Lafayette Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 65% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 61.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a final sample of 16 residents. The lack of treatment orders over a six day period resulted in a small open area that worsened into an Unstageable pressure area. (Resident identifiers is #158). Findings include: Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #158's admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/3/25 revealed that Resident #158 admitted to the facility on 2/2025 and under Section M - Skin Conditions was coded in item M0210 Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries as No (indicating that the Resident had no pressure ulcers during the 7 look-back period of 2/25/25 through 3/3/25). Right Buttock Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #158's Weekly Skin Review, dated 3/11/25, revealed that the Resident's skin was intact. This was completed by Staff H (Unit Manager). Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #158's Nursing Note, dated 3/18/25, revealed, Small open area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for 2 of 2 residents observed for wound care and failed to develop a water management program to minimize the risk of Legionella that had the potential to effect the facility census of 56 residents who resided at the facility. (Resident Identifiers are #32 and #158). Findings include: Resident #32 Observation on 5/23/25 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with Staff G (Infection Preventionist/ Wound Care Nurse) and Staff D (Advanced Practice Registered Nurse) performing wound care for Resident #32 revealed the following: Staff G gathered their supplies outside of the room and placed them on a clip board without cleaning the clipboard or placing a clean field barrier. There was a sign indicating the resident needed EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) hanging on the outside of Resident #32's door. Staff G entered Resident #32's room. Staff G did not don an isolation gown. Staff G removed Resident #32's dirty coccyx wound dressing. Resident #158 Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to keep residents apprised of the progress towards resolution, and maintain evidence demonstrating the response and rationale of the resident group grievance for the attendees of the Resident Council Meeting for 3 of 3 months of meeting minutes reviewed. Findings include: Interview on 5/22/25 at approximately 10:00 a.m. during Resident Council Meeting revealed that the complaints about LNA's (Licensed Nursing Assistance) discussing other residents and being loud is an on going issue. All 9 residents at this meeting stated they do not feel this concern was addressed and that no one had followed up to inform them of what if any actions had been taken since the initiation of the concerns. Review on 5/22/25 of the facility's Resident Council Meeting minutes revealed the following documented concerns under Nursing: February 11, 2025 minutes: LNA's talking about residents in front of other residents; March 25, 2025 minutes: LNA's talking about residents in front of other residents. Has gotten better; April…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and update comprehensive care plans for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a final sample of 16 residents. (Resident identifiers are #32 and #158). Findings include: Resident #32 Review on 5/22/25 of Resident #32's medical record revealed a provider note dated 5/19/25 written by Staff D (Advanced Practice Registered Nurse) that stated; Previously closed sacral ulcer now has one open area, mid-line, continue with medihoney and silicone border dressings to open area. Review on 5/22/25 of Resident #32's MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed a physician's order with a start date of 4/21/25 to Cleanse sites on inner left and right buttock. Apply Medi honey and cover with silicone dressing. Change 3x [three times a] week in the morning every Mon, Wed, Fri [Monday, Wednesday, and Friday]. Interview on 5/23/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Staff H (Unit Manager) confirmed that there were no new orders addressing the 5/19/25 wound note that identified the new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices in a final sample of 16 residents (Resident Identifier is #21). Findings include: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th edition St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021. Page 614 .It is essential to verify the accuracy of every medication you give to your patients with the patient's order. If the medication order is incomplete, incorrect, or inappropriate, or if there is a discrepancy between the original order and the information on the MAR [Medication Administration Record]. consult with the health care provider. Do not give a medication until you are certain that you can follow the seven rights of medication administration . Page 672 .seven rights of medication administration include right medication, right dose, right patient, right route, right time, right documentation and right indication . [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assist a resident in gaining access to hearing services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for communication in a final sample of 16 residents (Resident Identifier is #42). Findings include: Interview on 5/22/25 at 10:40 a.m. with Resident #42 revealed that he/she had requested to be seen by the audiologist. Resident #42 stated that he/she felt that his/her hearing was getting worse, and he/she was concerned. Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #42's medical record revealed that Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in 2023 and diagnosed with abnormal auditory perceptions in the left ear in 9/2024. Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #42's ambulatory clinic notes for a hearing evaluation dated 5/23/24 revealed that Resident #42 was a good candidate for bilateral hearing aides. Interview on 5/23/25 at approximately 1:00 p.m. with Resident #42's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) revealed that Resident #42 had difficulty communicating with family both in person and on the telephone. Interview on 5/23/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0778 — isolated
  Help the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance in making transportation arrangements for a scheduled x-ray which resulted in a missed appointments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for transportation assistance in a final sample of 16 residents. (Resident Identifier is #13.) Findings include: Review on 5/21/25 of Resident #13's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to the facility on 12/2024. Interview on 5/21/25 at 10:42 a.m. with Resident #13 revealed that he/she was upset because they were supposed to have an x-ray of their knee at the orthopaedic clinic, but was told by Staff F (Medical Records/Central Supply coordinator), who sets up the transportation, that they did not know anything about an appointment and transportation had not been set up. Interview on 5/22/25 at 2:28 p.m. with Staff L (Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant) confirmed that they had seen paperwork at the nurses station for Resident #13 regarding an appointment for an x-ray of the knee on 5/21/25 and that they had reached out to Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident Identifier #5). Findings include: Review on 8/7/24 of Resident #5's medical record revealed the following diagnosises: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. Further review of the medical record that Resident #5 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3. Review on 8/7/24 of a facility reported incident, dated 5/9/24, revealed that on 5/5/24, Resident #2 was observed by a staff member with his/her hand down the pants of Resident #5. Interview on 8/7/24 with Staff A (Activities Director) revealed on 5/5/24, Staff A observed Resident #2 with his/her hand down the pants of Resident #5. Further interview revealed that Staff A was aware of multiple incidents of Resident #2 being sexually inappropriate with residents who have cognitive issues. Interview on 8/7/24 at approximately 11:50 a.m. with Staff H (Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations of abuse were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 3 of 4 allegations of abuse reviewed (Resident Identifiers are #1, #2 and #3). Findings include: Review on 8/7/24 of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised on 01/2024, revealed: .VII Reporting/Response .1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframe's: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury . Resident #2 Review on 8/7/24 of a facility reported incident, reported to the State Agency on 7/28/24 at 6:02 a.m., revealed that Resident #2 was observed by Staff H…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise care plans for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident Identifiers are #1 and #3). Findings include: Resident #1 Review on 8/7/24 of a facility reported incident revealed that Resident #1 was observed by Staff B (Licensed Nursing Assistant) with his/her hand placed on the genital area of Resident #6 on 7/28/24 at 4:40 p.m. Review on 8/7/24 of Resident #1's medical record revealed a provider progress note, dated 7/30/24, that stated Resident #1 had been seen for increased sexual behaviors towards others and also indicated staff reported increased wandering behaviors with difficulty to redirect. Review on 8/7/24 of Resident #1's care plan revealed a care plan for the potential to demonstrate verbal/physical behaviors towards others related to ineffective coping skills, created on 7/1/24 and revised on 7/15/24. Resident #1's behavior care plan revealed the following interventions: Evaluate need/provide for Psych/Behavioral Health consultation, created on 7/15/24. Further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors were free from re-traumatization for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for trauma (Resident Identifier #4). Findings include: Review on 8/7/24 of a facility reported incident revealed Resident #4 yelled out for help. Staff observed Resident #3 exiting Resident #4's room. Resident #4 was found lying on the floor with a hematoma to the top right side of his/her head, a skin tear to the right elbow and complaints of rib pain. Interview on 8/7/24 at approximately 12:40 p.m. with Staff G (Social Services) revealed that Resident #4 had told Staff G that he/she had a past history of trauma. Staff G further revealed that Resident #4's daughter had revealed to Staff G that Resident #4 had a past history of trauma. Interview on 8/7/24 at approximately 1:15 p.m. with Resident #4 revealed that he/she remembered Resident #3 coming to his/her room and hitting him/her. Resident #4 stated that he/she had a traumatic past and was upset with Resident #3 trying to get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$50,164 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $50,164 — penalty dated 2025-05-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH