Pleasant View Center
239 Pleasant Street, Concord, NH 03301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (603) 224-6561 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,982 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-26)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2025-12, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-12 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.2% | 22.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 44.6% | 13.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.4% | 17.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.1% | 19.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.4% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.3% | 25.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.2% | 17.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 49.3% | 83.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.3% | 22.2% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.65 | 1.64 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.87 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 171 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 25.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.8%CMS range 38.0–49.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.7–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 25.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 20.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 17.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.4–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 150.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from significant medication errors which resulted in a resident requiring interventions and hospitalization for multiple nights for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for medication errors. (Resident identifiers is #5.) Findings include: Review on 2/26/25 of Resident #5's medical record revealed the following nursing note written by Staff E (Registered Nurse), dated 2/23/25 at 4:17 p.m.: During morning medication round I inadvertently administered the incorrect medication to the patient. While verifying the medication administration record (MAR) I recognized that the following medications were given. Ativan oral tab [tablet] 0.5 mg [milligrams] Zyprexa oral tab 7.5 mg Tramadol HCL [hydrochloric acid] 50 mg half tab Amantadine 100 mg tab Amlodipine 10 mg tab Cymbalta oral cap [capsule] delayed release particles 20 mg Gabapentin 300 mg capsule Protonix oral tab delayed release 40 mg tab Instead of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed to self-administer medication for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for choices in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident identifier is #1.)Findings include:Observation on 6/2/26 at approximately 8:30 a.m. of Resident #1's bedside table revealed a Phenylephrine HCL (hydrochloride) 1% (percent) nasal spray, expiration date 10/25.Interview on 6/2/26 at approximately 9:00 a.m. with Staff A (Registered Nurse) confirmed the above findings.Interview on 6/2/26 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Resident #1 revealed that he/she used the nasal spray every night since purchasing the nasal spray months ago and Resident #1 had left the nasal spray on his/her bedside table.Review on 6/4/26 Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 did not have a physician's order for the above medication and that Resident #1 had not been assessed to self-administer medication. Interview on 6/4/26 at approximately 8:00 a.m. with Staff E (Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #1 was not assessed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation of abuse was reported timely to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 5 resident reviewed for Abuse or Neglect. (Resident Identifier is #137.) Findings include:Interview on 6/2/26 at approximately 10:40 a.m. with Resident #137 revealed that he/she recalled an incident in the dining room when Resident #137 felt that a staff member was rude and condescending. Resident #137 further revealed that the incident occurred in front of other residents and family. Resident #137 stated that he/she did complain to staff. Observation on 6/2/26 at approximately 10:45 a.m. of Resident #137 revealed that while recounting the incident he/she became teary and emotional. Interview on 6/2/26 at approximately 11:43 a.m. with Resident #137's spouse revealed that he/she observed part of the incident. Resident #137's spouse further revealed that the staff member was standing over the resident and their voice was aggressive and escalating in tone. Interview on 6/4/26 at approximately 1:15 p.m. with Staff N…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standard for medication administration via jejunostomy tube for 1 of 3 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident identifier is #14.)Findings include: Standard: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME] [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th edition St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021. Page 608 Because the nurse who administers the medication is responsible for any errors related to it, nurses administer only the medications they prepare. You cannot delegate preparation of medication to another person and then administer the medication to the patient. Page 614 .It is essential to verify the accuracy of every medication you give to your patients with the patient's order. If the medication order is incomplete, incorrect, or inappropriate, or if there is a discrepancy between the original order and the information on the MAR [Medication Administration Record]. consult with the health care provider. Do not give a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services to promote healing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident identifier is #38).Findings include:Review on 6/3/26 of Resident #38's Admission/Re-Admission/Quarterly Screening (an assessment form) with an effective date of 5/19/26 revealed under Section K Skin Integrity that the resident readmitted to the facility with the following pressure areas:1. Right heel pressure area 2.5 cm (centimeters) length by 3 cm width by 0.3 depth; 2. Left heel pressure area 0.5 cm length by 0.5 cm width by 0.2 cm depth;3. Sacrum pressure 1.5 cm length by 1.5 cm width by 0.2 cm depth.Further review revealed that the pressure ulcers were not staged and there was no other description of the wounds or the surrounding tissue. Review on 6/3/26 of Resident #38's provider note for date of service 5/21/26 and signed by the provider on 6/3/26 revealed the following under Wound Care, . wounds [sic] are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that ordered devices were used to maintain mobility for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for range of motion in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident identifier is #145.) Findings Include: Review on 6/3/26 of Resident #145's medical record revealed an order to Apply right palmar protector after breakfast until dinner always removing for meals, with a start date of 5/21/26. Observation on 6/2/26 at approximately 1:30 p.m. of Resident #145 revealed Resident #145 was in a sitting Broda chair near the nurses' station with his/her right hand closed tightly and no palm protector in place. Observation on 6/3/26 at 11:51 a.m. of Resident #145 revealed Resident #145 was sitting in Broda chair with right hand closed tightly and no palm protector in place. Interview on 6/3/26 at 12:06 p.m. with Staff I (Occupational Therapist) revealed that Resident #145 worked with occupational therapy for decreased range of motion on right hand with a discharge date of 5/29/26. Staff I further revealed that multiple palm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled according to professional standards and that expired medications were not available for use for 2 of 2 medication rooms and 2 of 3 medication carts observed. Findings include: Observation on 6/2/26 at approximately 8:13 a.m. of the Second Floor North Medication Cart with Staff V (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) revealed the following open and used medications with no open date or discard dates: Resident #11's Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005% (percent), with a dispensed date of 5/14/26 and no open date or open expiration date. Resident #55's Ventolin 90 mcg (microgram) inhaler with a dispensed date of 1/7/25 and no open date or open expiration date. Resident #137's Olopatadine Hydrochloride Solution 0.2%, with a dispense date of 3/31/26 and no open date or open expiration date. Resident #137's Gentamicin Sulfate 0.3% Ophthalmic Solution with a dispensed date of 4/13/26 and no open date or open expiration date. Interview on 6/2/26 at approximately 8:36 a.m. with Staff V…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident to obtain dental care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident identifier is #51.)Findings include: Interview on 6/2/26 at approximately 8:45 a.m. with Resident #51 revealed he/she has been complaining of dental pain. Resident #51 stated, My teeth are rotten and I have been asking to see the dentist for months. They hurt and no one is helping me see a dentist. Review on 6/3/26 of Resident #51's dental record revealed he/she was last seen by the dentist at the facility on 9/15/25 with a recall date of 9/1/26. Review on 6/3/26 of Resident #51's physician's progress note, dated 4/16/26, revealed, . [pronoun omitted] reports overall dental pain and would like to see the in house dentist. dental pain reported, . Dental care needs: Referral placed for in-house dental consult. Interview on 6/4/26 at approximately 10:45 a.m. with Staff E (Director of Nursing) revealed the facility dentist has been in the building on 5/11/26 and 6/1/26, and Resident #51 had not been seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control policies and procedures for 1 of 4 Residents reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). (Resident identifier is #35).Findings include:Observation on 6/2/26 of Resident #35's door to his/her room revealed signage for EBP.Review on 6/2/26 of Resident #35's physician orders revealed that he/she had an order dated 3/9/26, Maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Indwelling Medical Device(s). Specify device: suprapubic catheter.Observation on 6/2/26 at approximately 10:54 a.m. revealed Staff H (Licensed Nursing Aide (LNA)) opened Resident #35's door from the inside and Staff H was wearing gloves and no gown.Interview on 6/2/26 at approximately 11:15 a.m. with Staff H revealed that Staff H was providing bathing, dressing, and personal care assistance for Resident #35 while not wearing a gown. Staff H further revealed that they would wear a gown when working directly with the resident's catheter. Observation on 6/2/26 at approximately 11:00 a.m. revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to facilitate the inclusion of the resident and/or representative in quarterly care plan meetings for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for care plan meetings in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident identifiers are #6, #13, #16, #37, and #68). Findings include: Resident #13 Interview on 1/9/26 at 12:44 p.m. with Resident #13 revealed that he/she had not attended a care plan meeting in over a year. Review on 1/9/26 of Resident #13's medical record revealed that there was a care plan meeting note, dated 10/29/24. Further review revealed that there was no documentation of a care plan meeting for Resident #13 after 10/29/24. Resident #16 Interview on 1/9/26 at 12:47 p.m. with Resident #16 revealed that Resident #16 had never attended a care plan meeting. Review on 1/9/26 of Resident #16's medical record revealed that there was no documentation of a care plan meeting since Resident #16's admission in 2024. Resident #37 Interview on 1/9/26 at 12:38 p.m. with Resident #37 revealed that he/she had not attended a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to document that the resident and/or the resident's representative was fully informed of the risk and benefits of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident identifier is #66). Findings include:Review on 1/9/26 of Resident #66's provider progress note, dated 12/5/25, revealed the following: Depression currently treated with Sertraline 25 mg daily; decision made to change regimen, discontinue Sertraline 25 mg [milligram] daily. Prescribed Duloxetine 30 mg daily. Interview on 1/9/26 at approximately 9:00 a.m. with Staff F (Nurse Practitioner) revealed that he/she did not explain the risks and benefits of the medication with Resident #66 and/or their representatives before starting the duloxetine. Review on 1/9/26 of Resident #66's December Medication Administration Record revealed that Resident #66 was administered Duloxetine HCI (Hydrochloride) Capsule Delayed Release Particles 30 MG (Antidepressant) 1 time daily since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident choice regarding meal times for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for choices in a final sample of 30 residents (Resident identifiers are #48 and #64). Findings include:Resident #64Interview on 1/7/2026 at approximately 10:15 a.m. with Resident #64 revealed that the he/she has dialysis three times a week and usually returns to the facility during lunchtime. His/her meal tray is usually delivered and waiting for them when they return from dialysis and the food is cold. Resident #64 has requested the meal be reheated and staff stated they could not. Resident #64 has to eat the meal cold.Resident #48Interview on 1/6/2026 at approximately 9:20 a.m. with Resident #48 revealed that he/she was not always ready to eat when the meal tray was served. When Resident #48 requested the meal be reheated, staff stated they could not due to germs. Resident #48 said they had to eat the meal cold.Interview on 1/6/2026 at approximately 12:30 p.m. with Staff P (Licensed Nursing Assistant) revealed the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure admission medications and supplements were administered for 1 of 2 newly admitted residents reviewed. (Resident Identifier is #163).Findings include:Interview on 1/9/26 at 1:42 p.m. with Resident #163 revealed that he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was not given all of their medications that evening. Review on 1/9/26 of Resident #163's Progress Notes, dated 1/5/26 at 1:20 p.m., revealed a Social History and Initial Assessment was completed by Social Services. Review on 1/9/26 of Resident #163's January 2026 Medication Administration Record revealed the following medications and supplements ordered by the physician was not documented as administered:On 1/5/26:Melatonin Tablet 3 milligrams (mg) fat, scheduled for 8:00 p.m.,MiraLAX Powder 17 grams, scheduled for 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.,Olanzapine Tablet 2.5 mg, scheduled for 8:00 p.m.,Phenytoin Sodium Extended Oral Capsule 30 mg eight tablets (240…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking, and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dementia care in a final sample of 30 residents (Resident Identifiers are #38, #66 and #113). Findings include:Resident #66 Review on 1/9/26 of Resident #66's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/5/25 under section F0400 - Interview for Activity Preferences revealed that while Resident #66 was in the facility, very important was coded for the following: to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read; listen to music; be around animals; keep up with the news; do things with groups of people; do you favorite activities; do your favorite activities, and participate in religious services or practices. Review on 1/9/26 of Resident #66's care plan revealed there was no care plan interventions for activities. Interview on 1/9/26 at 9:35 a.m. with Staff D (Director of Social Services) confirmed the above findings. Resident #38 Interview on 1/6/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for insulin, for 1 of 4 residents observed for medication administration, and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking in a final sample of 30 residents (Resident Identifiers are #4, #38, and #47). Findings include: Resident #4 Standard: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th edition St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021. Page 614 .It is essential to verify the accuracy of every medication you give to your patients with the patient's order. If the medication order is incomplete, incorrect, or inappropriate, or if there is a discrepancy between the original order and the information on the MAR [Medication Administration Record]. consult with the health care provider. Do not give a medication until you are certain that you can follow the seven rights of medication administration . Page 672 .seven rights of medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for skin conditions in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident identifier is #125). Findings include:Observation on 1/6/26 at approximately 9:30 a.m. of Resident #125 sitting in the hallway with his/her button shirt open at the top; and resident itching his/her chest area that was bright red and raised with bumps.Interview on 1/6/26 at approximately 9:45 a.m. with Resident #125 revealed I'm always itchy.Review of Resident #125's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/21/25 revealed in Section C Cognitive Patterns C0200 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) a score of 03 which indicates severe impairment.Review on 1/8/26 of Resident #125's medical record revealed a diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis. Further review of Resident #125's MAR (Medication Administration Record)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement established infection prevention policies for transmission-based precautions (TBP) for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for droplet precautions. (Resident identifier is #136.)Findings include:Observation on 1/6/2026 at approximately 10:15 a.m. of Resident #136's room revealed signage for Droplet Precautions. Further observation revealed two housekeepers don personal protective equipment (PPE) to include mask, gown and gloves. After performing some cleaning tasks, Staff A (Housekeeper) wore all PPE out of the room to access the housekeeping cart and speak with other staff. Staff A walked down the hall and accessed another room with all the same PPE from Resident #136's room and Staff A had not performed hand hygiene.Interview on 1/6/2026 at approximately 10:15 a.m. with Staff A confirmed that he/she left PPE on after exiting Resident #136's room and entering the hallway and another resident's room.Review on 1/7/2026 of facility outbreak line list revealed Resident #136 was on Droplet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and observation it was determined that the facility failed to care plan according to their smoking assessment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident identifier is #68.)Resident #68Review on 1/6/26 of Resident #68's smoking assessment, dated 11/6/25, revealed that Resident #68 is a supervised smoker. Review on 1/6/26 of Resident #68's smoking care plan, revised 1/6/26, revealed that Resident #68 may smoke without supervision per smoking assessment. Interview on 1/7/26 at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Resident #68 revealed that he/she smokes independently. Interview on 1/8/26 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Staff J (Nurse Supervisor) confirmed Resident #68 smokes independently.Review on 1/9/26 of the facility policy titled Resident Smoking implemented on 7/1/21 revealed .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: #7. Residents who smoke will be further assessed, using the Smoking Evaluation, to determine whether or not supervision is required for smoking , orif resident is safe to smoke at all .#10.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility's antibiotic stewardship program and antibiotic use protocols for 1 of 1 month of antibiotic line list reviewed. (Resident identifier is #41.)Findings include:Review on 7/1/25 of the facility policy title, Antibiotic Stewardship Program, review date of 6/2025, revealed the following: .Antibiotic Stewardship Program leaders utilize existing resources to support antibiotic stewards' effort by working with the following partners: a. Infection Preventionist - utilizes expertise and data to inform strategies to improve antibiotic use to include tracking of antibiotic starts, monitoring adherence to evidence-based published criteria during the evaluation and management of treated infections, and reviewing antibiotic resistance patterns in the facility to understand which infections are caused by resistant organisms .3. Licensed nurses participate in the program through assessment of residents and following protocols as established by the program. 4. The program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents could formulate for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for advance directive in a final sample of 29 residents. (Resident identifiers are #118 and #125.)Findings include:Review on 7/1/25 of the facility policy titled, Communication of Code Status, review date of 6/2025, revealed the following: .Policy: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to resident's rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individual who need to know this information. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. When an order is written pertaining to a resident's presence or absence of an Advance Directive, the direction will be clearly documented in designated sections of the medical record .3. The nurse who notates the physician order is responsible for documenting the directions in all relevant sections of the medical record. 4. The designated sections of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from physical restraints for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for physical restraints in a final sample of 29 residents (Resident identifier is #146).Findings include:Observation on 7/2/25 between 9:12 a.m. to 9:25 a.m. on the third floor common room revealed Resident #146 was sitting in his/her pedal broda chair with his/her leg rest elevated parallel to the floor and 2 of the 4 wheels were in a lock position. Resident #146 had one leg off on each side of the leg rest and feet on the ground and struggling to propel forward and backwards. Further observation revealed Resident #146 was able to turn himself/herself in a quarter circle and appeared agitated. Interview on 7/2/25 at 9:25 a.m. with Staff L (Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)) confirmed that Resident #146 appeared agitated and was struggling to move their broda chair due to the 2 of the 4 wheels being locked. Interview on 7/2/25 at 10:11 a.m. with Staff M (LNA) revealed that he/she had brought Resident #146 into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were available for 2 of 2 newly admitted residents reviewed in a final sample of 29 residents. (Resident identifiers are #254 and #258).Findings include:Resident #254Interview on 6/30/25 at approximately 9:45 a.m. with Resident #254 revealed they had not received all of their medications since admitting to the facility. Review on 6/30/25 of Resident #254's medical record revealed they had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review on 7/1/25 of Resident #254's June 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following medications were not given on 6/29/25:Arformoterol Inhaler give by nebulizer twice a day for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease);Atrovastatin Calcium 10 mg once a day;Budesonide Inhaler twice a day;Duloxetine 20 mg once a day for depression;Furosemide (Diuretic) 40 mg (milligrams) twice a day for heart failure;Ipratopium- Albuterol inhaler twice a day for COPD;Losartan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 7 residents in a final sample of 29 residents (Resident identifiers are #33, #47, #70, #97, #118, #146, and #11).Findings include:Resident #33Review on 7/2/25 of Resident #33's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/14/25 under section F0500 - Interview for Activity Preferences revealed that while Resident #33 was in the facility, that very important was coded for the following: to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read; listen to music; be around animals; keep up with the news; do your favorite activities, and participate in religious services or practices. Review on 7/2/25 of Resident #33's care plan revealed there was no care plan for Resident #33's group or individual activity preferences or what Resident #33's likes to do.Interview on 7/2/25 with Staff V (Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)) revealed that he/she would look in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to determine what may have caused or contributed to falls, and when necessary revise the resident's plan of care and/or facility practices, to reduce the likelihood of another fall for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls in a final sample of 29 residents (Resident identifier is #42).Findings include:Interview on 6/30/25 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with Resident #42's DPOA-HC (Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care) revealed that he/she have had repeated falls from their bed and from their wheelchair. Resident #42's DPOA-HC stated that Resident #42 sustained a fractured clavicle as a result of one of the falls.Review on 6/30/25 of Resident #42's progress notes from March 2025 to April 2025 revealed the following falls:3/23/25 slide out of bed on to sacrum;4/1/25 found on floor next to their bed;4/10/25 found on floor in the dinning room and was sent to the emergency room for shoulder pain;4/29/25- und sitting on floor in the hallway.Review on 7/1/25 of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that trauma survivors have identified triggers and interventions to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for behavioral and emotional status in a final sample of 29 residents. (Resident identifier is #97).Findings include:Review on 6/30/25 of Resident #97's medical record revealed that Resident #97 had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Further review revealed that Resident #97 had an incomplete Social History and Trauma Assessment that was initiated on 5/16/25. Resident #97's care plan did not have a care plan for PTSD with identified triggers and interventions to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization. Interview on 7/2/25 at approximately 9:00 a.m. with Staff J (Licensed Nursing Assistant) revealed that he/she was unaware of any residents with diagnosis of PTSD and observed him/her defer to nursing for sources of this information. Interview on 7/2/25 at approximately 9:10 a.m. with Staff D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain radiology services for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for radiological services in a final sample of 29 residents. (Resident identifier is #46.)Findings include:Interview on 7/3/25 at 10:00 a.m. with Resident #46 revealed they went to have a CT (Computed Tomography) scan done in March 2025 but left the appointment before it could be completed. Resident #46 did not recall the reason the CT scan was not done.Review on 7/3/25 of Resident #46's medical record revealed an Infectious Disease note, dated 1/3/25, .We decided to re-image the pubic area for any new collections, Pt [patient] is at a high risk for recurrence of infection and thus we opted to continue antibiotic therapy with [NAME] [Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy] until imaging is addressed .Orders Placed CT Abdomen & Pelvis w [with] Contrast . Further review of medical record revealed no results of follow up for the CT scan or radiology imaging.Interview on 7/3/25 at approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their pneumococcal vaccine policy for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident identifiers are #97 and #120.)Findings include:Review on 7/1/25 of the facility policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine, review date of 6/2025, revealed the following: .1. Each resident will be assessed for pneumococcal immunizations upon admission. Self-reported immunizations shall be accepted. Any additional efforts to obtain information shall be documented, including efforts to determine date of immunizations or type of vaccine received. 2. Each resident will be offered a pneumococcal immunizations unless it is medically contraindicated or resident has already been immunized. Following assessment for any medical contraindications, the immunizations may be administered in accordance with physician-approved standing orders. 3. Prior to offering the pneumococcal immunizations, each resident or the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their COVID-19 vaccine policy for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident identifiers are #4, #97 and #120.)Findings include:Review on 7/1/25 of the facility policy titled, COVID-19 Vaccine, review date of 6/2025, revealed .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) by educating and offering our residents and staff the COVID-19 vaccine .Up-to-date is defines as receiving a 2024-2025 updated COVID-19 vaccine (as per CDC) .COVID-19 vaccinations currently in use include the updated 2024-2025 mRNA [messenger Ribonucleic Acid] COVID-19 vaccines .The number of updated 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccines doses and individual needs is based on age and vaccination history. For people who are not moderately or severely immunocompromised (See Table 1) .Table 1. Routine COVID-19 vaccine schedule, October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation of abuse was reported immediately to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an alleged violation of Abuse or Neglect. (Resident Identifier is #5.) Findings include: Review on 2/26/25 of Resident #5's medical record revealed the following nursing note written by Staff E (Registered Nurse), dated 2/23/25 at 4:17 p.m.: During morning medication round I inadvertently administered the incorrect medication to the patient. While verifying the medication administration record (MAR) I recognized that the following medications were given. Ativan oral tab [tablet] 0.5 mg [milligrams] Zyprexa oral tab 7.5 mg Tramadol HCL [hydrochloric acid] 50 mg half tab Amantadine 100 mg tab Amlodipine 10 mg tab Cymbalta oral cap [capsule] delayed release particles 20 mg Gabapentin 300 mg capsule Protonix oral tab delayed release 40 mg tab Instead of the following prescribed medication Atenolol oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medications timely for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident identifiers are #1 and #4.) Findings include: Review on 2/26/25 of [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], Wendy; and [NAME], [NAME]. Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques. 10th ed. [NAME], Pennsylvania: Elsevier, 2022, Page 597 , Safe Medication Preparation: Right Time revealed the following: With time-critical medications (e.g., antibiotics, anticoagulants, insulin, immunosuppressives), early or delayed administration of the maintenance doses of more than 30 minutes before or after the scheduled dose will most likely cause harm or result in subtherapeutic responses in a patient. Resident #4 Observation on 2/26/25 at approximately 8:35 a.m. of Staff H (Registered Nurse) during medication administration revealed on his/her computer screen that Resident #4's name was in red. Interview on 2/26/25 at approximately 8:35 a.m. with Staff H…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents needs for 1 of 2 staff reviewed for competencies. (Staff identifier is E.) Findings include: Interview on 2/26/25 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with Staff E (Registered Nurse) revealed that on 2/23/25, he/she entered the facility for a shift that he/she had picked up through an agency. Staff E did not receive an orientation prior to the assignment or upon arrival. Staff E was assigned to do medication administration. Staff E had never used the electronic medical record that the facility used. Staff E stated that one resident required antibiotics and Staff E did not know where the medication room was located and did not know how to use the intravenous pump that was needed for administration. Interview on 2/26/25 at approximately 10:30 a.m. with Staff G (Night Supervisor) revealed that on the morning of 2/23/25, Staff E (Registered Nurse) arrived for their shift. Staff G revealed that Staff E voiced some concerns to Staff G that they did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to establish and maintain a system of records of receipt and disposition of controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for controlled drugs. (Resident Identifier is #2.) Findings include: Interview on 2/26/25 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with Staff E (Registered Nurse) revealed that on 2/23/25 they reconciled the narcotic count with the night shift nurse and discovered that the amount of narcotics for one resident did not match the documented count in the narcotic book. Staff E told Staff G (Night Supervisor) who changed the count in the narcotic book to match the physical count. Interview on 2/26/25 at approximately 10:30 a.m. with Staff G confirmed that there was a discrepancy with the narcotic count and revealed that Staff G counted the number of the actual pills and changed the narcotic book to match that number with no investigation. Interview on 2/26/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Staff A revealed Staff A denied…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to take actions aimed at performance improvement and, after implementing those actions, measure its success, and track performance to ensure that improvements are realized and sustained for reporting alleged violations of abuse and neglect. Findings include: Review on 2/26/25 of Resident #5's medical record revealed the following nursing note written by Staff E (Registered Nurse), dated 2/23/25 at 4:17 p.m.: During morning medication round I inadvertently administered the incorrect medication to the patient. While verifying the medication administration record (MAR) I recognized that the following medications were given. Ativan oral tab [tablet] 0.5 mg [milligrams] Zyprexa oral tab 7.5 mg Tramadol HCL [hydrochloric acid] 50 mg half tab Amantadine 100 mg tab Amlodipine 10 mg tab Cymbalta oral cap [capsule] delayed release particles 20 mg Gabapentin 300 mg capsule Protonix oral tab delayed release 40 mg tab Instead of the following prescribed medication Atenolol oral tab 25 mg Lactobacillus capsule…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered timely for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for timely medication administration (Resident Identifiers are #5 and #6). Findings include: Standard: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2021. Chapter 31 Medication Administration Page 595, .Medications that are time critical most likely cause harm or have subtherapeutic effects if they are not administered in time (usually 30 minutes before and after the scheduled dose). Non-time-critical medications most likely do not cause harm if they are given within 1 hour to 2 hours before or after the schedule time. Thus, you need to administer time-critical medications at a precise time, within 30 minutes before and after a scheduled time. You administer non-time-critical medications within 1 to 2 hours of their scheduled times . Resident #5 Review on 11/5/24 of Resident #5's active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's activated Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare (DPOA-H) of a change in condition or needs to alter treatment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for death (Resident Identifier #8). Findings include: Review on 9/24/24 of Resident #'8's medical record revealed the following: Provider note on 7/8 at 9:42 a.m.- Resident was seen due to reports of hypoxia and nasal congestion. Chest x-ray and Flonase was ordered. Nursing note on 7/9/24 at 1:30 a.m.- Resident complained of difficulty breathing and increased congestion. Resident refused chest x-ray. Provider note on 7/9/24 at 9:45 a.m.- Resident was seen for follow up and consider gradual dose reduction of morphine. Resident reports chest congestion, cough and shortness of breath. Resident refused chest x-ray. Resident was started on 250 mg [milligram] Azithromycin once daily for 5 days, discontinued 0.75ml [milliliter] of Morphine 10 mg/ 5 ml 4x [times] daily and started on 5 mg Oxycodone 3x daily. Nursing note on 7/9/24 at 1:07 p.m.-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that allegations involving neglect were reported to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident Identifier #3). Findings include: Review on 9/23/24 of Resident #3's progress note, dated 7/28/24, revealed that around 5:40 p.m. the nurse could not locate the resident inside or outside the facility. The resident had not signed out of the check out book on the unit floor or at the reception desk. Administration was notified and a statement was given to the police. The resident was found and reported back on the floor around 9:00 p.m. Interview on 9/23/24 at approximately 2:35 p.m. with Staff C (Assistant Director of Nursing) revealed Resident #3 had left the faciity on 7/28/24, without the facilities knowledge, and walked down the road. Resident #3 got a ride to the Holiday Inn where they went inside and proceeded to drink alcohol at the bar. The police located Resident #3 and notified the facility of their location. Review on 9/23/24 of Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation; and failed to determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained for 2 of 3 narcotic books reviewed and for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident Identifier #101). Findings include: Review on 7/25/24 of the facility policy titled, Controlled Substance Administration & Accountability, revised 1/2024, revealed: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure .Inventory Verification .b. For areas without automated dispensing systems, two licensed nurses account for all controlled substances and access keys at the end of each shift. 4th Floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Observation on 7/23/24 from 12:30 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. of the North Medication Cart on 4th floor revealed it was unlocked in the hallway with no staff within sight. There were 2 residents wheeling themselves in the hallway. Interview on 7/23/24 at 12:45 p.m. with Staff I (Registered Nurse) confirmed the cart was unlocked and unattended for approximately 15 minutes. Review of facility policy titled, Storage of Medication, dated May 2018, revealed: .Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access .Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 3 medication carts observed and for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for self administration of mediations (Resident Identifiers are #18, #73, and #48). Findings include: Observation on 7/23/24 at approximately 8:40 a.m. of the [NAME] medication cart, on the third floor, revealed Resident #73's two Insulin Aspart Flex pens…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident Identifier #80). Findings include: Resident #80 Standards: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 7th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009. Page 336- Physicians' Orders, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or harm clients. Therefore you need to assess all orders, and if you find one to be erroneous or harmful, further clarification from the physician is necessary . Interview on 7/23/24 at 1:15 p.m. with Resident #80 revealed that he/she had wounds on his/her abdomen and groin. Resident #80 stated that they were supposed to be cleaned daily but no one had cleaned them since last week. Review on 7/25/24 of Resident #80's current physician's orders revealed that Resident #80 had an order for Abdomen/groin wounds:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report alleged misappropriation/diversion of medications. Findings include: Interview on 3/22/24 with Anonymous revealed that they noticed a pattern of narcotics that were signed out of the narcotic book (a book that tracks controlled substances) and were not signed out of the resident's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) for several residents. Anonymous alleged that this practice could indicate drug diversion. Interview further revealed that Anonymous was told by a staff member that it was being dealt with by the unit manager and administration. Anonymous did not report the allegation to the Administrator. Interview on 3/28/24 with Staff E (Administrator) and Staff F (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings and they were not aware of any allegations of misappropriation/diversion of residents' medications.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate accounting for all controlled medications for 4 out of 8 residents reviewed for Pharmacy Services (Resident Identifiers are #1, #2, #3, and #7). Findings include: Review on 3/28/24 of the facility's policy titled Administration Procedures for All Medications effective date May 2018, revealed the following: J. After administration, return to cart, replace medication container (if multi-dose and doses remain), and document administration in the MAR [Medication Administration Record], TAR [Treatment Administration Record], and controlled substance sign out record, if indicated .M. When administering an as needed (PRN) medication, document the reason for giving, observe for medication actions/reactions and record pertinent details [on the PRN effectiveness sheet/nurse's notes]. [NAME] A. [NAME] and [NAME], Fundamentals of Nursing. 7th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009. Page 709:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-06-04 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for resident assessment and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident Identifier are #23, #38, #109, and #129.)Findings include:Resident #23 Review on 6/2/26 of Resident #23's Entry Tracking Record with an entry date of 3/11/26 revealed that under item A0810 - Sex was coded Male. Review on 6/2/26 of Resident #23's admission Record revealed that Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 and had the assigned sex of female. Interview on 6/4/26 at 1:02 p.m. with Staff M (MDS Coordinator) confirmed that Resident #23's sex was incorrectly coded. Resident #38 Review on 6/4/26 of Resident #38's 5-Day MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/25/26 revealed under Section M - Skin Conditions item M0210 Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries was coded No. Further review revealed under items M0300 no pressure ulcers were coded. Review on 6/3/26 of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident's medical records were accurate and complete for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for closed records and 2 residents in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident Identifiers are #9, #18, #30, #146, and #164.)Findings include: Resident #9 Interview on 6/2/26 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with Resident #9 revealed that Resident #9 had a foley catheter and no concerns. Review on 6/2/26 of Resident #9's physician's orders revealed and order dated 4/10/26 that stated, Foley catheter__ FR with __ balloon to bedside straight drainage for diagnosis/Hx (History) of need____. Further review revealed that the order audit for the foley catheter was reviewed and confirmed by Staff X (Registered Nurse Supervisor), Staff L (Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON)) and Staff R (Doctor of Medicine). Interview on 6/3/26 at approximately 1:14 p.m. with Staff L revealed that Staff L had placed the foley catheter order on 4/10/26 and confirmed the order information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-07-03 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide notice to the resident or the resident representative(s) of transfer and bed hold for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations in a final sample of 29 residents (Resident identifiers are #4 and #114).Findings include:Resident #4Review on 6/30/25 of Resident #4's medical record revealed Resident #4 was transferred to the hospital on 6/8/25 and 6/14/25. Further review revealed no documentation that a bed hold notice was provided to Resident #4 for either transfers to the hospital.Interview on 7/2/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Staff Q (Business Manager) confirmed there was no evidence that a bed hold notice was provided to Resident #4 for either transfers to the hospital.Resident #114Review on 6/30/25 of Resident #114's medical record revealed Resident #114 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review revealed no documentation that a transfer/discharge notice and bed hold notice was provided to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-07-03 · tag F0637 — patternAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed timely for 3 residents in a final sample of 29 residents. (Resident identifiers are #19, #42, and #85).Findings include:Resident #85Review on 7/2/25 of Resident #85's Hospice Certification of Terminal Illness form revealed that Resident #85 was admitted to hospice care on 5/31/25. Review on 7/2/25 of Resident #85's Significant Change in Status MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/5/25, revealed it was signed as completed on 6/22/25 by Staff A (MDS Coordinator).Interview on 7/2/25 at 12:49 p.m. with Staff A confirmed that the above MDS assessment for Resident #85 was completed late. Resident #19Interview on 6/30/25 at approximately 9:00 a.m. with Staff D (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed that Resident #19 no longer was receiving hospice services. Review on 7/1/25 of Resident #19's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage for hospice services revealed hospice service end date of 4/14/25. Review on 7/1/25 of Resident #19's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged violation of abuse no later than 24 hours and the results of the investigation to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for allegation of abuse (Resident Identifier #1). Findings include: Interview on 11/5/24 at approximately 11:30 a.m. with Staff A (Social Service Director) revealed that a nurse reported to him/her that Resident #1 had a bruise of unknown origin on 9/20/24. Staff A stated that he/she interviewed Resident #1 about the bruise and that Resident #1 mentioned a tall black man. Staff A also stated that during their investigation, the facility identified that the alleged perpetrator was Staff D (Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)). Review on 11/5/24 of Resident #1's provider note dated 9/20/24 revealed that Resident #1 was seen per nursing request and a report of a new bruise to his/her right medial forearm was first noted on 9/19/24. Further review revealed that the bruise was approximately 10 centimeters (cm) by 5 cm on the right medial to posterior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for smoking, and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample size of 31 residents (Resident Identifiers are #5 and #48). Findings include: Resident #48 Interview on 7/23/24 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with Resident #48 revealed that he/she smoked supervised by staff. Review on 7/24/24 of Resident #48's smoking/vaping screening assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #48 required supervised smoking. Review on 7/24/25 of Resident #48's care plans revealed that there was no care plan for supervised smoking. Interview on 7/25/24 at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Staff F (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings. Review on 7/25/24 of the facility's policy titled, Resident Smoking, revision date of 1/2024, revealed: .Residents who smoke will be further assessed, using the Smoking Evaluation, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,982 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-02-26
- $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AN MAGNOLIA OPCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 11% | since 01/21/2022 |
| EICHLER, ABRAHAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | 40% | since 01/21/2022 |
| EISEN, MENASHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 14% | since 01/21/2022 |
| KLEIN, YEHUDIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 01/21/2022 |
| PERLSTEIN, BARRY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 01/21/2022 |
| PERIGROVE 1014 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 17% | since 01/21/2022 |
| AWEH, NELSON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| ROGERS, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| PLEASANT VIEW I REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Hampshire Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 305045. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.