Morrison Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 46.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents remained free from resident to resident sexual abuse or from staff to resident physical and verbal abuse (Resident identifiers are #35 and #36). Finding include: Resident #36 Interview on 11/14/23 at 11:14 a.m. with Staff K (Registered Nurse (RN)) revealed that Resident #36 had incidents involving inappropriate sexual behavior towards other residents. Review on 11/16/23 of Resident #36's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a primary diagnosis of a traumatic subdural hemorrhage and a secondary diagnosis of unspecified dementia. Resident #36 resides in the Memory Care Unit on the B-Wing. Review on 11/16/23 of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 10/16/23 revealed that Resident #36 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review on 11/16/23 of Resident #36's nurse's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately administer in a way to ensure that when allegations of abuse were identified, that the facility's policies for reporting and investigating were followed and that appropriate corrective actions were taken to prevent further abuse and ensure the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing in a facility. (Census 53 Residents) Findings include: Review on 11/16/23 of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised 9/2017, revealed .Role of the Administrator: 1. If an incident or suspected incident of residents abuse, mistreatment, neglect or injury of unknown source is reported, the Administrator will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual. 2. The Administrator will provide any supporting documents relative to the alleged incident to the person in charge of the investigation. 3. The Administrator will keep the resident and his/her representative (sponsor) informed of the progress of the investigation. 4. The Administrator will suspend immediately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food storage temperatures for 1 out of 2 kitchen refrigerators and 1 of 3 kitchenette refrigerators observed. Findings include:Observation on 1/6/26 at approximately 9:25 a.m. of the [NAME] Wing Kitchenette Resident refrigerator revealed a temperature of 46 degrees F (Fahrenheit).Observation on 1/6/26 at approximately 10:50 a.m. of the Cook's refrigerator in the Main kitchen with Staff A (Dietary Manager) revealed that the temperature of 41.4 degrees F.Interview on 1/6/26 at approximately 10:50 a.m. with Staff A confirmed the above findings. Staff A further revealed that he/she was unaware of the out-of-range temperatures for the [NAME] Wing Kitchenette refrigerator or the Cook's refrigerator.Observation on 1/6/26 at approximately 12:55 p.m. of the Cook's refrigerator in the Main kitchen with Staff C (Dietary Aide) revealed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to have smoking policies in regards to smoking safety for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident identifier is #29.) Findings include:Interview on 1/7/26 with Resident #29 at approximately 12:00 p.m. revealed that he/she goes across the street with his/her cane several times per day to smoke independently. Interview on 1/7/26 with Staff E (Registered Nurse), at approximately 12:30 p.m. revealed that Resident #29 goes off campus several times per day to smoke and that Resident #29 comes to the nurse to obtain lighter and returns it to the nurse when he/she returns to the facility. Interview on 1/7/26 at approximately 2:15 p.m. with Staff D (Administrator) confirmed that Resident #29 goes off campus to smoke and there was no smoking assessment completed for Resident #29. Review on 1/7/26 of Resident #29's medical record revealed no assessment of residents ability to smoke independently. Observation on 1/7/26 at approximately 2:30 p.m. of Resident #29 revealed Resident #29…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff used hair restraints when handling food and failed to label and store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety to prevent foodborne illness for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. Findings include: Observation on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:20 a.m. of Staff C (Dietary Aide) revealed Staff C to be portioning fruit salad into individual cups for meal service with long hair pulled up in a bun with a hair clip. Staff C was not wearing a hair restraint in place. Interview on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:20 a.m. with Staff C revealed that he/she had not been told to use a hair restraint and did not wear a hair net while working with food. Review on 12/10/24 of facility policy titled, Morrison Nursing Home Hair Net Policy, revealed: .All Food Handlers are required to wear effective hair restraints that cover all exposed body hair . Observation on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:10 a.m. of the Main Kitchen Refrigerator revealed the following food with no use by or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were appropriately stored in 2 out of 3 medication carts observed (Resident Identifiers are #15 and #42). Findings include: Observation on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:20 a.m. of the A Wing medication cart revealed an unlabeled medicine cup with a tablet in it. Interview on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:20 a.m. with Staff G (Registered Nurse (RN)) confirmed the above finding and Staff G stated that it was his/her personal medication in the medicine cup. Observation on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:25 a.m. of the [NAME] Wing medication cart revealed 2 unlabeled medicine cups. One cup had pills in it and one cup had pills and a transdermal patch in it. Interview on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:25 a.m. with Staff H (RN) confirmed the above findings and revealed that the medicine cups were Resident #15's and Resident #42's morning medications. Review on 12/8/24 of Resident #15's Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0813 — isolated
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their policy for labeling and dating resident food items brought in by visitors for 1 of 3 kitchenettes observed. Observation on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:50 a.m. of the B wing kitchenette revealed food that was not labeled with resident names or dates: two prepackaged pepperoni sticks, one unopened can of Low Sodium V-8 juice, one prepackaged pulled pork mac-n-cheese bowl, and two packages of ice cream sandwiches. Interview on 12/8/24 at approximately 9:50 a.m. with Staff B (Dietary Manager) confirmed that the above items were not provided by the facility and were not labeled with resident names or dates. Review on 12/8/24 of facility policy titled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, revised November 2017, revealed: .6. Food brought by family/visitors .will be labeled and stored in manner that is clearly distinguishable from facility-prepared food .

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies for hand hygiene for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers and the use of appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to prevent the potential spread of infection for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter/urinary tract infection (Resident Identifier #1). Findings include: Review on 12/9/24 of Resident #1's medical record revealed that he/she currently had two pressure wounds and an indwelling catheter. Observation on 12/9/2024 of Resident #1's room revealed signage indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) use for Resident #1. Observation on 12/9/24 at 10:15 a.m. of Staff D (Licensed Nursing Assistant) exiting Resident #1's room after providing a shower and dressing Resident #1. Further observation revealed Staff D was not wearing a gown. Interview on 12/9/24 at 10:15 a.m. with Staff D revealed that he/she was unaware that Resident #1 was on EBP and was unaware that he/she needed to wear a gown while providing high-contact care activities. Review on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy for 5 out of 5 residents and 2 out of 3 staff reviewed for abuse (Resident Identifiers are #9, #10, #20, #35 and #36). Findings include: Review on 11/16/23 of the facility policy titled, Abuse Policy and Procedure, with a revised date of 9/2019, revealed .Identification: Incident reports are reviewed by members of the Interdisciplinary Team to identify events, such as suspicious bruising, occurrences, patterns, and trends that may constitute abuse; and to determine the direction of the investigation .Resident to Resident Contact/Abuse: Every attempt to foresee/prevent incident will be made by observing the following: Identify resident with potential behavior problems . Identify the precipitating situation . Closely supervise . Document interventions in Resident Care Plans .Reporting Resident Abuse or Neglect: Observation or suspicion of alleged resident abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property must be reported and investigated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 5 out of 5 residents and 2 out of 3 staff members reviewed for abuse (Resident Identifiers are #9, #10, #20, #35 and #36) and (Staff Identifiers are I and M ). Findings include: Resident #35 Review on 11/17/23 of Resident #35's nurse's notes revealed the following: On 9/24/23 at 8:14 p.m. revealed that .the resident had inappropriate behaviors towards a [gender omitted] . On 7/8/23 at 5:36 p.m. revealed that .the resident was witnessed making sexual advance, reaches for a [gender omitted] areola .' Interview on 11/17/23 at 12:48 p.m. with Staff A (Registered Nurse (RN)) revealed that the incidents on 9/24/23 and 7/8/23 were not investigated by staff at the facility. Resident #36 Review on 11/16/23 of Resident #36's behavior notes from 6/1/23 through 11/13/23 revealed that Resident #36 had 18 sexually inappropriate behaviors with residents (11/13/23, 11/7/23, 10/29/23, 9/21/23, 8/8/23, 8/6/23, 7/30/23, 7/21/23, 7/16/23, 7/14/23,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse immediately, but no later than 24 hours, to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and the results of the investigation to the SSA within 5 working days of the incident for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for alleged abuse (Resident Identifiers are #9, #10, #20, #35 and #36). Findings include: Resident #35 Review on 11/17/23 of Resident #35's nurse's notes revealed the following: On 9/24/23 at 8:14 p.m. revealed that .the resident had inappropriate behaviors towards a [gender omitted] . On 7/8/23 at 5:36 p.m. revealed that .the resident was witnessed making sexual advance, reaches for a [gender omitted] areola .' Interview on 11/17/23 at 12:11 a.m. with Staff J (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) revealed that Staff J reported the incident on 9/24/23 to the Director of Nursing. Interview on 11/17/23 at 12:48 p.m. with Staff A (Register Nurse (RN)) revealed that the incidents on 9/24/23 and 7/8/23 were not reported to the SSA. Resident #36 Review on 11/16/23 of Resident #36's behavior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure confidentiality of medical records was maintained for 1 of 23 residents (Resident identifier is #2). Findings include: Review on 11/14/23 of Resident #2's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to receive hospice services on 11/4/23 without a physician referral. Interview on 11/17/23 at approximately 9:00 a.m. with Staff C (Administrator in Training) confirmed that there was not a physician referral for Resident #2 for hospice services and no signed consent from the resident or resident's representative for the release of medical records to the hospice. Further interview with Staff C revealed that he/she released a copy of Resident #2's medication list to the hospice facility for review. Review on 11/17/23 of the facility policy titled, Confidentiality of Information, Revision Date 10/2017 revealed: .1. The facility will safeguard all resident records, whether medical, financial, or social in nature, to protect the confidentiality of the information. 2. Access to resident medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$45,227 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $45,227 — penalty dated 2023-11-17
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-21 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH