Lafayette Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 34% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 61.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a final sample of 16 residents. The lack of treatment orders over a six day period resulted in a small open area that worsened into an Unstageable pressure area. (Resident identifiers is #158). Findings include: Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #158's admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/3/25 revealed that Resident #158 admitted to the facility on 2/2025 and under Section M - Skin Conditions was coded in item M0210 Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries as No (indicating that the Resident had no pressure ulcers during the 7 look-back period of 2/25/25 through 3/3/25). Right Buttock Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #158's Weekly Skin Review, dated 3/11/25, revealed that the Resident's skin was intact. This was completed by Staff H (Unit Manager). Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #158's Nursing Note, dated 3/18/25, revealed, Small open area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for laundry services, failed to update their water management program to include information identified during a recent water infection control risk assessment, and failed to identify other potential risk areas in an effort to minimize the risk of Legionella that had the potential to effect the facility census of 58 residents.Findings include:Review on 6/24/26 of the CDC website titled Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) Appendix D-Linen and Laundry management, retrieved from : https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/resource-limited/laundry.html, revised on 3/27/20, revealed, .Best practice for linen (and Laundry) handling: .Always launder soiled linens from patient care areas in a designated area, which should: be a dedicated space for performing laundering of soiled linen .have a separation between the soiled linen and clean linen storage areas .Best practices for management for clean linen: Sort, package, transport, and store clean linens in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their system for monitoring antibiotic use for 5 of 7 resident reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. (Resident identifiers are #6, #7, #35, #45 and #60.)Findings include:Review on 6/24/26 of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, revised on 6/2025, revealed .iii. The facility uses .updated McGeer criteria.to define infections.Nursing will monitor the initiation of antibiotics on residents and conduct an antibiotic time out within 48-72 [hours] of antibiotic therapy to monitor the response to the antibiotic and review laboratory results and will consult with the practitioner to determine if the antibiotic is to continue or if adjustments need to be made based on the findings.Review on 6/24/26 of LOEB AND REVISED MCGEER CRITERIA, found at https://infectioncontrolma.org/docs/Loeb-and-Revised-McGeer-Criteria.pdf, updated September 2023, revealed .Revised McGeer criteria for urinary tract infection.UTI [Urinary Tract Infection] without indwelling catheter criteria.At least one of the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for Psychotropic Medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 17 residents. (Resident identifier is #3). Findings include: Review on 6/24/26 of Resident #3's care plan for risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic medications, dated 2/20/26, revealed an intervention, AIMS testing per protocol.Review on 6/24/26 of the facility's policy Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), dated 6/26, revealed, .13. Residents who receive an antipsychotic medication will have an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test performed on admission, quarterly, with a significant change in condition, change in antipsychotic medication, PRN, or as per facility policy .Review on 6/24/26 of Resident #3's medical record revealed a physician's order for Quetiapine Fumarate for Dementia with psychosis since admission.Review on 6/24/26 of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission Screening Assessment, dated 2/20/26, under Section M. Antipsychotics/AIMS, 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with eating during meals for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition in a final sample of 17 residents. (Resident identifier is #47.)Findings include:Review on 6/22/26 of Resident #47's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan, initiated on 5/1/26, revealed the following interventions:Provide setup to partial assistance for eating, dated 6/5/26; Monitor conditions that may contribute to ADL decline, including poor nutrition, dated 5/7/26; and Provide cuing for safety and sequencing to maximize current level of function, dated 5/7/26. Review on 6/22/26 of Resident #47's Nutrition care plan, initiated 5/4/26, revealed the following interventions:Resident does need assistance with eating at times. Assist as needed, dated 5/7/26; Monitor for changes in nutritional status (changes in intake, ability to feed self, unplanned weight loss/gain, abnormal labs) and report to food and nutrition/physician as indicated, dated 5/4/26; and Monitor intake at all meals, offer alternate choices as needed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for elopement and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls in a final sample of 17 residents. (Resident identifiers are #10, #49, and #56). Findings include: Resident #49 Interview on 6/22/26 at 11:27 a.m. with Resident #49 revealed that he/she fell in the bathroom shortly after she was admitted . There was one aide helping her in the bathroom when his/her knee gave out. Review on 6/23/26 of Resident #49's medical record revealed a care plan for assistance for ADL (Activities of Daily Living), with an intervention for two-person assist with a walker with a gait belt for all transfers, initiated on 6/1/26. Review on 6/23/26 of Resident #49's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 6/1/26 revealed Resident #49 had a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, meaning cognitively intact. Further review revealed that under section GG – Functional Abilities, Resident #49 was coded as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for 2 of 2 residents observed for wound care and failed to develop a water management program to minimize the risk of Legionella that had the potential to effect the facility census of 56 residents who resided at the facility. (Resident Identifiers are #32 and #158). Findings include: Resident #32 Observation on 5/23/25 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with Staff G (Infection Preventionist/ Wound Care Nurse) and Staff D (Advanced Practice Registered Nurse) performing wound care for Resident #32 revealed the following: Staff G gathered their supplies outside of the room and placed them on a clip board without cleaning the clipboard or placing a clean field barrier. There was a sign indicating the resident needed EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) hanging on the outside of Resident #32's door. Staff G entered Resident #32's room. Staff G did not don an isolation gown. Staff G removed Resident #32's dirty coccyx wound dressing. Resident #158 Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to keep residents apprised of the progress towards resolution, and maintain evidence demonstrating the response and rationale of the resident group grievance for the attendees of the Resident Council Meeting for 3 of 3 months of meeting minutes reviewed. Findings include: Interview on 5/22/25 at approximately 10:00 a.m. during Resident Council Meeting revealed that the complaints about LNA's (Licensed Nursing Assistance) discussing other residents and being loud is an on going issue. All 9 residents at this meeting stated they do not feel this concern was addressed and that no one had followed up to inform them of what if any actions had been taken since the initiation of the concerns. Review on 5/22/25 of the facility's Resident Council Meeting minutes revealed the following documented concerns under Nursing: February 11, 2025 minutes: LNA's talking about residents in front of other residents; March 25, 2025 minutes: LNA's talking about residents in front of other residents. Has gotten better; April…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and update comprehensive care plans for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a final sample of 16 residents. (Resident identifiers are #32 and #158). Findings include: Resident #32 Review on 5/22/25 of Resident #32's medical record revealed a provider note dated 5/19/25 written by Staff D (Advanced Practice Registered Nurse) that stated; Previously closed sacral ulcer now has one open area, mid-line, continue with medihoney and silicone border dressings to open area. Review on 5/22/25 of Resident #32's MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed a physician's order with a start date of 4/21/25 to Cleanse sites on inner left and right buttock. Apply Medi honey and cover with silicone dressing. Change 3x [three times a] week in the morning every Mon, Wed, Fri [Monday, Wednesday, and Friday]. Interview on 5/23/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Staff H (Unit Manager) confirmed that there were no new orders addressing the 5/19/25 wound note that identified the new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices in a final sample of 16 residents (Resident Identifier is #21). Findings include: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th edition St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021. Page 614 .It is essential to verify the accuracy of every medication you give to your patients with the patient's order. If the medication order is incomplete, incorrect, or inappropriate, or if there is a discrepancy between the original order and the information on the MAR [Medication Administration Record]. consult with the health care provider. Do not give a medication until you are certain that you can follow the seven rights of medication administration . Page 672 .seven rights of medication administration include right medication, right dose, right patient, right route, right time, right documentation and right indication . [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assist a resident in gaining access to hearing services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for communication in a final sample of 16 residents (Resident Identifier is #42). Findings include: Interview on 5/22/25 at 10:40 a.m. with Resident #42 revealed that he/she had requested to be seen by the audiologist. Resident #42 stated that he/she felt that his/her hearing was getting worse, and he/she was concerned. Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #42's medical record revealed that Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in 2023 and diagnosed with abnormal auditory perceptions in the left ear in 9/2024. Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #42's ambulatory clinic notes for a hearing evaluation dated 5/23/24 revealed that Resident #42 was a good candidate for bilateral hearing aides. Interview on 5/23/25 at approximately 1:00 p.m. with Resident #42's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) revealed that Resident #42 had difficulty communicating with family both in person and on the telephone. Interview on 5/23/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$50,164 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $50,164 — penalty dated 2025-05-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH