The Banyan at Montclair
2525 South 135th Avenue, Omaha, NE 68144 · For profit - Corporation · 175 certified beds · (402) 333-2304 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $141,793 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-18)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.0% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 2.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.6% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.3% | 4.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.1% | 18.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.3% | 19.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.2% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.2% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.9% | 20.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.8% | 75.9% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.5% | 20.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.8% | 11.4% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.63 | 1.81 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 1.92 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.6%CMS range 42.4–66.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 8.1–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.4–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 175 beds and averages 108.7 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-007.04C1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure temperatures in 59 of 76 occupied resident rooms and common areas were maintained at a safe and comfortable level. This has the potential to affect all 119 residents of the facility. The facility was notified on 2/18/25 at 8:23 PM of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 2/18/25. The IJ was removed on 2/19/25, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Findings are: A. A review of undated, un-timed temperature log revealed the following temperatures of less than 71 degrees F [Fahrenheit]: memory care unit 67.3 F; room [ROOM NUMBER] 68.3 F; and Station 1 67 F. A notation on the log revealed the log temperatures were due to a tripped breaker and the breaker had been reset. The log also stated an electrician had been called to increase the breaker size to prevent a reoccurrence. In an interview on 2/18/25 at 5:53 PM, the DON [Director of Nursing] reported that the undated log had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff were trained to check the function of individual resident elopement prevention equipment to prevent an elopement (unsupervised wandering that leads to the resident leaving the facility without facility staff knowledge). The facility staff identified a total of 13 residents at risk for elopement. The facility had a census of 135. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 1's Medical Diagnosis sheet, revealed Resident 1's medical diagnoses of: personal history of traumatic brain injury, paranoid schizophrenia and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 2/15/2024 indicated the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status, (BIMS - a federally mandated tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents upon admission into a long-term care facility) score of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 4) of 4 was free from significant medication errors. The facility staff identified a census of 131. Findings are: A record review of Resident 4's patient profile sheet dated 6/23/2024 revealed Resident 4 was [AGE] years old. A record review of the residents' electronic health record medical diagnosis sheet revealed Resident 4 had the following medical diagnoses: Acute on Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 4, Cirrhosis of Liver, Anemia, Type 2 Diabetes with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Hypertension, Hypothyroidism, Vitamin D Deficiency, Constipation and Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase Resistance (EBSL). A record review of Resident 4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) dated 5/28/2024 revealed Resident 4 had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D2a Based on observation, record reviews and interview; the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent and treat pressure ulcer for 1 (Resident 87 ) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 126. The findings are: A. Record review of Resident 87's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 2-08-2024 revealed Resident 87 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Anemia, Atrial fibrillation, Hypertension, Gastroesophageal reflux Disease (GERD), thyroid disorder, Cerebrovascular Accident (stroke), Malnutrition, Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). Further review of Resident 87's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 87 required Substantial/Maximal assistance with toileting, shower/baths, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, rolling left and right and go from a sitting to lying position. Resident 87 was dependent on staff form sitting to standing and chair to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observations, record reviews and interviews: the facility staff failed to utilize handwashing and gloving techniques for 4 (Residents 5, 15, 28, and 41), failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) on 2 residents (Residents 5 and 15), failed to store equipment to prevent potential cross contamination for 1 resident (Resident 5), failed to implement isolation procedures for 1 (Resident 102) and fails to provide personal care in a manor to prevent potential infection for 1 (Resident 28). The total sample size was 53 and the facility census was 111. Findings are:Record review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy with a revision date of 10/23/2025 revealed the following: 6. Additional considerations: a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves and immediately after removing gloves. Record review of the facility's undated Hand Hygiene Table revealed the following: Before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.5(G)Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a psychotropic medication had an adequate indication for use for Resident 5, and side effect monitoring was in place for residents 10 and 105 of 6 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 111. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review policy, with an implementation date of 4/1/2023 and a revised date of 1/8/2026 revealed the following: Policy: The drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the resident's medical chart. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Medication Regimen Review (MRR), or Drug Regimen Review, is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes: Review of the medical record in order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate and report a fall with significant injury within the required time frame for 1(Resident 63) of 1. The facility reported a census of 111. Findings are: A record review of Resident 63's Clinical Resident Profile (a sheet containing residents name, code status, primary diagnosis, admission date, personal contacts information and medical professionals contact information) revealed Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A record review of Resident 63's Minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated, standardized assessment tool used in Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes to evaluate a residents functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive status) dated 4/5/2026 revealed Resident 63 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a standardized assessment used in nursing homes to assess cognitive function, specifically memory and orientation) of 5 indicating Resident 63 was severely cognitively impaired.A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the potential for pressure injuries on 1 (Resident 15) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 111. Findings are:A record review of the facility's Use of Support Surfaces policy with a date reviewed/revised of 2/26 revealed a support surface was a specialized mattress, overlay, or chair cushion to manage pressure, shear, microclimate, or friction on tissue. Support surfaces would be utilized in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. A record review of the facility's Turning and Repositioning policy with a date reviewed/revised date of 2/2026 revealed all residents at risk of or had existing pressure injuries would be turned and repositioned. The frequency of turning and repositioning would be documented in the resident's care plan. If the resident had a pressure redistribution support surface in use, turning and reposition was still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(1)(i)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a new fall intervention for Resident 63 following a fall on 05/02/2026. The facility reported a census of 111. Findings are:A record review of the facility Accidents and Supervision policy dated 4/1/24 and reviewed on 2/2026 revealed the following:Implementation of interventions - using specific interventions to try to reduce a resident's risk from hazards in the environment. The process includes:Communicating the interventions to all relevant staffProviding training as neededDocumenting the interventions (plans of action developed through the QAA Committee or care plans for the individual resident. A record review of Resident 63's Clinical Resident Profile (a sheet containing residents name, code status, primary diagnosis, admission date, personal contacts information and medical professionals contact information) revealed Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.9(H)(iv) Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure that a bowel protocol was followed for 1 resident (Resident 2) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census at 111. Findings are:A.Record review of the facility's policy Constipation Prevention dated 8/1/2023 revealed the following:PRN Laxative will be offered during the 3rd day without a BM. The PRN Laxative will be offered and preferably administered by 2:00pm. Example: no BM on the 1st and 2nd, PRN laxative too be offered on the 3rd.A suppository will be offered the AM of the 4th day without a BM. Example: no BM on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd, a suppository will be offered the AM of the 4th.If a resident does not have a BM after PRN laxative and a suppository is provided, an assessment of the abdomen, bowel sounds, pain and appetite will be completed. The primary physician will be notified.When a resident is using PRN laxative/suppository on a regular basis, update the primary physician and request a routine stool softener/laxative. B.Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(A)(4)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication irregularity was reported to the attending physician and failed to ensure the report was acted on for 1 (Resident 5) of 5 sampled residents.The facility reported a census of 111. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review policy, with an implementation date of 4/1/2023 and a revised date of 1/8/2026 revealed the following.Policy:The drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the resident's medical chart.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. Medication Regimen Review (MRR), or Drug Regimen Review, is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes:Review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 (Resident 5 and 15) of 5 sampled residents were free of significant medication errors. The facility census was 111. Findings are:A record review of the facility's Medication Errors policy with a date last reviewed/revised of 2/2026 revealed a significant medication error meant one which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes the resident's health and safety. The facility should ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders. A record review of the facility's Medication Administration policy with a date reviewed/revised of 02/2026 revealed medications would be administered by staff who are legally authorized to do so, as ordered by the physician, and in accordance with professional standards of practice. A. A record review of Resident 15's Clinical Census dated 05/07/2026 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify resident representative of changes in treatment and significant weight loss for 1 [Resident 3] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 111 residents. Findings are:A.A review of facility policy dated 2024 titled Notification of Changes revealed: The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. The facility further identified the following circumstances that required notification:- 1. Accidents a. Resulting in injury. b. Potential to require physician intervention.- 2. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status.This may include: Life-threatening conditions, orClinical complications- 3. Circumstances that require a need to alter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i)(l) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor nutritional status after implementation of nutritional interventions for weight loss for 1 [Resident 3] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 111 residents. Findings are:A.A review of facility policy dated 4/1/24 titled Weight Monitoring revealed the following:- Interventions will be identified, implemented, monitored and modified (as appropriate), consistent with the resident's assessed needs, choices, preferences, goals, and current professional standards to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status.- A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents: a. Weights should be recorded at the time obtained. Mathematical rounding should be utilized (i.e., if weight is X.5 pounds [lbs.] or more, round weight upward to the nearest whole pound. If weight is X.1 to X.4 [lbs.] round down to the nearest whole pound). b. Newly admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure all food stored in the facility's kitchen was labeled, sealed, and/or dated, ensure food was discarded that was past it's use-by date, and failed to ensure all kitchen equipment was clean and sanitized. This had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen.A record review of the facility's Food Safety Requirements with a date reviewed/revised of 5/2025 revealed facility staff shall inspect all food, product, and beverages for proper storage to include labeling, dating, and monitoring food so it is used by its use by date. All equipment used shall be cleaned and sanitized. A.An observation on 12/10/2025 at 7:12 AM - 8:04 AM The True 2 door reach-in fridge contained a bag of a green leafy substance that was not labeled or dated. The true 2 door reach-in fridge by the double ovens had contained a plastic bag of brown patties that was not labeled and dated and 1 gallon container of Mayonnaise that had been opened with no open date. The walk-in refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(H) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Adult Protective Services (APS) was notified within 2 hours of an allegation (a statement, made without giving proof, that someone has done something wrong) of potential abuse for 1 (Resident 51) of 3 sampled residents. The total facility census was 113. Findings are:A record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy with a Date Reviewed/Revised of 8/4/25 revealed an alleged violation is: A situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor, or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services would be done immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made if the allegation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)g Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen and BiPap orders were obtained and followed for 1 (Resident 73) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 113. The findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP, AVAPS, Trilogy) dated 05-20-2025 revealed it is the policy of this facility to provide noninvasive ventilation as per physician's orders and current standards of practice. BiPAP or bi-level positive airway pressure, is a respiratory therapy intervention that delivers an inhale pressure and an exhale pressure to provide a patent airway. It requires a machine that generates the separate pressures through a tube into a mask that fits over the nose or mouth. A personal BiPAP device may be brought into the facility for the resident's use. If brought in, the nurse/respiratory therapist will verify the settings on the machine prior to use. Record review of Resident 73's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to evaluate and identify situational triggers for post -traumatic stress disorder [PTSD, a psychological reaction occurring after experiencing a highly stressing event (such as wartime combat, physical violence, or a natural disaster) that is usually characterized by depression, anxiety, flashbacks, recurrent nightmares, and avoidance of reminders of the event] for 1 (Resident 12) of 2 residents reviewed. The facility census was 113. Findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Trauma Informed Care dated 3/25/25 revealed the following information: It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches which are culturally competent, account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and / or re-traumatization. Trauma results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006. 09(H)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medications according to prescribed blood pressure parameters for 2 (residents 1 and 3) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 113. Findings are: A. A record review of the facilities Medication Administration policy with a revision date of 10/15/25 revealed the following: Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. A record review of the facilities Unnecessary Drugs-Without Adequate Indication for Use policy with a revision date of 11/4/24 revealed the following: Information gathered during the initial and ongoing evaluations will be incorporated into the resident's comprehensive care plan that reflects person-centered medication related goals and parameters for monitoring the residents condition, including the likely medication effects and potentials for adverse consequences. A record review of Resident 3's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D)Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observation of 25 medications revealed 4 errors with a resulting error rate of 16%. The medication errors are related to 1 (Resident 100) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 113.Findings are:A record review of the facilities Medication Administration policy with a revision date of 10/15/25 revealed the following: Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed:a. Right residentb. Right drugc. Right dosaged. Right routee. Right timef. Right documentation A record review of the facilities Medication Errors policy with a revision date of 8/16/25 revealed the following: The facility must ensure that it is free of medication error rates of 5% or greater as well as significant medication error events. A record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 006.11 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to physician's ordered diet was followed for 1 [Resident 122] of 1 sampled resident with orders for a renal diet. The facility had a total census of 113. Findings are:A review of Resident 122's admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease [a stage of impairment that appears irreversible and permanent]. A review of Resident 122's order summary revealed an order dated 12/3/25 of a renal diet with regular texture and thin liquid consistency. A review of Resident 122's care plan revealed an intervention of providing and serving diet as ordered. Observations on 12/11/25 at 12:22 PM revealed Resident 122 with lunch tray. Resident 122's lunch included chicken, cornbread, macaroni and cheese, Brussel sprouts, and pumpkin pie. A review of facility menu for 12/11/25 and Resident 122's 12/11/25 tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(B)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.19(A)(i) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transported clean linen in a manner to prevent potential cross contamination, ensure clean sheets were utilized for Resident 70, and failed to ensure Resident 1's nebulizer (neb)(a machine used to deliver aerosolized medications to the lungs) administration kit was cleaned after each use. The facility census was 113. Findings are: A. An observation on 12/15/2025 at 7:29 AM revealed Medication Aide-A exited the laundry room and walked down the 100 hallway to Resident 11's room with unbagged, clean, bedding draped over MA-A's left arm and against MA-A's hand and clothing. An observation on 12/15/2025 at 2:55 PM revealed NA-B exited the dining room and walked to the South side of building into the resident care areas with unbagged, clean, linens being carried between NA-B's left arm and chest against NA-B's clothing. In an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19 Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the carpets in clean condition to prevent urine odors in 13 resident rooms (Rooms 103, 105, 106, 109, 203, 205, 207, 208, 311, 317, 407, 409) of 45 occupied resident rooms on the north side of the building and the carpets throughout the 100, 200, 300 and 400 hallways of the north side of the facility. This had the potential to affect 17 residents that resided in those rooms. The facility had a total of 81 occupied resident rooms in the facility. The facility census was 110. Findings are: Observation during the environmental tour 6/25/25 between 8:00 AM and 9:50 AM, with the facility Maintenance Director [MD], Housekeeping Director [HD] and Administrator [ADM], revealed the following environmental concerns in resident use areas in the facility: - Carpets were stained in spots on the north side of the building on the 100, 200, 300 and 400 hallways. - A piece of carpet was pulled up and folded over itself beside the vending machine in the 400 hallway. - Carpets were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY D. Record review of Resident 16's admission Record revealed that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included secondary Parkinsonism, and Alzheimer's Disease early onset. Record review of Resident 16's Clinical Census revealed that Resident 16 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 16's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed that Resident 16 had a BIMS score of 15. The MDS manual identified that a score of 13-15 indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS identified that Resident 16 had verbal behaviors exhibited toward others and rejection of care 1-3 days per week. The MDS identified that Resident 16 used a wheelchair for ambulation and required supervision with activities of daily living. Record review of a Health Status Note for Resident 16, dated 12/10/24, revealed the following information: - Note Text: Resident called 911 and stated [gender] couldn't breathe. However, resident was non-compliant with nursing staff, refused to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Nebraska Food Code 2017 4-904.11(A) Based on observation, record review and interviews; the facility failed to handle dishware in a manner to prevent the potential for food borne illness while serving foods in the facility dining room. This had the potential to affect 7 (Residents 3, 44, 53, 72, 99, 105, and 250) residents that received foods during the meal service and failed to ensure a refrigerators were maintained below 41 degrees in 1 (Resident 75) of 15 resident refrigerators. The facility census was 110. Findings are: A. Record review of an undated facility Policy entitled Proper Handling of Tableware revealed the following information: Handling of clean tableware: - Do not touch eating surfaces of forks, spoons, knives, rims of glasses, or the inside of bowls and plates. - Glasses, cups and bowls should be handled by the base or out edge only. Observation during dining services on 06/23/25 between 12:00 PM and 12:28 PM revealed Dietary Aide (DA) A served a drink to Resident 72. Observation revealed that DA-A handled the glass of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
D. An observation on 6/23/2025 at 10:48 AM revealed a nebulizer machine (a machine that changes liquid medicine into fine droplets inhaled through a mouthpiece or a mask) and tubing and a room telephone placed directly on the carpeted floor beside the bed of Resident 64. An observation on 6/24/2025 at 5:00 PM revealed a nebulizer machine and tubing and room telephone on the floor beside the bed of Resident 64. An observation on 6/24/2025 at 7:10 AM revealed a nebulizer machine and tubing and room telephone on the floor beside the bed of Resident 64. An interview on 6/23/2025 at 10:50 AM with Resident 64 confirmed the nebulizer machine and tubing and the room telephone are always kept on the floor of the resident's room. An interview on 6/24/25 at 5:10 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) O confirmed having the nebulizer machine, tubing and telephone on the floor is an infection control risk. An interview on 6/24/25 at 5:15 PM with Medication Aide (MA) P confirmed the placement of the nebulizer machine, tubing and telephone on the floor is an infection control risk. An interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to notify the provider of unavailable medication for 1 (Resident 57) of 7 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 110. The findings are: Record review of an undated facility policy entitled Unavailable Medications revealed: 4. Medications may be unavailable for a number of reasons. Staff shall take immediate action when it is known that the medication is unavailable: a. Determine reason for unavailability, length of time medication is unavailable, and what efforts have been attempted by the facility or pharmacy provide to obtain the medication. b. Notify physician of inability to obtain medication upon notification or awareness that medication is not available. Obtain alternative treatment orders and/or specific orders for monitoring resident while medication is on hold. Record review of Resident 57's admission Record printed 6/25/25 identified Resident 57 as having diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a condition characterized by dramatic shifts in mood,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-005.04 Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to resolve an ongoing grievance (a complaint or protest) and provide a written decision regarding grievance to the resident's representative. This had the potential to affect 1 (Resident 40) out of 1 resident sampled. The facility census was 110. Findings are: A record review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 05/22/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 10. According to the MDS Manual a score of 8-12 indicates a person has moderately impaired cognition Section I of the MDS revealed the Resident was diagnosed with non-Alzheimer's dementia. Record review of the grievance form dated 03/16/2025 by the Director of Rehab (DOR) G on behalf of Resident's 40's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(H) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect 1(Resident 3) of 2 resident's sampled from physical abuse. The facility census was 110. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 05-09-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13-15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. -had a cerebral infarction also known as a stroke with paralysis on one side of the body. -required limited assistance with bathing, transferring into or out of the tub or shower, and ambulation. Record Review of Resident 3's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 06-03-2025 revealed Resident 3 had been involved in a resident-to-resident altercation in June of 2025. An interview conducted with Resident 3 on 06-26-2025 at 9:53 AM revealed on 06-02-2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the required State Agency of a significant injury within the required time frame for 1 (Resident 70) of 1 sampled. The facility staff identified a census of 110. Findings are: A record review of Resident 70's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the Resident on 04/15/2024. Further review of Resident 70's admission Record revealed diagnoses of history of falling, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, violent behavior, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, and other chronic pain. A record review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 04/04/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 5. The MDS manual states a score of 0-7 indicated the Resident had severe impairment. A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) within the required time frames for 1 (Resident 72) of 29 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 110. The findings are: Record review of the Centers for Medicare and (&) Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Version 1.18.11 dated 10/2023 revealed a quarterly MDS must be completed and signed not later than 14 days from the assessment reference date. Record review of Resident 72's quarterly MDS with a reference date of 6/10/25 revealed that as of 6/26/25 at 10:36 AM, the MDS had not been signed as completed, which is two days after the reference date. During an interview on 6/26/25 at 10:36 AM, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC-I) stated MDSC-I had begun the role in April and due to still learning, Regional MDS support was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(B) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 04/25/25 reflected only medications received for 1 (Resident 49) of 6 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 110. The findings are: Record review of the Centers for Medicare and (&) Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.8.11 dated 10/2023, Section N - Medications revealed: The intent of the items in this section is to record the number of days, during the last 7 days (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days) that any type of injection, insulin and/or select medications were received by the resident. N0415 Steps for Assessment instructed to review the resident's medical record for documentation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F) Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a Baseline Care Plan was completed for 1( Resident 255) of 1 residents within 48 hours of admission. The facility had a census of 110. Findings are: Record review of a Order summary Report sheet printed on 6-24-2025 revealed the facility staff admitted Resident 255 on 06-18-2025. A record review of the Resident 255's discharge orders from the hospital dated [DATE] revealed the following information: Renal Diet (a meal plan designed to support kidney health by carefully managing the intake of sodium, potassium, phosphorus, and protein along with fluid). 1500 milliliters (ml - a unit of measurement) a day fluid restriction. Dialysis (a mechanical treatment that performs the function of healthy kidneys to remove waste and excess fluid from the blood). Monday/Wednesday/Friday at 6:00 AM. Resident had a hemodialysis catheter (a soft flexible tube used to access a patient's blood for hemodialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident 70) of 1 sampled. The facility census was 110. The findings are: A record review of Resident 70's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the Resident on 04/15/2024. Further review of Resident 70's admission Record identified diagnoses of history of falling, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, violent behavior and other chronic pain. A record review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 04/047/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 5. The MDS manual states a score of 0-7 is considered a score of 0-7 indicated the Resident had severe impairment. A record review of progress notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 (H) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to establish a restorative nursing program with frequency of modalities for 3 (Resident 3, 37 and 72) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 110. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 05-09-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13-15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. -had a cerebral infarction also known as a stroke with paralysis on one side of the body. -required limited assistance with bathing, transferring into or out of the tub or shower, and ambulation. -was receiving restorative range of motion, and ambulation. Record review of Resident 3's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 07-16-2024 revealed the following: -Focus Resident 3 was working with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess the ability to smoke safely, which resulted in physical injury for 1 (Resident 50) of 1 smoking residents sampled and failed to implement a fall mat for 1 (Resident 99) of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 110. The findings are: A. Record review of Resident 50's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 12-23-2024 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -had admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored at a 5. According the MDS Manual a score of 0-7 indicates a person has severe cognitive impairment. -had a previous cerebrovascular accident (stroke) with hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body) and aphasia (a brain disorder that affects how you speak and understand language). -had limited range of motion to the right arm and leg. - was non…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(2) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility staff failed to evaluate and implement a toileting program for 1 (Resident 72) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 110. The findings are: Record review of a facility policy entitled Incontinence dated 8/2024 revealed: -Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, all residents that are incontinent will receive appropriate treatment and services. - 4. Residents that are incontinent of bladder or bowel will receive appropriate treatment to prevent infections and to restore continence to the extent possible. Record review of Resident 72's admission Record (AR) printed on 06/25/25 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/07/23. Further review of the AR identified that Resident 72 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic constipation, benign prostatic hyperplasia (a condition where the prostate gland enlarges, potentially causing urinary problems), polyuria (increased urine production), and bilateral osteoarthritis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews; the facility failed to assess for bed assist bar (a bar affixed to the bed used to assist the resident in bed mobility and positioning) use for 1 (Resident 49) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 110. The findings are: Record review of Resident 49's admission Record printed 06/25/25 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/25/23 and identified Resident 49 had diagnoses that included stroke, dementia, epilepsy, weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and reduced mobility. Record review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) revealed Resident 49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 11. According to the MDS manual, a score of 11 indicated the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Observation of 35 medications revealed 3 errors with a resulting error rate of 8.57%. The medication errors are related to 1 (Resident 91) of 6 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 110. The findings are: Record review of Resident 91's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 06/2025 revealed Resident 91's practitioner had ordered medications that included: -potassium 20 milliequivalents (mEq) to be given in the morning; -divalproex tablet delayed release 500 mg to be given twice a day; and -artificial tears one drop in both eyes to be given twice a day. Observation on 06/25/25 at 7:57 AM revealed Medication Aide (MA-S) prepared Resident 91's medications for administration. The potassium and divalproex medication cards from which medications are dispensed and compared to the MAR read Do Not Crush. MA-S crushed all the resident's medications prior to mixing with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) and 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to evaluate, monitor, implement interventions for pressure ulcer prevention and promote healing for 4 (Resident 1,2,3 and 4) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 108. The findings are: Record review of the facility's policy titled Wound Treatment Management dated 04-01-2024 indicated the policy was to promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders. The policy explanation and compliance guidelines revealed the following: -Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician's orders, including cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. -In the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify the physician to obtain treatment orders. -The effectiveness of treatments…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.01 (C) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(A)(G) Based on observations, record review, and interviews; the facility administration staff failed to ensure effective management of facility resources to maintain the highest practical well being of residents and the facility environment as evidenced by failure to implement an effective plan of action to maintain correction for previously cited areas of deficient practice result. The facility staff identified a census was 119. Findings are: Review of the facility survey history revealed the facility received a citation at F584 for failing to ensure temperatures on the 200 hallway were maintained on 12-05-2024. F 584, The facility failed to maintain temperatures in resident rooms and common area. The facility failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. According to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) A IJ is a situation in which the nursing home's non-compliance with one or more requirements has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.19 and 175 NAC 12-007.04(C) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure temperatures were maintained on the 200 hallway which has the potential to affect 16 residents residing on the 100 hallway, the handrails on the 300/400 unit were in good repair which has the potential to affect 37 residents residing in the 300 and 400 hallway, the door to the smoking room was in good repair which has the potential to affect 16 residents who smoke at the facility, and a guard was in place on the baseboard heater in room [ROOM NUMBER] which has the potential to affect 2 resident residing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility had a total census 117 residents. Findings are: A. Observations on 12/2/24 at 3:24 PM revealed a temperature of 69 F [Fahrenheit] on the thermometer located in the 200 hallway. Observations on 12/3/24 between 11:40 AM and 3:46 PM revealed the following temperatures on the thermometer located in the 200 hallway: -12/3/24 11:40 AM 63…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an order for daily weights was followed for 1 (Resident 34), failed to ensure a providers' order was clarified for 1 (Resident 12) and failed to ensure an order to discontinue medication was transcribed for 1 (Resident 7). The total sample size was 24. The facility had a census of 117. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health of residents in nursing homes that are certified by Medicare or Medicaid) dated 9/2/24 revealed Resident 34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a screening tool used to assess a person's cognitive functioning) of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A record review of Resident 34's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident 34 has the following diagnoses: -Acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (a condition in which the heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18 Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a nurse performed hand hygiene, changed gloves, and wore a gown when providing care to 1 resident (Resident 115) of 1 resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - a set of infection control practices that use gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). The total sample was 24. The facility census was 117. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 115's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] (MDS - a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health of residents in nursing homes that are certified by Medicare or Medicaid) dated 9/2/24 revealed Resident 115 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a screening tool used to assess a person's cognitive functioning) of 4, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. A record review of Resident 115's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17(A)(v) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for 1(Resident 1) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 118. Findings are: A record review of Resident 1's admission Record printed 11/13/2024 revealed the resident was over [AGE] years of age, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes, heart failure, and pressure injuries to their left heel and sacral area (the area at the base of the spine between the hips). The resident was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. A review of a communication app used by the facility to communicate with the Primary Care Provider (PCP) revealed the following information: On 10/11/2024 at 5:48 PM, from the facility iPad, an image of a handwritten note from the resident's cardiologist. On 10/21/2024 at 4:18 PM, from the PCP, a response to notification that the nurse had been unable to obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(1) and 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 2's indwelling urinary catheter was cleaned in a manner to prevent potential urinary tract infection and failed to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions were maintained for in order to prevent the potential for cross-contamination for 2 (Residents 2 and 5) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 118. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's undated Suprapubic Catheterization (SP catheter-a tube that goes into the bladder through the lower abdomen to drain urine) policy marked Copyright 2023 at the bottom revealed that the stoma (the opening the catheter goes into the bladder through) should be cleaned outward from the stoma in a circular motion. B. A record review of the facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy marked Copyright 2024 at the bottom revealed that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) was an infection control intervention that employed the use of a gown and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.05(S) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident 5) of 3 sampled residents was able to have a visitor of their choice. The facility had a census of 123. Finding are: A record review of Resident 5's Clinical Resident Profile revealed Resident 5 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the residents' family member was listed as their responsible party and their Power of Attorney for health care and financial. A record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health status of nursing home residents) revealed Resident 5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a cognitive screening tool used to assess a persons' cognitive functioning) of 3 indicating the resident severely cognitively impaired. A record review of an e-mail, dated 9/5/2024 from the facility Administrator (Admin) to the Ombudsman (a person who investigates, reports on and helps settle complaints) revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(S) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to resolve grievances in a timely manner for 1 resident (Resident 5) of 3 residents sampled. The facility had a census of 123. Findings are: A record review of Resident 5's Clinical Resident Profile revealed Resident 5 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the residents' family member was listed as their responsible party and their Power of Attorney for health care and financial. A record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health status of nursing home residents) revealed Resident 5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a cognitive screening tool used to assess a persons' cognitive functioning) of 3 indicating the resident severely cognitively impaired. A record review of the Social Services progress notes revealed the following note dated 9/3/2024. Care conference held with the resident (Resident 5). Social Services in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility kitchen staff failed to ensure food was thawed in a manor to prevent the potential for food borne illness, failed to ensure that foods were labeled and dated and failed to discard food that was out of date This has the potential to effect all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility claimed a census of 123 residents. Findings are: An observation of the kitchen on 8/22/24 at 7:30 AM revealed the following: - The refrigerator contained 35 small containers of an unlabeled, undated food on a tray. -A second tray contained 46 containers of a jello-like substance which was not labeled and was dated 8/15/2024 and 3 containers of a jello-like substance which was not labeled and was dated 8/3/2024. -A third tray contained 11 portions of an unlabeled food dated 8/11. -A 4th tray contained 40 containers of an unlabeled food, 37 of which were dated 8/21/24 and 3 which were dated 8/13/24. An observation on 8/22/2024 at 8:35 AM of a kitchen sink revealed it contained 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.04(G) Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to answered calls for assistance in a timely manner for 6 (Residents 4,11,12,13,14 and 15) of 37 residents observed on the 500-600 hall. The facility census was 123. Findings are: An observation of call lights being on and the call light notification system on 8/26-2024 from 10:40 AM to 10:45 AM revealed the following information: -The call light for room [ROOM NUMBER] had been on for 27:44 minutes. -The call light for room [ROOM NUMBER] had been on for 32.27 minutes. -The call light for room [ROOM NUMBER] had been on for 39:00 minutes. -The call light for room [ROOM NUMBER] had been on for 17:09 minutes. -The call light for room [ROOM NUMBER] had been on for 13:37 minutes. -The call light for room [ROOM NUMBER] had been on for 16:01 minutes. An interview on 8/26/2024 at 11:00 AM was conducted with Registered Nurse-E (RN). During the interview RN -E reported 5-10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12.(D)(iii) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12.(D)(vi) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to ensure that an insulin injector pen was labeled correctly for 1 resident (Resident 6), failed to ensure that an expired insulin injector pen for 1 resident (Resident 5) was discarded and failed to ensure that an insulin injector pen was identified and dated before it was placed in the medication cart. The facility staff identified there were 26 residents in the facility who receive insulin via insulin injector pens. The facility staff identified a census of 131. Findings are: An observation of the labels of the opened insulin injector pens for 26 residents were examined on [DATE] from 9:45AM to 10:05 AM A. An observation on [DATE] at 9:45 AM of a medication cart revealed 1 opened Victoza insulin pen was labeled with Resident 6's name. Further review revealed the Victoza insulin pen did not have an opened-on date or an expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.10 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 [Resident 2] of 5 sampled residents was free from a significant medication error. The facility had a total census of 130 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 2's admission record revealed an admission date of 3/22/21 with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [a condition that involves the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel]. A review of Resident 2's hospital discharge orders dated 5/14/24 revealed a new order for Lispro insulin [fast acting insulin] sliding scale to be given with meals and night based on the following blood sugars: -151-200 give 2 units -201-250 give 4 units -251-300 give 6 units -351-400 give 8 units -More than 400 call MD [Medical Doctor] -Stop Lyumjev KwikPen U-100 insulin 100 unit/ml -Change insulin glargine U-300 300 unit/ml [Toujeo; a long-acting insulin] to 12 units subcutaneously nightly A review of APRN A [Advance Practice Registered Nurse] orders for Resident 2 dated 5/14/24 revealed the following order: Resume previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor 2 (Resident 1 and 3) of 3 residents post procedural appointments. The facility identified a census of 132. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 1's Census revealed an admission date of 10/13/24. Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed to do care-planning) dated 4/15/24, revealed the resident's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, is a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents upon admission into a long-term care facility) had a score of 8, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 1's undated Diagnosis sheet revealed the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's Disease, inguinal hernia, chronic atrial fibrillation, pain, Vitamin D deficiency, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hypertension, inflammatory disorder of the scrotum, muscle wasting, insomnia, and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04B2 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete competencies for 7 (staff members C, T, U, V, W, X and Y) of 34 Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] employees files, 2 (staff members Z, and AA) of 36 Registered Nurse [RN] employee files and 6 (staff members J, K, L, BB, CC and DD) of 122 Nurse Aide [NA] employee files. The files reviewed included both facility and agency staff. This had the potential to affect 126 residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 126. Findings are: A. Record review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated 12/20/23 revealed the following information related to competencies: Staff are provided ongoing education utilizing online education, staff in services, conferences and competency/skills fair. Consider the following competencies (this is not an inclusive list): - Activities of daily living: Bathing (tub, shower, sitz), bed making (occupied and unoccupied), bedpan, dressing, feeding, nail and hair care, Perineal care ( female and male), mouth care (brushing teeth or dentures),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide bathing per resident preference for 2 (Resident 78 and 384) of 13 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 126. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy Resident Showers and the policy is undated. The policy states: It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per the current standards of practice. Policy explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1) Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident safety. B. Record review of Resident 78's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandates assessment tool used for care planning) dated 1/5/24 revealed Resident 78's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was a 5. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 0 to 7 indicates a person has severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement infection control precaution to prevent the spread of infectious disease for 1 (Resident 100) and failed to utilized handwashing and gloving techniques during the provision of care and treatments for 3 (Resident 120, 41 and 80). The total sample size was 12. The facility staff identified a census of 126. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 100's electronic medical record revealed Resident 100 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses list in electronic medical records identified a diagnosis of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase Resistance [an enzyme found in some strains of bacteria that is antibiotic resistant] during stay dated 3/11/24. A review of Resident 100's Urinalysis result dated 12/27/23 showed moderate Leukocyte Esterase [white blood cells] with specimen forwarded for culture and sensitivity. A review of Resident 100's Urine Culture Result dated 12/29/23 revealed microbiology…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party was notified of a change of condition for 1 [Resident 32] of 4 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 126. Findings are: A review of Resident 32's electronic medical record revealed Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia. A review of Resident 32's Progress Note dated 3/13/24 at 6:03 PM revealed Resident 32 was being sent to emergency room for evaluation and treatment of left sided weakness, facial drooping, and slurred speech since 3/8/24. Resident 32's Progress Note indicated Resident 32's physician was informed and a verbal order was received to send to emergency room via 911. A review of Resident 32's Progress Note dated 3/13/24 at 6:16 PM revealed Resident 32's family was notified of Resident 32's condition and transfer to the hospital. A review of Neurology Consult Note dated 3/14/24 identified a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(8) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse within the required timeframe to the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] for 1( Residents 233) of 4 facility self report investigations reviewed. The facility census was 126. Findings are: Record review of an undated facility policy entitled Abuse , Neglect, Exploitation revealed the following information: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, Adult Protective Services and to all other required agencies within specified timeframe's: - a. Immediately, but not later then 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation of abuse or result in serious bodily injury or: - b. Not later then 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not involve serious bodily injury. B. The Administrator will follow up with government agencies, during business hours, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure monitoring was completed for change of resident condition for 1 [Resident 32] of 4 sampled residents. The facility has a total census of 126 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 32's electronic medical record revealed Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified Dementia. A review of Resident 32's Progress Note dated 3/13/24 at 6:03 PM revealed Resident 32 was being sent to emergency room for evaluation and treatment of left sided weakness, facial drooping, and slurred speech since 3/8/24. Resident 32's Progress Note dated 3/13/24 indicated Resident 32's physician was informed and verbal order was received to send to emergency room via 911. A review of Neurology Consult Note dated 3/14/24 identified a diagnosis of subacute CVA [Cerebral vascular accident]. In an interview on 3/18/24 at 12:14 PM, LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse] A reported that Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 12-006.10D Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident 137) of 8 sampled residents. The facility census was 126. Findings are: Record review of Resident 137's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated -3-11-2024 revealed Resident 137 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Seizure Disorder-Epilepsy, Anemia, Arthritis, Cerebrovascular Accident, Depression, and Asthma. The MDS also revealed Resident 137 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score (BIMS, an assessment that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. A score of 0-7 equals severe impairment, 8-12 indicates moderate impairment and 13-15 indicates cognitively intact) of 15 indicating Resident 137 was cognitively intact. An interview with Resident 137 on 03-18-2024 at 2:17 PM revealed Resident 137 was concerned that (gender) was not getting all the medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-04 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure 5 Nursing Assistants (NA) (NA-G, NA-H, NA-I, NA-J and NA-K) of 33 Nursing Assistants sampled received and completed 12 hours of continuing education. The facility staff identified a census of 135. Findings are: A record review of the employee files of 5 nursing assistants (NA) revealed there was no evidence of the employees receiving and completing the required 12 hours of continuing education. Record review of NA-G's employee record revealed a hire date of: 10/31/2022. Record review of NA-H's employee record revealed a hire date of 8/22/2022. Record review of NA-I's employee record revealed a hire date of 10/17/2022. Record review of NA-J's employee record revealed a hire date of 10/10/2022. Record review of NA-K's employee record revealed a hire date of 2/14/2022. Interview on 03/04/2024 at 9:00 AM with the Facility Administrator confirmed [gender] was unable to find education for NA-G, NA-H, NA-I, NA-J, and NA-K. The Administrator was unable to confirm if the 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$141,793 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $33,862 — penalty dated 2025-02-18
- $55,795 — penalty dated 2024-06-03
- $52,136 — penalty dated 2024-03-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-18 for 45 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-30 for 31 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NE M2 HOLDCO OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2024 |
| BRASS NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| BSD BEIS HEALTH TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| DOURO VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| GOLD NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| NE SNF HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| NE SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| SF 4140 OLDE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD REAL PROPERTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| SILVER NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| TULIP INVESTMENTS NE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2024 |
| SHARP, DAVID | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| PIHLGREN, LINDSEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| SILBERSTEIN, ARI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2024 |
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285054. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.