Webster At Rye

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 164 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 40.9 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.95 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.73 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sanitization of dishware in 1 of 1 kitchen observed.Findings include:Review on 8/20/25 of the facilities policy High-Temperature Dish out of temperature policy, undated, revealed the following: .Required temperature (per regulatory standards) .Final Rinse Cycle: Minimum temperature 180 degrees F [Fahrenheit] . 1. Immediate Verification Check the machine's temperature gauges. Confirm accuracy with a thermometer or heat sensitive test strip on dishes during the final rinse. Record out-of-range reading in the dishwasher temperature log.3 .Do not continue dishwashing until proper sanitation can be ensured. 4. Implement Back up Sanitation .Switch to 3- Compartment Sink Method .Observation on 8/19/25 at approximately 8:14 a.m. in the kitchen revealed Staff E (Cook) loading morning dirty dishes into the high temperature dish machine. The dish machine achieved a maximum temperature of 172 degrees Fahrenheit during the final rinse. Observation on 8/19/25 at approximately 12:45 p.m. in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement antibiotic use protocols that address unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. (Resident identifiers is #38.) Findings include:Resident #38Review on 8/21/25 of Resident #38's physician's order revealed an order dated 7/7/25 for Cipro for an UTI.Review on 8/21/25 of Resident #38's medical record revealed no antibiotic time out was completed for the above antibiotic.Review on 8/21/25 of Resident #38's Revised McGeer Criteria for Infection Surveillance Checklist, dated 8/5/25, for the UTI infection on 7/7/25 did not meet criteria.Interview on 8/21/25 at 8:12 a.m. with Staff A (Director of Nursing) confirmed that the above facility's policy titled Antibiotic Management did not include Antibiotic Stewardship or the use of an antibiotic time out. Further interview revealed that the facility did not document time-outs for antibiotic use. Staff A revealed that the facility follows the CDC for antibiotic use guidelines.Review on 8/21/25 of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to determine if self-administration is appropriate for a resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident Identifier #152). Findings include: Observation on 8/13/24 at approximately 9:15 a.m. of Resident #152 revealed Resident #152 sitting up in their recliner chair with 3 medicine cups sitting on the side table next to them. Further observation revealed one medicine cup to contain seven pills and three capsules, and the two other medicine cups to each contain a liquid (one was very light blue in color and the other was a pale orange color). Interview on 8/17/24 at approximately 9:20 a.m. with Staff E (Registered Nurse (RN)) confirmed the above findings. Further Interview with Staff E revealed that the medication cups observed contained Resident #152's morning medications that were administered by Staff F (RN). Staff E confirmed that Resident #152 does not have an order to self administer medications and does not have an assessment to self administer their medications.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an ongoing systematic collection of surveillance data during a SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak from 7/7/24 to 7/25/24 and failed to ensure a system for identifying residents with COVID-19 through timely testing for 1 of 10 residents reviewed with respiratory symptoms (Resident Identifier is #99). Findings include: Interview with Staff C (Director of Nursing) on 8/13/24 revealed that Staff C was providing a new COVID-19 Line List for July 2024, originally provided on 8/12/24, due to some inaccuracies identified by the facility that had been corrected. Review on 8/13/24 of the facility's COVID-19 Line List for July 2024, received on 8/13/24, revealed changes had been made to the list provided on 8/12/24 related to symptom onset, test collection dates, and symptom information. Interview with Staff C on 8/14/24 revealed that Staff C was providing a new COVID-19 Line List for July 2024 to replace the list provided on 8/13/24, due to additional inaccuracies identified by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formulated advance directives for 1 out of 13 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident Identifier is #13). Findings include: Review on [DATE] of Resident #13's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that Resident #13 was a full code. Review on [DATE] of Resident #13's paper medical record revealed on the chart binder a sticker indicating full code. Further review of Resident #13's paper medical record revealed that Resident #13 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order signed by the physician on [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at approximately 12:10 p.m. with Staff A (Registered Nurse) revealed that he/she would first look at the band on a resident's arm to determine a residents code status, if resident did not have a wrist band on he/she would then look in the EHR, and lastly would check the binder of a residents paper medical record. Observation on [DATE] at approximately 12:12 p.m. of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 resident in a final sample of 13 residents (Resident Identifier is #34). Based on interview and record review determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's weight for 1 resident reviewed in a final sample of 13 residents. (Resident Identifier is #32). Findings include: Resident #34 Review on 6/6/23 of Resident #34's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following physician's orders: May 2023 Amlodipine Besylate Oral Tablet 10 milligrams (mg) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypertension (HTN), Hold for Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) less than 120/70, order date 4/28/23. May 13th SBP was 109 and medication was documented as being administered. June 2023 Amlodipine Besylate Oral Tablet 10 mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN, Hold for SBP less than 120/70, order date 4/28/23. June 5th SBP was 110 and medication was documented as being administered.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled with an opened date or use by date and expired medications were removed from use for 1 out of 2 medication carts and 1 out of 1 medication room observed (Resident Identifiers are #26 and #96). Findings include: Southwest Medication Cart Observation on 6/6/23 at approximately 8:00 a.m. of the medication room with Staff C (Registered Nurse) revealed the following: Resident #26's Timolol Meleate 0.5% [percent] eye drop with an opened date of 3/25/23 and a pharmacy sticker that stated discard 60 days after opening; Resident #96's Dorzolamide HCL [Hydrochloric acid] 2% Ophthalmic Solution (eye drop) with no opened date and a pharmacy expired sticker dated 5/31/23. Interview with on 6/6/23 at approximately 8:15 a.m. with Staff C confirmed the above findings. Staff C confirmed that the medications identified were currently ordered and in use. Facility Medication Room Observation on 6/6/23 at approximately 8:30 a.m. of the medication room with Staff B…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · Bcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored at the proper temperature in 1 of 1 kitchenettes observed. Findings include: Review on 8/12/24 at approximately 9:45 a.m. of the kitchenette refrigerator temperature logs revealed the following missing temperatures: June 2024 6/11/24 (PM), 6/12/24 (PM), 6/13/24(PM), 6/14/24 (AM and PM), 6/15/24 (AM and PM), 6/16/24 (AM), 6/17/24 (PM), 6/18/24 (PM), 6/19/24 (PM), 6/22/24 (PM), 6/23/24(PM), 6/24/24(PM), 6/25/24(PM), 6/26/24(PM), 6/27/24 (PM), 6/28/24 (PM), 6/29/24(AM and PM), and 6/30/24 (AM and PM). July 2024 7/12/24 (PM), 7/13/24 (PM), 7/15/24 (PM), 7/16/24 (AM and PM), 7/18/24 (PM), 7/19/24 (PM), 7/20/24 (AM and PM), 7/21/24 (AM and PM), 7/22/24 (AM and PM), 7/23/24 (AM and PM), 7/24/24 (PM), 7/25/24 (PM), 7/26/24 (AM) 7/27/24 (AM and PM), 7/28/24 (AM and PM), 7/29/24 (AM and PM) and 7/31/24 (AM). August 2024 8/7/24 (AM), 8/8/24 (AM), 8/10/24 (AM), and 8/11/24 (AM and PM). Interview on 8/12/24 at approximately 9:45 a.m. with Staff B (Food Services Director)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $487K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH