No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crystal Lake Healthcare And Rehabilitation

395 Lakeside Blvd, Bayville, NJ 08721 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 235 certified beds · (732) 269-0500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0610) — most recent Apr 20259 immediate-jeopardy citations$538,184 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 9 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $538,184 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-27)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
800 Atlantic City Blvd · (732) 269-4100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
495 Atlantic City Blvd · (732) 797-9955 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
483 Atlantic City Blvd · (609) 389-4339 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Tilton Boulevard · (732) 269-4456 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2025-07, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-07 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.

Overall ratingnot rated now
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.4%8.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.8%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms33.3%12.1%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.4%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.8%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%97.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%5.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.6%15.6%21.2%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine36.4%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.8%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.2%8.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.002.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.751.111.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.1–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.1–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
54.4%
Total nursing turnover
63.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 235 beds and averages 197.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-27)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2716119 Based on observations, interviews, review of the medical record, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident from self-harm and provide adequate supervision for a resident (Resident #100) with a history of suicidal ideations with plans to cut their wrist prior to admission to the facility, who cut their wrist while residing in the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #100). According to the progress notes, on 1/11/2026 at 10:30 PM, the resident was noted by facility staff with a two-inch laceration to their right wrist that was bleeding profusely. The resident stated, I thought that I was going home, but they said I was not. During an interview with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) on 1/21/2026, LPN #1 stated that the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) during their rounds observed that the resident was bleeding, and when LPN #1 went to the resident's room, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ185153 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 4/10/25, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) a staff member immediately reported an observed sexual encounter between a resident (Resident #1) who had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment) from a resident (Resident #2) who had a BIMS score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment) and b) both residents were immediately separated, safe, and no other residents were placed in immediate danger. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Resident Abuse/Neglect Policy. On 4/3/25 at approximately 12:00 P.M., the Housekeeper (HK) stated she went to Resident #1 and Resident #2's room and knocked on the door. The HK entered the room and observed Resident #1 on the bed performing oral sex on Resident #2. The HK finished collecting hangers from out of the room and then went on her lunch break for approximately 30 minutes. When the HK returned from lunch, she reported it to her co-worker. The co-worker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ185153 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 4/10/25 and 4/23/2025, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to a) ensure that the staff implemented the facility's policies and procedures for a witnessed sexual abuse that occurred between two residents, and b) ensure that residents were provided with the care and services to achieve their highest practical wellbeing. On 4/3/25 at approximately 12:00 P.M., the Housekeeper (HK) stated she went to Resident #1 and Resident #2's room and knocked on the door. The HK entered the room and observed Resident #1 on the bed performing oral sex on Resident #2. The HK finished collecting hangers from out of the room and then went on her lunch break for approximately 30 minutes. When the HK returned from lunch, she reported it to her co-worker. Her co-worker then reported the sexual encounter that the HK observed to the Central Supply Coordinator (CSC). The CSC reported it to the 5th floor nurse, the abuse coordinator, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ181767, NJ181768, NJ181846 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 12/23/2024 and 12/30/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) prevent physical and verbal abuse towards a resident (Resident #1) from a staff member and b.) staff members that witnessed the abuse failed to intervene and report the incident. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Abuse Policy and Procedure. During an interview on 12/23/2024 at 3:08 P.M., the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) stated she recorded a video on her cellphone of the Director of Nursing (DON) hitting Resident #1 with a broom. LPN #1 sent the video to a friend, and it was posted to a social media website. On 12/21/2024, the local police went to the facility to investigate an abuse allegation after receiving notification that the video was circulating online. The Surveyors and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) reviewed a video on 12/23/2024 at 10:41 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ181767, NJ181768, NJ181846 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 12/23/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation for an allegation of witnessed staff to resident physical abuse toward a resident (Resident #1). During an interview on 12/23/2024 at 3:08 P.M., the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) stated she recorded a video on her cellphone of the Director of Nursing (DON) hitting Resident #1 with a broom. LPN #1 sent the video to a friend, and it was posted to a social media website. The Surveyors and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) reviewed a video on 12/23/2024 at 10:41 A.M. found on a social media website, that revealed a staff member hitting at a resident with a broom. Several other staff members observed the incident and did not intervene. The ADON identified the resident in the video as Resident #1. The ADON identified the staff member holding the broom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ178530 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, 10/24/2024 and 10/29/2024, it was determined that the facility: a) failed to provide services necessary to prevent physical abuse for a resident (Resident #1), b) used a physical hold restraint for a resident (Resident #1) with a known history of physically aggressive behaviors towards others and diagnoses of Traumatic Brain Injury, Impulse Disorder, and Schizoaffective Disorder. On 10/14/2024 at approximately 11:58 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1) stated she observed Resident #1 on the floor in the hallway with CNA #2 and the Smoking Monitor (SM) hitting Resident #1, at which time she ran to get the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) who was already on her way to the hallway. LPN #1 stated she heard a loud bang and yelling in the hallway. LPN #1 responded to the hallway and saw Resident #1 laying on the floor in the hallway yelling please stop, get them off of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ178530 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, 10/24/2024, and 10/29/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation for an allegation of witnessed and reported staff to resident physical abuse toward a resident (Resident #1). On 10/14/2024 at approximately 11:58 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1) stated she observed Resident #1 on the floor in the hallway with CNA #2 and the Smoking Monitor (SM) hitting Resident #1, at which time she ran to get the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) who was already on her way to the hallway. LPN #1 stated she heard a loud bang and yelling in the hallway. LPN #1 responded to the hallway and saw Resident #1 laying on the floor in the hallway yelling please stop, get them off of me. LPN #1 stated she observed CNA #2 kicking Resident #1 and the SM hitting Resident #1 with his fist. LPN #1 told both staff members (CNA #2 and SM) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ178530 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, 10/24/2024, and 10/29/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) implement care plan (CP) interventions for a resident (Resident #1) with a known history of physically aggressive behaviors towards others and diagnoses of Traumatic Brain Injury (a head injury causing damage to the brain), Impulse Disorder (an inability to control impulses and behaviors), and Schizoaffective Disorder (a chronic mental health condition that combines symptoms of psychosis with symptoms of mood disorders). On 10/14/2024 at approximately 11:58 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1) stated she observed Resident #1 on the floor in the hallway with CNA #2 and the Smoking Monitor (SM) hitting Resident #1, at which time she ran to get the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) who was already on her way to the hallway. LPN #1 stated she heard a loud bang and yelling in the hallway.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ178530 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, 10/24/2024, and 10/29/2024, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to: a.) provide services necessary to prevent physical abuse for a resident (Resident #1), b.) follow the facility's abuse policy by allowing staff members to continue to work with other residents after an abuse allegation occurred, c.) conduct a timely and thorough investigation for a reported witnessed allegation of staff to resident physical abuse, d.) provide accurate and original witness statements to the surveyors for an abuse investigation e.) implement care plan (CP) interventions for a resident (Resident #1) with a known history of physically aggressive behaviors towards others and diagnoses of Traumatic Brain Injury, Impulse Disorder, and Schizoaffective Disorder. On 10/14/2024 at approximately 11:58 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #2), who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) a.) received appropriate interventions to prevent the development of a facility-acquired full thickness pressure injury; b.) ongoing skin assessments were completed and documented in accordance with a physician's order; c.) hospice recommendations for pressure reducing devices were communicated to the physician; and d.) consistently follow-up documentation to monitor the progression or resolution of the skin breakdown. On 11/22/25, Resident #2 was identified as having a Stage 1 reddened area on their sacrum, that subsequently progressed to a full thickness wound and the wound measured on 1/18/26, as 10 centimeters by 7.5 centimeters by 7.5 centimeters (10 cm x 7.5 cm x 7.5 cm) by the Wound Care Nurse Practitioner (NP) during their initial assessment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint#: NJ176503, NJ178530 Based on interviews and medical record review on 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, 10/24/2024, and 10/29/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the recommendations from a resident's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level II determination. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for the PASARR (Resident #1), and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Traumatic Brain Injury (a head injury causing damage to the brain), Impulse Disorder (an inability to control impulses and behaviors), and Schizoaffective Disorder (a chronic mental health condition that combines symptoms of psychosis with symptoms of mood disorders). According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 08/09/2024, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJAC 8:39-4.1(a)5 NJAC 8:39-33.2(c)12 Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for two of seven residents (Resident (R) 191 and R79) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. R79 suffered a facial fracture due to physical abuse. The facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse for one of seven (R116) residents reviewed for sexual abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of R168's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including restlessness and agitation, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of R168's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/10/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), score of three out of 15 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident # 1 and Resident #2) by implementing the practice of double diapering, which is not an accepted standard of incontinence care and has the potential to compromise skin integrity and resident dignity.According to the admission Record (AR) Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: dementia (a decline in mental ability-including memory, language, and reasoning), mild intellectual disabilities, and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar caused by insulin resistance, where body cells fail to use insulin properly, alongside relative insulin deficiency).According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/1/26, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 99 which indicated that the resident was unable to complete this assessment.Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow proper sanitation practices for dishware and kitchen equipment to prevent microbial growth in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/15/26 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Director of Service Director (FSD) and observed that the three-compartment sink quaternary chemical sanitization solution indicated 200 parts per million (ppm) concentration. The surveyor interviewed the FSD regarding proper sanitization using sanitizer, and stated that a quaternary ammonium compound required concentration levels between 150-200 ppm. The surveyor requested that the FSD verify the sanitizer concentration level using a test strip. However, the FSD was unable to conduct the test and admitted that test strips were not available. The FSD further indicated that he would obtain the test strips immediately. The FSD confirmed that the kitchen should never run out of the sanitizer strips as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure that staff, as well themselves, failed to ensure the facility's policies and procedures were implemented to ensure resident safety and well-being by failing: a.) protect residents who were previously identified to be at risk for self-harm and suicidal ideations b.) properly assess, monitor and implement the provision of a wound treatment c.) secure and maintain resident specific medications at all times e.) maintain an accurate accountability for controlled medications. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided on 3 of 5 nursing units (nursing units 5, 6 and 7) and was evidenced by the following: A review of the undated facility Administrator job description revealed the following:The Long-Term Care Administrator oversees the daily operations of a specialized facility focused on behavior and mental health. This role is responsible for ensuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 5 (three of five) nursing units, [the third (3rd), fifth (5th), sixth (6th)] inspected and was evidenced by the following: On 1/16/2026 at11:37 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed the following on the third floor nursing unit: Room (RM) 306's rest room had a broken toilet paper holder. RM 309 C had a frayed protective mat wrapped with duct tape applied to the end of the bed. RM 313, the creases of the bathroom tiles had a brown substance on them, a broken toilet paper holder, and the toilet paper was located next to a soiled trash bin. RM 315 had a light switch box that was rusted and had flaked areas. The wall had areas of elevation that appeared to have been water damage. RM 316 had holes in the wall, a broken toilet paper holder, and a roll of toilet paper was located on a covered bathtub. RM 317 had a hole in the wall and there were other damaged areas on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of other facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards of practice to ensure: a.) accountability of controlled substance medications were consistently conducted for prompt identification of loss or potential narcotic diversion, and develop a policy and procedure for the use of an emergency electronic backup machine (electronic backup machine; EBM, b.) emergency medications were always available for administration, c.) consistent reconciliation of dispensed and administered controlled dangerous substances (narcotic medications) were accurately documented and discrepancies were immediately investigated. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) EBMs and was evidenced as follows: On 1/16/26 at 9:00 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility had one (1) EBM, and the inventory auditing procedure (cycle counts) were completed daily, during the day shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, medical record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices a.) during medication pass observation b.) during wound care observation and c.) during dining observation specifically, performing appropriate hand hygiene during the meal service to prevent the spread of potential infectionThis deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 nurses observed administering medications to 1 of 4 residents (Resident #88) during the medication pass observation task, and for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) observed for wound care and for 1 of 5 dining rooms (6th floor).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1.) On 1/16/26 at 9:22AM, the surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN #1) prepare medications for Resident #88. RN #1 prepared five medications for the resident. One of the medications was Vitamin D3 50 mcg (microgram); give one tablet by mouth daily. The surveyor observed RN #1 open the bottle and pour the medication directly into her open palm and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan with related goals and interventions each time the resident sustained a fall. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #135) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following:On 1/16/26 at 12:52 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #135 ambulating independently in the hallway without an assistive device. At that time, the surveyor attempted to interview the resident who appeared to be confused and was unable to answer the surveyor's questions appropriately. On 1/20/26 at 11:54 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #135.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, schizophrenia, unspecified (a serious mental health condition), anxiety disorder, unspecified, depression, unspecified, and primary open-angle glaucoma, bilateral, mild stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment services, consistent with professional standards of clinical practice by not performing treatments as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (one) of 1 resident (Resident #194) reviewed for skin alterations and was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Title 45, Chapter 11, Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and well-being, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist:Reference New Jersey Statutes, Title 45, Chapter 11, Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide urinary catheter (a tube used to drain urine), treatment and care, based upon current standards of practice specifically : a.) not documenting urinary outputs, and b.) failing to ensure the urinary catheter drainage bag was positioned off the floor and was not visible from the doorway, for 2 of 2 (two) residents (Resident #5 and Resident #8) reviewed for urinary catheter care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/15/26 at 12:22 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #5 lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated while being fed by staff. The surveyor observed the urinary catheter drainage bag contained within a privacy bag and positioned on the floor, visible from the hallway. On 1/16/26 at 9:31 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #5 lying in bed. The surveyor observed the urinary catheter drainage bag positioned on the floor and visible from the hallway. On 1/16/26 at 11:36 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) assess a resident's oxygen setting to ensure that the resident was receiving the correct amount of oxygen as ordered by the physician and b.) properly store a Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), machine [helps breathing by delivering air through a face mask), in a bag when not in use, in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 (one of one) resident (Resident #191) reviewed for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following: On 1/15/26 at 12:35 PM, during the initial facility tour, the surveyor observed Resident #191 lying in bed and the resident received three liters (3L) of humidified oxygen (O ) via an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that filters and delivers oxygen from the air). The surveyor also observed that the Resident's BiPAP machine was not stored in a plastic bag as ordered when not in use. On 1/16/26 at 9:29 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #191 lying in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to act upon the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #135) reviewed for medications and was evidenced by the following:On 1/16/26 at 12:52 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #135 ambulating independently in the hallway without an assistive device. At that time, the surveyor attempted to interview the resident who appeared to be confused and was unable to answer the surveyor's questions appropriately. On 1/20/26 at 11:54 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #135. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, schizophrenia, unspecified (a serious mental health condition), anxiety disorder, unspecified, depression, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Unspecified whether with Hypoxia (deficiency in the amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store and secure medication left at a resident's bedside (Resident #13). This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 5 nursing units (5th Floor) and was evidenced by the following:On 1/20/26 at 10:36 AM, the surveyor in the presence of another surveyor, observed Resident #13 lying in bed, with their eyes closed, fully dressed with a blanket over their legs. On the bedside table there was a clear plastic cup containing a clear liquid and a plastic medicine cup with two round pills, one pink-colored pill, and one slightly smaller light orange pill. The resident had their privacy curtain pulled to the side of their footboard on the bed, inhibiting access to the nightstand. The resident did not respond to surveyor inquiry.At that time, the surveyor did not observe any residents ambulating independently near the resident's room without staff present.On 1/20/26 at 10:37 AM, surveyor #2 went to find the nurse and the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to properly dispose of garbage and refuse in one of one garbage disposal areas.This deficient practice was evidenced by:On 1/15/26 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the facility's garbage disposal area. The surveyor observed container tops, food waste, plastic utensils, pieces of wood and cardboard boxes, as well as used gloves and face masks discarded on the ground adjacent to the garbage disposal containers. The surveyor also observed low-lying black tubing and additional black tubing running along the ground in the garbage disposal area. During the tour, the surveyor interviewed the FSD regarding the facility's garbage disposal practices and the presence of black tubing in the garbage disposal area. The FSD stated that maintenance of the facility's garbage disposal areas was a shared responsibility between the dietary and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required members were present during the quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee Meetings. This deficient practice occurred during 2 of 4 meetings reviewed and was evidenced by the following:On 1/15/26 at 11:39 AM, the surveyor requested to view the last four quarters of the QAPI meeting sign-in sheets.On 1/20/26 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor was provided with the QAPI Committee Quarterly Meeting Sign-In Sheets that were dated 1/23/25, 4/24/25, July 2025, and October 2025. A review of the 4/24/25 Sign-In Sheet revealed that LOA (Leave of Absence) was documented in the signature panel of a mandatory participant, the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP). Further review of the July 2025 QAPI Meeting Sign-In Sheet revealed that the signature panel that was allotted for the ICP's signature was not filled in with any data to indicate the status of the ICP's attendance at the quarterly QAPI Meeting.On 1/23/2026 at 3:04…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-08 · tag F0848 — widespread
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the arbitration agreement and admission agreement specifically provides for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties, specifically by stating in the admission Agreement a specific location where binding arbitration will be settled. This deficient practice was identified for all residents in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Review of a copy of the facility's undated admission Agreement revealed in section 9. Miscellaneous Category G, Disputes, Any controversy, dispute or disagreement arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the breach thereof, or the subject matter thereof including Facility's obligation thereof shall be settled by binding arbitration, which shall be conducted in Jersey City, New Jersey in accordance with the American Health Lawyers Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Service Rules of Procedure for Arbitration, and which to the extent of the subject matter of the arbitration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a periodic and federally mandated, standardized assessment tool, within the required time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 23 of 59 residents (Residents #2, #108, #69, #125, #90, #57, #111, #100, #60, #21, #165, #177, #136, #134, #132, #172, #83, #104, #174, #96 ,#54, and #19) reviewed for Resident Assessment and was evidenced by the following: Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual classified the Observation (Look Back) Period as the time period over which the resident's condition or status was to be captured by the MDS. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) referred to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that the assessment covered for the resident. At a minimum, facilities are required to complete a comprehensive assessment for each resident within 14 calendar days after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (QMDS), a periodic and federally mandated, standardized assessment tool, within the required time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 54 of 59 residents (Residents # 129,#51, #42, #8, #2, #108, #69, #5, #1, #125, #58, #48, #111, #100, #3, #60, #21, #159, #46, #169, #75, #138, #71, #165, #107, #177, #67, #181, #176, #136, #147, #74, #134, #132, #126, #172, #18, #23, #83, #38, #104, #13, #96, #54, #78, #19, #105, #155, #116, #182, #135, #99, #39, and #52) reviewed for Resident Assessment and was evidenced by the following: Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual classified the Observation (Look Back) Period as the time period over which the resident's condition or status was to be captured by the MDS. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) referred to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set death in facility tracking record in accordance with federal guidelines and that the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 59 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #34, #129, #58, #26 and #48 ). This deficient practice was evidenced by: The MDS is a comprehensive federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that should be completed and submitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS no later than 14 days after the assessment being completed. After transmission of the MDS, it will generate a quality measure to enable a facility to monitor the residents decline and progress. The following residents were identified that the MDSs were not transmitted timely: 1. Resident #34: the resident expired on [DATE]. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner designed to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/30/2025 from 09:33 to 9:58 AM the surveyor, accompanied the by the facility Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. In the dry storage room, a can of pear halves on 1of 4 mobile, multi-tiered storage racks had a significant dent on the bottom seam of the can. The RDN removed the dented can to the designated dented can area and told the surveyor that he noticed the dent. 2. On an upper shelf of a multi-tiered storage shelf, two (2) previously opened packages of dry pasta had no open or use by dates. The RDN removed the opened bags of dry pasta to the trash. The pasta consisted of fine noodles and rigatoni noodles. When asked what the facility practice was for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure the infection control practices for residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented in accordance with facility policy and accepted national standards, b.) follow appropriate hand hygiene practices during wound treatment, and c.) follow appropriate hand hygiene practices during incontinence rounds to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was identified in 2 of 4 resident's reviewed for transmission-based precautions (Resident's #30 and #88), 1 of 1 resident (Resident #30) observed for wound treatment, and 10 of 10 residents (Resident #30, #40, #48, #52, #81, #132, #167, #169, #187, and #187) observed during incontinence rounds. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: Hand hygiene should be performed immediately before touching a patient; before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F548 Based on observation, interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received a homelike environment during dining by removing the food from the tray and providing tablecloths. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 dining rooms, the main dining room, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 05/01/2025 at 11:50 AM during the lunch meal in the main dining room [ROOM NUMBER] residents were in attendance by surveyor count. 30 dining tables were available by surveyor count and numbered table cards. 30 tables were observed without tablecloths. The first lunch meal tray was delivered at 12:01 PM. Staff brought the meal tray into the dining room and placed the tray on the table in front of the resident. Staff removed the top pellet and then proceeded to exit the dining room. Staff proceeded to distribute resident lunch meal trays from a meal cart to residents in attendance for the lunch meal. 43 of 43 residents in attendance at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (BCP) within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs of the resident. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #185, Resident #187 and #293) and was evidenced by the following: 1.)1. According to the admission record, Resident #185 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with the following but not limited to diagnoses: paranoid schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus and heart failure. A review of the [facility name] Baseline Care Plan - V 2 revealed that there were five (5) sections to the baseline care plan and were as follows: 1. General Information and Initial Goals 2. Functional Status 3. Health Conditions 4. Dietary, Therapy and Social Services 5. BCP Summary and Signatures A review of Resident #185's base line care plan revealed that Section 1, Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was identified as having a contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity or rigidity of joints) received services to prevent further decreased range of motion (ROM) after discharge from therapy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for limited ROM, (Resident #33) and was evidenced by the following: On 4/30/2025 at 9:49 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #33 sitting in the wheelchair in the hallway. The resident's left thumb and 4th finger were noted curled inward towards the palm. When the resident was asked if they could extend their left fingers, the resident stated that they could not and that their fingers were stiff. The fingernails on both hands were trimmed and buffed. There was no skin opening on the left palm. The resident was not wearing any brace or splint. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received appropriate care and sufficient services based upon current standards of practice for a urinary catheter. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 118) investigated under the Urinary Catheter investigation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/30/2025 at 09:48 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident # 118 in bed in their room. At that time, the resident told the survey that his urinary catheter was connected to a leg bag. A review of Resident # 118's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed under, Orders that there was a Physician's Order that indicated, Monitor urine output. The order was started on 01/31/2025. There were no other orders related to a urinary catheter. A review of Resident # 118's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed in section H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain a physician order for the use of oxygen b.) obtain a physician order for the use of a suction catheter (a flexible plastic tube used to remove fluid from the airway). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #185 and Resident #68) and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 4/30/2025 at 10:45 AM, the Surveyor #1 observed Resident # 185 in the dayroom receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen). On 5/1/2025 at 11:36 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in the dayroom receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. On 5/5/2025 at 1:58 PM, the surveyor observed the resident in the dayroom receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #185. A review of the admission Record reflected Resident #185 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were notlimited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to effectively accommodate the needs and preferences of residents during dining. This deficient practice was identified for 2 residents (Residents #14 and #85) on 1 of 6 dining rooms, who were included in the review of the dining observation and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 05/01/2025 at 12:12 PM the surveyor observed Resident #85 seated alone in the main dining room eating the lunch meal. The lunch meal consisted of baked ziti, green beans, and garlic bread. Resident #85 consumed 100%of baked ziti and garlic bread. Resident #85 did not eat the green beans received. Resident #85 stated to the surveyor that the lunch was excellent. The surveyor asked Resident #85 why he/she did not eat their green beans and Resident #85 responded that he/she did not like green beans. Observation of Resident #85's meal ticket for the lunch meal on Thursday 05/01/25 revealed the following DISLIKES: Green Beans Resident #85 was provided green beans at the lunch meal when his/her meal ticket clearly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ185153 Based on interviews and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 4/23/25, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. On 4/23/25 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor requested the facility's QAPI plan and most recent meeting minutes from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA). On 4/23/25 at 11:05 AM, the surveyor interviewed the LNHA who stated she was unable to retrieve the QAPI plan and meeting minutes due to not having internet access. The LNHA stated she kept the QAPI plan and meeting minutes on her computer. She further stated she would try to email the surveyor the QAPI plan and meeting minutes. On 4/23/25 at 12:06 PM, the surveyor conducted a follow up interview with the LNHA who stated No, I am unable to print my QAPI meeting minutes. Since we don't have internet, I am unable to access it. The LNHA further indicated that the QAPI should have been readily accessible to the surveyors when requested. A review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ182091 Based on interviews and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 4/10/25, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a staff member assigned the position of Monitor was not performing direct resident care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 monitors reviewed and was evidenced by the following: According to the Facility Reportable Event (FRE), a New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) document used by healthcare facilities to report incidents with an event date of 1/1/25 revealed the Physical Therapist Aide (PTA) was approached by Resident #4 who stated the aide hit Resident #3. The PTA went to the residents' room, where the aide (Monitor #1) was performing Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) with Resident #3. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/25/24, Resident #3 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ181767, NJ181768, NJ181846 Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality were not violated when a video of a resident (Resident #1) being hit with a broom by the Director of Nursing (DON) was recorded by a staff member and sent to their friend who posted the video on a social media website. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) who was reviewed for privacy and confidentiality and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia, and Epilepsy (seizures). According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 11/02/2024, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ181767, NJ181768, NJ181846 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 12/23/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of witnessed staff to resident physical and verbal abuse toward a resident (Resident #1) to the Department of Health and to the local Police Department when the incident occurred on 06/20/2023. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following: The Surveyors and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) reviewed a video on 12/23/2024 at 10:41 A.M. found on a social media website, that revealed a staff member hitting at a resident with a broom. Several other staff members observed the incident and did not intervene. The ADON identified the resident in the video as Resident #1. The ADON identified the staff member holding the broom throughout the video as the DON. The DON was heard asking the staff that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ178766, NJ178770 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, and 10/24/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to update the care plan (CP) with interventions for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #3 & #4) for making an abuse allegation about staff to the local authorities. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Care Plan. This deficient practice was evidenced by: According to the Facility Reportable Events (FRE), a New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) document used by healthcare facilities to report incidents dated 10/18/2024, with an event date of 10/17/2024 and a time of event of 12:30 P.M., pertaining to Resident #3: Local authorities came to the facility stating they were investigating an anonymous call stating, the resident was being abused by staff. An investigation was immediately started in the presence of the local authorities. A body check was completed with the local authorities present in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ172203 Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor the rights to have in their possession a personal cell phone for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings included: The facility policy titled, Personal Property, revised in September 2012, revealed Residents are permitted to retain and use personal possessions and appropriate clothing, as space permits. A review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/09/2024 with diagnoses that included heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and depression. A review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/16/2024, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident#1's care plan, initiated on 02/22/2024, revealed the resident had a potential for alteration in psychosocial well-being due to the resident called 911 instead of a nurse for chest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of physical and sexual abuse and injury of unknown origin were reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) timely for three of seven residents (Resident (R)191, R79 and R116) reviewed for physical and sexual abuse and one of one resident (R79) reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Findings include: 1. Review of R168's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including restlessness and agitation, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of R191's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the EMR revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including schizophrenia. Review of a Nurse's Note in the EMR under the Notes tab written by Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident-to- resident abuse and injury of unknown origin were investigated thoroughly for two of seven residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse (Resident (R)191 and R79) and for one of one injury of unknown origin (R79). Findings include: 1. Review of R168's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, restlessness and agitation, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of R191's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the EMR revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of schizophrenia. Review of the facility's Reportable Event provided by Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the incident occurred on 05/05/23 at 8:49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for 14 of 35 sampled residents (Resident (R) 11, R12, R24, R38, R47, R53, R76, R80, R85, R99, R116, R145, R157 and R171). Findings include: Review of the CMS's RAI 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11, dated 10/01/23, revealed . Chapter 2: Assessment for the RAI . 05. Quarterly Assessment (A0310A = 02) The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. As such, not all MDS items appear on the Quarterly assessment. The ARD (A2300) must be not more than 92 days after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity for two of three sampled residents (Resident (R157 and R88) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 35 residents. Specifically, staff stood while assisting residents with their meals. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished self-worth, self-esteem, and feelings of embarrassment. Findings include: 1 Review of R88's admission Record found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab documented R88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included adjustment disorder and major depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/06/23 documented R88 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment and required maximal assistance with eating. Review of the Care Plan found in the EMR under the Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, document review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 46) of 35 sampled residents were maintained in a manner to ensure resident privacy, in that the computer screen on the medication cart was left open revealing R46's medications. This failure placed residents at risk of loss of the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of medical information. Findings include: Review of R46's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab documented R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an observation on 02/04/24, at 3:55 PM, the computer screen was on the top of the fourth-floor medication cart left open and was displaying R46's medications. The cart was locked and there were no staff member at the medication cart. During an interview on 02/05/24 at 3:58 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 acknowledged the computer screen had displayed R46's name and medications while she was away…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment was submitted after a new mental illness diagnosis for one (Resident (R)168) out of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Review of R168's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, restlessness and agitation, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of R168's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/10/23 and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), score of three out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of R168's Initial Assessment PASARR located under the Resident Documents tab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical records included accurate advance directives for one (Resident (R) R88) of three residents reviewed for advance directives, of a total sample of 35 residents. Findings include: Review of the admission Record found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab documented R88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included adjustment disorder and major depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment found in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] documented R88 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of R88's Physician Order for Sustaining Treatment (POLST) located in the EMR under the Miscellaneous tab dated [DATE] revealed, Attempt resuscitation/CPR .Do not intubate . Review of the Physician Orders located in the EMR under the Orders tab revealed R88…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the oxygen concentrators for two out of two residents (Resident (R) 38 and R12) of 35 sample residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/05/24 at 12:05 PM, revealed R38's oxygen concentrators was dirty with debris. Review of R38's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to on 11/19/22 with diagnosis of pneumonia. Review of the Physician Orders under the Orders tab of the EMR revealed the resident had an order dated 03/23/23 for Oxygen via nasal cannula @ [at] 4 L/min [liters per minute] continuously every shift for SOB [shortness of breath]. 2. Observation on 02/06/24 at 12:18 PM revealed R12's oxygen concentrator filter and machine were dirty with debris. Further observation on 02/08/24 at 9:41 AM, the outside of R12's oxygen concentrator machine was dirty with debris. Record review of the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side rail and failed to complete quarterly assessments for the continued use and safety of the side rail for one of one resident reviewed for side rails out of 35 sampled residents (Resident (R) 80). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Side Rails, revised 10/01/17, revealed Purpose To determine the appropriateness of bed rail use for individual residents. Procedure I. The Assessment of whether to use bed rails should include an evaluation of the alternatives to the use of bed rail that were attempted and how these alternatives failed to meet the resident's assessed needs. II. If side rails are to be used, the assessment form, Side Rail Utilization Assessment, by a licensed nurse and/or the IDT . i. Before installing a side rail, the Facility must: a. Assess the risk resident for risk of entrapment from side rails; and b. Ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, policy review and manufacturer's guidelines review, the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of infection and cross-contamination between residents in that the nurses did not disinfected the glucometer after completing R76's accu chek per the facility's policy prior to storage of the glucometer and the nurse failed to sanitize the top of the medication cart and residents' beside table after placing the unclean glucometer directly on the two surfaces for two residents (Resident (R) 76 and R4) of three residents in the sample of 35. In addition, one of one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA10) staff failed to sanitize their hands between direct contact with residents, R22 and R88. Findings include: 1 Review of R76's admission Record found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab documented R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. During an observation on 02/05/23 at 4:08 PM, Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 151371 Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to notify one (Resident (R) 12)'s representative, out of a survey sample of 17, when the resident sustained a change in her condition and had to be transported to a local hospital. Findings include: Review of a policy provided by the facility titled Notification of Change of Condition: Responsible Party/Guardian, dated 09/21/21 indicated .The responsible party or guardian is to be notified of changes in condition or occurrences to ensure that the resident's responsible party or guardian is notified of changes and/or occurrences and action and pertinent information are documented. When any one of the following instances occurs, the resident's responsible party or guardian will be notified.There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status, weight loss. Review of R12's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) 17) out of 17 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Failure to code the MDS correctly could potentially lead to inaccurate federal reimbursements and inaccurate assessment and care planning of the resident. Findings include: Review R17's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R17's EMR titled annual MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/08/23 indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS score of three out of 15 which revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated the resident had no obvious broken teeth. During an interview on 08/16/23 at 1:44 PM, R17 stated he lost weight and when asked about dental care the resident opened his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 155008 Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that narcotic pain medication was ordered and available in a timely manner for one resident (Resident (R) 7) out of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, 4.0 Schedule II Controlled Substance Medication, revised 09/2020 stated, . B. If a medication shortage is noted during normal pharmacy hours: a. A licensed nurse notifies the pharmacy and speaks to a registered pharmacist to determine the status of the order. If not ordered, place the order or re-order to be sent with the next scheduled delivery. 2. If the next available delivery results in a delay or missed dose in the customer's medication schedule . If ordered medication is not available in the emergency stock supply, notify the pharmacist that an emergency delivery is requested .C. If a medication shortage is noted after normal pharmacy hours: . 2. If the ordered medication is unavailable in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 155008 Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records related to the administration of narcotic medication was complete and contained accurate documentation for one resident (Resident (R) 7) out of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, 4.0 Schedule II Controlled Substance Medication, revised 09/2020 stated, . 3. A declining inventory sheet will be provided with each dispensed prescription for controlled dangerous medications. The form will contain the following information: customer name, medication name, medication strength, dosage form, name of prescribing physician, amount dispensed, prescription number and date dispensed .5. When a CDS (controlled dangerous substance) is administered, in addition to following proper procedure for the charting of medications, the nurse must document on the declining inventory sheet the date of administration, the quantity administered, the amount of medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$538,184 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $146,848 — penalty dated 2026-01-27
  • $207,415 — penalty dated 2025-04-29
  • $175,991 — penalty dated 2024-10-29
  • $7,930 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-09 for 38 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PBV HERMAN HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/22/2021
POPLAR OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 10/22/2021
RBNT CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 10/22/2021
SJMR, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST39%since 10/22/2021
YP INVESTORS GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST29%since 10/22/2021
FISCHMAN, ISAACIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/22/2021
PHILLIP, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/22/2021
REINER, JOSEFIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/22/2021
SMITH, SUSANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/22/2021
STERN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/22/2021

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.4M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 95%Medicare 3%Other / private 2%

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$249per resident / day
operating cost
$7,577per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$259per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315125. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next