No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Abigail House For Nursing & Rehabilitation

1105 -1115 Linden Street, Camden, NJ 08102 · For profit - Partnership · 188 certified beds · (856) 365-8500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1 Cooper Plz · (856) 342-2040 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
433 N 7th St · (856) 541-8242 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
433 N 7th St · (856) 963-2665 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Cornelius Martin Park, 562 N 10th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.5%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.3%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.3%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.4%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.2%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table49.2%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.1%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.9%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.072.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.731.111.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
82.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 82.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.5%CMS range 44.6–64.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.8–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge82.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge83.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.4%CMS range 5.9–14.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.341.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
39.4%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 176.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-17)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. Nursing staff failed to wear gloves and/or perform hand hygiene while performing FSBS. 1. Review of R61's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the EMR revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of R61's Physician Order, dated 06/28/22 and located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed R61 was to receive a fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS) test two times a day every two days. 2. Review of R150's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the EMR, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and schizoaffective disorder. Review of R150's Physician Order, dated 01/25/23, indicated R15 was to receive a FSBS test two times a day every seven days. During an observation on 04/04/23 at 4:02 PM, LPN3 performed finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) tests for Residents (R61 and R150). LPN3 retrieved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This is a repeat deficiency. Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe consistent manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/4/25 from 9:39 AM until 10:37 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD): 1. The FSD lifted the lid of the ice machine to display its contents. The surveyor noted that the ice release cover had multiple areas of brown and gray debris on it. The surveyor asked the FSD to wipe the area with a paper towel. The FSD wiped the ice release cover and then showed the surveyor the paper towel which was then soiled with a brown substance. The FSD stated that if the substance were mold, it would be black, not brown in color. The FSD stated that the ice machine was not sanitary and might be unsafe for use. The FSD stated that the ice machine should be cleaned every month, but he was unsure when it was last cleaned. There was no maintenance log maintained on the ice machine to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's individual comprehensive care plan after psychotropic medications were discontinued for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for mood and behavior. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/4/25 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #38 lying in bed. The resident was not experiencing any behaviors at that time. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia and unspecified psychosis. A review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 1/30/25, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed the only psychotropic medication the resident received in the last seven days was an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) administer medications according to manufacturers' instructions for 1 of 2 nurses observed during the medication administration pass, b.) ensure the accountability of the narcotic shift to shift count logs were completed for 1 of 3 medication carts inspected, and c.) complete and maintain copies of Federal narcotic order forms (DEA 222 forms) for 3 of 3 DEA 222 forms reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 4/7/25 at 9:20 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 prepare medications for Resident #95. The LPN dispensed six medications, including a ferrous sulfate elixir 220 mg (milligrams)/5 ml (milliliters). The LPN poured 7.5 ml into a medicine cup and administered the medication to the resident without diluting it in water or juice. When the resident drank the ferrous sulfate elixir, he/she grimaced. A review of the Order Summary Report (OSR), dated as of 4/7/25, included a physician's order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 nurses on 2 of 3 units (A Wing and C Wing) administering medications to 2 of 6 residents (Resident #137 and #231) making 2 errors out of 26 medication opportunities which resulted in a medication error rate of 7%. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 4/7/25 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 administer medications to Resident #231. The LPN dispensed four medications, including one tab of multivitamin with minerals. After administering the medications, the LPN signed off an order for plain multivitamin as administered (Error #1). A review of the Order Summary Report (OSR), as of 4/7/25, included a physician's order for Thera Oral Tablet (Multiple Vitamin) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for vitamin deficiency, with a start date of 3/29/25. A review of the April 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly secure medication within the medication cart for 2 of 2 nurses observed during the medication administration pass, and b.) store medications within acceptable temperature ranges for 2 of 3 medication storage areas (B Wing and C Wing) reviewed for medication storage. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 4/7/25 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 prepare medications for Resident #30. When the nurse entered the resident's room to administer the resident's medications, she did not lock the medication cart before leaving the medication cart unattended. On 4/7/25 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #3 prepare medications for Resident #231. When the nurse entered the resident's room to administer the resident's medications, she did not lock the medication cart before leaving the medication cart unattended. On 4/7/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #3 prepare medications for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents that maintained a Personal Needs Account (PNA) that approached the limit that could jeopardize a resident's eligibility for Medicaid or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) received a written notification. This deficient practice was identified for all residents who maintained Personal Needs Accounts at the facility and was evidenced by: A review of the Patient Fund Balances Report through 4/4/2025 revealed a list of 171 active resident names with a balance of $104,879.71. There were nine (9) residents listed with PNA funds that range from $2,014.77 to $2,723.14. There were ten (10) residents listed with PNA funds that range from $1,801.93 to $1,965.65 On 4/7/25 at 12:02 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Business Office Manager (BOM) in the presence of the survey team who stated her role regarding the PNA was that she reviewed the monthly balances and completed the transfers and maintained the trust account. The BOM stated that she tried to maintain each resident's PNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and a review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Saturday mail services to residents. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident interviewed during the Resident Council group meeting (Residents #50) and was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 10:44 AM, the surveyor conducted the Resident Council (RC) meeting with Residents #50, #74, #115, #137, and #152. During RC, the surveyor asked the residents if they received mail on Saturdays and Resident #50 stated that he/she never received mail on a Saturday while living at the facility. Residents #115 and #137 stated they did not normally receive mail on a regular basis because nobody sent them mail. Residents #74 and #152 did not reply when asked if they received mail on Saturdays. On 4/10/2025 at 12:20 PM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), in the presence of the DON and the survey team, stated that he was not sure if the facility received mail on Saturdays. He further stated that the mail was delivered to the business…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's room in a sanitary and homelike manner. This deficient practice was evidenced on 1 of 3 resident units (C-Wing) and was evidenced by the following: On 4/4/25 at 10:10 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor entered an unsampled resident's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]-B). The bed remote was noted to have a buildup of a hard brown substance. The bed frame contained a buildup of dust and small particles. The windowsill was also noted to have a buildup of dust. On 4/8/25 at 10:41 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Housekeeper (HSK), who stated that she cleaned the bed frames and windowsills every day. On 4/8/25 at 12:34 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Environmental Services Director (EVSD), who stated that she was fully staffed. She further stated that the high-touch areas in the resident rooms were cleaned daily, and any areas that were visibly dirty should be cleaned. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview, record review, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents who were discharged to the community had a discharge summary that was completed by the physician. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #179), reviewed for discharge. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #179. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, high blood pressure, diabetes, and complications of amputation stump. A review of the most recent Discharge Return Not Anticipated (DRNA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 1/31/24, revealed in Section A Identification Information that the discharge (d/c) status was coded 01 (home/community). Further review of the medical records revealed that there was no documented evidence that the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to administer pain medication according to the physician prescribed pain scale for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for pain. This deficient practice was evidenced by: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) fall interventions were in place for a resident with a history of falls. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #382) On 4/4/25 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #382 awake and alert lying in bed. The surveyor observed two blue floor mats folded and stored at the head of the bed leaning against the wall. The resident stated he/she has had falls and stated, That's why I am here. On 4/7/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #382 lying in bed with his/her eyes closed. The resident had a floor mat in place to the resident's left side, but the floor mat for the resident's right side was folded up and not in place. On 4/9/25 at 8:18 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #382 in bed with their eyes closed. The resident had a floor mat in place to the resident's left side, but the floor mat for the resident's right side was folded up and not in place. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in an appropriate way to prevent the spread of infection for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #28 and #57) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On [DATE] at 10:31 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #28 was not in their room. The surveyor observed a nebulizer mask (a device used with a nebulizer machine to deliver medication in the form of a mist directly to the lungs through the nose and mouth) was lying directly on the nebulizer machine located on the bedside table, uncovered and not stored in a plastic bag. The surveyor observed oxygen tubing not in use lying directly on the floor. On [DATE] at 8:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #28 awake and alert lying in bed. Resident #28 had an intact tracheostomy (an opening created in the neck to insert a tube into the trachea (windpipe) This allows…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain a physician's order b.) obtain consent, c.) perform a side rail safety assessment, and d.) follow the facility's policy for side rail assessment and protocol prior to the application of two half side rails and two quarter side rails to a resident's bed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (#13), reviewed for restraints and was evidenced by the following: On 4/4/25 at 11:15 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed with two bilateral half side rails and two bilateral quarter side rails in the raised position on the resident's bed. When interviewed, the resident stated that he/she used the upper side rails to reposition in bed. The resident was unable to state when the side rails were placed on the bed. On 4/7/25 at 10:31 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #13. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were ordered for no more than 14 days. This was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for psychotropic medication use . This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/10/2025, at 11:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #40 sitting quietly and calmly in the day room, smiling. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: dementia, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms. A review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 3/10/2025, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A review of the resident's individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area, dated 6/15/2024, that the resident is at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' records were kept confidential for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #30, #231, and #232) observed during the medication administration pass. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 prepare medications for Resident #30. When the nurse left the medication cart to administer the resident's medications, she did not put up a privacy screen to cover the resident's record displayed on the nurse's laptop. On 4/7/25 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #3 prepare medications for Resident #231. When the nurse left the medication cart to administer the resident's medications, she did not put up a privacy screen to cover the resident's record displayed on the nurse's laptop. On 4/7/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #3 prepare medications for Resident #232. When the nurse left the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices to ensure: a.) kitchen staff performed hand hygiene at the appropriate times and adhered to proper food handling procedures during the tray line observation b.) staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during meal service for 1 of 3 dining rooms observed (A Wing). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/9/25 at 12:16 PM, during a follow-up visit to the kitchen to observe the lunch meal tray line service, the surveyor observed [NAME] #1 who washed her hands at the handwashing sink for 21 seconds. [NAME] #1 then proceeded to donn (put on) a pair of gloves prior to preparing to obtain food temperatures from the steam table. [NAME] #1 placed several scoops and ladles in direct contact with the surface of the preparation area of the steam table. As [NAME] #1 proceeded to obtain food temperatures, her right arm brushed up against the scoops and ladles which caused them all to fall onto the floor. At 12:25 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure full implementation of the antibiotic stewardship program, including ongoing monitoring and use of a nationally recognized surveillance criteria when antibiotics were being prescribed. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #50, #78, and #124) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/9/2025 at 11:04 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist (IP) regarding the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program (efforts to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate). The IP stated that she had worked at the facility full-time since February 24, 2025. The IP stated that she used the McGeer criteria (clinical and laboratory findings used to define and track infections in long-term care facilities). At that time, the surveyor reviewed the IP Checklist (a list of residents prescribed antibiotics). The IP checklist indicated the following: Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: 165979 Based on observation, interviews, review of the medical record, and other pertinent facility documentation on 12/29/23, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently document Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care as being provided to Resident #3 on the ADL Documentation form. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for ADL care and evidenced by the following: Review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on 6/2023 with medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Unspecified Dementia, Cerebral Palsy (a condition marked by impaired muscle coordination), Cerebral Infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), and Anxiety. Review of Resident #3's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 7/6/23, indicated that Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #3 needed extensive assistance with ADL tasks including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-11 · tag F0570 — widespread
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a surety bond in an amount large enough to cover the highest daily balance of the residents' trust fund account. This had the potential to affect 164 of 164 residents whose trust fund monies were held by the facility. Findings include: Review of the Resident Fund Trust Account bank statement, for the period of [DATE] through [DATE], revealed the lowest daily balance for the period was $202,548.31 on [DATE] and the highest daily balance for the period was $278,324.65 on [DATE]. Review of the Resident Fund Trust Account bank statement, for the period of [DATE] through [DATE], revealed the lowest daily balance for the period was $275,915.65 on [DATE] and the highest daily balance for the period was $354,435.91 on [DATE]. Review of the Resident Fund Trust Account bank statement, for the period of [DATE] through [DATE], revealed the lowest daily balance for the period was $350,361.47 on [DATE] and the highest daily balance for the period was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for four of four residents (Resident (R) 14, R41, R65, R68) reviewed for call lights out a total sample of 47 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R14's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side. Review of R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/18/23 revealed the resident required limited assistance with bed mobility and transfers and extensive assistance with dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Further review revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 indicating R14 was cognitively intact. Review of R14's Care Plan, initiated 08/06/16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure information on the role of the State Ombudsman as an advocate was provided for three of three residents (Resident (R) 79, R46, and R88) reviewed in a total sample of 47 residents. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for lack of access to the State Ombudsman Advocacy Group. Findings include: 1.Review of R79's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and acute kidney failure. Review of R79's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/09/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R79 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 04/04/23 at 1:55 PM, R79 stated that he had been the Resident Council President of the facility for a year and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0575 — pattern
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to post in prominent locations the contact information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program to include the name of the ombudsman, business address (mailing and email) and business number to ensure residents and resident representative were able to file a complaint. The resident census was 164 on the first day of survey. Findings include: Observations by five surveyors of the facility's lobby, hallways, resident units, and common areas of all three units throughout the entirety of the survey from 04/03/23 through 04/06/23, revealed the absence of postings of the contact information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program. During an interview on 04/05/23 at 12:05 PM, the Activities Director (AD) confirmed the above required information was not posted. The AD stated that the ombudsman contact information posting had been removed during facility renovations in December 2022. During an interview on 04/05/23 at 2:15 PM, the Administrator stated the ombudsman posting had been removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances, document evidence of investigations and resolutions for five of 12 grievances provided by the facility for review. Additionally, the facility failed to discuss the resolution or lack thereof with residents and family members. Findings include: Review of documents titled, Resident Concern Report, provided by the Director of Social Work (SSD) 2 from a binder located in her office, revealed five resident concern reports without resolution statements, documentation of the date that the grievance was turned over to the Social Work Department, the date the grievance with either resolved or unresolved, and/or if the resolution or the lack thereof was discussed with the resident or family. During an interview on 04/04/23 at 2:48 PM with the SSD1, she stated the grievances that are heard by the social workers are written up on a concern form and sent to the department manager of which the grievance correlates. SSD1 stated that the department managers follow up on their own…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 Screenings accurately and/or with new major mental illness diagnoses for three (Resident (R) 152, R34, and R141) of 47 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R152's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record, revealed R152's principal admitting on diagnosis on 09/23/22 was schizoaffective disorder. Review of R152's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 Screen, dated 09/28/22 and located under the Misc tab of the EMR, indicated, . Does the individual have a diagnosis or evidence of a major mental illness limited to the following disorders . schizoaffective . The form was marked No and signed by Director of Social Work (SSD) 1. During an interview on 04/05/23 at 9:00 AM, SSD1 verified she had completed the Level 1 PASRR screening for R152. SSD1 stated she had obtained the diagnoses to complete the form from R152's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of R41's admission Record, located in the EMR under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke), and repeated falls. Review of R41's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/05/23 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two out of 15, which indicated R41 was severely cognitively impaired and was totally dependent on the staff for personal hygiene. Review of R41's Care Plan, initiated 05/03/21 and located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab, revealed: R 41 requires extensive assist with daily bathing, dressing and hygiene; Intervention: R41 will need extensive assist of . hygiene. During an observation and interview on, 04/03/23 at 10:03 AM, R41 was observed appearing unshaven. R41 indicated to the surveyor that he would like a shave but would need assistance. R41's nails were observed dirty, with a dark brown substance underneath the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed maintain a medication error rate below five percent. Out of 37 opportunities there were five errors/omissions occurred during medication administration on one (A Wing) of three wings. The facility's medication error rate was 13.51% Findings include: Observation of medication passes throughout the facility on 04/04/23 and 04/05/23 revealed the following medication errors or omissions: 1. On A Wing 04/05/23 at 4:37 PM revealed Registered Nurse (RN)1 setting up medications for R92. A review of R92's physician orders located in the electronic medical records (EMR) Orders tab documented the resident was to receive cyclobenzaprine HCl Oral Tablet 10 milligrams (mg.) for muscle spasm. The resident did not receive the cyclobenzaprine for muscle spasm during the medication observation. Interview on 04/05/23 at 5:40 PM, RN1 verified she did not give the Cyclobenzaprine during the medication pass because none was available in the resident's medication box. 2. Observation on A Wing on 04/05/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide food storage in a safe and consistent manner, for one of three (Unit B) pantry refrigerators, and for one of one kitchen observed for food storage. This had the potential to affect 161 of 164 residents who consumed food from the kitchen, with possible foodborne illnesses related to the sanitation of food being stored and served. Findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 04/03/23 at 9:17 AM, accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed dry spices [seasoning salt and cumin] and open liquid condiments [soy sauce] that were not labeled with either a received or opened dates. During observations of the Unit B refrigerator on 04/06/23 at 11:12 AM, revealed the second clear plastic shelf was covered with a light orange liquid substance. The refrigerator had five bottles of water, two which were opened and labeled with initials, but with no dates on them. There was leftover food in a plastic reusable container with initials and no date on top. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an admission record was completed for three residents (Resident (R)18, R137, and R141) in a total sample of 47 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R18's 5 day scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/27/23, revealed R18 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. 2.Review of R137's quarterly MDS located in the EMR under the MDS tab, with an ARD of 02/21/23, revealed R137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, indicating mild cognitive impairment. 3.Review of R141's quarterly MDS located in the EMR under the MDS tab, with an ARD of 02/11/23, revealed R141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a BIMS score of 00 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that binding arbitration agreements were explained in a form and manner that residents understood, and failed to inform the resident that they had the right to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing, for three residents (Resident (R)101, R103, and R152) of three residents reviewed for binding arbitration agreements out of a total sample of 47 residents Findings include: 1. Review of R101's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/04/23 revealed R101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating she was mildly cognitively impaired. 2. Review of R103's quarterly MDS, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, with an ARD of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of facility documentation, the Quality Assurance (QA) committee failed to identify and take corrective action related to the following quality deficiencies: 1. sanitizing multi-use glucometers before and after each resident; 2. binding arbitration agreements; 3. surety bond; and 4. medication administration errors. Findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to sanitize multi -use glucometers before and after each resident increasing the risk of transmission of blood borne pathogens to residents undergoing blood sugar checks. Cross reference: F880-K Infection Control. 2. The facility failed to ensure residents understood the binding arbitration agreements prior to signing and failed to ensure residents were given a choice of a neutral arbitrator and the option to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing. Cross reference: F847-E Entering into Binding Arbitration Agreements and F848-E Binding Arbitration Agreements. 3. The facility failed to ensure that the facility's surety bond covered all the residents in the facility. Cross reference: F570-F…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to facilitate resident council meetings for three of three consecutive months (January 2023, February 2023, and March 2023) and to consistently respond to issues and concerns presented by resident council members, and/or discuss and document its responses to the resident's grievances and recommendations with the Resident Council President (Resident (R) 79). Findings include: Review of the resident council meeting minutes for January 2023, February 2023, and March 2023 provided by the Director of Social Work (SSD) 1 on 04/04/23 at 1:45 PM, revealed that the facility did not have resident council meetings for those three consecutive months. Furthermore, there were repetitive concerns from month to month without any documentation of the facility responses or of the concerns being addressed. Review of documents titled, Residents' Council, for January 2023, February 2023, and March 2023 stated, ln lieu of resident's council meetings, activity staff were doing room-by-room visits during months of lockdown. Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received assistance with formulating Advance Directives and had completed Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms for three (Residents (R)18, R93, and R76) of 12 residents reviewed for Advance Directives in a total sample of 47 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R18's 5 day scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/27/23, revealed R18 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia, dementia, neutropenia (low white blood cell count), and schizoaffective disorder (serious mental illness of hallucinations (hearing, seeing, smelling, touching objects not real) and delusions (firmly held beliefs not base on reality). R18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop all care plans for two residents (Resident (R)76 and R159) out of a total sample of 47 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R76's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident had diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of R76's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/07/23, located in the EMR MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight out of 15 which indicated R76 had moderately impaired cognition. R76 also exhibited signs and symptoms of feeling depressed, poor concentration, poor appetite, and trouble sleeping. Further review of this MDS revealed R76 had an active diagnosis of PTSD and received antidepressant medication daily. Review of the resident's psychological evaluation, dated 03/15/23 and located in EMR Miscellaneous tab, revealed diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to revise care plans for one resident (Resident (R)64) out of a total sample of 47 residents. Findings include: Observation 04/06/23 at 2:10 PM revealed R64 lying on a low air mattress with bolster pads on the sides to prevent entrapment. The head of bed (HOB) was elevated 45 degrees. Tube feeding of 2 Cal HN (name of tube feeding formula) was hanging with the pump turned off with 100cc (cubic centimeters) of formula remaining. R64 was observed wearing a heel lift boot in bed. Review of R64's admission Sheet, located in the EMR Profile tab, documented the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), right below the know amputation (BKA), and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the resident's Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/16/23, located in the EMR MDS tab, documented a BIMS score of one out of 15 which indicated R64 had severely impaired cognition. R64 was dependent on staff for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently implement necessary treatment and services to a pressure ulcer to for one of five residents (Resident (R)41) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of total sample of 47 residents Findings include: Review of R41's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke), psychosis (out of touch with reality), severe dementia with mood disturbance, convulsions, and repeated falls. Review of R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/05/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two out of 15, which indicated R41 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from the staff for bed mobility, and was at risk of developing pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and supervision for 12 (Resident (R) 98, R36, R149, R159, R5, R99, R113, R32, R100, R102, R124, and R129) of 32 residents that required supervision per the smoking safety screen out of a total of 43 residents who smoked. The facility further failed to assess one (R129) of 42 residents that smoke.The facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked during medication administration. The medication cart on the A 100 wing remained unlocked for 15 minutes with eye drops on top on the cart with staff members and residents passing by. Findings include: 1. Review of R98's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of undifferentiated schizophrenia (serious mental illness of hallucinations (hearing, smelling, tasting, seeing objects not present) and delusions (firmly held…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 6) of eight residents observed during medication administration received the correct insulin and dosage according physicians' orders. This failure has the potential for R6 to experience either hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) or hyperglycemic (high blood sugar) readings. Findings include: During medication pass on 04/05/23 at 4:50 PM Registered Nurse (RN)1 performed a glucose reading on R6. RN1 stated the reading was 290 and according to the physician's orders the resident was on sliding scale coverage. The resident was to receive 10 units of Lispro with the evening meal. And according to the sliding scale the resident was to receive an additional 4 units of the Lispro Insulin which R6 would receive a total 14 units of Lispro Insulin. RN1 drew up 14 units of Lispro Insulin and administered to R6's left arm subcutaneously (subq). Review of the resident's Physicians Orders, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) Orders tab, revealed orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) 68) of 47 sampled residents had a functioning call light system. Findings include: Review of R68's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and diabetes. Review of R68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/25/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score that was not assessed due to cognitive impairment. During an observation on 04/03/23 at 12:52 PM and 04/04/24 at 8:34 AM, R68's call light outlet was observed with no call light cord attached. There was no call light cord observed in the room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/05/23 at 12:30 PM, the Maintenance Director (MD) observed the call light outlet with the surveyor and confirmed the call light cord was not present in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner in order to prevent foodborne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/20/21 from 9:00 AM to 9:32 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Floor Manager (FM), observed the following the kitchen area: 1. In the reach-in refrigerator, a plastic bin contained sliced deli ham. The plastic bin was dated, 1-12-21, which indicated that the sliced deli ham had been in the refrigerator for 8 days. A Labeling and Dating System Protocol on the refrigerator door stated, Deli Meat opened. Sliced three days. During an interview, the FM said, This is trash, I'm throwing it away. The FM threw the sliced deli ham in the trash in the presence of the surveyor. 2. In the walk-in freezer, an unidentified red substance was on the floor under the 3-tiered rear storage shelf. Unidentified food debris was also on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BLEIER, CHAYAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 08/25/2005
BRAUNSTEIN, JACQUELINEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 03/31/2003
SCHON, SHLOIMIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/19/2003
YOUNG, SIMONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/28/2003

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 12%Other / private 2%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,739per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315267. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next