Woodlawn Healthcare Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 50.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility's water management plan failed to have an assessment documenting where Legionella or other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread or to include interventions for when control limits were not met. This deficiency has the potential to affect the facility's census of 51 residents. Findings include:Review on 2/18/26 of facility policy titled Woodlawn Care Center Legionella Management Plan Policy and Procedure, revealed that there was no assessment identifying areas within the facility where Legionella or other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread. Further review revealed that there were no established interventions for situations in which control limits were not met. The review also revealed under control measures, hot water temperatures were required to be maintained at a level high enough to discourage the growth of Legionella, between 116-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview on 2/19/26 at approximately 2:20 p.m. with Staff B (Director of Maintenance) confirmed the above findings.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notifications of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification (Resident identifiers are #4 and #14).Findings include: Resident #4Review on 2/18/26 of the SNF Beneficiary Notification for residents who received Medicare Part A services (Form CMS-20052) revealed that the facility/provider initiated a discharge from Medicare Part A services for Resident #4 before the resident's benefit days were exhausted. Further review revealed that Resident #4 remained in the facility and that the last covered skilled services was 10/10/25. Resident #4 or Resident #4's representative was not provided the SNF ABN. Resident #14Review on 2/18/26 of SNF Beneficiary Notification for residents who received Medicare Part A Services (FORM CMS-20052) revealed that the facility/provider initiated a discharge from Medicare Part A services for Resident #14 before the resident's benefit days were exhausted. Further review revealed that Resident #14 remained at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents have the appropriate equipment to prevent a decrease in Range of Motion (ROM) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for limited range of motion in a final sample of 13 residents (Resident identifier is #21).Findings include:Review on 2/18/26 of Resident #21's physician's orders revealed an order for OT [Occupational Therapy] Recommendation: B palm protectors [orthotic device] should be worn daily as tolerated to reduce contractures and skin breakdown. B palms should be cleaned and thoroughly dried before donning. The order had a start date of 12/30/25, and an end date of 3/24/26. Observation on 2/17/26 at 2:06 p.m. of Resident #21 revealed Resident #21 was sleeping in bed, both hands clenched. Resident #21 was not wearing palm protectors. Further observation revealed that the palm protectors were stored in the drawer of the resident's bedside table.Interview on 2/17/26 at 2:07 p.m. with Staff C (Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)) confirmed the above findings. Staff C stated that he/she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was informed of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notices (Resident identifier is #148.) Findings include: Review on 1/14/25 of the Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months form, completed by the facility, revealed that Resident #148 was discharged from Medicare Services on 9/2/24 to home or lesser care. Review on 1/14/25 of Resident #148's SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed that Resident #148 was not provided a Notice of Medicare Non - Coverage (NOMNC) Form CMS - 10123 notice prior to discharge from Medicare Part A services. Interview on 1/14/25 at approximately 11:10 a.m. with Staff A (Business Office Manager) confirmed the above findings.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0680 — isolated
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the activities program was directed by a qualified professional for a facility census of 44 residents. Findings include: Interview on 1/13/24 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Staff C (Activities Director) revealed that he/she started working at the facility as the Activities Director in April 2024. Interview on 1/14/24 at approximately 2:40 p.m. with Staff B (Administrator) confirmed Staff C had not completed a certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist and did not have 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly sanitize dishes according to manufacturer's instructions for a facility census of 44 residents. Findings include: Observation on 1/13/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m. of Staff C (Dietary Manager) run a load of dishes through the dishwasher. Staff C dipped a test strip for the sanitizer into a bucket that was attached to the outside of the dishwasher. Staff C reported a result of 0 PPM (parts per million). Staff C then ran the dishwasher for a second time and tested the fliud in the bucket two more times. Staff C reported results of 0 PPM on both testing strips. Interview on 1/13/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Staff C revealed the manufacturer requires the sanitizer to register on the test strips in a range of 50- 100 PPM's. Observation on 1/13/25 at approximately 8:35 a.m. revealed a sign posted on the wall near the dishwasher. The sign posted was titled, Sanitizer Test Strips. Further review of the sign revealed: .Please notify the Dietary Manager if the results of the Test…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0868 — isolated
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required committee members attended meetings at least quarterly for 4 of the 4 quarterly meetings reviewed. Findings include: Review on 1/14/25 of the Quality Assurance Improvement QAPI meeting attendance sheets from 2024 revealed the following required members were not in attendance: Quarter 1 - Infection Preventionist Quarter 2 - Infection Preventionist Quarter 3 - Infection Preventionist Quarter 4 - Administrator Interview on 1/14/25 at approximately 1:30 p.m. with Staff B (Administrator) confirmed the above findings. Review on 1/14/25 of the facility's police titled Quality Performance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program - Governance and Leadership, revised 10/14/24, revealed .The following individuals serve on the committee: Administrator, or a designee who is in a leadership role, Director of nursing services, Medical director, Infection preventionist .

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for indwelling catheter in a final sample of 21 residents (Resident Identifier #16). Findings include: Observation on 2/20/24 at approximately 6:30 p.m. revealed that Resident #16 had a urinary drainage bag hanging on his/her walker below his/her bladder. Review on 2/22/24 of Resident #16's Foley Catheter Care Plan dated 1/7/21, revealed a care plan intervention to record urinary output. Review on 2/22/24 of Resident #16's medical records revealed no documentation of urinary output. Interview on 2/22/24 at approximately 2:25 p.m. with Staff B (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings. Staff B stated that the nursing staff does not record urine output for residents with indwelling catheters.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to update resident care plans with new or revised interventions after a fall for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for falls in a final sample of 21 residents (Resident Identifiers #14 and #29). Findings include: Resident #29 Review on 2/22/24 of the Facility Incident/Accident report dated 2/10/24, indicated that Resident #29 had a fall on 2/10/24 with no apparent injuries. Review on 2/22/24 of the Facility Incident/Accident report dated 2/12/24, indicated that Resident #29 had a fall on 2/12/24 with no apparent injuries Review on 2/22/24 of the Facility Incident/Accident report dated 2/15/24, indicated that Resident #29 had a fall on 2/15/24 resulting in a right femoral fracture. Review on 2/22/24 of Resident #29's Falls Care Plan dated 1/30/24, revealed no new interventions after falls on 2/10/24, 2/12/24, or 2/15/24. Interview on 2/22/24 at approximately 1:45 p.m. with Staff B (Director of Nurses) confirmed that no new interventions were added to Resident #29's Falls Care Plan after the above falls. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility assessment it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff in accordance with their facility assessment. Findings Include: Review on 2/21/24 at 9:00 am of 30 days (1/20/24 to 2/19/24) of the nursing staffing schedule revealed that on the following weekend days the facility had one nurse working from the hours of 6:00 pm until 10:00 pm: 1/20/24 and 1/21/24 1/21/24 and 1/22/24 1/27/24 and 1/28/24 2/3/24 and 2/4/24 2/10/24 and 2/11/24 2/17/24 and 2/18/24 Review on 2/21/24 of the Facility Assessment with a revised date of 1/20/24 revealed: .page 3 Woodlawn has 3 shifts 6 am to 2 pm, 2 pm to 10 pm, and 10 pm to 6 am. Minimum staff is as follows: 1st. shift has two nurses and 5 aides [Licensed Nursing Assistant], 2nd shift has two nurses and four aides, and 3rd shift has one nurse and 2 aides. Interview on 2/23/24 at 3:30 pm with Staff B (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH