge for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident 63) as required. The facility census was 62. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Discharge Planning Process dated 5/3/17 revealed that the facility will develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of the resident to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. The Discharge Checklist section of the policy revealed that the facility will notify the ombudsman of resident discharge by fax on the date of discharge. Record review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, a mandatory comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) for Resident 63 dated 4/1/25 revealed that Resident 63 admitted into the facility on 2/28/25. The MDS revealed that Resident 63 had a discharge date of 4/1/25.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(A)(i) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Nebraska Level 1 Form (an initial pre-screening for mental illness and intellectual/developmental disabilities prior to admission) screening was completed prior to resident admission into the facility for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 34). The facility census was 62. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program dated 2/4/22 revealed that the facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. All applicants to the facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. PASARR Level 1- is the initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan with new interventions after each fall for one (Resident 15) of one resident sampled. The facility census was 62. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans dated 10/18/2017 revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, paragraph 6 that the comprehensive care plan will be prepared by an interdisciplinary team that includes but is not limited to the attending physician, a registered nurse with responsibility for the resident, a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident, a member of the food and nutrition services staff, the resident and the resident's representative to the extent possible, and other appropriate staff. Alternative interventions will be documented, as needed. Paragraph 10 stated staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan will be notified of their roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure refernce number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements by not removing dented cans for resident consumption, maintaining correct placement of hairnets while prepping and plating food, preforming hand hygiene for 20 seconds prior to plating residents' food, failure to prevent contamination by improperly holding dining plates while serving the residents meals, and improper storage of the fountain dispenser line. This has the potential to affect 62 residents in the facility. The facility identifies a census of 62 residents. Findings are: A review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene undated, revealed .Rub hands together vigorously for at least 20 seconds with soap and water. An interview on 04/30/2024 at 3:26 PM The Dietary Manager (DM) stated the facility does not have a policy for dented or damaged cans. An observation on 4/29/2024 at 9:15 AM in the dry storage area, revealed 2 cans of apple pie filling 112 oz, both with large, dented sides, placed into the shelf for use. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure reference 175 NAC 12-006.05 (21) Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat for 1 (Resident 24) of 1 sampled residents with dignity by asking them regarding their personal bowel habits while seated at the table in the dining room with their table mates. The facility identified a census is 62. An observation on 04/30/2024 at 12:00 PM while in the dining area, Registered Nurse-A (RN-A) approached Resident 24 while they were seated at their assigned seat for meals. RN-A held a conversation with Resident 24 regarding their bowel habits. This conversation was loud enough for Resident 24 table mates to hear the conversation and this observer to hear across the room. An interview on 05/01/2024 at 1:24 PM with Resident 24, confirmed they would prefer personal bowel habits are kept private. An interview on 05/01/2024 at 3:48 PM with the DON confirmed private conversations regarding bowel habits, should not be occurring in a public space in front of Resident 24 peers. DON further revealed the facility did not have a policy for personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10A1 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to evaluate 1 (Resident 42) of 3 sampled residents' ability to self-medicate. The facility census was 62. Findings are: A record review of Resident 42's undated Face Sheet revealed an admission date to the facility on 4/17/2023 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure (the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), hypertension (force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that causes poor blood flow), vitamin deficiency, and pain. An observation on 5/1/2024 at 8:00 AM during morning medication pass revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-A placed the following medications in a medication cup for Resident 42: carvedilol (used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure), cetirizine (used to treat allergies), cholecalciferol (Vitamin D supplement), docusate sodium (used to treat constipation), tramadol (used to treat pain), torsemide (diuretic used for heart failure), probiotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE