No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Fountains Of Atco

114 Hayes Mill Road, Atco, NJ 08004 · For profit - Individual · 60 certified beds · (856) 809-7206 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Jan 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$236,148 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $236,148 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
339 RT-73 · (856) 767-8228 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
416 Tansboro Rd · (855) 847-8563 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
42 Haines Ave
Park
(609) 567-0700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
49 Hayes Mill Rd · (856) 767-5056

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.6%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.1%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%8.2%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.6%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%5.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.1%15.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.8%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.9%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.5%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.062.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.681.111.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.84U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.33hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.9%CMS range 29.8–46.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.2–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.7%CMS range 5.8–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
2.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
5.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
7.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 5.20 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 8.03 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

24
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #3041277 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) develop and implement an effective water management plan in accordance with nationally accepted standards to mitigate the growth of Legionella bacteria in the facility's water system, b.) follow the recommended guidance from the New Jersey Department of Health's (NJDOH) Communicable Disease Service (CDS) including biweekly water testing and conducting a root cause analysis to identify and address any hazardous conditions, and c.) implement corrective actions for nine occupied resident rooms that tested positive for Legionella. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 53 residents. A review of the facility provided water testing for Legionella dated 3/28/26, with a results date of 4/9/26, revealed 9 of 9 Long-Term Care (LTC) resident rooms tested positive for Legionella (bacteria found in the water that causes Legionnaire's disease, a severe pneumonia) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ161922, NJ169428 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 12/5/2023 and 12/6/2023, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the process of receiving medications from an outside pharmacy vendor was followed by staff. It was determined on 3/4/2023 that a Security Guard (SG) working at the main lobby of the facility received a mailed package addressed to Resident #2 with his/her name and room number on the unopened package. The SG delivered the unopened package to Resident #2 . Resident #2 is cognitively impaired and SG failed to give this package to nursing staff , so the package could be opened by resident with staff present. After SG left package with Resident #2, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) observed the resident with an opened bottle of Risperdal 2 milligrams (mg) (a medication used to treat to treat schizophrenia) which contained 30 tables was empty. The Registered Nurse/Supervisor (RN/Supervisor) was made aware,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2704937; 414412 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) adequate supervision was provided to a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #7) identified as being at high risk for falls, impulsive, and required supervision. Resident #7 sustained 13 falls including three falls with injury that required transfer to the emergency room on 8/10/25, for a contusion and laceration to the left supraorbital and frontal scalp; on 10/28/25, for a large intramuscular hematoma to the right thigh, and on 11/14/25, for a closed head injury and laceration to the forehead which required sutures; b) ensure each fall was thoroughly investigated to prevent additional falls; and c.) consistently initiate and implement new fall prevention interventions in response to falls to prevent further falls. This deficient practice identified for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #7, #27, and #70) and was evidenced by the following: A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT # 2792802 and 2795965 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that facility staff members failed to a.) ensure control measures were implemented, maintained and monitored to prevent the growth of Legionella in accordance with the facility Water Management Program (WMP)(a risk management plan for the prevention and control of legionellosis associated with the building water systems) and in accordance with accepted national standards, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Guideline 12, when there was a positive Legionella report in December 2024 and February 2025, by maintaining and changing filters in the shower heads and ice machine; b.) including the Infection Preventionist (IP) in the control measures to minimize the risk of Legionella exposure to all residents; and c.) update the WMP to include current responsible identified program team members. The deficient practice had the potential to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: 2792802 and 2795965 Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation on 03/05/2026, in the presence of the facility's Campus Maintenance Director (CMD), it was determined that the facility failed to provide 0.2-micron biological point-of-use filters on resident showerheads and change water filters on ice machines to ensure control measures were implemented to mitigate the growth of legionella. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and was evidenced by the following:A review of facility provided documentation from the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) Communicable Disease Service (CDS) to the facility, dated 01/21/2025, included:Immediate Control Measures: 1. Immediately install 0.2-micro biological point-of-use filters on any shower heads intended for use or restrict showers and use sponge baths instead. Filters must comply with the requirements of ASTM F838.a. Access the facility for the potential installation of additional point-of-use filters at water fixtures where the risk of exposure to aerosolized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure a) prior to hire, all employees were pre-screened to ensure that they had not been found guilty in a court of law of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation, or had findings entered into the state nurse aide registry or against a professional license, and b) a process was in place to maintain documentation to confirm an appropriate pre-screening had occurred for all contracted facility employees which including dietary and housekeeping. The deficient practice was identified for 28 of 55 (50%) employee files reviewed that were provided by the facility (99 out of 154 employee files were not able to be provided by the facility).The evidence was as follows: A review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021 included:Policy Statement: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The resident abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) sufficient and competent staff were available to provide timely and appropriate incontinence care, showers, and feeding assistance for residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) care, b) ensure staff were available to supervise residents identified as high fall risks, c) competent to reposition a resident in bed so the resident did not sustain a fall, and d) ensure minimum Certified Nurse Aide staffing requirements were consistently met. The deficient practice was evidenced for 5 of 5 residents who attended a resident council meeting, 4 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #9, Resident #22, Resident #73, Resident #74) and 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #7 and Resident #27) and affected all residents who resident at the facility.The evidence was as follows: The deficient practice was as follows:Refer to F610, F677 & F689a) On 1/5/26 at 10:12 AM, during the initial tour of the facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that annual performance reviews were completed for Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) and ensure that education was provided based on the outcome of the review. The deficient practice was evidenced for 5 of 5 CNA records reviewed and was evidenced by the following: requested CNA files. A performance review had not been completed for all five of five CNAs: CNA #1, Date of Hire (DOH) 7/29/24CNA #2, DOH 7/30/2024CNA #3, DOH 8/08/2024CNA #4, DOH 9/06/2024CNA #5, DOH 11/07/2024On 01/07/26 at 12:30 PM, the Human Resources Director (HRD) confirmed that she did not have the performance reviews. On 01/09/26 at 10:02 AM, the HRD stated that performance evaluations were the responsibility of the department heads where the employee worked. The HRD stated sometimes the department heads provided copies and sometimes they did not. Performance evaluations are completed by the manager of the department where the employee works. Admin is responsible for department heads are responsible. Sometimes they give them to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure menus were prepared using standard meal planning guides, and recipes were utilized with portion sizes to ensure menus were nutritionally adequate. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/5/26 at 10:00 AM, the Food Service Director provided a copy of the for week menu cycle and the surveyor requested the extensions/portion sized for all diets. On 01/06/26 at 12:03 PM, during the lunch preparation observation in the remote dining pantry, the surveyor observed staff utilize a 2- ounce scoop and prepared portions of cucumber salad that were placed in a plastic cup with a lid. When asked the staff how much the portion of the salad should be, she stated 4 ounces, and then showed the surveyor the blue handled ice cream type scoop which was a 2-ounce scoop. On 01/06/26 at 12:12 PM, the surveyor asked the Food Service Director (FSD) where the portion sizes were listed for staff to ensure that the proper portions were served? The FSD stated it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) food was stored in a manner to ensure it was utilized by a safe use- by date, and b) the kitchen and remote service kitchen environment and equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination from foreign substances and limit the potential for the development a food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 01/05/26 at 9:48 AM, the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the kitchen with the Executive Chef (EC) and Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following:-The EC utilized a hair net on his face which did not cover all of his facial hair above lip and on sides. -Staff was observed using the dish-machine to clean dishware/food preparation equipment and while the dish machine was functioning the surveyor observed that the wash gauge did not register a temperature. The surveyor observed a hot water booster directly under the dish machine. The surveyor alerted the FSD to the observation and the FSD stated, we…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to notify CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and receive authorization for a change in the facility's name in accordance with 42 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 424.516. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to 42 CFR 424.516 Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling and maintaining active enrollment status in the Medicare Program:(a) Certifying compliance. CMS enrolls and maintains an active enrollment status for a provider or supplier when that provider or supplier certifies that it meets, and continues to meet, and CMS verifies that it meets, and continues to meet, all of the following requirements: (1) Compliance with title XVIII of the Act and applicable Medicare regulations. (2) Compliance with Federal and State licensure, certification, and regulatory requirements, as required, based on the type of services, or supplies the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment addressed the skill sets, and competencies required by staff to provide care to the resident population. The deficient practice affected all residents and was evidenced by the following: On 1/5/26 at 12:30 PM, the facility provided a copy of the facility assessment (FA) which completed by the prior Licensed Nursing Home Administrator on 2/10/25 and revealed under Staff training/education and competencies 3.6 Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and tapes of support and care needed for your resident population . It may be helpful to review specific references in the regulation regarding the facility assessment .Consider the following training topics (this is not an inclusive list) . A review of the Matrix for Provided (a required document that lists diagnoses for the resident population) that was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed facility residents had pressure ulcers, required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to self-identify systems and processes that may negatively affect resident quality of care, quality of life and review significant events implement data driven QAPI program. The deficient practice affected all residents who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following: Refer to 607F, 610E, 677E, 684E, 689H, 742DOn 1/5/26 at 10:12 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #22 lying in bed in their room. There was a strong urine odor in the room. The resident was alert and informed the surveyor that he/she was soiled. The surveyor left the room and informed the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) if he could assist with an incontinence tour observation. The CNA exited the room and returned 10 minutes later. The surveyor asked CNA #1 to check if the resident was incontinent. The surveyor observed Resident #22 wearing two incontinent briefs which were saturated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of facility policies and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a system to prevent the spread of potential influenza (flu) by ensuring a process was in place to monitor employee flu vaccination to prevent potential transmission of influenza to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all resident who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following:Reference: Infection Prevention and Control Strategies for Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Settings; Health Care Providers (HCP); April 28, 2025.On January 13, 2020, Governor [NAME] signed P.L. 2019 c. 330 (codified at N.J.S.A. 26:2H-18.79 and referred to hereafter as the Statute). The Statute requires certain healthcare facilities to establish and implement an annual influenza vaccination program. The New Jersey Department of Health (Department) is required by the Statute to promulgate rules and designate a medical exemption form to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a staff training program and ensure staff were competent to provide care and services for the resident population as identified on the facility assessment. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/5/26 at 12:30 PM, the facility provided a copy of the facility assessment (FA) which completed by the prior Licensed Nursing Home Administrator on 2/10/25 and revealed under Staff training/education and competencies 3.6 Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and tapes of support and care needed for your resident population . It may be helpful to review specific references in the regulation regarding the facility assessment .Consider the following training topics (this is not an inclusive list) . A review of the Matrix for Provided (a required document that lists diagnoses for the resident population) that was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed facility residents had pressure ulcers, required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure investigations were initiated to determine if potential abuse and neglect had occurred when residents who were dependent on staff to provide care, contacted 911 due to the facility not providing incontinence care or assistance with meals. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #74) reviewed for abuse and neglect and was evidenced by the following:a. On 1/5/2026 at 10:28 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #9 in bed, and the surveyor inquired about the care provided at the facility. Resident #9 stated there had been multiple times that they had been left unattended in wet incontinence briefs and linens for hours. Resident #9 also stated that one time they called 911 due to not being provided incontinence care and the police responded to the facility. On 1/6/2026 at 8:58 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #9 again regarding the date the 911 call was made, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT #2704937 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a communication device for a resident identified as having language barrier. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #27) reviewed for language and communication deficits and was evidenced by the following: Refer to 684EA review of the Complaint #2704937 reflected an alleged event date on 12/29/25 at 8:15 AM showed the family representative arrived at the hospital on that day at 8:00 AM that day, to meet the resident and was told that the facility cancelled the appointment. The family representative then arrived at the facility at 8:15 AM and spoke with Resident # 27 who spoke minimal English. On 1/5/26 at 10:44 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) assigned to the resident that day entered Resident #27's room with the surveyor. At that time, the CNA #1 could not locate a communication device and confirmed that a communication board was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were provided with timely and appropriate incontinence care, showers, and feeding assistance The deficient practice was evidenced for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #9, Resident #22, Resident #73, Resident #74) and was evidenced by the following:a) On 1/5/26 at 10:12 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, a strong odor of urine was permeated in the hallway. The surveyor continued the tour and entered Resident #22's room. A strong urine odor was noted in the room. The surveyor asked a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) to assist with an incontinence tour. Resident #22 had 2 incontinence briefs on and was soiled with urine and feces. The CNA exited the room and returned 10 minutes later. The surveyor asked CNA #1 to check if the resident was incontinent. The surveyor observed Resident #22 wearing two incontinence briefs, the 1st brief was saturated with urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ 2704937Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a system was developed and implemented that enabled residents to attend outside physician appointments in accordance with resident needs, goals for care, and professional stands of practice. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident# 27) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and was evidenced by the following: On 1/5/26 at 10:51 AM, Resident #27 was observed asleep in the activities room and appeared well dressed and groomed. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #27. According to the resident's admission Record (AR; or face sheet; admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to; hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect arms, legs and facial muscles) following cerebral infarction (stroke due to disrupted blood flow to the brain) affecting left non-dominant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to dispose of medications for one (1) of one (1) medication refrigerator and for one (1) of one (1) medication room inspected. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/7/26 at 10:33 AM, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse/Charge Nurse (LPN/CN), the surveyor inspected the medication refrigerator and observed the following: -Spikevax (Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine) the pharmacy label reflected, thawed on 10/10/25 and an expiration date of 12/10/25.-discharged Resident #78's one (1) box of Brovana (used for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; COPD). Resident #78 was discharged on 11/29/25.-discharged Resident #79's one (1) box Cosentyx (biological medication used for chronic inflammatory condition. Resident #79 was discharged on 9/2/25.-discharged Resident #52's one box (1) of Wegovy (biological used to reduce excess body weight). Resident #52 was discharged on 12/31/25. At that time, the LPN/UM stated that the nurses on the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift and the consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0825 — pattern
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provided rehabilitation services per physician order to ensure a resident reached their highest physical and practical level. The deficient practice was evidenced for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for rehabilitation services (Resident #74) and was evidenced by the following:On 01/05/26 at 10:18 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #74 in bed and when asked how things were going at the facility, Resident #74 stated, it's bad here, I am paralyzed. Resident #74 stated they wanted to be transferred to [another facility name]. Resident #74 also reported that a couple weeks ago they called 911 because the staff was not assisting them with eating breakfast and was worried because they were Diabetic (a condition where your body doesn't make enough insulin and may require insulin to utilize food as energy). The resident also reported that they had not received physical therapy since they were admitted because the facility was waiting for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for change in insurance coverage status and who remained in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/7/26 at 10:06 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 in bed, awake, alert and conversant. Resident #1 stated they received rehabilitative services in the past that had stopped without explanation.On 1/8/26 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided Beneficiary Protection Notification Review (BPNR) forms for two residents, Resident #1 and #30, who had a change in insurance coverage status and remained in the facility.A review of Resident #1's BPNR included the last covered day for Medicare Part A Services was on 11/9/25 and the explanation as to why the resident was not provided the SNF ABN was, not applicable.On 1/8/26 at 9:51 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT # NJ 2704937 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, the facility failed to ensure that the method for filing a grievance was consistent with the facility's practice and policy. This deficient practice was identified for one 1 of four 1 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for grievances and was evidenced by the following: Refer to 684E and 676EOn 1/6/26 at 10:13 AM, two (2) surveyors interviewed Resident #27 regarding the care that they received. Resident #27 stated their name and was aware that they resided in a long-term care facility. Resident #27 also stated that they had anticipated a medical appointment related to follow-up brain surgery that was scheduled on 12/29/25, and Resident #27 shared that they were eager to see their physician because of the persistent deep pain they felt in their head. Resident #27 added that nobody from the facility came to get them dressed and ready for their appointment on the morning of 12/29/25. Resident #27 confirmed that they did not refuse the appointment. The resident stated that they felt dizzy, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a periodic and federally mandated, standardized assessment tool, within the required time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 1resident (Resident #74) reviewed for timing of assessments and was evidenced by the following: On 1/05/26 a review of the electronic health record (EHR) reflects that resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Comprehensive admission MDS was noted to be in progress.On 1/07/2026 at 10:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS coordinator (MDSC), who stated she worked remote and was rarely in the facility. She further stated that an admission MDS must be completed by day 14 (of the resident's stay in facility). The MDSC stated I know that I am behind She explained that was hired part time for this facility and that she worked at another facility full time which was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of medical records, other facility documentation, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 1 resident reviewed (Resident #74). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/05/26 a review of the electronic health record (EHR) reflects that resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Comprehensive admission MDS was noted to be in progress. On 1/07/2026 at 10:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS coordinator (MDSC), who stated she worked remote and was rarely in the facility. She further stated that an admission MDS must be completed by day 14 (of the resident's stay in facility). The MDSC stated I know that I am behind She explained that was hired part time for this facility and that she worked at another facility full time which was causing her difficulty in keeping up with the work. She further explained that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory care services were provided per physician orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care and services (Resident #73). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/5/26 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #73 in bed. The head of the bed was elevated, the resident was receiving Oxygen at 4 liters via Nasal Cannula. The resident asked the surveyor to adjust the head and informed the nurse who was in the hallway.On 1/5/25 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor returned to the room and observed the resident in bed with their eyes closed. The oxygen was running at 4 liters.On 1/5/26 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed the resident clinical record. The admission Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to, multiple fractures of ribs, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pleural effusion and pneumonia.The 5-day Minimum Data Set Assessment with a target date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) received the appropriate treatments and services, when on 12/21/25, the resident (Resident #74) became increasingly anxious when they had not received their breakfast timely. The resident reported that they had a panic attack and called 911 emergency services since they were diabetic and received insulin. This deficient practice was identified for one 1 of 1 resident (Resident #74) reviewed for PTSD and was evidenced by the following:Refer F 610 On 1/05/26 at 10:18 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #74 in bed. When asked about how their stay had been at the facility, Resident #74 stated it's bad here, and that I am paralyzed. Resident #74 stated they wanted to be transferred to [another facility name]and the Social Worker (SW) had been made aware. Resident #74 also reported that a couple weeks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed (a).to ensure that a medication was administered according to the physician orders (PO) and acceptable standards of practice in accordance with the New Jersey Board of Nursing. This deficient practice was identified for (one) 1 of three (3) residents (Resident#77), administered by one (1) of two (2) nurses, observed during medication administration and (b). 1of 1 resident (Resident #74) reviewed for urinary catheter and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/25/2024 from 07:30 AM to 07:50 AM the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Assistant Director (FSAD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. The meat slicer was observed uncovered with pink food scraps on it. The FSAD said, We just finished cutting ham for breakfast, and haven't had time to clean it yet. 2. In the walk-in refrigerator an open package of hard-boiled eggs was wrapped in plastic wrap with no open or use by date label. The FSAD removed them from the refrigerator and stated, It should have a label on it. 3. In the freezer, an unidentified frozen food was wrapped in plastic wrap without a label or date. The FSAD removed the food from the Freezer and stated, Yes, this should be labeled also. 4. In the dry storage area, a dented can of baked beans was observed on the can rack. The FSAD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment in a timely manner for 2 residents. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 Residents (Residents #43 and #4) reviewed for Resident Assessment and was evidenced by the following: Resident #43 was admitted with diagnoses that included but was not limited to congestive heart failure and muscle weakness. On 6/26/2024, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for resident #43. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (QMDS), an assessment tool completed every 3 months, revealed an Assessment Reference Date (ARD), a date used as the last day of a look-back period, of 5/26/2024. The EMR revealed that the QMDS for Resident #43 had been completed on 6/12/2024, 3 days late. Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses that included but was not limited to dementia and anxiety. On 6/26/2024, the surveyor reviewed the EMR for Resident #4. The QMDS revealed an ARD of 5/24/2024. The EMR revealed that the QMDS for Resident #4 had been completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives, timelines, and interventions to meet resident's medical and nursing needs specifically by failing to implement a care plan for a.) the use of and refusal of bilateral (b/l) leg wraps for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #47) reviewed for skin conditions, b.) actual falls for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #19) reviewed for falls, and c.) an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheter or Urinary Tract Infection. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a.) On 06/25/2024 at 7:53 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #47 lying in bed. Resident #47 stated that his/her legs blew up from water, went down and now are scaly. Resident #47 further stated that he/she told the staff to stop applying wraps to his/her legs because they [the wraps] were too tight. A review of Resident #47's admission Record revealed that he/she had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide education to a resident who was refusing a treatment and to notify the resident's physician and family. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for skin conditions. The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to A. maintain accurate accountability of a controlled medication and B. properly acquire a controlled drug (Xanax) that staff borrowed for an unsampled resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 medication carts and was evidenced by the following: A. On 6/25/2024 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor reviewed Cart 1 with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The Individual Patient Controlled Substance Administration (IPCSA) record for unsampled Resident # 154 reflected that there were 29 Xanax (a drug used to treat anxiety) 0.5mg (milligram) pills available. The LPN and the surveyor reviewed the corresponding medication card (bingo card) for the Xanax 0.5mg which reflected there were 28 pills available. The LPN acknowledged that there should be 29 Xanax pills. On 6/25/24 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor reviewed the June 2024 Medication Administration Record for Resident #154 with the LPN. There was no documentation that the Xanax 0.5mg was administered to the resident. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure documentation in the resident's medical record of the information provided regarding the benefits and risks of immunization and the administration or the refusal of the vaccine, specifically the influenza vaccination (vaccine used to prevent influenza). The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 resident's reviewed for immunizations, (Resident #45). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (a disease of inadequate control of blood levels of glucose) and Hypertension (high blood pressure). A Review of Resident #45's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate care, dated 02/13/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 14/15, indicating Resident #45 was cognitively intact. Section 0250 indicated Resident #45's influenza vaccine was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-12-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ161922, NJ169428 Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide complete and readily access to Electronic Medical Records (EMR) for all their residents. On 12/1/2023, the first day of the survey, the facility was unable to provide full access to EMR for Surveyors to access previous and current residents at the facility prior to April 2023. The facility failed to follow their policy titled Storage and Security of Resident Records. This deficient practice affects all previous and current residents at the facility. During the survey at 10:00 a.m., the Surveyor attempted to access the EMR for current and previous residents prior to April 2023, but was unable to reveiw medical records using the access that was provided by the facility at that time. The screen revealed No Data. During an interview on 12/1/2023 at 12:20 p.m., the Administrator informed the Surveyor that there was a change of ownership which occurred in august 2023 and that Point Click Care (PCC) system was initiated in April 2023. He further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$236,148 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $82,690 — penalty dated 2026-06-08
  • $137,865 — penalty dated 2026-01-09
  • $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SAGE OPERATIONS NJ LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/22/2019
SATT, AVRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 11/22/2019
TENNENBAUM, SAMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR50%since 11/22/2019
MENDELL, ELYZEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/22/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.2M
Related-party expense30% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 41%Medicare 17%Other / private 42%

This home reported $6.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,147per resident / day
operating cost
$34,876per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,013per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315297. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next