St Catherine Of Siena

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 2% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 25.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.25 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 10% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following:On 5/26/26 at 5:25 PM, in the presence of Food Service Director (FSD) the surveyor observed the following1. The Dietary Aide (DA#1) was observed wearing with large hooped earrings in the kitchen. DA#1 stated they were not aware they could not wear large earrings in the kitchen. The FSD stated they would provide education the entire kitchen staff.2. On a 4 shelf, dish storage rack, the surveyor observed a dust-like build up on each shelf. The FSD stated the shelves would be cleaned immediately.3. In the cooking area, on the 6-range stovetop the surveyor observed burnt on food-like particles and a blackish grease-like substance on the griddle. The FSD stated there is a cleaning schedule and the equipment would be thoroughly cleaned.4. In the walk-in refrigerator, the surveyor observed a dust-like substance on the fan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0811 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  repeat deficiency Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure Feeding Assistance staff were assigned to feed residents that did not have complex diets (the physical/mechanical texture of the food).This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident # 17 and Resident # 28) and was evidenced by the following: 1. A review of Resident #17's admission Record face sheet (admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Parkinsons disease (a progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement), Epilepsy (a group of neurological disorders characterized by seizures), unspecified dementia (Loss of memory, language, problem solving that interfere with daily living) and vision loss in both eyes.A review of Resident #17's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 (0…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within the resident's reach (Resident #25). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 28 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #25, and was evidenced by the following: On 5/28/26 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 in their bed with the call bell at the bottom of the bed, wrapped around the bed frame not within the resident's reach. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #25.A review of the admission Record reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; chronic kidney disease, dementia, and a history of falls. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 4/20/26, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). A review of Resident #25's Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that a specialty low air loss mattress was accurately set and monitored according to the resident's weight for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #25) and b.) failed to provide a resident with a wound the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcer development for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #4). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:According to the U.S. CDC guidelines Hand Hygiene Recommendations, Guidance for Healthcare Providers (HCP) for Hand Hygiene and COVID-19, page last reviewed 1/8/2021 included that the HCP should perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with the residents and immediately after glove removal. In addition, when cleaning your hands with soap and water, wet your hands first with water, apply the amount of product…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of facility policies, it was determined the facility failed to provide new fall interventions following a residents fall, accurately code the Minimum Data Set ((MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care), follow a Physician Order (PO) for residents who had a history of falls. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #25 and #27) reviewed for falls. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 6:39 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #27 in bed with the eyes closed. Resident #27's bed was observed in the lowest position to the floor and had a partial bedrail (a safety device attached to the sides of a bed, designed to prevent patients from falling out of bed and to assist with mobility.) On [DATE] at 7:29 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (E-mar) for Resident #27. A review of the resident's Face sheet (FS) (an admission summary) revealed the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy it was determined that the facility failed to follow Physician Orders (PO), individualized care plan (ICP), and facility policy by not providing a privacy bag for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (IUC). This deficient practice was noted for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed with IUC, (Resident #6). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 5/26/26 at 6:24 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 in bed with an IUC (flexible tube that is inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) bag observed connected to bedrail without a privacy bag. Resident#6 stated they do not recall having a privacy bag for their IUC. On 5/26/26 at 6:49 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (E-mar) for Resident #6.A review of the resident's Face sheet (FS) (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system), retention of urine (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a Physician's Order (PO) for an Oxygen (O2) dependent resident and failed to include or revise the person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) for O2 therapy, in accordance with professional standards of practice.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all certified nursing assistants (CNA) received 12 hours of mandatory in-service training as required annually. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 5 CNA files reviewed and was evidenced by the following:A review of the in-service records for 5 randomly selected CNAs revealed that 3 of 5 CNAs did not have the required 12 hours of annual in-service training by their anniversary date.1. CNA #1 had a hire date of 3/14/2024 and completed 11 hours, 12 minutes of training.2. CNA #2 had a hire date of 10/24/2024 and completed 6 hours of training.3. CNA #3 had a hire date of 12/5/2011 and completed 11 hours, 42 minutes of training.On 05/28/26 at 11:27 AM, the surveyor reviewed the in-service training tracking forms for the 3 CNAs with the Infection Preventionist (IP), who was also the Staff Educator. The IP stated that the 3 CNAs did not meet the annually required 12 hours of in-services.On 5/28/26 at12:45 PM, the surveyor team met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) received an annual performance review for 5 of 5 CNA files reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/27/24 at 12:08 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the annual performance reviews that were done for 5 randomly selected CNAs. On 12/30/24 at 9:17 AM, the LNHA stated that the facility did not have any performance reviews for the 5 CNAs. She added that the Director of Nursing (DON) had the forms that were to be used but that she had not done the reviews yet. The facility did not provide any documented evidence that the 5 CNAs received an annual performance review. On 12/30/24 at 12:36 PM, in the presence of the survey team, the surveyor told the LNHA and DON the concern that the 5 CNAs did not have an annual performance review. On 12/31/24 at 10:44 AM, in the presence of the survey team and the LNHA, the DON stated that she had been at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a) Certified Nurses Aides (CNA) received 12 hours of mandatory in-service training for 5 of 5 CNAs reviewed (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, CNA #4 and CNA #5); and b) CNA education included abuse and resident rights for 1 of 5 CNAs reviewed (CNA #1). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 12:08 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the annual education that was provided to 5 randomly selected CNAs. On [DATE] at 8:41 AM, the LNHA stated that the facility had a book of the education provided which were in person sessions with sign in sheets but that not everyone signed that they attended. She added that the facility did not use a computer-based education system and did not have an educator. On [DATE] at 9:11 AM, the LNHA provided the binder of inservice sign in sheets that the facility had done. The LNHA stated that capturing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,171 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $9,116 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
• $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $3,174 — penalty dated 2023-10-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $90K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ