Tallwoods Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 217 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 153.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility documents and policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 346) was protected from sexual abuse by another resident (R347). The facility then placed resident (R348) at risk for serious harm by placing R347 in R348's room following the sexual abuse incident. On 04/11/24, a past-noncompliance immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents were safe from sexual abuse. The IJ was determined to exist on 01/23/22 when an act of sexual abuse occurred to R346. The IJ was removed on 01/24/22 when R347 was placed in a private room. The Administrator was informed and provided the IJ template on 04/11/24 at 5:00 PM that the past noncompliance IJ situation existed . The facility provided an IJ Removal Plan that was accepted on 04/11/24 at 6:59 PM. The survey team validated implementation of the Removal Plan through interviews and review of training records on 04/11/24 at 7:15 PM.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a clean, safe and sanitary manner as evidenced by the following. On 11/19/25 at 10:47 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen:1. The can-opener blade had brown debris under the blade and screw area. The black interior removable sleeve of the can opener mount on the counter when removed had sticky, gelatinous substance on the outside and interior where the can opener shaft would rest . The FSD acknowledged and agreed it had not been cleaned or washed according to facility policy. 2. The microwave had multicolored food debris on the interior ceiling. The FSD acknowledged and agreed that it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 3. 3 of 4 convention ovens (2-upper and 1-lower unit), had baked on food debris on the two glass doors and on the inside surfaces. The 4th unit was not operational. The FSD did not have a cleaning schedule and acknowledged and agreed that it was not cleaned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # 2638538Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure adequate procedures for maintaining accurate records, tracking, and timely investigation of discrepancies related to controlled substances leading to actual and potential drug loss or diversion. This deficient practice was identified for a.) 1 resident (Resident #78) reviewed for pharmaceutical services and for b.) 5 unsampled residents (Residents #45, #115, #134, #142, and #168) identified during medication storage inspection of 2 of 4 medications carts (Maple High, Pine Low, and Pine Swing) and was evidenced by the following:1.) On 11/19/2025 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #78 in bed awake. The resident stated that they were not in pain. When resident was asked if they have missed any dose of their pain medication in the facility, the resident stated they have not missed any pain medication and had no complaints. On 11/20/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of clinical practice, by failing to 1.) follow appropriate disinfection of a shared resident care equipment during medication administration observation, and 2.) provide residents with appropriate products for hand hygiene during mealtime. This deficient practice was identified for 6 of 6 unsampled residents (Residents #163, #164, #104, #165, #166, and # 167) observed during medication administration and 1 of 3 dining room observations (1st Floor Pine Unit dining room). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 11/20/2025 at 7:36 AM, during the medication administration observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, Surveyor #1 observed RN #1 take the blood pressure (BP) of Resident #163 from the right arm. The BP read as 126/72. RN #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a physician's order (PO) for a resident's code status (refers to a patient's decision regarding the level of medical intervention they wish to receive in the event of a life-threatening crisis, such as cardiac or respiratory arrest). This deficient practice was identified for 1 [one] of 29 residents (Resident #139) reviewed was evidenced by the following:On 11/20/25 at 10:03 AM the surveyor observed Resident #139 lying in bed and watching TV. The Resident stated, the staff known I do not want nothing done and that I signed papers about my choice. On 11/20/25, at 10:20 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #139. The admission Record (admission summary) dated 9/12/23 reflected that the Resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but was not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lung disease with low oxygen levels in the blood), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment that was clean, safe, and sanitary. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 units (Pine Unit).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/20/2025 at 9:00 AM, in the lower side Pine Unit shower room, the surveyor observed that the ceiling vent contained black debris, and a piece of the drop ceiling was missing. A section of the drop ceiling was bulging, and the metal framing of the ceiling was stained red and brown. The first shower stall had hair in the drain and tan debris on the shower tile. The third shower stall was blocked off with yellow caution tape, and the drain was missing, leaving standing water that contained brown debris. Additionally, a motorized wheelchair was stored in the shower room, covered in a white, furry substance, with a torn cushion and pieces of fabric missing. On 11/20/2025 at 9:15 AM, in the high-side Pine Unit shower room, the surveyor observed that a toilet was missing its tank…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's Interdisciplinary Care Plan (ICP) was resident specific and reflected accurate resident care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (one) of 29 residents (Resident #139) reviewed was evidenced by the following: On 11/20/25 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #139 lying in bed, watching TV. The surveyor interviewed the resident regarding their code status (refers to a patient's decision regarding the level of medical intervention they wish to receive in the event of a life-threatening crisis, such as cardiac or respiratory arrest). The Resident stated, the staff know I do not want nothing done and that I signed papers about my choice. On 11/20/25, at 10:20 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #139. The admission Record (admission summary) dated 9/12/23, reflected that the Resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but was not limited to chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: ensure that a resident received care and services for the provision of observation, documentation, and dressing changes to IV catheter, (a small plastic tube, placed in a vein for intermittent access) site consistent with professional standards of practice and facility policy. The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for medication administration (Resident #120).As evidenced by the following: On 11/19/25 at 12:12 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #120 had an IV Catheter located in the right forearm. The surveyor observed the dressing was not labeled, dated, and loose. The adhesive of the dressing was peeling the entire circumference form the skin of the resident. The clip on the IV catheter was in the un-locked position. On 11/20/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #120 had an IV Catheter located in the right forearm. The surveyor observed that the dressing was not labeled, dated, and loose. The adhesive of the dressing was peeling the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure that all oxygen supplies were cleaned and stored according to nursing standards of practice and per facility policy b.) post cautionary signage to indicate that continuous oxygen therapy was in use for 1 of 2 residents (resident # 10). These deficient practices were evidenced by the following:On 11/19/25 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor observed on the door frame of residents #10 room. There was not any indication the resident was on oxygen (O2). Upon entering the room, the surveyor observed the resident on continuous O2, the concentrator had a humidified bottle and the setting was at 3 liters per minute (LPM), the nebulizer compressor and equipment (Small volume 5 milliliter (mL) nebulizer medication cup with mouthpiece, anti-spill T-piece, tubing) were out on the resident's nightstand, and the mouth piece was attached and hooked around siderail via the extension tubing and swinging in the open air. The medication cup was still attached to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # 2638538Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to properly store a controlled substance securely inside the medication room. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 medication rooms inspected during the medication storage and labeling task was evidenced by the following: On 11/21/2025 at 11:48 AM, during an inspection of the Pine unit medication room with Unit Manager/ Licensed Practical Nurse (UM/ LPN) #1, the surveyor observed the metal narcotic box unlocked. Inside the narcotic box was a packaging labeled Lorazepam Intensol oral concentrate 2 milligram (mg) per milliliter (ml). Inside the packaging was a bottle filled with fluid labeled Lorazepam Intensol 2 mg/ml and a medicine dropper. UM/LPN #1 stated to the surveyor that the narcotic box should be locked at all times. On 11/24/2025 at 9:30 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that narcotic boxes should be kept locked. A review of facility- provided undated policy titled Controlled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment for its staff and its residents. This deficient practice was observed in the facility kitchen and was evidenced by the following:On 11/19/25 at 10:47 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen: Two- 6 burner units in the kitchen. On 11/19/25 at 11:15 AM the surveyor interviewed the Food Service Director (FSD) who stated that only 4 burners on each stove were operational (totaling 8 of 12), They have not worked since he was employed and that he told maintenance about the issue, but it was never fixed. The FSD was unable to provide documentation of the notification to maintenance. Ie . (email, or maintenance log) of the 4 -faulty burners reporting to provide to the surveyor. He further stated the licensed nursing home administrator (LNHA) was aware. The FSD did not think it mattered since they have gotten by with 8 of the 12 burners to cook on. The surveyor observed debris in the grates, cooking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,452 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,452 — penalty dated 2024-04-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $43K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ