Little Brook Nursing And Convalescent Home
78 Sliker Road, Califon, NJ 07830 · For profit - Corporation · 36 certified beds · (908) 832-2220 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0610), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 8 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $355,418 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.8% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.5% | 8.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.3% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.9% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.1% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.2% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.6% | 12.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 7.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.17 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.25 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 27.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00185571 Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents on 07/01/2025 and 07/02/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a physician-ordered intervention to supervise and provide safety to residents from physical abuse by another resident (Resident #7,) who has a known history of aggressive behaviors towards other residents. The abuse occurred when facility staff failed to supervise, and to provide one-to-one (1:1) monitoring of Resident #7. This allowed the resident the opportunity to strike Resident #5 on the head with a metal object, causing laceration (cut) that required transfer to the hospital for treatment. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #7, 1 of 1 residents reviewed and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the Facility Reported Event [FRE] dated 04/14/2025, which revealed that Resident #7 was observed striking Resident #5 with a grabber (a metal device used to assist residents grab items that are out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ183318, NJ183964 Based on interviews, medical records review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 3/12/25 and 3/13/25, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an abuse allegation that involved a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) and Resident #1. The facility also failed to ensure its policy titled Abuse Investigations was implemented during the alleged abuse allegation. On 2/4/25 at approximately 12:40 P.M., the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) was notified by two representatives of the Ombudsman office that CNA #1 was trying to get Resident #1 out of bed, and the resident was screaming. The LNHA went to the resident's room, and Resident #1 told her that he/she did not want CNA #1 touching him/her. Resident #1 expressed to the LNHA and the Registered Nurse (RN #1) that CNA #1 pulled and hurt his/her left arm. RN #1 conducted a skin assessment that revealed bruising to Resident #1's left thumb. The LNHA stated she conducted an investigation and suspended CNA #1 immediately on 2/4/25. The LNHA did not conduct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Part A Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident with a PO (physician's order) for NTL (nectar thick liquid, liquid thickened with an agent for a nectar like consistency) to prevent aspiration (accidental breathing in of fluid or food into the lungs). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for modified liquid diet consistency. On 10/23/24 at 12:28 PM, during lunch observation, the surveyor observed Resident #19 coughing while the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) was assisting Resident#19 with their meal. LPN #1 informed the surveyor that the resident started coughing after LPN #1 fed Resident #19 whole mandarin oranges in its own thin juice. LPN #1 stated that Resident #19 was on nectar thickened liquid. The surveyor observed thickened water, thickened coffee, and mandarin oranges in thin liquid juice on the resident's meal tray. The surveyor checked the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #s NJ00155172, NJ00161276, NJ00160806, NJ00159306 Refer to F760K; F835L; F836L Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 29 residents were adequately supervised when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 worked 24 hours straight, six times in May 2023 with one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 on the assignment during designated shifts. The failure to have adequate staff led to a lack of supervision for residents, which increased the risk of improper care, resident neglect, accidents such as falls, entrapments or elopements, and/or medication administration errors or omissions. Serious injury or death may have occurred due to staff inability to respond to an emergent situation in a timely manner. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The facility was notified of the IJ on 6/5/23, and it continued until 6/8/23, when the facility implemented their written removal plan. The facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) was notified of the IJ on 6/5/23 at 2:26 PM. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #s NJ00155172, NJ00161276, NJ00160806, NJ00159306 Refer to F689, F756, F760, F836 Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure a.) staffing levels outlined in the Facility Assessment Tool were consistently met to address the population census and needs of their residents; b.) minimum State staffing requirements were met for 17 weeks of 17 weeks reviewed during which time the facility continued to admit residents; c.) safe medication administration to residents resulting in significant medication errors; d.) Consultant Pharmacist (CP) monthly medication review reports were acted upon by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Physician in a timely manner; e.) adequate supervision and competent staff when Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1) would sleep during excessive continuous hours at work, leaving no nurse to supervise the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and no nurse to supervise the 29 residents while LPN #1 slept. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2023-06-15 · tag F0836 — widespreadEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #s NJ00155172, NJ00161276, NJ00160806, NJ00159306 Refer to F689, F756, F760, F835 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-resident ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey for 118 of 119 day shifts, 54 of 119 evening shifts, and 10 of 119 overnight shifts. The failure of the facility to operate safely by following State minimum staffing requirements while continuing to admit new residents placed all residents at risk for serious harm, impairment or death. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 1/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes, indicated the New Jersey Governor signed into law P.L. 2020 c 112, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:13-18 (the Act), which established minimum staffing requirements in nursing homes. The following ratio(s) were effective on 2/01/21:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-06-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Refer to 760K Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations dated 3/7/23 were acted upon in a timely manner regarding the documentation and administration of critical medications, including anticoagulants and insulin medications to prevent serious adverse outcomes for Resident #13, #19 and #20 who required blood sugar monitoring and were dependent on insulin, and Resident #17 and #230 who had physician orders for an anticoagulant to prevent blood clotting. The failure to act upon the CP recommendations in a timely manner to ensure all residents were accurately receiving the necessary medications in the appropriate timeframe in accordance with their physician's orders to prevent an adverse outcome placed all residents who received critical medications at risk for a serious outcome. The failure to monitor and document blood sugars and administer insulin when indicated per the physician's order is likely to result in hypoglycemia (low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-06-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. The surveyor observed Resident #25 on 5/24/23 at 10:54 AM, receiving personal care from the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The surveyor again observed the resident on 5/26/23 at 11:45 AM, awake in bed watching television. The resident was alert and oriented and able to answer simple questions. A review of the hybrid medical record revealed the following: According to AR, Resident #25 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of the left lower extremity (also known as DVT). The resident was care planned (5/29/23) for using anticoagulant therapy related to DVT. Interventions included: Administer anticoagulant medications as ordered by the physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness q [every] shift. Monitor/document/report PRN [as needed] adverse reactions of anticoagulant therapy: blood tinged or red blood in urine, black, tarry stools, dark or bright red blood in stools, sudden severe headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, blurred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint: NJ183318, NJ183964 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 3/12/25 and 3/13/25, it was determined that the facility failed to complete Section C of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) and failed to follow its policy titled MDS for 6 of 6 sampled residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in September of 2023 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Unspecified Dementia, Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and Depression. A review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/22/24 under Section C0100 (Should a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) be Conducted?) revealed a code of 1 which indicated Yes. The surveyor reviewed Sections C0200 (Repetition of Three Words), C0300 (Temporal Orientation), C0400 (Recall), and C0500 (BIMS Summary Score) which revealed blank spaces. Under Section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ183318, NJ183964 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 3/12/25 and 3/13/25, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) update the care plan (CP) with interventions for a resident (Resident #1) involved in a staff to resident abuse allegation and b.) for residents (Resident #3 and #4) involved in a resident-to-resident incident. This deficient practice was identified in 3 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in September of 2023 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Unspecified Dementia, Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and Depression. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/22/2024, Resident #1 had a blank space for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score. Under the Assessment section of the electronic medical record (EMR), Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 8 out of 15 on 3/11/2025, which indicated the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ183318, NJ183964 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 3/12/25 and 3/13/25, it was determined that the facility failed to report an abuse allegation involving a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) and Resident #1 to the local Police Department. The facility also failed to follow its policies titled Resident Abuse Prohibition Policy and Reporting Abuse to State Agencies and Other Entities/Individuals. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in September of 2023 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Unspecified Dementia, Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and Depression. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/22/24, Resident #1 had a blank space for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score. Under the Assessment section of the electronic medical record (EMR), Resident #1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ1833183, NJ183964 Based on interview and review of facility documentation on 3/12/25 and 3/13/25, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate the performance of a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on an annual basis. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 CNAs whose personnel files were reviewed (CNA #2). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/12/25 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor reviewed the employee files for 3 CNAs which were provided by the facility. The surveyor identified the following: CNA #2 had a hire date of 10/23/23. According to CNA #2's personnel file, there was no documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed. On 3/12/24 at 3:19 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Business Office Manager /Human Resources (BO/HR) who confirmed there was no annual performance evaluation completed for CNA #2. The BO/HR stated the Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for completing the annual performance evaluation. She further stated the previous DON would have been responsible for completing CNA #2's performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0640 — widespreadEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately transmit the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 20 of 32 residents reviewed, Residents #25, #3, #13, #10, #28, #1, #7, #17, #31, #231, #32, #33, #22, #27, #28 and was evidenced by the following: On 10/23/24 at 10:44 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment task that included the Resident's MDS Assessments. The MDS is a comprehensive federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and submitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS up to 14 days of the assessment being completed. After transmitting the MDS, it will generate a quality measure to enable a facility to monitor the residents decline and progress. The following residents were identified that the MDS were not transmitted timely: 1. Resident #25 was triggered under the survey facility task as MDS record over 120 days old. Resident #25 was observed to have an admission MDS with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/10/24 and was due to be transmitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) received a performance review for one (1) of five (5) CNA files reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/22/24 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor requested from the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) and Business Office Manager (the annual education, competencies, and performance reviews for five randomly selected CNAs. The facility provided a copy for each of the five CNA's records which contained their post tests for the education they received. The facility did not provide performance reviews for the five CNAs. On 10/29/24 at 12:02 PM, the surveyor interviewed the DON regarding performance reviews who stated that she did not complete all the required annual performance review for everyone who was hired within the last year except for 1 CNA. The DON confirmed that the other 4 CNAs did not have performance reviews. A review of the facility's policy titled, Job Descriptions - Written with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 10/22/24 9:07 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. The surveyor observed three dented cans (6 lb. peaches, 6 lb. potatoes, and 6 lb. shredded potatoes) stored with all intact canned goods. FSD stated those cans should have been removed and placed in the dented can area. 2. The surveyor observed the canned goods stored on the top of the storage unit were warm to the touch with a heat vent observed on ceiling next to the canned goods. 3. The surveyor observed three portable window air conditioning units (AC). All three AC units were observed with a blackish dust like build up on the vents. The AC unit located next to the 3 compartment sink and food prep area was also noted with a brown colored sticky substance on the left vent. The FSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1. ensure the sharps container (SC) that were filled with contaminated sharps/needles were disposed properly, 2. ensure the used COVID19 Ag test card was discarded after use, 3.ensure the clean linen room was free from soiled device and 4. ensure the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) cart was cleaned to prevent the spread of infection. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/22/24 at 9:00 AM, two surveyors observed a used COVID19 Ag test card exposed laying on the table right by the entrance door where all the visitors and staff enter the facility. The surveyor further observed that the COVID19 Ag test card showed a one red line indicating the results was negative (-). The surveyor also observed a red bio hazard bin next to the table where the test card was observed. On 10/22/24 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Business Office Manager (BOM) who stated the facility provided COVID19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ174200 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident's dignity by, a. not providing an incontinent resident the correct size of incontinence briefs (IB) and b. standing over the resident while feeding during mealtime. This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #21 and Resident #18) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/28/24 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #21 in their room seated in an upward position in their bed. Resident #21 was observed eating their breakfast. The surveyor observed the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1) feeding Resident #21 while standing over them. The surveyor interviewed CNA #1, who stated they know they should be seated next to the resident during feeding assistance but could not provide an explanation why they were not seated. A review of the admission Record (AR) (an admission summary) for Resident #21 which revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #14 and Resident #27) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by: The SNF ABN provides information to beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. If the SNF provides the beneficiary with the SNF ABN, the facility has met its obligation to inform the beneficiary of his or her potential financial liability and related standard claim appeal rights. On 10/22/24 at 10:27 AM, the facility provided the surveyor with a list of residents who were covered under Medicare A benefits, was discharged from the facility within the last 6 months from October 2022 and should have received the SNF ABN form. The surveyor reviewed Resident #14 and Resident #27 who were listed discharged from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's representative and the Office of the Ombudsman in writing for an emergency transfer to the hospital. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, Resident #9, reviewed for hospitalization. On 10/23/24 at 9:28 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #9. A review of the physician's progress note dated 4/20/24, revealed that the resident had a recent hospitalization. A review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 4/15/24, reflected that Resident #9 was discharged to the hospital with a return anticipated to the facility. On 10/23/24 at 12:06 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON), who stated she reviewed the book of letters which contained a report to the Office of the Ombudsman and to the residents' representatives but was unable to find them. The DON further stated that in May 2024, she started to do the notification because there had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to reflect the resident status in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #7) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The MDS is a comprehensive tool that is federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. 1. On 10/23/24 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #7 seated in the wheelchair inside the room, watching television. The resident was able to answer the surveyor's inquiry. On 10/24/24 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record (HMR) of Resident #7, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR) (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with significant weight changes (a weight change of 5% in 30 days and/or 10% in 180 days) were addressed by the Registered Dietitian (RD) in a timely fashion. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for significant weights changes (Resident #3 and #14), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/22/24 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 seated in their wheelchair on the outside deck of the facility. Resident #3 stated they had weight gains and losses but was not sure of their current weight. A review of Resident #3' admission Record (AR) (admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but were not limited to paranoid schizophrenia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and muscle wasting and atrophy. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (Q/MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 9/15/24 reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of clinical practice for accurately administering medications according to the physician's order (PO). This deficient practice was identified in 1 (one) of 12 (twelve) residents (Resident #20) observed during the medication observation pass. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label, store, and dispose medications in one (1) of two (2) medication carts inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 11:35 AM, the surveyor inspected medication cart #1 in the presence of a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1). The surveyor observed an opened vial of Fiasp insulin with an opened date of [DATE] and was expired. The surveyor also observed two opened bottles of Pro-Stat AWC (protein supplement), one bottle had an opened date of [DATE] and a second bottle with an opened date of [DATE]. Both bottles of Pro-Stat AWC were expired. At that time, the surveyor interviewed LPN#1 who acknowledged that both the Fiasp insulin vial and the two bottles of Pro-Stat AWC were expired and should have been removed from the medication cart. A review of the manufacturer's specifications for the following medications revealed that the Fiasp insulin had an expiration date of 28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received liquids in the appropriate consistency at meals in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/26/24 at 11:37 AM, during the kitchen inspection, the surveyor observed Resident #1's lunch tray with tray card listing the resident's diet, diet consistency and liquid consistency. The surveyor further observed Resident #1's tray card which revealed the current diet order was Regular diet, mechanical soft consistency (mechanical soft diet consists of any foods that can be blended, mashed, pureed, or chopped using a kitchen tool such as a knife, a grinder, a blender, or a food processor) and nectar thick liquids (nectar thick liquids are thicker than water, fall slowly from a spoon, and are sipped through a straw or from a cup). The surveyor observed a cup with a clear liquid labeled nectar on Resident #1's tray. A review of the Resident Face Sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for (1) one of (5) five residents (Resident #28) reviewed for unnecessary medication. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/23/24 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #28 in bed, awake, covered with a blanket, and unable to answer the surveyor's inquiry. On 10/23/24 at 11:23 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record of Resident #28, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #28 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified dementia (memory loss), unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances. A review of the recent annual Minimum Data Set (An/MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 9/8/24, reflected that Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ#173220 Based on interview and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of Abuse/Neglect to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJ DOH) in the required timeframe for 2 of 2 sampled residents, (Residents #29 and Resident #81). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/28/24 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed a Reportable Event Record/Report Form (RER/RF) provided by the facility. The form was dated 4/24/24 and documented an event that occurred on 4/20/24 at 3:30 PM involving Resident #81 and Resident #29. The report documented Resident #81 touched Resident #29's face and attempted to remove the resident's glasses from Resident #29's face. Resident #29 who was startled and reacted by swatting Resident #81's hand away. The facility's activity director was present during the time of the incident and was able to separate both residents and notified the nurse. Further review of the REF/RF form revealed an event date of 4/20/24 at 3:30 PM and the NJ DOH was notified by the facility via a phone call on 4/24/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint#: NJ00171484 Based on interviews, review of electronic medical records (EMR), and other pertinent facility documentation on 03/04/24, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record by having an incomplete smoking assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues), anxiety disorder, and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of Resident #1's 10/10/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care revealed, that the resident did use tobacco. Review of Resident #1's 01/07/24 Quarterly MDS revealed that Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated that the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #1's Smoking- Safety Screen, (Smoking Assessment), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C #: NJ167461, NJ169331, and NJ169500 Based on interview, medical records (MR) review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 12/7/23, 12/11/23, and 12/12/23, it was determined that the facility failed to report four allegations of resident to resident abuse to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) and follow their facility policy on Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property Prevention for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident 4, and Resident #6) reviewed for incident and accident, investigation and reporting. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Dementia and Macular Degeneration The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 9/27/23, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C #: NJ167461, NJ169331, and NJ169500 Based on interview, medical records (MR) review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 12/7/23, 12/11/23, and 12/12/23, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that four allegations of resident to resident abuse were thoroughly investigated according to their facility's policies on Reporting Accident and Incident and Resident Abuse Prohibition Policy for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident 4 and Resident #6) reviewed for incident and accident investigation and reporting. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Dementia and Macular Degeneration. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 9/27/23, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A Care Plan (CP),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C #: NJ167461, NJ169331, and NJ169500 Based on interview, medical records (MR) review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 12/7/23, 12/11/23, and 12/12/23, it was determined that the facility failed to revise residents care plans (CP) for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #4, and Resident #6) reviewed for CP revision. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Dementia and Macular Degeneration. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 9/27/23, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 which indicated cognition was severely impaired. The MDS further revealed that Resident #1 had a fall prior to the MDS assessment. A Care Plan (CP), initiated on 12/20/21, reflected that Resident #1 was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that three (3) Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #1, #2, #3) had competencies to assess nursing care for residents' needs. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/01/23 at 3:25 PM, the surveyor reviewed the requested nurse competencies for LPN #1 provided by the Director of Nursing (DON). The competencies were for handwashing, covid antigen nasal swab testing, enteral nutrition feedings, and personal protective equipment donning and doffing. The competencies were done between 9/2022 and 11/2022. On 6/1/23 at 3:30 PM, the surveyor asked the DON if LPN #1 had completed other competencies. The surveyor also requested competencies for the other two (2) LPNs (LPN #2 and #3) who worked at the facility. The DON stated that no other nurse competencies were found. She stated she would call the former DON to see where they were filed. No additional nurse competencies were provided to the surveyor. Additionally, the facility did not have a policy for nurse competencies.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), it was determined that the facility failed to complete the annual Nurse Aide performance appraisals for 4 of 4 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: On 6/5/23 at 9:36 AM, the surveyor requested the annual Nurse Aide performance appraisals for CNA #1, 2, 3, and 4. The LNHA referred the surveyor to the Director of Nursing (DON). On 6/5/23 at 12:12 PM, the DON told the surveyor that the performance appraisals were not done. The DON stated, I will begin them now. On 6/5/23 at 1 PM, the surveyor requested the facility policy regarding employee annual performance appraisals. The policy was not provided to the surveyor. NJAC 8:39-43.17(b)
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure that medications were administered and accurately signed in the electronic medication administration record (eMAR). This deficient practice was identified for 13 of 13 residents (Residents #4, #11, #13, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #26, #79, #179, #229, and #230) reviewed for medication management. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-15 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist (IP), Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director (MD), or designee attended the quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings. This was identified for 2 of the 3 quarterly QA meetings reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the QA meeting sign-in sheets for the last three (3) quarters dated April 26, 2023, January 25, 2023, and September 30, 2022. Reviewing the sign-in sheets for those 3 quarters revealed no DON signatures to show that the DON was in attendance for September 30, 2022 and January 25, 2023 QA meetings. There were no IP signatures to show that the IP was in attendance for January 25, 2023, and September 30, 2022, QA meetings, and there were no MD signatures to show that the MD attended the QA meeting on September 30, 2022. On 5/25/23 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), who confirmed the abovementioned concerns. The LNHA stated that she knows the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes his/her quality of life during lunch. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #11) who required assistance to eat and were not being assisted while the other residents at the same table were either eating or being assisted. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/24/23 at 12:20 PM, during lunch in the dining area, the surveyor observed Resident #11 seated in a geri-chair (a chair that can fully recline with wheels to provide a portable, spacious seat) at a table with two (2) unsampled residents. All three residents had their lunch trays in front of them, and Resident #11's lunch tray remained covered. One of the unsampled residents could eat independently, and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assisted the other unsampled resident at a hospice company (HCNA). The HCNA was seated between the unsampled resident she was feeding and Resident #11. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain current and past-employer reference checks prior to hiring in accordance with the facility's abuse policy and procedure for screening newly hired employees. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 5 newly hired employees and was evidenced by the following: On 6/5/23, the surveyor reviewed pre-screening for five (5) newly hired employees. Three of the 5 employees listed below had no reference checks performed before starting work at the facility. a) A Dietary Aide (DA) who began working at the facility on 5/12/22. b) A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who began working on 3/13/23. c) A Registered Nurse (RN) who began working on 3/10/23. On 6/5/23 at 9:20 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), who stated the DA, CNA, and RN did not have pre-employment reference checks done. The LNHA stated the facility's policy is to perform them before hiring. The LNHA did not give a reason for the omissions. The LNHA provided the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to document the circumstances of the resident change of condition leading to emergency transfer and the resident's readmission to the facility post-hospitalization. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #26, #4) reviewed for hospitalization. The evidence is as follows: 1. The surveyor observed Resident #26 sitting in bed on 5/24/23 at 10:45 AM. The alert and oriented resident discussed her various medical conditions with the surveyor. A review of the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following information: The admission Record (AR) listed diagnoses of displacement of nephrostomy catheter, irritable bowel syndrome, diabetes mellitus, hypotension, kidney failure, and urinary tract infection. The 3/19/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool indicated the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A Social Service (SS) Progress Note written on 4/14/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) assess a weight change for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutritional status, which did not contribute to weight loss, Resident #229, and b.) follow the physician's order (PO) for medication used to raise blood pressure for 1 of 1 resident, Resident #26. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states, The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 5/30/23 at 12:20 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for respiratory care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/24/23 at 10:11 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed receiving oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator at two (2) liters per minute (lpm). The oxygen tubing was not labeled to indicate when the tubing had been changed. On 5/25/23 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed with eyes closed, receiving oxygen. The tubing was not dated. On 5/25/23 at 10:17 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) told the surveyor the resident always used oxygen, She needs it. The CNA stated nurses and CNAs encourage the resident to use oxygen. The CNA revealed the nurse changes the oxygen tubing once a week. On 5/25/23 at 11:10 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) told the surveyor that the resident used oxygen continuously. She stated the nurse routinely changed the tubing weekly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication observations on 5/25/23 and 5/26/23, the surveyors observed one (1) nurse administer medications to five (5) residents. There were twenty-seven (27) opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed, calculated to a medication administration error rate of 13.5%. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents observed (Resident #18) that were administered medications by one (1) nurse. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/25/23 at 8:46 AM, during the morning medication pass, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) preparing eight (8) medications which included one (1) Aspirin Enteric Coated (EC) 81 milligram (MG) tablet for Resident #18. On 5/25/23 at 9:01 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #1 preparing thickened water and stated that she would administer the eight (8) medications to Resident #18. At that time, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and review of documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices to prevent the development of food borne illnesses. The deficient practice was observed and was evidenced by the following: On 05/18/21 at 10:27 AM, during the tour of the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following: 1. Inside the reach-in freezer: -An opened clear bag of chicken nuggets. The bag did not have an identifier label, a received on date, or an opened on date. The FSD confirmed that the bag contained chicken nuggets. -An opened clear bag of unidentifiable white pieced items. The bag did not have an identifier label, a received on date, or an opened on date. The FSD stated the bag contained frozen diced chicken -An opened blue bag of frozen white and brown items. The bag did not have an identifier label, a received on date, or an opened on date. The FSD stated that the bag contained stuffed potatoes. -Frozen hot dogs contained in clear wrap. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility's Administrator failed to ensure that the facility was in compliance by following their policy and procedures. The Administrator did not: a.) maintain or have readily accessible facility policies and procedures; b.) maintain life-saving medical equipment; c.) store resident care supplies in a sanitary manner to prevent infection, and d.) maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Refer to: F689; F880; F881 A review of the Administrator's job description dated [DATE] included the primary purpose of the Administrator's job position is to direct the day to day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to the residents at all times. The Administrator is delegated the administrative authority, responsibility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards and procedures to address the risk of infection transmission by failing to: a.) perform proper hand hygiene and perform a wound treatment in a safe and sanitary manner for 1 of 1 nurse observed providing a wound care treatment, to 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #6); b.) maintain and store sterile and non-sterile resident care equipment in a safe and sanitary manner; c.) follow appropriate hand hygiene practices for 2 of 2 nurses who administered medications to 3 of 6 residents (Resident #20, #24, and #26) during the medication pass; d.) implement a handwashing policy that adheres to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines; and, f) ensure that their Infection Control Policies and Procedure (ICPP) manual was reviewed annually; and, g) ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory equipment. (Residents #13 and #28). This deficient practice was evidenced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to a.) report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an allegation of abuse for injuries of unknown origin and b.) follow the facility's Resident Abuse Prohibition Policy. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin (Resident #17 and #20). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 05/18/2021 at 11:05 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #20 seated in a high back wheelchair with a chair alarm to the back of the chair, doing puzzles and eating snacks in the dining area. The surveyor reviewed the medical records for Resident #20. According to the admission Record, Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on 10/2020. Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 02/11/2021, reflected the resident was hospitalized . Review of the Significant change MDS dated [DATE], indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to investigate injuries of unknown origins in accordance with the facility's Resident Abuse Prohibition Policy. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin (Resident #17 and #20) and was evidenced by the following: On 05/18/2021 at 11:05 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #20 seated in a high back wheelchair with chair alarm to the back of the chair, doing puzzles and eating snacks in the dining area. The surveyor reviewed the medical records for Resident #20. According to the admission Record, Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on 10/2020. Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 02/11/2021, reflected the resident was hospitalized . Review of the Significant change MDS dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a medical diagnoses that included but was not limited to: Hypertension (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) an assessment and evaluation for restraint use was performed and b.) obtain a consent with disclosure of risk versus benefits for use the of a restraint for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for restraints. (Resident #28) This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the facility admission Record, Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in 4/2021 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; down syndrome and pneumonitis (inflammation of lungs) due to inhalation of food and vomit. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 4/20/21, revealed that the resident had short and long term memory impairments, required total care with activities of daily living, was receiving oxygen therapy, and limb restraint was used daily. Review of the Universal Transfer form from the hospital dated 04/13/21, revealed that the resident had a diagnosis of pneumonia, was receiving oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan in a timely manner for 1 of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident #21) This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 05/18/21 at 09:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #21 in bed pointing to his/her head sutures. The resident stated a few days ago he/she was walking to the kitchen and fell backwards striking his/her head on the floor. Resident stated he/she was using the walker at the time. According to the admission Record, Resident #21 was admitted in 4/2020 with diagnoses which included by were not limited to: dementia, cerebral infarction (stroke), and altered mental status. Review of the resident's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 4/8/21, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 which indicated that the resident's cognition was intact. Review of the resident's care plan (CP) initiated on 4/10/2020 with a revision on 4/14/2020,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of clinical practice with medication administration for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #24) observed for medication pass. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey state: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and well-being, and executing a medical regimen as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey state: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to a.)ensure the implementation of physician orders for bilateral heel boot for a resident at risk for skin breakdown for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for position and mobility (Resident #15) b.) obtain a physician's order for oral suctioning for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #28) and c.) ensure suction machine equipment was available and in working order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, (Resident #28). 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 05/18/21 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #15 in bed resting with both eyes closed. The surveyor observed a pair of heel boots on the dresser next to the resident's bed. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 03/21/2021, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility in 12/2020 with medical diagnoses that included but not limited to: hypertension (high blood pressure), non-Alzheimer dementia and depression. The residents Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) was 00 which indicated the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that emergency medical equipment was maintained and stored in a safe and sanitary manner for 1 of 1 nursing units reviewed for emergency equipment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 12:45 PM, the surveyor entered the facility's Therapy room. The Therapy room, which was used for storage, included a staff bathroom. The surveyor observed the emergency response kit (backup medication box) was unlocked, lying directly on the floor in the staff's bathroom under the handwashing sink. At that time, the surveyor interviewed the Acting Director of Nursing (ADON), who stated that she did not know that it was there or when the lock was removed. She stated that the pharmacy should have been notified when a medication was removed so that it could have been replaced and another lock would have been issued to secure the emergency response kit. She stated that it should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to order as needed psychotropic medications for a 14-day period for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #3) for medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in May of 2019 with medical diagnosis which included but were not limited to: dementia with behavioral disturbance, generalized anxiety disorder and depressive episodes. The surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #3 for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications (any drug capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior). Review of the Physician's Order Sheet revealed a physician's order dated 01/25/21 for alprazolam (generic for Xanax) 0.5 mg (milligram) one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for severe anxiety. The physician's order did not contain a stop date of 14 days as required. The facility was unable to provide complete and documented evidence of Resident #3's Medication Administration Records for January through March of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-05-21 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify in writing, the resident's representative and the representative of the Office of Ombudsman about the resident's transfer or discharge to the hospital. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization (Resident # 20) and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the admission Record which indicated Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in 10/2020. Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 02/11/2021, reflected the resident was hospitalized . Review of the Significant Change MDS dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a medical diagnoses that included but not limited to; hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (high blood sugar), and fracture. Review of progress notes reflected Resident #20 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to a fall and returned to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation or evidence that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2021-05-21 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the posted 24-hour staffing information was current. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/19/2021 at 8:45 AM, the surveyor observed the 24-hour staffing information posted in the front entrance vestibule was dated 3/24/2021. During an interview with the surveyor on 5/19/2021 at 10:56 AM, the Office Manager (OM) stated that she was responsible for posting the 24-hour staffing information in the front entrance vestibule after it was completed by the night shift nurse. The OM further stated she was unsure of when the 24-hour staffing information was last updated and posted. On 5/19/2021 at 11:09 AM, the surveyor and OM observed the 24-hour staffing information posted in the front entrance vestibule and confirmed that it was dated 3/24/2021. The OM stated that it should have been updated and posted daily. During an interview with the surveyor on 5/19/2021 at 12:00 PM, the Acting Director of Nursing (ADON) stated the 24-hour staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2021-05-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct ongoing review for their Antibiotic Stewardship Program. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During an interview with the surveyor on 05/20/2021 at 12:27 PM, the Acting Director of Nursing (ADON) stated she knew nothing about the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. When asked if the facility utilized a tracking tool for residents with infections, the ADON was only able to provide a list of antibiotics generated by the facility's pharmacy company. During an interview with the surveyor on 05/20/2021 at 1:00 PM, the Medical Director (MD) stated the facility used to hold quarterly meetings related to antibiotic usage, but they were stopped due to COVID. The MD further stated that the facility used to collect data on antibiotic usage, but he was unsure if there was anything in place currently since the previous DON left. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Recap form, undated, included the most recent data for resident infections was March 2020. Review of the Long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$355,418 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $62,493 — penalty dated 2025-07-10
- $255,403 — penalty dated 2025-03-18
- $37,522 — penalty dated 2024-10-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FERNANDEZ, ROSA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | 51% | since 11/09/2005 |
| HAMPILOS, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/09/2005 |
| LAZARE GROUP, INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/13/2002 |
| BETHANE PROPERTIES, INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/13/2002 |
| BRADFORD, CYNTHIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/27/2021 |
| SEGARAM, SANDIRA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2005 |
| CAISSIE, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| FERNANDEZ, ROSEMARIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/30/2005 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $395K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315467. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.