No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hillcrest Shadow Lake LLC

1507 E Gold Coast Road, Papillion, NE 68046 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 114 certified beds · (402) 339-6010 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (402) 339-6010 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
312 Olson Dr Ste 101 · (402) 933-6300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1413 S Washington St · (402) 331-8632 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hy-Vee0.6 mi
11650 S 73rd St · (402) 597-5790 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2100 Corn Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1301 Gold Coast Rd · (402) 331-3477

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.7%19.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%4.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%19.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.0%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.4%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.4%20.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine44.4%75.9%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.071.811.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.501.921.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
62.2%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 95.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-22)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) & 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to evaluate, monitor, and implement interventions for pressure ulcer prevention and promotion of wound healing for 2 (Resident 1 and 3) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 95. Findings are:A. Record review of the facility policy titled Skin integrity, Wound, Ulcer Assessment Prevention Treatment Documentation Policy dated 02-11-2021 revealed all team members are responsible for preventing, caring for, and providing treatment to any guest that has altered skin integrity. A licensed nurse/physician/therapist may stage a wound and determine etiology. Measurement of the wound must be completed upon identification. For admissions, wounds must be measured when completing the admission skin assessment. Wounds are measured in 3 dimensions length, width, and depth. Measurements must be completed routinely and documented on a wound progress assessment form on all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7a Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 48) of 8 sampled resident's safety belt remain secured during the bathing process and implement interventions to prevent a fall with fracture for 1 (Resident 94) of 8 sampled residents. The facility census was 92. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Bathing Procedure dated 05/23/2024 revealed the spa tub procedure was to assist residents out of their clothing and onto the tub chair utilizing appropriate transfer device and ensure the safety belt was on the resident. NEVER leave guest unattended during bath. A record review of Resident 48's Medical Diagnosis dated 04/04/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety (confusion), Other Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction (altered sensation following a stroke), Memory Deficit Following Cerebral Infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i)(1). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and implement interventions for a significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 4) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 96. The findings are:A.Record review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-admitted to the facility on [DATE].-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 14. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13 to 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact.-required set up assistance with eating.-required extensive assistance with upper body dressing.-required total assistance with hygiene, bathing, toileting, lower body dressing, bed mobility and transfers.-weighed 219 pounds (lb). Record review of Resident 4's Dietary Progress Notes (DPN) dated 04-08-2026 revealed the Registered Dietician (RD) had assessed Resident 4's nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-009.06 (H)(iii). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure vascular wounds were monitored to promote healing for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 95. Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Skin integrity, Wound, Ulcer Assessment Prevention Treatment Documentation Policy dated 02-11-2021 revealed all team members are responsible for preventing, caring for, and providing treatment to any guest that has altered skin integrity. A licensed nurse/physician/therapist may stage a wound and determine etiology. Measurement of the wound must be completed upon identification. For admissions, wounds must be measured when completing the admission skin assessment. Wounds are measured in 3 dimensions: length, width, and depth. Measurements must be completed routinely and documented on a wound progress assessment form on all identified impaired skin integrity issues.Record review of Resident 2's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B)(D)Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff utilized infection control practices to prevent cross contamination of wounds during wound care for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Resident 1 and 2). The facility had a census of 44.A.A record review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy, dated 3/1/2022 revealed the following:Hand Hygiene GuidanceHealthcare personnel should use an alcohol-base hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications:Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient.After touching a patient or the patient's immediate environmentAfter contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfacesImmediately after glove removalGloves and Hand HygieneIf your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning (put on) gloves, before touching the patient or the patient environment.Change gloves and perform hand hygiene during patient care, if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that monitoring was in place for diuretic medication (a medication that increases the amount of urine produced by the kidneys and helps to remove excess fluid and salt from the body) administered to 3 of 6 residents surveyed (Residents 2, 3, and 4). The facility claimed a census of 109. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 2's medical diagnoses (the nature and cause of a disease or condition) revealed Resident 2 had Chronic Kidney Disease (a disease characterized by progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys). A record review of Resident 2's medication orders revealed an order dated 3/3/2025 for Furosemide (a diuretic medication used to treat excess fluid held in the body) 20 mg (mg - milligram - a unit of measurement) daily for edema (excess fluid retained in the body). A record review of Resident 2's physician orders revealed there were no laboratory orders to monitor the effect of the medication Furosemide on Resident 2. A record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Nebraska 2017 Food Code 2-301.14 Nebraska Food Code 2017 3-302.11(4) Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to utilize handwashing and gloving techneques during meal service and failed to serve foods in a manor to prevent potentail contamination. This had the potential to affect 44 residents. the facility census was 103. Findings are: Record review of a facility policy entitled Meal Tray Delivery Related to Infection Control dated 10/27/2017 revealed: -2. After a tray has been delivered, the server will exit the room and apply hand sanitizer that is provided in the service hallways (Per the hand sanitizing gel policy) prior to entering the next resident's room. -3. Once the server has returned to the kitchen, he/she will repeat the handwashing procedures (Per the handwashing policy) prior to the delivery of the next meal tray. Continuous observation in the assisted dining room and the Evergreen Hall on 04/17/2025 from 12:15 PM to 12:43 PM revealed Nurse Tech (NA)-K, with gloved hands, obtained a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on interview and record reviews; the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the required State Agency (SA) within the required timeframe for 1 (Resident 15) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 103. The findings are: Record review of a facility policy entitled Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation dated revised 03/05/2025 revealed: -The facility must develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training team members, protection of guest and for the prevention, identification, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property. The purpose is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control prevent occurrences. -7. Reporting/Response: The facility will report all alleged violations and all substantiated incidents to the state agency and to all other agencies as required, and take all necessary corrective action depending on the results of the investigation. -Procedure for Response and Reporting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Nebraska Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(h)(vi)(3)(g) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to measure and record pulse rates before and after a breathing treatment was administered for 1 (Resident 42) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 103. The findings are: Record review of a facility provided, undated Nebulizer Competency revealed: -Procedure: -3. Take client's pulse prior to treatment. -10. Take client's pulse rate at completion of treatment. Record review of Resident 42's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 03/11/2025. Further review of the admission record revealed Resident 42 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and chronic kidney disease. Record review of Resident 42's Order Summary Report printed 04/17/2025 revealed an order dated 04/14/2025 for albuterol sulfate inhalation nebulization solution to be administered by nebulizer twice daily for seven days. Record review of Resident 42's medical record revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18 (D) Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene before and after using gloves during medication administration for 2 (Residents 33 and 66) of 4 residents observed during medication pass. The facility census was 103. Findings are: A. An observation on 4/17/2025 at 7:10AM of medication administration by Medication Aide (MA) I to Resident 33 revealed MA I donned gloves to assist Resident 33 to sit up, handed them their medication and a glass of water. MA I administered nasal spray and assisted Resident 33 to lie down on their bed. MA I applied powder to Resident 33's skin and covered the resident with a blanket. MA I removed their gloves and left the residents room to return to the medication cart and chart the medication administration. MA I did not wash their hands or use hand sanitizer before putting the gloves on, taking them off or when they exited the room. An interview with MA I on 4/17/2025 at 7:10AM confirmed they should have used hand sanitizer before and after using gloves,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure positioning to maintain body alignment for 1 [Resident 1] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 103 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 1's admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease [a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions]. A review of Resident 1's Care Plan revealed a focus area for being at risk for falls with an intervention dated 11/2/24 of staff being educated on ensuring Resident 1 is in a tilt position in wheelchair at all times except when eating meals. A review of facility investigation dated 11/6/24 revealed Resident 1 was being wheeled to communal area after dinner when Resident 1 put feet down on the floor, leaned forward and fell out of Resident 1's wheelchair. Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a nose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09(l) Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred in accordance with plan of care for 2 [Residents 1 and 3] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 103 residents. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 3's admission Record revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Parkinson's Disease [a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement] and unspecified dementia. A review of Resident 3's Care Plan revealed a focus area related needing assist with activities of daily living with an intervention dated 11/15/24 of Resident 3 requiring a Hoyer lift [full body lift] transfer with 2-assist. Observations on 11/20/24 at 11:51 AM revealed Resident 3 being transferred from recliner to wheelchair by Director of Nursing and Nurse Aide A with gait belt and utilizing a pivot transfer. Resident 3 was taken by wheelchair to the spa and transferred to toilet by Nurse Aide A and Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand washing after touching potentially contaminated items during meal prep, place the blade in the puree blender in a sanitary manner, ensure staff did not touch the drinking surfaces of the cups of 12 residents in the E hall dining room to prevent cross-contamination. The facility failed to ensure the main kitchen and the Evergreen/Memory unit kitchen floors and equipment were cleaned and failed to ensure all items in the Evergreen/Memory Care unit refrigerator and freezer were labeled and dated to prevent the potential for food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents in the facility. The facility census was 92. Findings are: A. An observation on 04/02/2024 at 7:04 AM revealed the facility's Chef went to dry storage in the food preparation (prep) process and got 3 cans of green beans, the Chef opened a box of frozen beans and opened the plastic bag inside the box and dumped them into a saucepan with the other green beans. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C. An observation on 04/03/2024 at 7:15 AM of Certified Medication Assistant K (CMA)-K performing blood glucose testing and insulin administration for Resident 74 revealed CMA-K gathered Resident 74's individual glucose monitor, a test strip, a cotton ball, a lancet and a pair of gloves. CMA-K also had 2 insulin flex pens, one of Lantus with 22 units of insulin and one of Humalog 5 units of insulin, both pens were prepared for administration with a safety needle attached. CMA-K entered the resident room and informed Resident 74 that CMA-K was there to test the residents blood glucose and administer insulin. Resident 74 agreed and CMA-K donned gloves without washing their hands or using hand sanitizer. CMA-K opened the alcohol wipe and wiped the forefinger on the right hand. CMA-K used the lancet to pierce the skin producing a drop of blood , placed the test strip in the glucometer and collected the blood drop. CMA-K used the cotton ball to blot the blood on the resident's finger and then gathered the trash and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18B3 Based on observations and interviews; the facility staff failed to ensure the venting system was functional in 4 (B-004, C-010, C-015 and C-017) room effecting 7 residents who resided in those rooms and failed to ensure the Heating and Cooling unit (commonly called PTAC) was maintained in good repair. This effected 7 of 92 residents. The facility staff identified a census of 92. Findings are: An observation on 04/01/24 at 9:30 AM revealed the vent were not fuctioning in the bathroom of rooms B-004, C-010, C-015, and C-017. An observation on 04/01/2024 at 10:00 AM revealed the front cover of the PTAC has missing pieces in room C-011. On 4/04/2024 at 12:26 PM during a tour of the facility with the Maintenance Director (MD) confirmed the vents in rooms B-004, C-010, C-010, and C-017 were not functional and the PTAC front cover needed replaced in C-011.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(9) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to protect 4 (Resident 32, 92, 342 and 33) residents from abuse. The survey sample was 19 and the facility staff identified a census of 92. Findings are: A. Record review of a Order Summary report sheet printed on 4-04-2024 revealed Resient 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 32 Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care-planning) dated 2-15-2024 revealed Resident 32 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 13 to 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. On 4-13-2024 at 11:00 AM the facility Administrator identified Resident 32 had reported of being verbally abused by Nursing Assistant (NA)-EE. On 4-03-2024 at 1:14 PM an interview was conducted with Resident 32. During the interview Resident 32 reported the incident of verbal abuse occurred on 3-30-2024. According to Resident 32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04B2b Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure competencies in insulin administration were completed for 5 Certified Medication Assistant (CMA) and 3 licensed nurses surveyed. This had the ability to affect 13 residents (Residents 6, 15, 19, 21, 25, 30, 38, 50, 60, 62, 74, 194 and 196) who receive insulin in the facility. The facility claimed a census of 92. Findings are: An interview on 04/03/2024 at 10:32 AM with CMA-K revealed they had not been assessed for competency in administering insulin by the facility. An interview on 04/03/2024 at 1:37 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed CMA's have to be assessed for competency before they are allowed to administer insulin in the facility. The DON confirmed they were not aware that MA-K had not been assessed for competency to administer insulin by the facility. An interview with on 04/03/2024 at 1:39 PM with Registered Nurse (RN) B confirmed facility staff are assessed for competency through the facility on boarding and education process. RN-B confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12B Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to have rationale for the continued use of an antianxiety medication for 3( Resident 1,21 and 25), failed to complete behavioral monitoring for 1(Resident 57) and failed to identify the need for a increase in dosage of a antidepressant medication for 1 (Resident) 1 of 5 residents sample size for the medication review. The facility staff identified a census of 92. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) dated 1/1/2024 revealed Resident 21 is [AGE] years old and had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS - a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents) of 5 indicating Resident 21 is severely cognitively impaired. Resident 21 had the following diagnoses: Unspecified dementia, severe with other behavioral disturbance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E7 Based on observation and interview;the facility staff failed to ensure 2 medications in medication cart E were labeled for use, failed to ensure 2 medication carts and medications were secured and failed to ensure the medication refrigerator was secured in the memory care unit. This had the ability to affect 9 ambulatory residents of 22 residents who live on the memory care unit. The facility claimed a census of 92. Findings are: A. An observation on 04/04/2024 at 7:30 AM of the drawers in the medication cart on hall E revealed an open undated, unlabeled generic brand of a 8 oz bottle of Cough DM and a bottle of Neomycin and Polymyxin B Sulfates and Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Suspension On 04/04/2024 at 7:30 AM an interview was conducted with Certified Medication Assistant (CMA). During the interview CMA-K reported not knowing who the medication belonged to or how long the medications had been in the cart. B. An observation on 04/04/24 at 12:45 PM revealed the medication refrigerator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C1c Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed review and revise 1 (Resident 77) of 1 resident's Care Plan related to the oxygen order. The facility census was 92. Findings are: A record review of the facility's undated Comprehensive Care Planning policy revealed assessments of residents were ongoing and the care plans were revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition changed. A record of Resident 77's Clinical Census dated 04/02/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 02/17/2024. A record review of Resident 77's Medical Diagnosis dated 04/02/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Pulmonary Hypertension, Unspecified (high pressure in the blood vessels that supply the lungs), Dependance on Supplemental Oxygen, and Solitary Pulmonary Nodule (single mass in lungs). A record review of Resident 77's Minimum Data Set (MDS,a comprehensive assessment used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to follow practitioners orders for medication administration for 1 (Resident 93) and failed to implement treatment orders for 1 ( Resident 25). The total survey sample was 19. The facility staff identified a census of 92. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 93's Medical Diagnosis sheet print on 4-04-2024 revealed Resident 93 had the diagnosis of Dementia, Diabetes, Hypertension, Major Depressive disorder and Functional Quadriplegia. Record review of Resident 93's Clinical Physician Orders sheet printed on 4-4-2024 revealed an order for staff to hold insulin if Resident 93 did not eat meals. A record review of Resident 93's Medication Administration Report (MAR) dated 3/16/24 revealed RN-SS administered Resident 93's insulin. A record review of the dietary intake sheet for Resident 93 revealed there was no documentation of food intake for 3/16/2024. A record review of Resident 93's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6(5) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure the provider was notified when Resident 77's oxygen level dropped below the ordered parameter. The facility census was 92. Findings are: A record of Resident 77's Clinical Census dated 04/02/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 02/17/2024. A record review of Resident 77's Medical Diagnosis dated 04/02/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Pulmonary Hypertension, Unspecified (high pressure in the blood vessels that supply the lungs), Dependance on Supplemental Oxygen, and Solitary Pulmonary Nodule (single mass in lungs). A record review of Resident 77's Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 02/23/2024 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)(a score of a residents cognitive abilities) 4 of 15 which indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility staff failed to evaluate and implement interventions to manage triggers for 1(Resident 81) of 1 resident reviewed who has a diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The facility staff identified a census of 92. Findings are: Record review of Resident 81's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 1-24-2024 revealed Resident 81 had an active diagnoses of PTSD. Record review of Resident 81's trauma care plan initial date and revised date is 02/06/2024. Care plan interventions are: - Provide reassurance and redirection. -Encourage to express needs/wants. -Encourage to participate in activities of choice. -Provide space if she is upset so long as she and her peers are safe. -Provide female caregivers for toileting/bathing when needed. -Provide comfort when sad. Observation on 04/01/2024 at 7:33 AM revealed Resident 81 was in their room wiping counters and had their belonging packed and placed in the hallway. Observation on 04/01/2024 at 12:33 PM revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04G Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff had functional pagers that alerted staff when residents requested assistance (commonly known as call light). This had the potential to effect all residents in the facility. The facility staff identified a census of 105. Findings are: A. Record review of an All Team meeting sign in sheet dated 9-08-2023 revealed part of the team meeting was to review the call light education. According to the All Team meeting information the facility used pagers and a screen in the nursing station. On 12-06-2023 at 12:00 PM an interview was conducted with Resident 62. During the interview Resident 62 reported it would take staff some times an hour or more to answer the call light. B. Record review of Resident 62's Device Activity Report (DAR, a report that identified what time the call light was activated and the time the call light was answer. The DAR also identified location of the call light that had been activated and zone in the facility) revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of the development of a pressure ulcer for 1(Resident 50) and failed to notify family of significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 4) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 105. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 50's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 11-17-2023 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 50's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) as a 3. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 0 to 7 indicates severe cognitive impairment. Record review of a Skin Only Evaluation ([NAME]) sheet dated 9-29-2023 revealed the facility staff identified Resident 50 had a wound the the left heel that measured 3.1 centimeters (CM) by 1.2 cm. Record review of a Practitioner report sheet dated 11-13-2023 revealed the wound to Resident 50 left heel was a pressure ulcer. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09D2a Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure sore treatment was initiated for 1 [Resident 4] of 4 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 105 residents. Findings are: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease according to admission record. Resident 4's admission record identified that Resident 4 discharged from the facility on 11/20/23. A review of Skin Only Evaluation sheet dated 11/4/23 revealed a new issue to left heel with a length of 2 cm [centimeters] and a width of 2 cm and a new issue to right foot with a length of 3 cm and a width of 2 cm. A review of Resident 4's 11.2023 MAR [Medication Administration Record] revealed the following orders: -An order dated 11/6/23 for left heel cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, paint heel with betadine and cover with a merpilex [an absorbent foam dressing] daily. The order was discontinued on 11/7/23. -An order dated 11/7/23 for left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain walls in good and cleanable condition in 15 (resident rooms A 1, A 2, A 7, A 9, B 3, B 4, B 5, B 11, C 6, C 7, E 4, E 5, E 6, E 7, E 10) of 56 occupied rooms. The facility census was 94. Findings are: Observation on 02/14/23 between 8:30 AM and 08:52 AM with the Environmental Services Director [ESD], the Maintenance Director [MD] and the Administrator [ADM] revealed many scraped and gouged areas on the walls behind recliners and next to resident beds in resident rooms A 1, A 2, A 7, A 9, B 3, B 4, B 5, B 11, C 6, C 7, E 4, E 5, E 6, E 7, E 10. Interview on 02/14/23 at 08:57 AM with the ESD confirmed the areas of scrapes and gouges on walls in resident rooms A 1, A 2, A 7, A 9, B 3, B 4, B 5, B 11, C 6, C 7, E 4, E 5, E 6, E 7, E 10 and that they had not been identified prior to the environmental tour of the facility.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, record review and interview the facility staff failed to ensure catheter cares were performed in a manner to prevent cross contamination for Res 45, failed to ensure Oxygen tubing was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination for Res 16, and failed to ensure the cleaning and storage for nebulizer masks and tubing was completed to prevent cross contamination for Res 28, 32, and 62. The facility census was 94. The findings are: A. Record review of the Bladder assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident 45 used an indwelling catheter for obstructive uropathy (occurs when urine cannot drain from the urinary tract) and urinary retention (the inability to completely empty your bladder when urinating). Review of Resident 45's Medication Adminstration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for February 2023 revealed an order dated April 1, 2022 for Foley Catheter Cares twice daily. Review of the Care plan dated April 1, 2022 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the resident or representative for 4 hospitalizations for one of one sampled residents (Resident 62). The facility identified a census of 94. Findings are: A record review of the census information for Resident 62 revealed in the last 120 days, readmission dates, post hospital stays, of 12/13/22, 12/19/22, 1/7/23 and 1/16/23. A record review of Resident 62's Progress Notes dated 10/20/22 through 2/8/23 revealed Resident 62 had been sent to ER (Emergency Room) and admitted to the hospital related to episodes of hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues) surrounding the dates listed above. The record review also noted Resident 62 to be Covid-19 (a mild to severe respiratory illness that is caused by a coronavirus) positive during one of the hospital stays. An interview on 02/14/23 at 2:57 PM with the DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed that no written notice of transfer or signed bed hold policy existed related to Resident 62's hospitalizations and should have been completed.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a signed bed-hold policy from the resident or representative related to 4 hospitalizations for one of one sampled residents (Resident 62). The facility identified a census of 94. Findings are: A record review of the census information for Resident 62 revealed in the last 120 days Resident 62 re-admission dates following hospital stay, of 12/13/22, 12/19/22, 1/7/23 and 1/16/23. A record review of Resident 62's Progress Notes dated 10/20/22 through 2/8/23 revealed Resident 62 had been sent to ER (Emergency Room) and admitted to the hospital related to episodes of hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues) surrounding the dates listed above. The record review also noted Resident 62 to be Covid (a mild to severe respiratory illness that is caused by a coronavirus) positive during one of the hospital stays. An interview on 02/14/23 at 02:57 PM with the DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed that no written notice of transfer or signed bed hold policy existed related to Resident 62's hospitalizations and should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to medications given outside of physician ordered parameters for 2 sampled residents (Resident 52 and Resident 62) and failed to prevent constipation for 1of 1 sampled residents (Resident 52). The facility census was 94. Findings are: A. A record review of the MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated February 2023 revealed Resident 52 had the following routine medication orders: Lisinopril (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 40mg orally every morning Metoprolol Succinate (a medication classified as a beta-blocker used to treat chest pain (angina), heart failure, and high blood pressure) tab 1000mg ER (Extended Release) orally every morning for hypertension, *hold for SBP <90 or HR <60 A record review of the MAR dated February 2023 revealed Resident 52 had a documented blood pressure of 150/68 and heart rate of 56 on 2/8/23 with the Metoprolol being given instead of held as ordered. A record review of the MAR dated January 2023 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for Resident 19. The facility staff identified a census of 94. The findings are: Record review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 01/05/23 revealed Resident 19 requires extensive assist with bed mobility and is total dependence with transfers and toilet use. Additionally the MDS revealed Resident 19 had 2 falls with injury. Review of the Huddle Report dated 11/5/22 revealed Resident 19 was observed by the nurse tech to be sitting on the floor next to bed. According to the Huddle report Resident 19 reported having pain in left lower leg. Resident 19 was transported by the Emergency Medical Staff to the Hospital. Review of the Huddle Report dated 11/7/22 revealed Resident 19 may have rolled to the side of the bed and slid off the bed. Resident 19 had a previous broken hip and was sitting on the floor at a diagnol. Resident 19 was sent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered before dialysis for 1 (Resident 16) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 94. The findings are: Record review of current physician orders printed on 02/13/23 revealed Resident 16 receives dialysis treatments on Monday, Wednesday and Friday and Resident 16 was to be woken up at 5 AM. An interview on 02/10/23 at 02:38 PM with Resident 16 revealed that (gender) takes about 3 or 4 medications before leaving for dialysis and then takes the rest with (gender) to the dialysis center. A record review of Resident 16's physician orders for February 2023 revealed an order dated May 6, 2020 for Pre-Dialysis Meds: Azelastine & Fluticason Nasal Sprays ( Medications to relieve nasal congestion), Gabapentin (a medication used to prevent seizures and relieve nerve pain), Pantoprazole (a medication used to reduce the amount of acid in the stomach), Loperamide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications for 1 out of 6 residents sampled (Resident 16 ) were secured and stored safely. The facility census was 94 at the time of survey. Findings are: An observation on 02/08/23 at 10:19 AM of a plastic medication cup with white powder was noted in Resident 16's room next to the sink. An observation on 02/09/23 at 10:08 AM of a plastic medication cup with white powder noted in Resident 16's room next to the sink. Resident stated it was Nystatin (used to treat fungal skin infections). Nystatin bottle was noted to be on top of the resident's refrigerator in room with label on, it did not say may keep at bedside or resident may self administer the medication. A review of the Medication Integrity and Labeling policy, dated 6/1/2017 stated the facility will ensure that nursing staff will follow pharmacy recommendations for storage of medications. A review of Medication Storage in the Facility undated policy stated Medications and biological's are stored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 28E299. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next