Golden View Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 231 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 71.4 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.31 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.89 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 allegations of neglect were reported timely to the Administrator of the facility and the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for Abuse or Neglect. (Resident identifiers are #3, #4, and #5.)Findings include: Resident #3Review on 5/21/26 of Resident #3's medical record revealed the following progress note, dated 4/1/26, Found in BR (bathroom) chair, adjacent to toilet, quite agitated, was unhappy w (with) O/N (over night) cares by LNA (Licensed Nursing Assistant) who states was 'Very rough getting me up, and [pronoun omitted] just left me here' .Interview on 5/21/26 at approximately 12:45 p.m. with Staff A confirmed the above allegation was not reported to the SSA.Resident #4 and #5Interview on 5/21/26 at approximately 1:00 p.m with Staff D (LNA) revealed he/she left a note for Staff G (Unit Manager) on 5/20/26 with concerns of Resident #4 and #5 not receiving care on the previous shift. Interview on 5/21/26 at approximately 2:10 p.m. with Staff G confirmed Staff D left a letter with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain evidence demonstrating the result of all grievances and ensure that all written decisions include the necessary elements for 2 out of 2 grievances reviewed.Findings include: Review on 5/21/26 of the facility 2026 Grievance Log revealed the following grievances:Resident #3, dated 4/1/26 and 4/15/26, Issue: [sic] LNA (Licensed Nursing Assistant) put cream on was burning and washed it off and did not come back after placing him/her in front of the sink to brush teeth. Ombudsman reported there was a concerned of nepotism re: LNA. Outcome: No abuse, neglect. Communication/technique. Staff educated.Resident #1, dated 4/1/26 and 4/15/26, LNA is too fast, rushes him/her and makes him/her feel anxious and that LNA left (spouse's) torso uncovered after care. Ombudsman reported there was a concerned of nepotism re: LNA uncovered after care. Reported: No. Outcome: No abuse, neglect. Communication/technique. Staff educated.Interview on 5/21/26 at approximately 1:00 p.m. with Staff A DON (Director of Nursing) revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control policies for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) and failed to implement water management control measures, potentially exposing 72 residents to waterborne pathogens. (Resident identifier is #12.) Findings include: Water Management Interview on 1/13/2026 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with Staff A (Maintenance Director) confirmed the above findings. Staff A revealed that there were no time frames for when unoccupied areas should be flushed. Staff A was unable to provide documentation that unoccupied areas were flushed. Staff A confirmed there were empty rooms that would be flushed. Review on 1/13/26 of the facility's Risk management plan for Legionella Control, revised 3/2025, revealed the following: Unoccupied Areas: When units are unoccupied resulting in a decrease of water usage and potential stagnation, the Director of Property Management or designee implements counteractive measures including flushing of the sinks and fixtures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sanitization of dishware and failed to label and store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety to prevent foodborne illness for 1 of 1 kitchens and 2 of 2 kitchenettes observed. Findings Include: Refrigerator Temperatures Review on 11/4/24 of the Main Kitchen refrigerator/freezer temperature logs, Cascade/Retreat refrigerator/freezer temperature logs, and the third floor refrigerator/freezer temperature logs for October and November 2024 revealed no logs were available for November 2024 (11/1, 11/2, and 11/3), and missing temperatures for 10/2, 10/22, 10/24, 10/28, 10/29, and 10/31. Observation on 11/4/24 of the third floor refrigerator revealed no thermometer for taking temperatures. Interview on 11/4/24 8:00 a.m. with Staff L (Assistant Kitchen Director) confirmed above refrigerator temperature findings. Review on 11/6/24 of facility policy titled Dining Services: Food and Refrigeration Temperature revision date 3/24 revealed POLICY: .Refrigerator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the spread of infections for 4 out of 8 residents reviewed for EBP in a final sample of 15 residents (Resident Identifiers are #12, #16, #23, and #39). Findings include: Resident #16 Observation on 11/4/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. revealed a cart with personal protective equipment (PPE) and a sign for EBP at Resident #16's room. Interview on 11/4/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Resident #16 revealed Resident #16 stated that staff do not wear gowns or gloves while providing his/her care. Review on 11/4/24 of Resident #16's physician orders revealed a current order for EBP due to a urinary catheter. Observation on 11/5/24 at approximately 2:00 p.m. of Staff T (Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)) revealed Staff T transferring Resident #16 from their wheelchair to their bathroom for toileting. Staff T was wearing gloves and was not wearing a gown. Interview on 11/5/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow procedures in place for self-administration of medications for 2 residents out of 4 residents reviewed for choices in a final survey sample of 16 residents (Resident Identifiers are #38 and #28). Findings include: Resident #38 Observation on 11/4/24 at approximately 9:30 a.m. of Resident #38's walker tray revealed a bottle of premium nasal spray with an expiration date of 6/9/24. Interview on 11/4/24 at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Resident #38 revealed that he/she administers the nasal spray Once in a while, maybe once a week. Review on 11/4/24 of Resident #38's current physician orders revealed that Resident #38 did not have an order for nasal spray. Interview on 11/4/24 at approximately 9:45 a.m. with Staff B (Registered Nurse) confirmed the above findings. Review on 11/5/24 of Resident #38's medical record revealed that Resident #38 did not have an assessment to self-administer medications. Resident #28 Observation on 11/4/24 at approximately 9:40 a.m. of Resident #28's room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff had infection control competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for 6 of 6 staff reviewed (Staff Identifier's are A, B, C, M, N, and O). Findings include: Review on 11/6/24 of the facility's infection control in service competency records revealed that there were no competencies documented for standard universal precautions, donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE), and hand hygiene for Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse), Staff B (Registered Nurse (RN)), Staff C (RN), Staff M (Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)), Staff N (LNA), and Staff O (LNA). Interview on 11/6/24 at 11:02 a.m. with Staff P (Administrator in Training (AIT)) confirmed that the facility was unable to provide documentation that Staff A, Staff B, Staff C, Staff M, Staff N, and Staff O completed competencies for standard universal precautions, donning and doffing of PPE, and hand hygiene. Review on 11/6/24 of the facility's facility assessment with a review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent for 3 of 29 medications observed during medication administration (Resident Identifiers are #22, #47 and #25). Findings include: Resident #22 Observation on 11/4/24 at approximately 12:00 p.m. of Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) administering medications to Resident #22 revealed Staff A prepared 1,000 milligrams (mg) of Calcium Carbonate. Review on 11/4/24 of Resident #22's November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following physician's order: Calcium Carbonate 500 mg calcium (1,250 mg) give 1 tablet daily, start date 10/28/24. Interview on 11/4/24 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with Staff A confirmed the above findings. Resident #47 Observation on 11/4/24 at approximately 12:20 p.m. of Staff A administering medications to Resident #47 revealed Staff A administering 1 spray of Flonase Allergy Relief to each nostril. Review on 11/4/24 of Resident #47's November 2024 MAR revealed the following physician's order:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of medications not administered to the resident for 3 residents in a final sample of 18 residents (Resident Identifiers are #17, #23 and #30). Findings include: Resident #23 Review on 12/15/23 of Resident #23's progress note dated 11/13/23 revealed that Resident #23 re-admitted from the hospital at 7:00 p.m. Review on 12/15/23 of Resident #23's Medication Administration Record from a local hospital dated 11/13/23 at 3:55 p.m. revealed that Resident #23 last received Dilantin (Phenytoin - a seizure medication) on 11/13/23 at 12:29 p.m. Review on 12/15/23 of Resident #23's November 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed physician's orders for phenytoin sodium extended release capsule 30 milligrams (mg) twice a day (at 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.) and phenytoin chewable tablet 100 mg three times a day (at 8:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m., and 8:00 p.m.). Further review revealed the following; -On 11/13/23 at 10:59 p.m. the 30 mg was Not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, policy review, and manufacturer's instructions, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident or resident's representative of the risks and benefits of Antipychotic medication for 2 out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 18 residents (Resident Identifiers are #25 and #42). Findings include: Resident #25 Review on 12/14/23 at approximately 2:41 p.m. of Resident #25's current physician order revealed the following: Arpiprazole (Antipsychotic) 10 mg [milligrams] once a day, with a start date of 8/16/23. Further review of Resident #25's medical record revealed no documention of consent for use of the Arpiprazole. Interview on 12/15/23 at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Staff G (Medication Nursing Assistant) confirmed that there was no consent or documentation of consent regarding the Arpiprazole in Resident #25's medical record. Resident #42 Review on 12/15/23 of Resident #42's electronic medical record revealed that Resident #42 has a diagnosis of Dementia with psychotic behaviors and Parkinson's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH