No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Goffstown Nursing And Rehab Center

29 Center Street, Goffstown, NH 03045 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 41 certified beds · (603) 497-4871 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (603) 497-4871 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Dec 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
89 S Mast St · (603) 497-5661 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
39 Main St · (603) 497-4771 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
69 Center St · (603) 497-2250 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Shirley Park Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.6%22.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.3%13.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%4.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.4%17.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.9%19.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.6%25.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.4%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%83.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.7%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.3%13.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.581.641.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.321.871.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
37.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.3%CMS range 39.7–63.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.3–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.4–16.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 36.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-03)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to inform residents or resident's representative of the risk and benefits of psychotropic medication use for 1 out of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in final sample of 12 residents. (Resident identifiers is #18.)Resident #18 Review on 12/2/25 of Resident #18's physicians orders revealed: Depakote Sprinkles Oral Capsule Delayed Release Sprinkle 125 mg (milligrams) (Divalproex Sodium), Give 500 mg by mouth one time a day for Bi-polar with Psychosis HOLD FOR SEDATION AND Give 750 mg by mouth in the evening for Bi-Polar with Psychosis, Order Date, 10/28/25. Review on 12/3/25 of Resident #18's medical record revealed that there was no documentation that Resident #18 and or the resident representative had been informed of the risks and benefits of the above medication. Interview on 12/3/25 at approximately 11:30 a.m. with Staff C (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings Review on 12/325 of the facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medications, Dated 2025, revealed: . 9. Prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that PRN orders for anti-psychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and are not renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident for the appropriateness of that medication for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 12 residents. (Resident identifier is #2.) Findings include:Review on 12/2/25 of Resident #2's December 2025's MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed the following physicians order: Quetiapine Fumarate oral tablet 25 mg (milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for psychosis, Start Date 10/23/25. Further review revealed no documentation from the physician of an evaluation for the appropriateness of the medication justifying continuation after 14 days. Interview on 12/3/25 at approximately 12:45 p.m. with Staff C (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings. Review on 12/3/25 of the facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medications, Dated 2025 revealed: . 16 a. PRN (as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents have a documented discharge summary for 1 of 3 closed records reviewed. (Resident identifier is #6.) Findings include:Review on 12/3/25 of Resident #6's medical record revealed that there was no documentation of discharge summary, medication reconciliation, or a post-discharge plan of care. Interview on 12/3/25 at approximately 11:30 a.m. with Staff C (Director of Nursing) revealed Resident #6 was discharged on 12/1/25 and confirmed the above findings. Interview on 12/3/25 at approximately 1:30 p.m. with Staff D (Director of Social Services) confirmed there was no documentation of discharge summary, medication reconciliation, or a post-discharge plan of care. Review on 12/3/25 of the facility policy titled, Documentation Requirements at Time of Resident Discharge Policy, undated revealed: . Documentation Requirements, 1. Discharge Summary, . 2. Medication Reconciliation, . 3. Follow-Up Care Instructions, . 4. Communication and Notification, . 5. Transfer/Transport Documentation, .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of a medication in a proper receptacle during observation of administration of 27 medications. Findings include: Observation on 12/3/25 at approximately 7:20 a.m. during medication administration with Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed Staff A dispose of an Aspirin EC (enteric coated) 81 mg (milligrams) in the sharps container attached to the medication cart. Interview on 12/3/25 at approximately 7:20 a.m. with Staff A confirmed the above findings and revealed that he/she was unsure of the facility policy for medication disposal. Interview on 12/3/25 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with Staff C (Director of Nursing) revealed that the facility has a receptacle in the medication room for wasting of medication. Review on 12/3/25 of the facility policy titled, Medication Wasting Policy, undated revealed: . 4. Procedure for Wasting NON-Controlled Medications, . 3. Render medication non-retrievable by placing it in the facility's approved pharmaceutical waste container .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain/prevent decrease in ROM/mobility for 1 out of 1 residents observed for mobility and positioning in a final sample of 12 residents. (Resident identifier is #20.)Observation on 12/2/25 at approximately 9:23 a.m. in Resident #20's room revealed a bedside table with four palm-wrist splints. Resident #20 was sitting in his/her wheelchair without a splint on his/her right hand. Observation further revealed that Resident #20's right hand was resting in a fisted position. Further observation revealed a sign, undated, on the wall near Resident #20's bed that stated Please put on [Resident #20's name omitted]'s palm splint in AM [morning] and remove before bed. rehab. Interview on 12/2/25 at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Resident #20 revealed that he/she wears a splint for his/her right hand but was unable to say when it should be worn. Observation on 12/2/25 at approximately 11:38 a.m. of Resident #20 revealed that he/she was self-propelling his/her wheelchair using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the provider reviewed irregularities identified by the pharmacist during the monthly Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review (MRR) timely for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident Identifier is #1).Findings include:Review on 12/3/25 of the facility's policy Pharmacy Medication Review- Follow-up and Required Actions, undated, revealed: .II. Policy Statement .All pharmacist recommendations, identified irregularities, and follow-up items must be 1. Reviewed by the attending practitioner. 2. Addressed within the required regulatory timeframe .C. Practitioner Response Requirements 1. The attending practitioner must respond to each pharmacist recommendation within 5 business days, unless state law requires a shorter timeline. Review on 12/3/25 of Omnicare Consultation Report, monthly pharmacy review, recommendation date 6/20/25, for Resident #1 revealed the following recommendation: please consider gradual dose reduction of olanzapine to reduce fall risk . Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent (%) for 3 of 27 medication administrations observed. (Resident Identifiers are #29 and #33.)Findings include:Resident #29 Observation on 12/3/25 at approximately 7:35 a.m. of medication administration with Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed Staff A preparing Resident #19's medications at the medication cart outside of the nursing station. Staff A prepared Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) 50 mg (milligrams) and Vitamin E 200 units. Staff A proceeded to walk down the hall to Resident #19's room. Upon entering the room Staff A looked over at Resident #19 sleeping in his/her bed. Staff A then went over to Resident #29's (Resident #19's roommate) bedside. Staff A placed Resident #19's medication in a cup on Resident #29's bedside table. Staff A then began conversing with Resident #29 and obtained his/her oxygen saturation level. Staff A then stated to Resident #29, Here is your morning medication. Staff A was stopped at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an expired medication was removed from a medication cart for 1 of 2 carts observed and the facility failed to ensured that medications with a shortened shelf life were labeled with an opening date.North Medication Cart Observation on [DATE] at approximately 8:30 a.m. of the North Medication Cart revealed: One Facility Glucagon with an expiration date of 11/25One Degludec insulin pen (Resident #16) opened and not labeled with a date of opening or an open expiration date Interview on [DATE] at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed the above findings. Further interview revealed that Staff A administered Resident #16's morning dose of Degludec from the above insulin pen. Review on [DATE] of Resident #16's [DATE] MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed:Insulin Degludec Subcutaneous Solution pen-injector 100 Uni/ml (milliliter) Inject 36 unit subcutaneously in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an equipment per manufacturer's instruction for 1 of 1 resident humidifier observed. (Resident identifier is #1.)Findings include: Observation on 12/2/25 at approximately 1:15 p.m. of Resident #1's room revealed that there was a humidifier at his/her bedside that was plugged into the wall. Interview on 12/3/25 at approximately 7:44 a.m. with Staff H (Licensed Practical Nurse), night nurse, confirmed the above observation. Staff H further revealed that the humidifier was brought in by family and had been present at the resident bedside since September 2025. Staff H stated that he/she did not clean and maintain the humidifier. Observation on 12/3/25 at approximately 7:45 a.m. with Staff H revealed that the humidifier had approximately 1/4-1/2 inch of water with a light tan film in the base of the unit. Further observation revealed that there was no indication that the humidifier had been inspected by maintenance. Interview on 12/3/25 at approximately 9:03 a.m. with Staff C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-22 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to submit to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information based on payroll data for Fiscal Quarter 3 (April 1, 2024 - June 30, 2024). Review on 10/20/24 of the facility's Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Quarter 3 2024 (April 1, 2024 - June 30, 2024) revealed that the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. Interview on 10/22/24 at 1:00 p.m. with Staff F (Business Office Manager) confirmed the above findings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 3 of 30 days reviewed between September 15, 2024 - October 20, 2024. Findings include: Review on 10/21/24 of the facility's daily nursing time sheets for September 15, 2024 - October 19, 2024, revealed the following: On 9/15/24 there were no RN hours documented as worked; On 9/28/24 there were no RN hours documented as worked; On 10/13/24 there were no RN hours documented as worked. Interview on 10/21/24 at 9:00 a.m. with Staff E (Scheduler) confirmed that there was no RN on duty on 9/15/24, 9/28/24, and 10/13/24. Interview on 10/21/24 at 10:00 a.m. with Staff B (Director of Nursing) revealed that he/she was on call every other weekend when there was not an RN working but was not physically in the building for 8 consecutive hours.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow antibiotic use protocols related to the appropriate use of antibiotic monitoring, tracking, and reviewing antibiotic use for 9 of 12 months reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: Review on 10/21/24 of the facility's line listing for antibiotic use from November 2023 through October 2024 revealed that the facility did not have documentation of a system to track antibiotic use within the facility from November 2023 through May 2024 and September 2024 to present. Interview on 10/21/24 at 12:00 p.m. with Staff C (Infection Prevention) confirmed the above findings. Interview further revealed that the facility did not have antibiotic monitoring and tracking from September 13, 2024, to present, including documentation that antibiotics met criteria for use. Staff A (Administrator) confirmed that the facility had residents with infections and who were on antibiotics from September 2024 to date. Review on 10/21/24 of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control - Antibiotic Stewardship,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident care equipment according to manufacturer's instructions for the hoyer lift. Findings include: Interview on 10/22/24 at approximately 9:57 a.m. with Staff J (Maintenance Director) revealed that the legs on the hoyer lift were difficult to open. Staff J stated that they had not performed routine inspections on the hoyer lift to determine any wear since he/she became employed at the facility approximately four months ago. Staff J revealed they had never performed routine maintenance on the hoyer lift, and did not have any documentation that the hoyer lift had been maintained, inspected or repaired at any time. Staff J confirmed that the hoyer lift was more than a year old and routine inspection and maintenance was required. Interview on 10/22/24 at approximately 10:29 a.m. with Staff K (Licensed Nursing Assistant(LNA)) revealed the hoyer lift is difficult to maneuver when a resident is in the lift. Interview on 10/22/24 at approximately 10:37 a.m. with Staff L (LNA) revealed the hoyer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to report alleged violations of neglect to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls in a final sample of 15 residents (Resident Identifier #26). Findings include: Interview on 10/20/24 at approximately 10:48 a.m. with Resident #26 revealed that Resident #26 had fell from the hoyer lift about six weeks ago. Review on 10/22/24 of Resident #26's medical record revealed an Incident Note, entered 8/21/24, dated 8/20/24, that stated: .resident was being transferred from [pronoun omitted] wheelchair to [pronoun omitted] bed using a hoyer lift .More staff were called in for assistance and resident was lowered to the floor after moving the bed away and releasing the hoyer lift pad . Review on 10/22/24 of Resident #26's medical record revealed a provider note, dated 8/23/24, that stated .nursing reported that 2 days ago, [pronoun omitted] had an accidental fall during a mechanical lift transfer and got between [pronoun omitted] bed and [pronoun omitted] window sill slightly bumping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations of neglect were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls in a final sample of 15 residents (Resident Identifier #26). Findings include: Interview on 10/20/24 at approximately 10:48 a.m. with Resident #26 revealed that Resident #26 had fell from the hoyer lift about six weeks ago. Review on 10/22/24 of Resident #26's medical record revealed a provider note, dated 8/23/24, that stated .nursing reported that 2 days ago, [pronoun omitted] had an accidental fall during a mechanical lift transfer and got between [pronoun omitted] bed and [pronoun omitted] window sill slightly bumping [pronoun omitted] head . Interview on 10/22/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Staff A (Administrator) revealed Staff A was not aware of the incident and Staff A was unable to provide documentation of an investigation of the incident. Interview on 10/22/24 at approximately 12:12 p.m. with Staff I (Licensed Nursing Assistant) revealed that he/she and another staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform neurological assessments after a resident fell and hit their head for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for falls in a final sample of 15 residents (Resident Identifier #26). Findings include: Journal of Nursing; AJN, November 2007 Vol. 107, No. 11. Retrieved from https://www.nursingcenter.com/pdfjournal?AID=751198&an=00000446-200711000-00030&Journal_ID=54030&Issue_ID=751137 on 10/30/20: When a Fall Occurs Step three: monitoring and reassessment. After the patient returns to bed, perform frequent neurologic and vital sign checks. Interview on 10/20/24 at approximately 10:50 a.m. with Resident #26 revealed that Resident #26 had a fall when being transferred with the hoyer lift, resulting in Resident #26 hitting their head. Review on 10/22/24 of Resident #26's medical record revealed an Incident note, dated 8/20/24, entered 8/21/24, that stated .Provider got notified and order was obtained to do neuro [neurological] checks for 72 hours . Further review revealed no electronic documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify trauma triggers to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident in 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in a final sample of 15 residents (Resident Identifier #10). Findings include: Record review on 10/22/24 of Resident #10's diagnosis list revealed a diagnosis of PTSD. Record review on 10/22/24 of Resident #10's last Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/8/24 revealed PTSD was a current diagnosis. Record review on 10/22/24 of Resident #10's care plans revealed a care plan for behaviors of crying, withdrawal, and lack of appetite associated with PTSD without identified triggers listed. Record review on 10/22/24 of Resident #10's Generations Psychiatry Progress Note dated 10/9/24, revealed no identified triggers for PTSD. Record review on 10/22/24 of Resident #10's behavior monitoring for [DATE] revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's who take psychotropic medications received a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) or document if GDR was clinically contraindicated for 1 of 5 resident's reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 15 residents (Resident Identifier #13). Findings include: Review on 10/21/24 of Resident #13's physician orders revealed an order for Seroquel 50 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet by mouth 3 times a day. Review on 10/21/24 of Resident #13's Pharmacy Consultant Report, dated 8/8/2024, revealed a recommendation to attempt a gradual dose reduction for Resident #13's Seroquel medication. The report further revealed the provider checked decline and wrote please see visit note from 9/5/24. The report was signed 9/24/24. There was no documentation of continued clinical appropriateness for the Seroquel. Review on 10/22/24 of Resident #13's Generations Geriatric Psychiatry Progress Note in Facility, dated 9/5/24, revealed the last GDR attempt was May 2021, and further revealed .Goals for Next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow Center For Disease Control (CDC) guidance for wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for an indwelling catheter in a sample of 15 residents (Resident Identifier #32). Findings include: Observation on 10/20/24 of Resident #32's room revealed an indwelling catheter bag hanging from the bed. There was no sign posted indicating Resident #32 was on EBP, and there was no PPE provided for care. Further observation revealed an Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) performing care without PPE. Interview on 10/22/24 at 8:34 a.m. with Staff M (LNA) confirmed he/she provided care to Resident #32 on 10/20/24 without using PPE. Staff M stated they were not aware Resident #32 was on EBP. Review on 10/22/24 of Resident #32's active orders revealed an order for a urinary catheter, entered on 10/15/24 and an order for EBP, entered on 10/20/24. Further review revealed an order for Ciprofloxacin (Cipro) Oral Table 250 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to update a residents care plan with new or revised interventions after a fall for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accidents in a final sample of 13 residents (Resident identifier is #1). Findings include: Observation on 10/24/23 at approximately 9:30 a.m. of Resident #1's room door revealed the door was closed. Review on 10/24/23 of Resident #1's nursing notes revealed that he/she had tested positive for COVID 19 on 10/20/23. Resident was placed on precautions on 10/20/23 with the residents room door being closed. Resident #1 had a fall on 10/22/23. Observation on 10/25/23 at approximately 8:00 a.m. of Resident #1's room door revealed the door was closed. Review on 10/25/23 of Resident #1's falls care plan revealed that there were no new interventions or revised interventions after the fall or with being placed on precautions. Interview on 10/25/23 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with Staff D (Licensed Nursing Assistant) confirmed that Resident #1 had been on precautions with the door closed since 10/20/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for 5 residents in a final sample of 13 residents (Resident identifiers are #25, #5, #6, #28, and #27). Findings include: Physician's Orders Standards: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 7th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009. Page 336- Physicians' Orders The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or harm clients. Therefore you need to assess all orders, and if you find one to be erroneous or harmful, further clarification from the physician is necessary . Review on 10/24/23 of Resident #25's medical record revealed the following physician's order: 2,000 ml [milliliters] fluid restriction every shift, start date 8/11/23. Further review of Resident #25's medical record revealed the following: 9/3/23 Resident #25's intake was 2,610 ml. 9/22/23 Resident #25's intake was 2,040 ml.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer had documentation of weekly assessments that contained measurements and descriptions of the pressure ulcer for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers in a final sample of 13 residents (Resident identifier is #19). Findings include: Review on 10/24/23 of Resident #19's nursing notes revealed the following: 9/16/23 Res [resident] skin check performed. Res skin is not intact. [pronoun omitted] is intact everywhere, except on R [right] ear, there are 2 small areas on outer ear. one is 7 mm [millimeter] in diameter and one is 2 mm in diameter. Res says they have been there a very long time and [pronoun omitted] scratches them off occasionally. Buttocks are intact but does have red areas. Also continues to have red/brown areas on L [left]shoulder and L hip from insisting on lying on L side most of the day and night. 9/23/23 .Skin Issue #001: New. Issue type: Redness. Location: Buttocks-generalized . Observation on 10/25/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff had demonstrated competencies and skills necessary to care for residents' needs for 7 out of 7 licensed staff reviewed for competencies (Staff identifiers are Staff B, Staff J, Staff K, Staff L, Staff P, Staff M, Staff N). Findings include: Annual Competencies Review of annual competencies for licensed staff revealed: Staff P (Licensed Practical Nurse) was hired 5/29/2019 and had no annual competencies. Competencies at hire: Review of the competencies upon hire for licensed staff revealed: Staff B (Infection Preventionist) was hired 5/02/2023 and no competencies were completed. Staff J (Licensed Nursing Assistant) was hired 6/29/23 and no competencies were completed. Staff K (Licensed Nursing Assistant) was hired 7/31/23 and no competencies were completed. Staff L (Medication Assistant) as hired 7/24/23 and no competencies were completed. Contracted Agency Staff: A review of the competencies prior to working at the facility revealed: Staff M (Registered Nurse) had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 5 of 90 days reviewed between April 1, 2023 and June 30, 2023. Findings include: Review on 10/25/23 of the facility's Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Quarter 3 (April 1, 2023-June 30, 2023) revealed that there were no RN hours for the following days: 5/27/23, 6/03/23, 6/04/23, 6/10/23, 6/25/23. Interview on 10/25/23 at 10:00 a.m. with Staff B (Infection Preventionist/Staffing Coordinator) confirmed the above findings.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a stop date for a as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 13 residents (Resident identifier is #26). Findings include: Record review on 10/25/23 revealed that Resident #26 had an order for Ativan 0.5 milligram (mg): Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety/agitation, start date 9/25/23. Interview on 10/25/23 at approximately 1:30 p.m. with Staff A (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow manufacturer's recommendations on 1 of 2 medication carts observed (Resident identifier is #10). Findings include: Observation on 10/24/23 at 8:30 am of the South Wing Medication Cart with Staff F (Medication Nursing Assistant) revealed an open multidose vial of Humalog insulin Lispro with an open date of 9/23/23 and a discard date of 10/21/23 for Resident #10. Interview on 10/24/23 at 8:30 a.m. with Staff F confirmed the above findings. Review on 10/24/23 of the Manufacturer's Recommendations for the use of Humalog Lispro Insulin: .Preparing your Humalog dose .Do not use Humalog past the expiration date printed on the label or 28 days after you first use it. Review on 10/25/23 of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications revised April 2007 Policy Interpretation and Implementation .4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated or deteriorated drugs or biologicals

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with the necessary assistive devices for dining for 4 residents observed for assistive devices out of a sample of 6 residents reviewed (Resident identifiers are #6, #88, #24, and #1). Findings Include: Review on 10/24/23 of a list of residents that use adaptive equipment, provided by the facility, revealed that 6 residents require adaptive equipment with meals. Resident #88: Observation on 10/25/23 at approximately 7:45 a.m. of Resident #88's breakfast tray revealed that Resident #88 received plastic utensils, a paper plate and a 1 handle coffee mug. Review on 10/25/23 of Resident #88's dietary meal ticket, under adaptive, revealed the following items that should be on Resident #88's meal tray: a divided red plate, built up foam for all utensils and a two handle cup. Resident #1: Observation on 10/25/23 at approximately 8:00 a.m. of Resident #1's breakfast tray revealed that he/she had a paper plate. Review on 10/25/23 of Resident #1's dietary meal ticket, under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly in a contained dumpster with a lid or cover. Findings Include: Observation on 10/25/23 at 9:15 a.m. of the dumpster located in the back of the facility revealed multiple clear bags with waste noted on the ground in front of the dumpster. The dumpster was not covered. Observations on 10/26/23 at 9:00 a.m. of the dumpster located in the back of the facility revealed multiple clear bags with waste noted on the ground in front of the dumpster. The dumpster was not covered. Interview on 10/26/23 at 9:00 a.m. with Staff C (Administrator) confirmed the above findings. Review on 10/26/23 at 10:00 a.m. of the facility policy titled Solid Waste Disposal Policy .Garbage containers are covered at all times .All Employees Place trash and garbage directly into designated receptacles. Keep lids to all outside trash receptacles closed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview it was determined that the facility failed to report to the State Department of Public Health an outbreak of COVID-19 Infection that included 16 out of 29 residents. Findings Include: Interview on 10/25/23 at 1:00 p.m. with Staff B (Infection Preventionist) revealed that Staff B had not reported the current COVID-19 outbreak that began on 10/19/23 to the State Department Of Public Health. Interview on 10/26/23 at 10:00 a.m. with Staff C (Administrator) confirmed the above findings. Review on 10/26/23 of the facility's Infection Control Policy and Procedure Manual Titled: Surveillance Dated 5/2014 .Outbreak of Communicable Diseases .The Administrator will be responsible for: 1. Telephoning a report to the health department .3. Submitting periodic progress reports to the health department as requested .6. Forwarding Communicable Disease Report Cards to the health department as required. Review on 10/27/23 of the New Hampshire Communicable Disease Report Form 2011. NH RSA 141-C and He-P300 mandate reporting of the listed communicable diseases by all physicians, labs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to have an antibiotic stewardship program that included a system to monitor antibiotic use. Findings Include: Review on 10/24/23 of the facility's line listing for antibiotic use from January 2023 through October 2023 revealed that the facility did not track antibiotic use within the facility from February 2023 through April 2023. Interview on 10/25/23 at 1:30 p.m. with Staff B (Infection Preventionist) confirmed the above findings. Review on 10/25/23 at 2:00 p.m. of the facility's policy titled [NAME]-Air Nursing and Rehab Antibiotic Stewardship Program 2. Policy: [NAME]-Air Nursing and Rehab Center will implement an antibiotic stewardship program based on the Center for Disease Control's: Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, and will be evaluated annually or more frequently if needed for effectiveness during review of the Infection Control Program 4.4 The infection Preventionist (IP) will track antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to revise the pneumococcal policy, and ensure/implement a facility system for the monitoring and recording of pneumococcal immunizations for 4 out of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident identifiers are #19, #12, #24, #27). Findings Include: Resident #19 Review on 10/24/23 of Resident #19's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to the facility 10/2019. Further review of Resident #19's medical record revealed that there was no documented evidence of pneumococcal vaccination being offered or received. Resident #12 Review on 10/24/23 of Resident #12's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to the facility 6/2022. Further review of Resident #12's medical record revealed that there was no documented evidence of pneumococcal vaccination being offered or received. Resident #24 Review on 10/24/23 of Resident #24's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to the facility 12/2022. Further review of Resident #24's medical record revealed that there was no documented evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-12-03 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and policy review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had access to their personal funds during off business hours. The facility manages personal accounts for 25 residents.Findings include:Review on 12/3/25 of the Facility's policy Resident Petty Cash Policy, undated, revealed Purpose To establish a clear procedure for .ensuring that residents have appropriate access during evenings and weekends 3. Weekend and Evening Availability .3.1 The facility will designate evening and weekend petty cash custodians, such as charge nurses, supervisors, or on-call administrative staff. 3.2 Access to funds during these periods will occur as follows: Evenings: Available until the end of the evening shift (typically 11:00 p.m.) through the charge nurse or supervisor. Weekends: Available during both day and evening shifts through designated nursing supervisors.Interview on 12/03/25 at approximately 1:06 p.m with Staff E (Business Office Manager) revealed that residents must request cash from him/her during regular business hours because residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-10-22 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was informed of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notices (Resident Identifiers are #135 and #136). Findings include: Resident #135 Review on 10/20/24 of the Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months form, completed by the facility, revealed that Resident #135 was discharged from Medicare Services on 6/28/24 and remained in the facility. Review on 10/20/24 of Resident #135's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form revealed that Resident #135 was not provided a SNF ABN Form CMS-10055 notice prior to discharge from Medicare Part A services. Resident #136 Review on 10/20/24 of the Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months form, completed by the facility, revealed that Resident #136 was discharged from Medicare Services on 5/3/24 and remained in the facility. Review on 10/20/24 of Resident #136's SNF…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the Nursing Staffing Data on a daily basis. Findings Include: Observation on 10/24/23 at 9:00 a.m. of the facility common areas revealed no daily Nursing Staff Data Posting. Observation on 10/25/23 at 10:00 a.m. of the facility common areas revealed no daily Nursing Staff Data Posting. Interview on 10/25/23 at 10:15 a.m. with Staff C (Administrator) confirmed that the facility was not posting staffing data daily. Review on 10/26/23 of the facility's policy titled: Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers: Policy Statement Our facility will post, on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personal responsible for providing direct care to residents.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SOROKA, NACHUMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR100%since 07/08/2022
TELLER, JOSHUAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/31/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-40.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$716K
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 21%Medicare 8%Other / private 70%

This home reported $716K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$450per resident / day
operating cost
$13,679per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Hampshire Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Hampshire
$12,243/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,444/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,025/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 305096. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next