The Arbor at Laurel Circle

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 354 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 42.0 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.49 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.84 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.74 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 169997 Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) thoroughly review the hospital discharge summary (After Visit Summary) and communicate the recommendations for an anti-anxiety (AA) medication to the physician, and b.) follow a physician's order for an AA medication (Clonazepam) ordered to be administered daily at bedtime. This resulted in Resident #152 not receiving the physician ordered AA medication for 14 days (from 12/5/23 through 12/19/23) which resulted in Resident #152 experiencing a change in behaviors which included: agitation, anxiety, insomnia and wandering at night. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #152), reviewed for medication administration and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy to ensure reference checks were completed for 18 of the 52 (Employee #1 through #18) newly hired employees reviewed since last survey of 9/13/2024. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1/13/2026, the surveyors reviewed the provided employee files which did not reveal reference checks for the following employees.Employee #1 with a date of hire (DOH) of 10/20/2025Employee #2 with a DOH of 9/2/025Employee #3 with a DOH of 10/21/2025Employee #4 with a DOH of 10/20/2025Employee #5 with a DOH of 1/29/2025Employee #6 with a DOH of 6/4/2025Employee #7 with a DOH of 3/27/2025Employee #8 with a DOH of 12/9/2024Employee #9 with a DOH of 7/28/2025Employee #10 with a DOH of 10/18/2024Employee #11 with a DOH of 10/22/2025Employee #12 with a DOH of 9/20/2025Employee #13 with a DOH of 10/29/2024Employee #14 with a DOH of 7/28/2025Employee #15 with a DOH of 10/1/2025Employee #16 with a DOH of 9/29/2025Employee #17 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to change respiratory equipment in a manner to prevent contamination for infection control. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #23), and was evidenced by the following:On 1/9/26 at 11:13 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #23 in their bedroom seated in their wheelchair. The surveyor observed an oxygen concentrator (device that delivers oxygen) with nasal cannula (device that delivers additional oxygen through the nose) tubing placed on the oxygen concentrator with a piece of clear tape with the date 12/5. The resident stated that they used oxygen at all times. The surveyor also observed a nebulizer machine located on the bedside table with tubing attached. The nebulizer mask tubing had a clear piece of tape with the date 12/5. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the remote healthcare food service pantry area, and adjacent storage room was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent the potential for food borne illness. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/10/24 at 11:34 AM, the surveyor toured the healthcare food service pantry in the presence of the Food Service Supervisor (FSS). -During the meal set up, and placement into the steam table, the surveyor observed an ant crawling up the wall in the kitchen and several small flying insects in the pantry. The FSS stated there was an ant issue and the facility was notified and the pest people sprayed for ants. At that time, the surveyor observed that there was splatters in several areas on the wall and crumbs and other debris on the floor behind the equipment and in the corners. The surveyor asked about cleaning and the FSS stated the floors are swept and mopped. The surveyor asked if a deep cleaning was performed, including moving mobile equipment and cleaning the entire pantry. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) have a system in place to ensure activities were conducted as scheduled, and 2) have a system in place to ensure residents were receiving their identified activity preferences to support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #34, on 2 of 2 units and was evidenced as follows: A review of the facility provided policy and procedure, Community Life Services [name redacted] Policies and Procedures revised 1/2024, included but was not limited to; Monthly Program Calendars. There are 3 neighborhood calendars. Calendars are distributed for each neighborhood. On 09/09/2024 at 6:36 PM, the surveyor toured the Seasons Unit (SU) and observed that two residents (one unsampled and Resident #34) were in the common area while the other six residents were in their rooms or in bed. One of the two residents was visiting with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were consistently implemented, revised after each fall and supervision was provided for residents at risk for falls. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #34) reviewed for falls and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 09/09/24 at 7:04 PM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #9 in bed, the bed was in a low position, the resident was non verbal and would not respond to the surveyor. Surveyor #1 observed a folded floor mat on the side of the bed in the resident's room. On 09/10/24 at 8:42 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #9 sitting in a wheelchair at the bedside. Resident #9 was awake and alert and able to feed themselves after the breakfast tray was set-up. On 09/11/24 at 9:32 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #9 in bed. The bed was in a low position. the surveyor observed a floor mat on the right side of the bed in the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to self- identify concerns and develop and maintain an effective data-driven Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for: a) reviewing adverse events, including medication errors and falls, b) ensuring an effective pest control program was maintained, c) ensuring kitchen sanitation was maintained, and d) ensuring activity programs occurred as scheduled. The deficient practice was as evidenced by the following: Refer: 679E, 684G, 689E, 812F, 925E On 09/12/24 at 1:44 PM, the Liscensed Nursing Home Administrator (LHNA) provided the QAPI minutes for August 2024. The document revealed the following QAPIs: Admin [LHNA]-N/A [not applicable]; Community Life-N/A; EVS [environmental services]- Turnover of rooms after discharge; Nusing-Infection Control, Anti-biotic Stewardship, Falls [# of falls per LNHA], Rehospitalizations; Dietary-Continue to address monthly weights; Food Services-Continue to address labeling of food products, Continue to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for the healthcare dining room, attached meal service pantry and food storage area. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/10/24 at 11:34 AM, the surveyor observed the meal preparation in the healthcare pantry, located on the 2nd floor, with the Food Service Supervisor (FSS) present. The trays were being assembled for distribution to the resident and for dining room service. The surveyor observed an ant crawling up the wall in the kitchen and several small flying insects in the pantry. The FSS stated there was an ant issue and the facility was notified and the pest people sprayed for ants. At that time, the surveyor observed that there was splatters in several areas on the wall and crumbs and other debris on the floor behind the equipment and in the corners. The surveyor asked about cleaning and the FSS stated the floors are swept and mopped. The adjacent storage room contained debris on the floor and in the corners, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the healthcare dining room in a clean and homelike manner. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/10/24 at 11:34 AM, the surveyor observed the meal preparation in the healthcare pantry, located on the 2nd floor, with the Food Service Supervisor (FSS) present. The trays were being assembled for distribution to the residents who eat in their rooms. At that time the surveyor observed an ant crawling up the wall in the kitchen and several small flying insects in the pantry. The FSS stated there was an ant issue and the facility was notified and the pest people sprayed for ants. At that time, the surveyor observed that there were splatters in several areas on the wall and crumbs and other debris on the floor behind the equipment and in the corners. The surveyor asked about the pantry cleaning and the FSS stated the floors are swept and mopped. The adjacent storage room was observed and contained debris on the floor and in the corners, the walls also had splatters and stains. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident-centered on-going care plan for a resident who sustained multiple falls. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility provided policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022, included but was not limited to; Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. On 09/09/24 at 6:32 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #34 in the Seasons Unit (SU) day room visiting with a family member. The family member stated that the resident had fallen multiple times. On 09/11/24 at 8:24 AM, the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen and respiratory related treatments were provided in a manner to prevent the spread of infection and injury for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #153) reviewed for respiratory care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/10/24 at 10:55AM, in the room of Resident #153, the surveyor observed an oxygen cylinder by the chair in a canvas carrier, unsupported, not in a cylinder holder. The oxygen tubing was wrapped around top of cylinder with a label dated 8/30/24. The surveyor did not observe an oxygen in use sign on the door or over the bed. The surveyor also observed a nebulizer machine on Resident #153's bedside table, with a mask wrapped in a paper towel. The surveyor did not observe a label on the nebulizer tubing/mask. Resident #153 stated to the surveyor that their breathing was ok and that they were on oxygen when they first came to facility but they had not used it for at least two weeks. Resident #153 also stated that they no longer received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,857 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,857 — penalty dated 2024-09-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ