Saint Vincent Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 56.5 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving psychotropic medications received a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 16 residents. (Resident identifier is #2.) Findings include: Review on 6/18/25 of Resident #2's physician orders revealed an order for Sertraline (antidepressant) 50 milligrams (mg) daily for Depression, dated 9/14/23, and an order for Seroquel (antipsychotic) 25 mg daily at bedtime for delusions, dated 9/14/23. Review on 6/18/25 of Resident #2's medical record revealed no attempts to perform a GDR or documentation of clinical necessity of either Sertraline or Seroquel. Interview on 6/19/25 at approximately 2:00 p.m. with Staff E (Corporate Nurse) confirmed there was no documentation of a GDR attempt or of a contraindication for a GDR to be attempted. Review on 6/19/25 of facility policy titled Utilization and Documentation of Psychotropic Medications revised 7/20/17 revealed .Residents who use psychotropic medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer had necessary treatment and services, which included documentation of weekly assessments that contained measurements and descriptions of the pressure ulcer for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident Identifier is #29). Findings include: Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #29's progress note, dated 3/15/25, revealed that Resident has two wounds to bilateral heels. Right inner heel is black/blue and reddened area . No measurements or wound stage were indicated. Further review of Resident #29's medical record revealed nurse's notes with descriptions and measurements of Resident #29's wounds on the following dates: 3/17/25, 4/2/25 (two weeks from prior assessment), 5/16/25 (6 weeks from previous assessment and is from wound clinic note), 5/23/25, and 6/4/25 (2 weeks from prior assessment and wound clinic note). Review on 6/19/25 of wound clinic note, dated 6/4/25, revealed Resident #29 had Active problems Unstageable pressure ulcer R heel.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for oxygen for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care in a final sample of 16 residents (Resident identifier is #54). Findings include: Observation on 6/17/25 at approximately 7:15 p.m. of Resident #54 revealed that Resident #54 was lying in bed using oxygen via nasal canula. Observation on 6/18/25 at approximately 2:45 p.m. of Resident #54 revealed he/she was in bed with the head of bed elevated and oxygen on at 1 liter via nasal canula. Observation on 6/19/25 at approximately 11:45 a.m. Resident #54 revealed he/she was in a wheelchair in the dining room with a portable oxygen tank via nasal canula. Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #54's clinical notes dated 6/14/25 revealed the following: Resident returned from hospital in wheelchair .Resident was admitted for acute bronchitis, UTI [urinary tract infection], early pneumonia and reactive airway disease . Resident is on 1L [liter] on NC [nasal canula] .Resident is currently sleeping nasal canula in place…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) to prevent the potential spread of infection for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for TBP in a final sample of 16 residents. (Resident identifier is #44.) Findings include: Observation on 6/18/25 between 8:46 a.m. and 8:52 a.m. of Resident #44's room revealed a sign on the door of the room stating Enteric Contact Isolation . Prior to entering the room*: Clean Hands, Gown, Gloves, Clean Hands With Soap + [and] Water on Exit. Further observation revealed Staff F (Laundry) standing inside of Resident #44's room at the doorway holding empty hangers. Staff F exited Resident #44's room without washing his/her hands with soap and water and proceeded to push the laundry rack down the hallway and enter the residents room. Interview on 6/18/25 at 8:50 a.m. with Staff F confirmed the above findings. Staff F was not aware that Resident #44 was on contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or provided education regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident Identifiers are #22, #29, #36, and #39). Findings include: Review on 6/19/25 of the current CDC immunization guidelines retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html revealed People ages 65 years and older .are up to date when you have received: 2 doses of any 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine 6 months apart. Resident #22 Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #22's vaccination records revealed Resident #22, born in 1933, received the COVD-19 Bivalent Booster (Pfizer) on 10/17/24. There was no documentation of Resident #22 being offered or educated about the next dose recommendations. Resident #29 Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #29's vaccination records revealed Resident #29, born in 1932, received the COVID-19 Bivalent Booster (Pfizer) on 10/17/24. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 7 of 92 days reviewed between October 1, 2023 and December 30, 2023. Findings include: Review on 5/5/24 of the facility's Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Quarter 1 2024 (October 1-December 1, 2023) revealed that there were no RN hours for the following days: 10/7/23, 10/21/23, 12/16/23, and 12/17/23. Review on 5/7/24 of the facility's daily nursing time sheets for October and December 2023 revealed the following: On 10/7/23 there were only 6 RN hours worked; On 10/8/23, 10/21/23, 10/22/23 there were no RN hours documented as worked; On 12/16/23 and 12/17/23 there were no RN hours documented as worked; On 12/31/23 there were 2 RN hours worked. Interview on 5/6/24 at 3:15 p.m. and on 5/7/24 at 1:58 p.m. with Staff J (Human Resources) confirmed the above findings.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow antibiotic use protocols related to the appropriate use of antibiotic monitoring, tracking, and reviewing antibiotic use for 6 of 12 months reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: Review on 5/6/24 of the facility's line listing for antibiotic use from May 2023 through April 2024 revealed that the facility did not track antibiotic use within the facility from December 2023 through April 2024. Interview on 5/7/24 at 2:00 p.m. with Staff A (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings. Interview further revealed that the facility did not have monthly antibiotic monitoring, tracking, or review documented from December to present, including documentation that antibiotics met criteria for use. Staff A confirmed that the facility had residents with infections and who were on antibiotics from December 2023 through April 2024. Review on 5/7/24 of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, revised 2/11/22, revealed: .The Infection Preventionist, in conjunction with the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for activities (Resident Identifiers are #45, #55, and #63). Findings include: Observation on 5/5/24 at approximately 2:00 p.m. of the Second Floor Unit revealed Resident #45 sitting in his/her wheelchair in the hall with eyes closed. Further observation of the second floor unit revealed that there were no activities in place on the unit. Review on 5/5/24 of the Second Floor Unit posted activity calendar for 5/5/24 revealed that the afternoon activity scheduled was a lemonade cart at 2:00 p.m. Observation on 5/6/24 at approximately 10:00 a.m. of the Second Floor Unit revealed Resident #45 with approximately five other residents sitting in their wheelchairs in the hall at the nurse's desk. Further observation revealed no activities occurring on the unit.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and/or provided education on the risks and benefits of the Pneumococcal or Influenza Vaccination for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations (Resident Identifiers are #29 and #59). Findings include: Resident #29 Review on 5/7/24 of Resident #29's medical record revealed that there was no record that the influenza vaccination had been offered for the 2023/2024 flu season. Interview on 5/7/24 at 3:10 p.m. with Staff G (Regional Clinical Director) confirmed the above finding. Review on 5/7/24 of the facility's policy titled, Immunizations: Influenza (Flu) Vaccination of Residents, Staff and Volunteers dated 2015, revealed: .II. Administration Procedure: A. Current and newly admitted residents, all staff, and volunteers will be offered the influenza vaccine from October of each year through the end of March the following year . Resident #59 Review on 5/7/24 of Resident #59's medical record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing numbers to meet the residents' needs for 12 out of 32 days reviewed. Findings include: Interview on 10/27/23 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with Staff I (Anonymous) revealed: . normal staffing was one nurse to first floor no LNA [Licensed Nursing Assistant], second floor 1 nurse and 1 LNA and third floor 1 nurse and 1 to 1 and 1/2 LNAs on average. This means 3 nurses and 2 and 1/2 LNAs to care for 63 residents. This is not safe. Review on 11/29/23 of the facility Nursing Schedule from 10/28/23 through 11/28/23 revealed: 10/28/23 3:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. there were 2 nurses, 1 Medication Nursing Assistant (MNA) and 2 LNAs, from 7:00 p.m. until 11:00 p.m. there was no nurse in the facility and 1 MNA and from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. there was no nurse, 2 MNAs and 1 LNA in the facility. Facility census was 63. 10/29/23 7:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. there was 1 nurse and 1 MNA and from 7:00 p.m. until 11:00 p.m. there was no nurse and 2 MNAs. Facility census was 63 residents. 11/5/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $482K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH