No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Douglas County Health Center

4102 Woolworth Avenue, Omaha, NE 68105 · Government - City/county · 254 certified beds · (402) 444-7041 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (402) 444-7041 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 20251 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (15% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
4101 Woolworth Avenue
Pharmacy
4001 Leavenworth St Ste 150A · (402) 979-8011 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Baker's0.8 mi
888 S Saddle Creek Rd · (402) 551-0613 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3720 Martha St · (402) 444-5955 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1941 S 42nd St · (402) 513-1463

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.8%19.0%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%2.8%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%4.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.2%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.9%19.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.7%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table48.6%20.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.7%75.9%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.8%20.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.7%11.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.171.811.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.311.921.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.5%CMS range 31.6–54.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.6%CMS range 5.6–11.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.9–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.01
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
14.9%
Total nursing turnover
12.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 254 beds and averages 228.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.26 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.94 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-13)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-10-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 3 (Resident 1, 4 and 5) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 233. The findings are:Record review of the facility's policy dated 02-22-2022 titled Medication Administration revealed medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Staff are to obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. Staff are to compare the medication source (bubble pack, bottle) with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route and time. Record review of the Long-Term Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer pain medication according to the practitioner's orders for 2 (Resident 4 and 5) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 233. The findings are:A.Record review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 08-27-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-BIMS was scored at an 11/15. According to the MDS Manual, a score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment.-The resident required limited assistance with dressing and hygiene.-The resident required extensive assistance with toileting, bathing, bed mobility and transfers. Record review of Resident 4's Progress Notes (PN) dated 10-01-2025 revealed Resident 4 had an order to discontinue their gabapentin (an anticonvulsant medication used to treat nerve pain). Record review of Resident 4's Office Visit Neurology Clinic (OVNC) dated 10-03-2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to utilize beard restraints while preparing food in facility kitchen. This had the potential to affect 231 of the 235 residents in the facility. The facility census was 240. The findings are: Record review of the Nebraska Food Code 2-402.11 revealed food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens and unwrapped single service items. Observation on 05-07-2025 at 7:30 AM revealed Dietary Aide (DA)-R was at the cold side of the service line assisting with plating food without a beard net in place and DA-R had a goatee that was approximately an inch long. Observation on 05-08-2025 at 8:49 AM revealed DA-R at the cold side of the service line, plating food without a beard net and DA-R had a goatee. Furthermore, Dietary [NAME] (DC)-Q was at the short-order grill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and monitor target behaviors for the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 (Resident 97) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 240. Findings are: A record review of Resident 97's diagnoses revealed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia (a term used for diseases that affect memory, thinking and the ability to perform daily activities). A record review of Resident 97's physicians orders revealed the resident had an order for Quetiapine Fumarate (an antipsychotic medication used to treat a variety of mental health conditions) 100mg (milligram - a unit of measurement) twice a day and an order for Quetiapine Fumarate 50mg at noon for dementia. Further record review of Resident 97's physicians orders revealed a physician's order dated 7/27/2023, which stated to monitor the resident for behaviors daily. There were no time values present on the order. A record review of Resident 97's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) St 28-372 Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to report to Adult Protective Services and the Department of Health and Human Services an alleged verbal altercation between 2 residents within the prescribed time frame. This had the potential to affect 1 (Resident 218) out of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 240. Findings are: A record review of Resident 218's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 12/15. The MDS manual states a score of 8-12 is considered moderately impaired. Section I of the MDS revealed the resident was diagnosed with non-traumatic brain dysfunction, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record reviews, interviews and observations, the facility failed to investigate an alleged verbal altercation between Resident 218 and an unnamed resident. This had the potential to affect 1 (Resident 218) out of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 240. Findings are: A record review of Resident 218's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) revealed the Resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 12/15. The MDS manual states a score of 8-12 is considered moderately impaired. Section I of the MDS revealed the resident was diagnosed with non-traumatic brain dysfunction, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia). A record review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(B) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) comprehensive assessment identified Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 (Resident 135) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 240. Findings are: A record review of Resident 135's MDS revealed Resident 135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Resident 135 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 10/15. The MDS manual identified a score of 8-12 was moderately impaired. Further record review of Resident 135's MDS revealed an admission Assessment was completed on 03/18/2025 and revealed non-Alzheimer's dementia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E)(i) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet the mental and psychological needs of 1 resident (135) out of 2 sampled. The facility census was 240. Findings are: A record review of Resident 135's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) revealed Resident 135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Resident 135 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 10/15. The MDS manual identified a score of 8-12 was moderately impaired. A review of facility progress notes written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-I on 05/02/2025 and 05/03/2025 revealed that Resident 135 was being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(3). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate and monitor open lesions for 1 (Resident 65) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 240. Findings Are: Record review of Resident 65's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03-24-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was not scored for this resident. -The resident required extensive assistance with lower body dressing, bed mobility and transfers. -The resident required total assistance with toileting and bathing. Record review of Resident 65's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) printed on 05-13-2025 revealed a focus area of risk for impaired skin integrity due to impaired mobility, bowel and bladder incontinence, and anemia. The goal was that Resident 65's skin will remain intact. Interventions for the staff to use were: -assist bars/side rails to help resident with self-mobility and steadiness with transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to offload heels to prevent the potential for pressure ulcer development for 1 (Resident 236) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 235. The findings are: Record review of Resident 236's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03-19-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13-15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. -The resident required extensive assistance with upper body dressing and bed mobility. -The resident required total assistance with transfers, toileting, bathing, and lower body dressing. -The resident currently had a pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident 236's Order Summary Report (OSR) printed on 05-07-2025 revealed an order dated 04-24-2025 to offload heels while the patient is in bed, as tolerated. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(v) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to reevaluate wheelchair positioning, ensure foot pedals were in place and head rest was positioned to support the head for 1 (Resident 164) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 240. Findings are: Record review of Resident 164's clinical census report revealed Resident 164 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and to Hospice on 11/29/24. Record review of Resident 164's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 2/10/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 0/15. The MDS manual identified that a score of 0-7 indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified that Resident 164 was dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and implement orders for a non-invasive ventilator including settings and daily, weekly, and monthly cleaning for 1 (Resident 55) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 235. The findings are: Record review of Resident 55's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 04-18-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) was scored as a 14/15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13-15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. -The resident required extensive assistance with lower body dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. -The resident required total assistance with toileting and bathing. -The resident had diagnoses of congestive heart failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess for pain prior to administering scheduled pain medication and failed to monitor for the effectiveness of pain medication for 1 (Resident 19) of 2 sampled residents. The facility had a census of 240. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Pain Management Policy which was last modified on 3/20/2025 revealed the following policy statement: -A resident will be assessed for the presence/absence of pain on admission, at least quarterly at the time of the MDS (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes to gather information about resident's health, functional status, and preferences) assessment and when there is a change in the resident's condition and any time a resident is receiving pain medication. A record review of Resident 19's physicians orders revealed Resident 19 has an order for scheduled Tramadol HCL (a medication used to relieve moderate to moderately severe pain) 50 MG (milligrams - a unit of measurement) tablet. 1 tablet three times a day for pain. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure trauma survivors received trauma-informed care to eliminate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 (Resident 135) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 240. Findings are: A record review of Resident 135's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) revealed Resident 135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Resident 135 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 10/15. The MDS manual identified a score of 8-12 as having moderately impaired cognition. A record review of progress notes written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-I on 05/02/2025 and 05/03/2025 revealed Resident 135 was confrontational with cares and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Resident 218, 135, 226) of 7 residents had a physician conduct a face-to-face visit within the first 30 days after admission. The facility census was 240. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 218's admission record revealed an admission date of 07/30/2024. A review of Resident 218's records revealed there was no evidence of a physician visit within the first 30 or 60 days after admission. Record review revealed Resident 218 was seen by a nurse practitioner (NP) on 08/09/2024 to establish care and on 09/20/24 for recertification. B. A record review of Resident 135's admission record revealed an admission date of 03/11/2025. A review of Resident 135's records revealed there was no evidence of a physician visit within the first 30 days after admission. A record review revealed Resident 135 was seen by an NP on 03/11/2025 for admission history and physical. C. A record review of Resident 226's admission record revealed an admission date of 04/15/2025. A review of Resident 226's records revealed there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) & 1-005.06 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to secure a catheter bag for 1 (Resident 221) of 2 residents and failed to secure oxygen tubing with cannula for 1 (Resident 108) of 5 residents sampled in a manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination. The facility census was 240. The findings are: A. Record review of Resident 221's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03-12-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted because Resident 221 was not able to complete the interview. -The resident required extensive assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. -The resident required total assistance with bed mobility, toileting and bathing. -The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to collect urine). An observation on 05-07-2025 at 9:10 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(f)(i)(5) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure follow up was completed with the physician to obtain x-rays after complaints of pain were made by Resident 1 and failed to ensure x-ray recommendations were followed timely for Resident 1. X-rays showed that Resident 1 sustained a fracture of the right shoulder. The facility census was 239. Findings are: Record review of Resident 1's Face Sheet revealed a admission date of 4/5/19 with diagnoses that included restlessness and agitation, altered mental status, schizophrenia, psychosis and mood affective disorder. Record review of Resident 1's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set-a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 4/30/24 revealed a BIMS (Brief interview for mental status, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 15, which indicated that Resident 1 was cognitively intact. The MDS showed that resident 1 was independent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review; the facility failed to implement a care planned intervention for 1 (Resident #2) of 6 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Specifically, following an incident on 04/22/2023 involving Resident #2 and another resident, the facility implemented a new intervention consisting of a magnetic barrier attached to Resident #2's door frame to deter other residents from entering Resident #2's room. This intervention was never discontinued, but the barrier was removed, and additional resident to resident altercations involving Resident #2 and Resident #3 occurred on 10/17/2023 and 11/22/2023, when Resident #3 entered Resident #2's room. Findings included: The facility's policy titled, Interdisciplinary Plan of Care, reviewed on 04/23/2024, indicated, Members of the Interdisciplinary Team are responsible for updating the plan of care, as indicated, as the resident's status changes or as other problems/needs are identified. Interdisciplinary Team members will review and evaluate the plan of care to make recommendations and revisions as needed. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored foods for residents in a sanitary manner. Specifically, staff failed to label and date resident foods brought in by visitors, clear the nourishment refrigerators of spoiled foods, and maintain the temperature logs for the nourishment refrigerators. This had the potential to affect 153 residents who resided in 6 neighborhoods (Wind Song Way, Field of Dreams, [NAME] Way, Tranquility Road, Sunshine Gardens, and Safe Harbor) of 10 total neighborhoods in the facility. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors, last modified on 10/21/2019, revealed, Policy: It is the right of the residents of this facility to have food brought in by family or other visitors. However, the food must be handled in a way to ensure the safety of the resident. The policy specified, 2. All food items that are already prepared by the family or visitor brought in must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to invite 1 (Resident #45) of 39 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed to attend their care conferences. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Interdisciplinary Plan of Care, last modified on 02/03/2021, revealed, Purpose 1. To facilitate an interdisciplinary approach to resident care which is aimed at meeting the many and varied needs of the resident. 2. To promote collaboration of the various disciplines. Procedure The resident's interdisciplinary plan of care is developed and revised through a collaborative effort of an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), the resident and the resident's guardian/DPOA [durable power of attorney] or representative of his/her choice. The policy further specified, 3. The disciplines discuss their assessments of the resident's needs. The members of the Interdisciplinary Team, the resident, and their family/guardian or representative of his/her choice are encouraged to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promptly notify a resident's hospice service provider of a change in condition for 1 (Resident #231) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for change in condition. Specifically, Resident #231's hospice and primary care provider were not notified of an abnormal culture and sensitivity (C&S) lab result until a week after it was reported to the facility. As a result of this delayed notification, the hospice provider did not order an antibiotic to treat Resident #231 until a week after the abnormal C&S lab result was reported to the facility. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Guidelines for Physician Notification, last modified by the facility on 09/28/2020, revealed under the section titled Physician Notification, the column titled Next Working Day indicated that physician notification by the next working day was recommended in the guidelines for laboratory tests, including a Urine Culture and Sensitivity revealing > [greater than] 100,000 colony count without any symptoms. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 2 (Resident #101 and Resident #487) of 2 residents observed for the use of call lights. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Response, last modified by the facility on 04/24/2024, revealed, 5. Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. 6. The call system will be accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations within the resident's room. A. A review of Resident #487's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/23/2023 and readmitted the resident on 04/17/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of a history of falling and difficulty in walking. A review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes.), with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure new Level I Preadmission and Resident Reviews (PASRRs) were completed after residents were diagnosed with new mental illness diagnoses and prescribed psychotropic medications for 2 (Resident #12 and Resident #74) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR), last modified on 12/12/2018, revealed, With any significant change in status or newly evident or possible serious mental disorder or intellectual disability or related condition, a new PASRR Level I screen will be completed for any resident identified per a Level II screen as requiring specialized services. Any changes will be promptly reported to the State mental health authority or State intellectual disability authority as indicated. A. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #12 on 06/26/2008. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside of 1 (Resident #102) of 20 residents that resided in the Field of Dreams neighborhood, which was a locked behavioral unit. Findings included: A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #102 on 07/10/2023. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes.), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/21/2024, revealed Resident #102 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #102's April 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident was scheduled to receive the following medications during the 9:00 AM medication pass on 04/22/2024: - allopurinol oral tablet 300 milligrams (mg), one tablet one time a day for prevention of calcium-containing kidney stones; - aspirin delayed release 81 mg tablet, one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and did not touch medications with their bare hands when administering medication for 1 (Resident #160) of 3 residents observed during medication pass. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, last modified on 07/14/2023, revealed, 2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table. A review of the attached Hand Hygiene Table revealed staff should perform hand hygiene with Either Soap and Water or Alcohol Based Hand Rub (ABHR is preferred) Between resident contacts and Before preparing or handling medications. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #160 on 03/21/2018. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, or anxiety; type two diabetes mellitus;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to provide a written investigation to the state agency within the required five working days for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 231. Findings are: Review of the [NAME] County Health Center Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Crime Reporting Form, dated 2/12/24, revealed that the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of an incident that involved Resident 1 on 2/12/24 at 2:30 PM and that the incident was reported to [name] at Adult Protective Services (APS) at an undocumented date and time. Review of the [NAME] County Health Center fax cover sheet dated 2/16/24 and addressed to the state agency included the written investigation called to APS. Interview on 3/5/24 at 12:18 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed that the written investigation had been scanned into a draft folder and then never sent in. The ADON confirmed that the written facility investigation had not been provided to the state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure glove changes were completed during food preparation and service to prevent potential food borne illness. This has the potential to affect 208 residents who eat meals prepared in the kitchen. The facility had a total census of 216 residents. Findings are: Observations of tray line on 5/15/23 between 11:45 AM-12:03 PM revealed Cook-F wearing gloves to open freezer door to obtain pizza then with same gloves used hands to place sausage on pizza. Cook-F continued with food preparation without changing gloves including handling precook hamburgers and tomato and lettuce for hamburgers. [NAME] F wearing same gloves moved trash can and continued with food preparation including handing ready to eat foods with changing gloves. Observations of tray line on 5/15/23 between 11:45 AM-12:03 PM revealed Cook-G wearing gloves dishing food from steam table on to plates then opening steam table drawer and dishing French fries on to plate with same gloves. Observations of tray line on 5/15/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-004.c3a(6) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the provider and resident representative of a change in condition for Resident 175. Total facility census was 216. Findings are: Record review of the facility's guidelines for Physician Notification with revision date of 05/26/2022 revealed the facility was to notify the House Supervisor or Nurse Manager of resident condition changes, and the physician should have been notified the next working day of any wound unless they required sutures (stitches). Record review of the facility's Notification of Resident Condition Change/Room Change Policy with a last review date of 11/07/2022 revealed in the event of a significant change in the resident's condition, the resident's family or legal guardian and the House Supervisor would be notified by the licensed nurse on duty. Observation on 05/10/2023 at 4:43 PM revealed Resident 175 was in the dining room reclined in the wheelchair with both socks off and was observed to have brown crusted wounds to the right foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18B Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 129) of 1 sampled resident's water faucet was operational to allow the flow of hot water. Total facility census was 216. Findings are: An observation of Resident 129's room on 05/10/2023 at 04:47 PM revealed no hot water was released when the hot water handle was turned to the on position on the water faucet. An observation of Resident 129's room on 05/11/2023 at 01:00 PM revealed no hot water was released when the hot water handle was turned to the on position on the water faucet. An observation on 05/15/2023 at 07:25 AM revealed hot water lever was still not working on Resident 129's water faucet. In an observation and interview on 05/15/2023 at 11:33 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)-A observed the hot water lever on Resident 129's faucet did not turn on when the handle was turned and confirmed the hot water on the faucet did not work. In an interview on 05/16/2023 at 08:10 AM, Maintenance Director (MD)-D confirmed there was not a work order in the system for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reevaluate resident status and provide notice of discharge for 1 [Resident 265] of 1 sampled resident following transfer to the hospital in an emergency status. The facility had a total census of 216 residents. Findings are: Record review of Resident 265's Progress Notes dated 3/31/23 revealed Resident 265 had reported eating 4 or 5 AA batteries, part of a stuffed animal and part of a CD player. Orders were received to send Resident 265 to the emergency room. Bed Hold policy was sent with Resident 265. Record review of Resident 265's Social Services notes dated 4/5/23 as a late entry for 4/4/23 revealed bed hold policy and transfer notice were mailed to guardian. Social Service notes dated 4/6/23 revealed 15 day Medicaid bed hold policy was explained to Resident 265's mother/guardian. Social Service Notes dated 4/10/23 revealed Resident 265's mother/guardian was contact to arrange for pick up of Resident 265's belongings. Record review of Bed Hold Policy Notice dated 3/31/23 revealed Resident or Resident representative had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.14 Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure Resident 176 received follow up dental services. The facility staff identified a census of 216. Findings are: Interview on 5/10/23 at 2:50 PM with Resident 176 revealed that [gender] had dental x-rays 2 months ago and had not recieved follow up. Resident 176 revealed [gender] wanted teeth removed to get dentures. Observation on 5/10/23 at 2:50 PM revealed that Resident 176 has multiple decayed and broken teeth. Interview on 5/11/23 at 2:00 PM with Social Worker (S.W.-H, someone who assists Resident's with a variety of arrangements and financial services) revealed that information has not been recieved from the dentist. Interview on 5/11/23 at 3:00 PM Nurse manager (N.M.-I, A Registered Nurse that monitor and oversees the Residents on specific units of the facility), verified that there were no other dental visits for Resident 176 since 10/28/22. Record review of Physician consult document dated 10/28/22. The document has a written note on it stating, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17D Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene (cleaning) between resident contact. This had the potential to affect 3 residents (Resident 80, 131, and 146). Total facility census was 216. Findings are: Record review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy with a last review date of 07/14/2022 revealed staff should perform hand hygiene before touching a resident, after touching a resident, and after contact with body fluids. Observation on 05/10/2023 at 11:50 AM revealed Resident 80 was sitting in the [NAME] Way Dining Room with nasal drainage from Resident 80's nose extending to their legs. Recreational Therapy Aide (RT)-C used a towel to wipe Resident 80's nasal drainage and proceeded to then place RT-C's right hand on Resident 131's back without having performed hand hygiene. Observation on 05/11/2023 at 1:28 PM revealed RT-C was seated in the [NAME] Way Dining Room with RT-C's shoe and sock removed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-04-26 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were readily accessible to all residents to review and that posted notices of the availability of the survey results were in an area of the facility that was prominent and accessible to the public. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Availability of Survey Results, last modified by the facility on 08/24/2023, revealed, Policy: The purpose of this policy is to uphold a resident's right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by federal or state surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. Definitions: Place readily accessible is a place (such as a lobby or other area frequented by most residents, visitors, or other individuals) where individuals wishing to examine survey results do not have to ask to see them. Results of the most recent survey means the Statement of Deficiencies (Form CMS [Center for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-04 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
NELSON, ERINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2019
BORGESON, MARY ANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/1995
BOYLE-MANGANARO, MAUREENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2021
CAVANAUGH, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2015
FRIEND, MIKEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2021
GARCIA, ROGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2021
MORGAN, PJIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2010
ROGERS, CHRISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next