Mineral Springs

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 72.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving anticoagulant (blood thinner) therapy received the necessary care and services for anticoagulation treatment for 5 days for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for anticoagulation therapy (Resident Identifier #1). Findings include: Record review on 5/30/24 of Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed a nurses note, dated 5/1/24 at 6:47 p.m. that stated Resident #1 was noted to have lips slightly cyanotic with vital signs as follows: Blood pressure of 124/87, heart rate of 163, respirations of 40, O2 [oxygen] saturation of 83% on 3 liters of oxygen and a temperature of 97.7 degrees Fahrenheit. Further review of the medical record revealed a note by Staff A (Nurse Practitioner) dated 5/1/24 and entered at 12:56 p.m., stating: The patient had not received [pronoun omitted] Coumadin since April 25 and was due for repeat INR [International Normalization Ratio] lab work however this appears to have not been done so the Coumadin was not re-dosed. The Nurse Practitioner's note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the health care provider's order for a therapeutic diet for a swallowing issue for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition in a final sample of 14 residents (Resident identifier is #43). Findings include:Review on 8/5/25 of Resident #43's physician's order revealed a dietary order dated 4/10/25 for Regular/Liberalized dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) advanced texture, pureed fruit and vegetables. Review on 8/5/25 of Resident #43's Care Plan revealed that Resident #43 was at nutritional risk for dysphagia with a goal of exhibiting no overt dysphagia with texture modification with a target date of 9/11/25. Further review revealed there was an intervention to provide a dysphagia diet as ordered. Observation on 8/5/25 at 12:15 p.m. of Resident #43 revealed that he/she was in their bed with their lunch tray set up in front of them with Resident #43's meal ticket which read Pureed Fruits and Vegetables. Further observation revealed there was a bowl of sliced whole pears on the tray.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to formulate advance directives for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for Advance Directives in a final sample of 15 residents. (Resident Identifier's are #102 and #152.) Findings include: Resident #102 Review on 2/19/25 of Resident #102's medical record revealed a physician's order, dated 2/15/25, for Full Code (meaning the patient wishes to receive all possible life-saving measures in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest). Further review of Resident #102's medical record revealed a Portable Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form, dated 7/11/22, that indicated Resident #102 was a DNR (meaning the patient wishes not to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempted on them if their heart or breathing stops). Review on 2/20/25 of Resident #102's care plan for advanced directives revealed Resident #102's code status was DNR. Interview on 2/20/25 at approximately 12:20 p.m. with Staff C (Registered Nurse) confirmed the above findings. Resident #152 Review on 2/19/25 of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to inform each resident before, or at the time of admission, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services for 1 resident in a final sample of 15 residents. (Resident identifier is #43.) Findings include: Interview on 2/19/25 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with Resident #43's DPOA (Durable Power of Attorney) revealed that his/her spouse was admitted to the facility in December 2024. He/she stated that they gave the facility their prescription card but was told that they needed to use the facility's pharmacy. Interview revealed they have been billed monthly for co-pays from the facility's pharmacy. They would not have co-pays at their pharmacy and the facility did not tell them they would be charged. Interview on 2/21/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Staff B (Admissions Coordinator) revealed that during the admission process, the option of using an outside pharmacy was not discussed with Resident #43 or their DPOA. Staff B also revealed that Resident #43's DPOA gave him/her an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents review for pain management in a final sample of 15 residents (Resident identifier is #44.) Findings include: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th edition St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021. Page 614 .Do not give a medication until you are certain that you can follow the seven rights of medication administration . Page 672 .seven rights of medication administration include right medication, right dose, right patient, right route, right time, right documentation and right indication . Review on 2/20/25 of Resident #44's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician order for Acetaminophen Tablet 325 mg [milligrams] Give 2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Mild Pain More than 3 doses in 48 hours, notify physician/advanced practice nurse . Review on 2/20/25 of Resident #44's MAR for January and February 2025 revealed that Resident #44…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 4 days in the month of September 2024. Findings include: Review on 2/19/25 of the Facility's Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Quarter 4 2024 (July 1-September 30, 2024) revealed that there were no RN hours submitted for the following days: 9/1/24, 9/15/24, 9/28/25, and 9/29/24. Interview on 2/20/25 at 1:00 p.m. with Staff D (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings and revealed that the facility could not provide documentation to show that there was an RN on duty during the above dates.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and manufacturer's instruction review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled and dated in accordance with currently acceptable professional principles for 2 out of 2 medication carts observed. (Resident identifiers are #152 and #36.) Findings include: Observation on 2/19/25 at 9:07 a.m. of the [NAME] Front medication cart revealed a small clear plastic medication cup in the top drawer containing 3 pills (medications). The cup was unlabeled and undated. Interview on 2/19/25 at 9:10 a.m. with Staff C (Registered Nurse) confirmed the above findings and revealed that the medications belonged to Resident #36. Observation on 2/19/25 at 9:45 a.m. of the [NAME] Woods medication cart revealed one Symbicort inhaler, not in a box or bag, with no resident identifier or open date or open expiration date. Further observation revealed an Advair Diskus inhaler in a box for Resident #152 without an open date or open expiration date. The pharmacy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records were accurately documented for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. (Resident Identifier is #202.) Findings include: Review on 2/20/25 of Resident #202's medical record revealed a diagnosis list, dated 2/13/25, that showed Resident #202 had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Further review of Resident #202's medical record revealed a Social Services Assessment and Documentation, signed on 2/17/25 by Staff F (Social Worker). Section C of the assessment titled Mental Health and Wellness .4. Trauma History: Does the patient/resident report or does the medical record reflect any history of trauma and/or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)? The box is shaded in for the answer 2 NO Interview on 2/20/25 at 1:49 P.M. with Staff F revealed that he/she did not ask Resident #202 about the trauma and did not completed the assessment accurately. Review on 2/20/25 of the facility's policy titled: Trauma Informed Care dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff, as determined by their facility assessment, to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident in a census of 48 residents. Interview on 9/10/24 at approximately 1:40 p.m. with Resident #26 revealed that he/she was frequently told that staff were too busy and it caused delays in the care that he/she needed, and medications administered were frequently late. Interview on 9/10/24 at approximately 1:00 p.m. with Resident #45 revealed that the facility was short staffed, and it caused longer responses to call lights and getting the assistance he/she needed. Resident #45 stated: I waited on the toilet for 45 minutes the other day. Interview on 9/11/24 at approximately 8:00 a.m. with Staff H (Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)) and Staff L (Medication Nursing Assistant (MNA)) revealed that at times, it is just an MNA on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow established infection control guidelines for facility water management by not having a system to monitor control measures to minimize the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens that has the potential to effect the facility census of 48 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Interview on 9/11/24 at approximately 10:30 a.m. with Staff D (Infection Preventionist) revealed they did not know if the facility had a system to monitor control measures in place to prevent the introduction and spread of Legionella. Review on 9/12/24 of the facility's policy, Legionella Water Management, dated 2017, revealed: .These domestic unmixed water tanks have a high-volume use and high temperature that make it completely inhospitable for the Legionella bacteria to grow. These tanks are also purged at the base to remove any settled impurities monthly by the maintenance staff using the TELS Maintenance System. All basement boiler and water flow systems are monitored for flow, pressure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders or provide medications timely for 5 residents in a final sample of 19 residents (Resident Identifiers are #1, #17, #26, #34, #47). Findings include: Standards: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 7th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009. Page 336 - Physicians' Orders The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or harm clients. Therefore you need to assess all orders, and if you find one to be erroneous or harmful, further clarification from the physician is necessary . [NAME], [NAME]; [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], Wendy; and [NAME], [NAME]. Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques. 10th ed. [NAME], Pennsylvania: Elsevier, 2022. Page 597 - Safe Medication Preparation: Right Time With time-critical medications (e.g., antibiotics, anticoagulants, insulin, immunosuppressives), early or delayed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$32,148 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-05-30
• $15,347 — penalty dated 2023-09-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to 603 HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH