Parkside Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 27.5 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete the required background checks for 2 or 5 sampled staff to protect residents from potential abuse. The facility census was 27. Findings are:A. Review of the undated facility policy Parkside Manor Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Resident Property revealed the following: -It was the policy of the facility to screen employees and volunteers prior to working with residents. Screening components include verification of references, certification and verification of license and criminal background checks. -Before new employees were permitted to work with residents, references provided by the prospective employees would be verified as well as appropriate board registrations and certifications regarding the prospective employee's background. The facility would not employ or otherwise engage individuals who had been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. -A criminal background check would be conducted on all prospective employees as provided by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident 26's Antibiotic was ordered in Accordance with the facility Antibiotic Stewardship program. The facility census was 27. Findings are:A. Review of the undated facility Antibiotic Stewardship Policy revealed the following:-It was the policy of Parkside Manor to maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) with the mission of promoting the appropriate use of antibiotics to treat infections and reduce possible adverse events associated with antibiotic use.-To meet the Antibiotic Stewardship guidelines, orders would include dose, duration, route and indication for Antibiotics prescribed for each resident and would be tracked and kept in the medical record. B. Record review of Resident 26's March 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed an order for Tobradexame Suspension (steroid/antibiotic combination) instill one drop to both eyes four times daily as needed for a diagnosis of Blepharitis (inflammation of the eyelid) with a start date of 08/25/25 (no stop date indicated). Further review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 006.18(B) Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to Covid 19 test 6 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 10, 11, 14, 17, 21, and 26) when respiratory illness symptoms were displayed and failed to implement isolation procedures for Resident 10 when respiratory symptoms were displayed. The facility failure had the potential to effect all residents in the building. The sample size was 6 and the census was 27. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Upper Respiratory Illness with a revision date of 9/4/24 revealed the following: -The facility made every attempt to prevent the transmission of any upper respiratory illness from entering the facility and also reduce the transmission of illness with the facility. -To reduce the transmission of upper respiratory illness mask and sanitizer was available at the main entrances, visitors were asked to use hand sanitizer before visiting residents, staff strictly adhered to hand, respiratory, and cough…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(A) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure Resident 4's as needed antipsychotic (a type of medication which alters chemicals in the brain to effect changes in behavior, mood and emotion) medication was reviewed for continued need and renewed every 14 days as required. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 27. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Antipsychotic Drug Use Policy, last revised 10/10 revealed the following: -all residents having antipsychotic drug orders would have a proper diagnosis, -resident behaviors would be monitored daily, -the Pharmacy would routinely monitor and request appropriate dose reductions, -the facility would utilize the lowest effective dose based on behaviors, -residents would have interventions on their care plans to assist in redirecting undesired behaviors, and -the resident's responsible party and/or the resident would be educated on the medication, diagnosis, dose changes, and side effects of the medications. Review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006(D)(vi) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were dated when opened to ensure safe administration of insulin for Resident 17 and Resident 129. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 27. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Insulin Administration with a revised date of [DATE] revealed the following: -The purpose of the Insulin Administration policy was to provide guidelines for the safe administration of insulin to residents with diabetes. -Check expiration date, if drawing from an opened multi-dose vial. If opening a new vial, record expiration date and time on the vial. Review of Resident 129's February 2025 medication administration record (MAR) revealed an order for Aspart (rapid acting insulin)10 units in the morning. An observation on [DATE] at 7:35 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-G obtained Resident 129's insulin pen out of the medication cart for administration. The Aspart Insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Liscensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a potential allegation of abuse to the State Agency for Resident 16. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 31. Findings are: A. Review of the facility's undated policy Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Resident Property revealed the following: -The facility encouraged and supported residents, staff, families, visitors, volunteers and resident representatives to report any suspected acts of abuse, neglect, exploitation, involuntary seclusion or misappropriation of resident property. -Any nursing home employee or volunteer who becomes aware of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation shall immediately report to the nursing home administrator. -The nursing home administrator or designee will report abuse to the State Agency per state and federal requirements. -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Liscensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments had accurate information for 3 residents (Resident's 15, 13 and 28) related to; 1) Resident 15's antiplatelet medication [a blood thinner used to prevent blood cells from clumping together to form a clot] 2) Resident 13's Level II Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) status and 3) Resident 28's anticoagulant medication [a blood thinner used to slow down the process of making clots]. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 31. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a mandatory assessment tool used to develop residents comprehensive care plans) dated 1/10/24 revealed the section related to medications had a check mark that indicated the resident received an anticoagulant medication and had not received an antiplatelet medication. Review of Resident 15's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 2024, revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Liscensure Reference Number 175 NAC12-006.11C Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's perishable food item was dated to prevent the potential of foodborne illness. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 31. Findings are: Review of the undated facility policy Foods Brought in from Outside Sources revealed the facility will ensure food items brought in from other sources are safe and follow food safety code standards by labeling the items with the resident's name, date the item was purchased or prepared and the name of the item. In addition, perishable food items that require refrigeration will be discarded after 72 hours if the food is not consumed by the resident. An observation on 1/30/24 at 11:45 AM revealed the dining room refrigerator had a package of steak tenders stored for a resident and did not contain a date. An interview on 1/30/24 at 11:45 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the package of meat should have been dated and was not.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RURAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE