South Jersey Extended Care
99 Manheim Avenue, Bridgeton, NJ 08302 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 167 certified beds · (856) 455-2100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.3% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.1% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.7% | 18.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 5.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.8% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.1% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.03 | 1.11 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 85.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.0%CMS range 23.0–48.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.1–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 85.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 85.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 85.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 65.2 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 102 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to store utensils in a clean, dry location; not exposed to splash, dust, or other contaminations, and failed to keep utensils covered or inverted to maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 11/19/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), observed in the facility kitchen, a white bin labeled Flour, with a clear top. Inside of the container, the surveyor noted a white powder and a clear plastic scoop utensil resting within the powder. When asked whether the scoop utensil was normally kept within the product, the FSD responded no, they should not be left in the flour, they should be cleaned and placed in the drying area after use for sanitary reasons. On 11/20/25 at 1:53 PM, a pink wash basin was observed sitting on top of the ice machine on the C/D unit. One clear plastic and one metal ice scoop utensil were each noted within the wash basin. The ice machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of the facility's policy, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to complete reference checks on employees before their start date. The deficient practice was identified for 6 of 107 employees (Employee #1, Employee #2, Employee #3, Employee #4, Employee #5, and Employee #6), reviewed and was evidenced by the following:On 11/19/25 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) the personnel files of all the new employees who were hired since the last standard survey (6/19/2024), whether currently employed or terminated, for review by the survey team. A review of the employee personnel files revealed the following: For Employee #1, a Housekeeper with a start date of 8/20/24, there was no evidence of a reference check prior to the start of employment. For Employee #2, a Registered Nurse (RN) with a start date of 11/6/24, there was no evidence of a reference check prior to the start of employment. For Employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and home-like environment for a.) residents who required the use of a wheelchair (Resident #5, #15, #29, #37, #50, #52, #and #56) and b.) a resident who required the use of an over the toilet commode (Resident #5). This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 2 units, A/B Unit and C/D Unit, and was evidenced the following:On 11/19/2025 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #74 in the hallway, seated in a wheelchair on a seat cushion. The seat cushion had a large amount of residue buildup on the sides and a rip along the right lateral side of the cushion. The wheelchair contained a large amount of thick residue on the seat and the frame.On 11/21/2025, at 8:29 AM, during a follow-up visit with Resident #74, the wheelchair remained heavily soiled.On 11/21/2025, at 9:23 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Housekeeper/Maintenance staff member (HKM), who stated that two (2) days per week, the wheelchairs were taken apart and cleaned.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a periodic and federally mandated standardized assessment tool, within the required time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for Resident Assessment and was evidenced by the following: Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual classified the Observation (Look Back) Period as the time period over which the resident's condition or status was to be captured by the MDS. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) referred to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that the assessment covered for the resident. At a minimum, facilities are required to complete a comprehensive assessment for each resident within 14 calendar days after admission to the facility, when there is a significant change in the resident's status and not less than once every 12 months while a resident, where 12 months refers to a period within 366 days. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a periodic and federally mandated standardized assessment tool, within the required timeframe. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #5, #12, #18, and #35) reviewed for Resident Assessment and was evidenced by the following:Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual classified the Observation (Look Back) Period as the time period over which the resident's condition or status was to be captured by the MDS. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) referred to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that the assessment covered for the resident. The Quarterly assessment was considered timely if 1). The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of the Quarterly MDS was within 92 days after the ARD of the previous MDS and 2). the completion date was no later than 14 days after the ARD. The following resident records were identified to be deficient with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 10 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #2, #4, #8 and #11). This deficient practice was evidenced by: The MDS is a comprehensive federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and submitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS no later than 14 days of assessment completion. After transmitting the MDS a quality measure is generated to enable a facility to monitor a resident's decline and progress. The following residents were identified as having late assessment completions: 1.Resident #2: the Quarterly MDS was completed on 9/15/25 and was transmitted and accepted on 11/19/25.2.Resident #4: the Annual MDS was completed on 9/15/25 and was transmitted and accepted on 10/19/25.3.Resident #8: the Quarterly MDS was completed on 9/15/25 and was transmitted and accepted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: accurately account for and document the administration of controlled medications. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage, and was evidenced by the following:During medication storage review on 11/21/25 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), reviewed the C/D unit long hall nursing unit's medication cart's which revealed the following: the individual resident Controlled Drug Record log (declining inventory log) for Resident #29 indicated the 9:00 AM (9 AM) dose of pregabalin (a controlled medication used to treat pain) 100 milligram (mg) tablet was not signed out on the declining inventory log. The declining inventory log was missing Nursing Administering signatures for 11/21/25 9 AM dose. A further review revealed that the individual resident Controlled Drug Record log for Resident #23 indicated the 9:00 AM (9 AM) dose of lacosamide oral tablet 200 mg (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a). remove unwanted medication from the resident's bedside table (Resident #27), and b). properly secure medication within the medication cart for 1 of 2 nurses observed during the medication administration pass. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 11/20/2025 at 8:16 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 prepare medications for Resident #27, which included polyethylene glycol 3350 powder (used to treat constipation) 17 grams mixed with eight (8) ounces of water, and fluticasone-salmeterol 250-50 micrograms/actuation (MCG/ACT) aerosol powder inhaler (used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). LPN #2 then locked the medication cart and took the medications into the resident's room. Resident #27 took two swallows of the water containing the polyethylene glycol, then placed the cup on the overbed bedside table and stated that they did not want the remainder of the medication. The LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) received at least 12 hours of mandatory in-service training annually for 1 of 5 CNAs reviewed (CNA #1). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 11/24/25, at 11:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the provided in-service education for five (5) randomly selected CNAs for the years 2024 and 2025, which revealed the following: CNA #1, with a date of hire of 6/30/15, had 9.25 hours of in-service training from date of hire anniversary dates (June 2024 - June 2025). On 11/25/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON), in the presence of the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the survey team. The DON stated she was responsible for the CNA in-service training and that it was important for CNAs to complete 12 hours of education annually to ensure the CNAs know how to properly care for the facility's residents. At that time, the DON confirmed that CNA #1 did not meet requirement for 12 hours of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-19 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Surety Bond was in place to provide coverage to protect resident personal needs account funds held by the facility. The deficient practice effected all residents who had personal needs funds held by the facility and was evidence by the following: On 06/13/24 at 2:00 PM. and again on 06/14/24 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor requested a facility Surety Bond from the Liscensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA). On 06/14/24 at 9:30 AM, the LNHA provided a Funds Balance Report for 06/03/24 which listed 48 active residents with a combined balance of $20,829.05. The surveyor again requested a Surety Bond from the LNHA. On 06/14/24 at 12:20 PM, the LNHA provided a Commercial Crime Policy effective: July 24, 2023- July 24, 2024, for a Bond Limit: $90,000. The policy did not specify any coverage to secure resident funds. On 06/14/24 at 11:37 AM, during an interview with the LNHA, in the presence of four surveyors, the LNHA provided a copy of a surety bond, effective June 14, 2024 for $100,000. The surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of Nursing Staffing Report sheets, Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Reports and facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing served as a charge nurse only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents for 7 of 16 days reviewed The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for 05/07/2023 through 05/13/2023 revealed the facility had one RN for the day shift on 05/12/2023. On 05/12/2023, the census was 100 residents. A review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for 05/26/2024 through 06/01/2024 revealed the facility had one RN for the day shift on 05/26/2024 and 05/27/2024. On 05/26/2024, the census was 92 residents. On 05/27/2024, the census was was 91 residents. A review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for 06/02/2024 through 06/08/2024, revealed the facility had one RN for the day shift on 06/08/2024. On 06/08/2024. the census was 90 residents. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-19 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) regular in-service education based on the outcome of employee job performance appraisals. The deficient practice was identified for 3 of 10 CNAs reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility provided documents titled, Employee Job Performance Appraisals revealed eleven measurable attributes such as but not limited to, Job Expectations, Adaptability, Leadership, and Dependability. Each attribute also has a comments section and a goal section. Each attribute can be scored with a numeral revealing the following: 0 - Fails to Meet Expectations 1 - Needs Immediate Improvement 2 - Meets Expectations 3 - Above Average 4 - Excellent A review of CNA # 1's Employee Job Performance Appraisal revealed a score of 1 under Adaptability. Number 1 indicated, Needs Immediate Improvement. The comments and goal section were left blank. On the reverse side of the document under Leadership, the score was 1. The comments and goal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe consistent manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 06/13/24 between 09:24 AM until 10:01 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen in the presence of the Dietary Manager (DM): 1. On 06/13/24 at 9:25 AM, the surveyor observed a Dietary Aid (DA) preparing food during the initial tour of the kitchen and was noted not wearing a beard guard. The DM stated that all staff have been trained according to the policy and procedure of the kitchen to wear proper attire while working in the kitchen. He confirmed that all staff must wear a hairnet and beard guard to prevent food contamination. The DA left the workstation and walked towards the entrance to put on his beard guard. 2. On 06/13/24 at 9:27 AM, the surveyor observed an opened package of hot dog buns containing 3 buns left in the package that was not dated with an opened date and use by date. The DM stated that items need to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator failed to ensure that facility policies and procedures were developed and consistently implemented. This failure to ensure a system was in place for residents who smoked independently and held their own smoking material and lighter, had the potential to effect all residents on 3 of 3 resident units and was evidenced by the following: On 06/13/24 at 2:03 PM, three surveyors observed a person walking behind the building on a path by the woods. The surveyors approached the person, who was by him/herself, to interview them, while the person was headed toward the road and then turned toward the parking lot. The person identified him/herself as Resident #25 and stated that he/she lived at the facility. The surveyors accompanied Resident #25 for the duration of the walk throughout the parking lot and into the main entrance and then asked the Receptionst about the resident walking around the building. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-19 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to submit accurate No RN [Registered Nurse] Hours Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Report to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The deficient practice was identified for 4 of 7 infraction dates on the PBJ Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 2 January 1 - March 31. A review of the PBJ Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 2 2024 January 1 - March 31 revealed the following days as ,Infraction Date under the No RN Hours Metric: 01/27 01/28 02/24 02/25 03/10 03/23 03/24 A review of the facility provided document titled, The Following RN rotation coverage revealed that on 01/27/2024 and 01/28/2024, the facility's current Director of Nursing worked as an RN. At that time, the DON was not promoted to the DON role. A review of the same document revealed that on 03/23/2024 and 03/24/2024 the [NAME] President of Clinical Services worked as the RN. On 06/19/2024 at 1:57 PM during an interview with the surveyor, the current DON revealed she became the DON sometime in April of 2024. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident room and the resident environment was free of insects, and that staff addressed a resident in a dignified manner. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #55) and was evidenced by the following: On 06/13/24 at 10:28 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #55 in bed and there was a noticeable urine odor in the room and the resident's urinary catheter was lying on the bed. Resident #55 stated, he/she was waiting for coffee at that time and acknowledged there was an odor. Black flies were noted scattered throughout the room and when asked the resident about the flies, the resident confirmed he/she was aware of the flies. Resident #55 then stated the smell isn't from me. On 06/13/24 at 2:01 PM, Surveyor #1 and #2 observed the resident in bed on top of a pink bedspread, with the urine catheter also on the bed and the bed remote next to it. The surveyors observed two black flies on the bedspread, one on the remote and observed flying in the room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #12 preferences had been accommodated. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #12) for accommodation of needs and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour on 6/14/24 at 10:31 AM, interview with Resident #12 revealed that would like to get out of the bed at a certain time and their wishes had not been honored. On 6/17/24 at 10:14 AM surveyor #2 followed up with Resident #12 regarding their concerns. The observation of Resident #12 revealed that Resident #12 was in bed dressed in a hospital gown. Resident #12 was upset and was crying to the surveyor and stated that he/she had not been able to contact their family. Resident #12 further stated that their belongings were still at the other facility and could not get in touch with the Social Worker (SW). When inquired if the resident enlisted the assistance of the SW at the current facility, Resident #12 stated, yes but nothing had been done. On 6/17/24 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the smoking policy was followed to ensure the safety for residents who smoked and held their own cigarettes and lighters. This deficient practice occurred for 2 of 2 residents who held their own lighters (Resident #22 and #25) and was evidenced by the following: a. During the initial tour on 6/13/2024 at 09:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #22 in their room. Upon inquiry, Resident #22 informed the surveyor that he/she was a smoker. On 06/17/2024 at 10:38 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #22 in the designated smoking area and was smoking. On 06/18/2024 at 09:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #22 in their room. Resident #22 informed the surveyor that they held their own cigarettes and lighter. The resident showed to the surveyor their cigarettes and lighter and stated that the facility was aware. On 6/18/24 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #22's medical record. The admission Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a resident bathroom toilet (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]) in a sanitary working condition for four days and was evidenced by the following: On 06/13/2024 at 9:58 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed the toilet in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The toilet bowl was observed with brown debris and paper products in the bowl. There was no water observed in the toilet. The resident stated that the toilet does not work, and the facility was aware the toilet had been broken for a few days. On 06/13/2024 at 12:59 PM, the surveyor reviewed the unit maintenance log sheets. The toilet in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was not on the log sheets to be repaired since 5/24/24. There was a work order dated 6/12/2024 for the paper towel dispenser in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] needing batteries which was completed the same day. On 06/13/2024 at 1:12 PM, the surveyor observed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain all resident rooms and common areas in a clean and sanitary manner. The deficient practice occurred on 1 of 3 units and in the Sub-Acute smoking courtyard and was evidenced by the following: On 6/13/24 at 10:41 AM, two surveyors toured the Sub-Acute smoking courtyard and observed cigarette butts were located throughout the lawn area surrounding the gazebo, on top of a garbage can and partially filling the inside of an open bucket that rested on the ground which included empty cigarette packages. There were signs posted to utilize cigarette disposal not the ground. On 06/17/24 at 9:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #47 in bed and observed the privacy curtain was stained in several areas, there was soiled areas on several walls and a broken window blind with flies in the room. The surveyor asked about the flies and the resident confirmed there were flies in the room. On 06/19/24 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the survey team informed the LNHA, Director of Nursing and Interum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level II assessment after a resident was newly diagnosed with a mental illness. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review PASARR (Resident #44) and was evidenced by the following: Resident #44 was a resident of the facility. On 06/13/2024 at 11:43 AM the surveyor reviewed the Level I PASARR (a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) for Resident #44 dated 12/21/17 which was negative, meaning the resident did not have any mental illness diagnoses that could lead to a chronic disability. The surveyor reviewed the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/4/2023. The MDS reflected that Resident #44 was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of depression. On 06/13/24 at 1:49 PM the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of records, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care, and personal hygiene care for 1 of 2 residents. (Resident #12) reviewed for activities of daily living. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/17/24 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #12 in bed. Resident #12 was alert and stated that incontinence care was not provided in a timely manner. When asked to elaborate, Resident #12 stated he/she was assisted with incontinence care at 11:00 PM and again this morning at 3:00 AM. Upon inquiry, the resident stated that he/she had not received care yet. The resident further stated that he/she was soiled and would like to be changed. The surveyor left the room and informed the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager. The Unit Manager provided the surveyor with the assignment sheet and identified the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) assigned to the resident. On 06/17/24 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor interviewed the CNA who had Resident #12 on her assignment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to identify conflicting physician's orders for emergency treatment on the medical record for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (a medical procedure involving repeated compressions of a person's chest, performed in an attempt to restore blood flow to and breathing of a person whose heart stopped), resident #49. This deficient practice was evidenced by: A review of Resident #49's Order Summary Report in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that, resident #49 had a full code order with a start date of 05/02/2024, and a DNR/DNI (do not resuscitate/do not intubate (to insert a tube into a person's throat, to help with breathing) order with a start date of 01/29/2024. A review of Resident #49's New Jersey Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated 10/03/2022, contained the following order: Do not attempt resuscitation, allow natural death, and do not intubate. On 06/17/2024 at 12:33 PM, during an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a system was in place and followed to review and notify physicians of laboratory values. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #47) and was evidenced by the following: On 06/17/24 at 9:39 AM, observed resident in bed and respond pretty good I guess when asked how was doing. A review of the electronic medical record revealed resident was discharged to the hospital and admitted for six days, and a discharge summary from the hospital, revealed the discharge diagnoses that included acute kidney injury, altered mental status, dehydration, hypernatremia (elevated blood sodium levels), Diabetes Type 2 and Urinary Tract Infection. A Nutrition Note dated: 06/12/24, timed 17:15 [5:15 PM] that was completed by the Registered Dietitian, revealed: Assessment and Plans: Resident is on a NCS [no concentrated sweets] puree diet. Intake varies. Is supplemented with 237 ml Glucerna daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order (PO) for an orthotic device for 1 of 1 resident (Resident#14) reviewed for positioning and mobility. On 06/13/2024 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #14 in the bed. An orthotic device was observed near Resident #14's right elbow. According to the admission Record, Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis including but not limited to; multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease of the central nervous system), cerebral infarction (a stroke) and hemiplegia (paralysis). Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool utilized to facilitate the management of care, dated 03/30/2024, reflected that the resident was cognitively intact and had impaired use of the upper extremity on one side of the body. Review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 06/18/2024 did not reveal an order for Resident #14's orthotic device for the right elbow. Review of Resident #14's current Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician orders related to the use of continuous oxygen (O2) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #42) reviewed for the use of oxygen. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/13/2024 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor observed a staff member assisting Resident #42 via a recliner chair, into the common area of the facility. The surveyor observed Resident #42 was wearing a nasal cannula attached to a portable O2 tank and the amount was set at 2 liters per minute (lpm) of oxygen. On 06/14/2024 at 8:43 AM, the surveyor observed the resident's privacy curtain drawn around the bed and could hear a staff member assisting the resident. At that time, the surveyor observed the resident's recliner chair in the hallway. The portable O2 tank was on the back of the chair and there was tubing with the nasal cannula wrapped around the tank. The nasal cannula was not in a protective covering and was exposed to the environment. On 06/14/2024 at 8:59 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) appropriately don (put on) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and b.) store respiratory equipment to prevent contamination and exposure to the environment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/13/2024 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor observed a staff member assisting Resident #42 via a recliner chair, into the common area of the facility. The surveyor observed Resident #42 was wearing a nasal cannula attached to a portable O2 tank and the amount was set at 2 liters per minute (lpm). On 06/14/2024 at 8:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #42's portable O2 tank was on the back of the recliner chair in the hallway. The surveyor observed that there was tubing with the nasal cannula wrapped around the tank. The nasal cannula was not in a protective covering and was exposed to the environment. On 06/14/2024 at 8:59 AM, the surveyor returned and observed Resident #42 in bed with his/her eyes closed and the oxygen tubing with the nasal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 00167157 Based on interview and rerecords review, it was determined that the facility failed to address Resident #194's (Activities of Daily Living ) ADLs care needs by ensuring that the resident was independent with care prior to discharge. The facility did not have a care plan that addressed discharge. The facility discharged Resident #194 without addressing and acknowledging family members voiced concerns of the resident being unable to independently care for himself/herself. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for discharge and was evidenced by the following: On 6/17/24 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #194's closed medical record. Resident #194 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 6/30/23. Resident #194's diagnoses included but were not limited to; Hypertension, pulmonary emboli, deep vein thrombosis, pneumomediastenum, multiple hemorrhagic strokes and intravenous drug use. A review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 00167157 Based on interviews, record review and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident call system was maintained in operable condition as evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 11:30 AM, the surveyor entered a random resident's room and asked the resident to activate the call light in the room. The surveyor went into the hallway and observed that the light was flashing and an audible sound could be heard. During an interview with the residents, they indicated that the call light was working but staff would take time to answer the call light. One of the resident revealed that 30 minutes could elapsed before staff would answer the call light. The surveyor reviewed the Maintenance logs and observed on 2 of the 4 units the following entries: Unit CD: [DATE] outside call light broken, repaired [DATE] (room [ROOM NUMBER]) [DATE] light not working repaired [DATE]. (room [ROOM NUMBER]) [DATE] call light knob…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT# NJ166159 Based on observations, interviews, medical records review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 8/4/2023, 8/7/2023 and 8/8/2023, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's movement in and out of a room was not restricted. The Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA #1) tied the resident's bedroom door handle with a plastic trash bag (trash bag) and attached the other end of the trash bag to the handrail located just outside the resident's room door, which resulted in the resident not being able to exit the bedroom into the hallway. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 sampled Residents (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following: According to the face sheet, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia, schizophrenia, seizure disorder, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT# NJ166159 Based on observations, interviews, medical records review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 8/4/2023, 8/7/2023 and 8/8/2023, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged violation and investigation to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). The alleged violation was reported to staff regarding an incident that involved a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA #1) who tied the resident's bedroom door handle with a plastic trash bag (trash bag) and attached the other end of the trash bag to the handrail located just outside the resident's room door, thus restricting the resident's ability to exit in and out of the room. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following: According to the face sheet, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia, schizophrenia, seizure disorder, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 03/20/23 from 9:40 AM to 10:34 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen in the presence of the Dietary Director (DD): 1. The surveyor observed the [NAME] who wore gloves as he prepared cooked pork to be served during lunch that day. The [NAME] then doffed (removed) his gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to taking the surveyor on a tour of the kitchen. 2. In the walk-in refrigerator: a. On the top shelf of a four-tiered rack, there was an eight-pound container of potato salad that was marked with a use by date of 04/02/23 and failed to contain an opened date. The [NAME] stated the item was required to be discarded within three days after it was opened, and he confirmed that the opened date could not be determined. The [NAME] then proceeded to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was identified that the facility failed to provide residents with a clean, home like environment. This deficient practice was identified on one of three nursing units, (the AB unit) and for two (2) of 21 resident's, (Resident #45 and Resident #48) reviewed for environment and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 03/20/23 at 10:23 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #48 laying in bed in his/her room. The surveyor further observed a Tube Feeding (TF) pole in the resident's room. The bottom of the TF pole had caked, tan material imbedded on it. The surveyor saw that the resident's beige colored privacy curtain was pushed back towards the wall by the head of the resident's bed and had a large brown, circular stain on it. At that time the surveyor attempted to interview Resident #48, but the resident was non-verbal. On 03/21/23 at 11:05 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #48 in his/her room seated in a reclining chair next to the bed. The surveyor further observed tan spillage on the bottom of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool utilized to facilitate the management of care) for 2 of 21 residents reviewed (Residents #45 and #65). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/20/23 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #45 seated in his/her room eating breakfast. According to the Medical Record, Resident #45 was admitted with a diagnosis that included schizophrenia (a mental illness.) The surveyor reviewed the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I and Level II for Resident # 45. It reflected that the resident had a serious mental illness. The surveyor reviewed Resident #45's Significant Change in Status MDS dated [DATE]. Section A1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review reflected that Resident #45 was currently NOT considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services, consistent with professional standards of clinical practice by not a.) performing neurological checks (neuro-checks, an assessment of an individual's neurological functions, motor and sensory response, and level of consciousness) for a resident that fell and hit their head and b.) following facility policy and procedures. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 28) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Title 45, Chapter 11, Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a.) conduct a complete and thorough fall investigation and b.) update and implement fall prevention interventions on a resident's Care Plan (CP). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: According to Resident #28's admission Face Sheet, Resident #28 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but was not limited to obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, dementia, and seizure disorder. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool utilized to facilitate the management of care) dated 10/26/22, indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment and severe impairment with decision making. The MDS also reflected that the resident was independent with ambulation (walking). On 03/20/23 at 10:00 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-28 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received the food on the meal ticket and adhered to resident preferences. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 38) reviewed for food preferences and accuracy of meal tickets and was evidenced by the following: On 3/20/23 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #38 lying in bed resting. According to the Medical Record, Resident #38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but not limited to: End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and Hyperkalemia (high Potassium in the bloodstream). A review of the most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care) dated 1/10/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 out of 15, indicating Resident #38 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #38's care plan dated 2/13/22, revealed weight loss/gain/fluctuated related to ESRD, with interventions that included, assess dietary preferences. On 3/23/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-03-28 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a Social Worker (SW) with the required one year of supervised social work experience in a healthcare setting working directly with the individuals per the facility's job description and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 SW employed and was evidenced by the following: On 03/22/23 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor interviewed the SW who stated that she worked in the facility for eight (8) months and that she was the only SW in the facility and did not have a SW degree. The SW stated that her degree was a Bachelors Degree in Behavioral Science and stated, I did this (job) for people with disabilities before. On 03/24/23 at 11:00 AM, during a follow up interview with the SW, the surveyor inquired about the SW's job orientation. The SW stated that she had not much of an orientation and that when she was hired that she shadowed another SW in another facility for one day. The SW stated when she was hired the facility had not had a SW…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEISZ, MARK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/29/2002 |
| COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2002 |
| KRAUSMAN, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2002 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315061. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.