Plainview Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to obtain signed informed consents for the use of psychotropic (medication medications for Residents 1,2,12,17, and 34. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use dated 4/14/22 revealed the following; -Psychotropic medications were considered for use only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, psychiatric, social, and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms were identified and addressed. -Residents only received psychotropic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they were indicated. -Residents who were admitted receiving psychotropic medications were evaluated for appropriateness and indication for use. B. Review of the facility Psychotropic Medication Review and Gradual Dose Reduction Policy dated 1/18/19 revealed the following: -Residents and/or their families were notified quarterly of the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY S483.45(e)(4) PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except as provided in S483.45(e)(5), if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order.This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to have a stop date for as needed (PRN) antianxiety medications for Resident's 12, 17 and 34. The facility census was 34.Findings are:A. Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use (medications that affect the mind, emotions and behavior) with a revised date of 4/14/22 revealed;-Psychotropic medications may be considered for residents only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms had been identified and addressed. Psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(vi)Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to label open insulin contains (vials/pens) with dates indicating when they were opened for Resident's 2, 13, and 14, to ensure the medication was not used beyond recommended use by dates. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications with a revision date of November 2020 revealed the following;-The facility stored all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in locked compartments, under proper temperatures, light, and humidity controls.-Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals were returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Review of the facility policy Insulin Administration with a revision date of [DATE] revealed no evidence the facility policy addressed dating insulin once opened, based on practice standards to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02 (H)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to report a fall with major injury within the required time frame for 1 (Resident 17) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 34.Findings are:A. Review of the facility policy Resident Abuse and Neglect with a revision date of 1/10/25 revealed:-All employees of the facility are responsible to protect and prevent resident abuse from occurring. -Abuse means any knowing or intentional act on the part of a caregiver which results in physical injury, psychosocial harm, unreasonable confinement, cruel punishment, sexual abuse of a vulnerable adult. -Physical abuse means damage to bodily tissue including but not limited to, fractures, bruises, lacerations and internal injuries.-Any injury resulting in possible fracture, laceration, stitches must be notified to the Administrator within 2 hours and notification to Adult Protection Services (APS). B. Review of Resident 17's medical record revealed; -On 8/11/25 at 7:20 PM Resident 17 had a fall in the dining room and received a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure Resident 7's Care Plan was reviewed and revised to ensure staff implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control strategy using gowns and gloves during high contact resident care to reduce the spread of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MRDO's-germ/s resistant to many antibiotics) during the provision of wound care for Resident 7. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 34. Findings are:Review of the facility policy Care Planning with a revision date of 2013 revealed the following: -the facility interdisciplinary team was responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. -The care plan is based on resident comprehensive assessment by the interdisciplinary team-The comprehensive, person-centered care plan included measurable objectives and timetable to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs were developed and implemented for each resident -Described services to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to complete neurological assessments (assessment of motor and sensory skills, hearing, speech, vision, coordination, and balance to determine a potential injury or change in status) after unwitnessed falls for 1 (Resident 24) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 34. Findings are: A. Review of the Neurological Assessment Policy with a revision date of 10/2010 revealed the purpose of the policy was to provide guidelines for a neurological assessment. Assessments were to be completed: 1) upon physician order; 2) when following an unwitnessed fall; 3) after a fall with a suspected head injury; or 4) when indicated by a resident's condition. Steps in the procedure:-perform neurologic checks with the frequency as ordered or per falls protocol.-determine the resident's orientation to time, place, and person.-observe the resident's speech pattern and clarity of speech.-check the pupil's reaction.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to implement new measures to prevent pressure ulcer development for Resident 7 following a significant condition change. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: Review of the facility Pressure Ulcer Policy and Procedure date 1/8/2016 revealed the following: -The purpose of the procedure was to provide guidelines for the structured assessment and identification of residents at risk for developing new pressure injuries or worsening of existing pressure injuries. -Licensed nursing staff examined an individual's skin condition upon admission to the facility. This included the initial admission and readmission following hospitalizations.-The purpose of pressure injury assessment was to identify all risk factors and to determine which factors could be modified.-Once the assessment was completed the facility completed a resident centered care plan to address and modify risk for pressure injury. -Development of the care plan was based on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(l)(i)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to develop and/or revise interventions for the prevention of ongoing falls for 1 (Residents 24) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Findings are:A. Review of the facility Falls and Fall Risk Management policy with a revision date of 2/16/21 revealed that based on previous evaluations and current data the staff were to identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try and minimize complications of falling. Fall risk factors included; environmental factors, conditions which may contribute to falls, and medical factors. Staff with the input of the fall risk management team, safety committee and the provider were to implement a resident centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factors of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. If falling recurs despite initial interventions,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This REQUIREMENT is not met as evidenced by Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(A)(vi) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications related to long term use of an antibiotic medication for Resident 23. The antibiotic did not specify a duration and had no supporting documentation for clinical use based on laboratory results. The sample size was 7 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program with a revision date of 1/16/20 revealed the following:-the purpose of the program was to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics, improve resident outcomes and lessen adverse events. -the overall goal was to prevent undesirable outcomes related to misuse by optimizing the selection of drug, dose, route, and duration of therapy. -the leadership team was to regularly review the appropriateness of antibiotic courses and make recommendations for adjustment where necessary, establish new or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control strategy using gowns and gloves during high contact resident care to reduce the spread of Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms (MRDO's-germ/s resistant to many antibiotics) during the provision of wound care for Resident 7. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 34.Findings are: Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a revision date of August 2022 revealed the following: -Enhanced Barrier Precautions were utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms to residents. -EBP employed targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions did not otherwise apply. -Gloves and gowns were applied prior to performing high contact resident care activity. -Examples of high contact care included dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE