No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cranford Park Care

600 Lincoln Park East, Cranford, NJ 07016 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (908) 276-7100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (908) 276-7100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 34 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
198 North Ave E · (908) 653-1001 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
17 N Union Ave · (908) 276-0062 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
200 South Ave E · (908) 276-0600 · Call to confirm hours
Park
150 Lincoln Ave E · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.9%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.8%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.9%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.4%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.1%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.3%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.702.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.001.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.3%CMS range 31.0–56.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.5–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.6–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.521.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 90.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-21)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT #2728237 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 5/26/26, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) appropriately reconcile a resident's medication at time of admission and b) administer an antibiotic treatment in a timely manner in accordance with professional standard of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for medication reconciliation and was evidenced by the following:Resident #6 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, type II diabetes, and convulsions. A review of Resident #6's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 11/14/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #2966196, 2955245Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure that care and services for a resident's colostomy was provided and b) resident's behaviors related to care and services of the colostomy were monitored and documented in the medical record. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 closed medical records reviewed (Resident #2) for ostomy care.Resident #2 was no longer at the facility. A closed medical record review was conducted. According to the admission record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: encounter for attention to ileostomy (a surgical procedure that reroutes waste out of your body by connecting the lowest part of the small intestine (the ileum) to an opening in your abdominal wall, called a stoma); need for assistance with personal care; long term use of immunosuppressive biologic (medication that reduces the activity of the immune system); dependence on renal dialysis (treatment that removes extra…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident environment, and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/31/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed the following conditions while touring the building from 9:30 AM to 11:30 AM:The carpet on the stairway leading to the B unit was heavily soiled and ripped.Heavy dust and debris accumulation on the stairwell leading to the B Unit. The corridor leading to the nourishment room of the B-Unit, had a broken exposed pipe with visible debris around.room [ROOM NUMBER] had a leaking air conditioner cover which was yellow stained. A white yellow stained towel was noted on the windowsill next to the air conditioner.The windows in the room were covered with dust. The windows had no window treatments or drapes providing a clear view of the street.An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed there were no windows…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen ceiling was clean above ready-to-eat foods and staff performed adequate hand hygiene when serving meals. The failures had the potential to increase the prevalence and spread of foodborne illness and infection for all 67 of 69 facility residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the Diet Assigned listing, dated 08/20/25, revealed two residents out of the total 69 facility residents received nutrition by tube and did not eat food prepared in the kitchen. 1. During initial observations of the kitchen on 08/18/25 at 9:40 AM, the ceiling above the tray line area was covered with [NAME] of gray/brown dust, some which hung down in strings that were moving in the airflow. During tray line observation in the kitchen on 08/20/25 beginning at 11:34 AM, the ceiling above the tray line area was covered with [NAME] of dust, some which hung down in strings that were moving in the airflow. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage was covered in area near the entrance to building A next to the stairs down to the kitchen entrance. This failure had potential to cause avoidable pest infestation that could affect all 69 facility residents. Findings include: During observation outside the stairs to the kitchen entrance on 08/18/25 at 9:40 AM, there were three open bins containing garbage bags and a pervasive trash/bowel movement/rotten food odor. None of the three bins had lids. During observation outside the stairs to the kitchen entrance on 08/20/25 at 11:28 AM, there were three open bins containing trash bags and a pervasive trash/bowel movement/rotten food odor. None of the three bins had lids. At this time, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated one bin was for kitchen trash and the others were for housekeeping waste. The DM confirmed none of the bins were covered. The DM stated the bin for kitchen trash was taken out to the dumpster after each meal or whenever it was full. During observation outside the stairs to the kitchen entrance on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for the five residents (Resident (R) 41, R47, R48, R2, and R79) who received a pureed diet out of a facility census of 69. The failure had the potential to contribute to weight loss, malnutrition, or lack of satisfaction with meals for these residents. Findings include: Review of the Diet Assigned listing, dated 08/20/25 and provided on paper, revealed five residents (R41, R47, R48, R2, and R79) out of the total 69 facility residents received pureed foods. Review of the undated Week 1, Cycle Day 4 menu, provided on paper, revealed the 08/20/25 lunch menu for a pureed diet called for 8 ounces (oz) of pureed goulash (split into 4 oz pureed egg noodles and 4 oz pureed goulash), 4 oz of pureed green beans, and one slice of pureed garlic bread. During observation of lunch tray line in the kitchen on 08/20/25 beginning at 11:34 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1 served a pureed plate with 3-oz portions of pureed goulash, pasta, bread, and green beans. At this time, interview with DC1 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices for three of the 18 sample residents (Resident (R) 25, R71, and R3). The facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment was available for use, proper PPE disposal was available, that staff donned and doffed PPE appropriately, and that hand hygiene was conducted during wound care. These failures increased the risk of the spread of infections and COVID-19 among staff and residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R25's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Covid 19 positive status. Review of R25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/31/25, located under the MDS tab indicated R25 was set up assist for oral hygiene, toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene; supervision for showering/bathing. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review and policy review, the facility failed to allow one of one resident (Resident (R) 33) reviewed for care planning in a sample of 18 residents the right to participate in the development and implementation of her person-centered plan of care. This failure increased the risk that the resident would not have any direct input into her plan of care.Findings include: Review of R33's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia, depression, and type II diabetes. Review of R33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/08/25, located under the RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] tab indicated R33 needed set up assist for eating; supervision for oral hygiene; partial/moderate assist for bed mobility and toileting; showering/bathing, dressing and personal hygiene were substantial /maximum assist. The MDS showed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the residents and/or their representatives with written information of the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advance directive for two of 18 sample residents (Resident (R) 11 and R17) reviewed for Advanced Directives. This failure created the potential for the residents' wishes not to be followed if the residents were unable to speak for themselves. Findings include: 1. Review of R11's undated admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R11's EMR revealed no documentation that R11 had an Advance Directive or that the facility provided written information to the resident, or the resident representative concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advance directive. 2. Review of R17's undated admission Record located in the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure written notice to the resident or representative of the transfer to the hospital included a statement of the appeal rights, information on how to file an appeal, and appeals contact information for two of two residents (Resident (R) 73 and R2) reviewed for hospitalization in a sample of 18 residents. This failure created the potential for a lack of understanding of appeal rights should the resident not be permitted to return or disagree with the reason for transfer, potentially causing confusion or distress upon transfer. Findings include: 1. Review of R73's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of discitis (infection of the spine). He was discharged from the facility on 05/20/25. Review of R73's Discharge - Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/20/25, located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the presence of a stage III pressure ulcer for one of three residents (Resident (R) 71) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a sample of 18. This failure created potential for an incomplete or ineffective plan of care related to pressure ulcer treatment and healing measures. Findings include: Review of R71's Diagnosis tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, aphasia, depression, anxiety, and chronic pain. Review of R71's quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/31/25, located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she did not have any current pressure ulcers. Review of R71's Care Plan, dated 05/23/25 and located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, revealed, The resident has a stage 3 pressure ulcer on the sacrum r/t [related] to impaired mobility, incontinent. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 71) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a sample of 18 received physician-ordered pressure ulcer prevention measures. This failure created potential for development of avoidable pressure ulcers and associated risks for pain, infection, and slow healing.Findings include: Review of R71's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, aphasia, depression, anxiety, and chronic pain. Review of R71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/31/25, located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and had short- and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. R71 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and bed mobility. R71 was at risk for pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT #NJ00179350, NJ00182926 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 6/3/25, 6/5/25, and 6/19/25 it was determined that the facility failed to consistently document in the Documentation Survey Report on care provided to dependent residents according to facility policy and protocol for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #5, and Resident #6) reviewed for documentation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Dementia, Muscle weakness, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 The surveyor reviewed Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 3/10/25, which indicated that Resident #1 had a BIMS of 9 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated that the resident required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A review of Resident # 1's Documentation Survey Report v2 (DSR) dated May 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #NJ 00182926 Based on interviews, medical records reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, on 06/03/25, 06/05/25, and 06/19/25, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan after an annual assessment for a cognitively impaired resident that needed assistance with meals. The facility also failed to follow its Care Plan policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following: Resident #6 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Muscle Weakness, Diabetes Mellitus and Encounter for Palliative Care. A review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 01/18/2025, revealed that Resident #6 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-27 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to submit their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for the PBJ Report submission for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 1 2024 (October 1-December 31) and was evidenced by the following: A review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D reflected a triggered area indicating the facility failed to submit data for the first Fiscal Year Quarter to CMS. The dates of the first quarter included October 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. On 3/19/24 at 10:00 AM, the Licensed Home Administrator (LNHA) informed the survey team that the facility used a third party to submit the PBJ Staffing Data Report to CMS. The third party did not provide a CMS validation or any proof of submission to CMS for staffing reported for the FY Quarter 1 2024. On 3/27/24 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor interviewed the LNHA, in the presence of another surveyor, regarding communication of staffing with CMS and he stated, We…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and submit electronically the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care of all residents, within 14 days of completing the resident's assessment and in accordance with the Center's for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. This deficient practice was identified for 7 of 19 residents (Resident #41, 9, 53, 3, 50, 66, and #10) and reviewed for resident assessment. According to the Long-Term Care RAI 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11, updated October 2023, the MDS is a comprehensive tool and a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents. It must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS within 14 days of the assessment being completed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/19/24, at 9:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility task that includes residents' MDS assessments, which was triggered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care of all residents, accurately for 5 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident # 69, # 9, # 57, #63, and # 24). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed Resident # 69's records. The resident was discharged from the facility and according to the Discharge Return Anticipated MDS, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 2/23/24, the resident was assessed as being discharged to the hospital. A review of Resident # 69's progress notes dated 2/23/24 revealed the resident had actually been discharged home, against medical advice. On 3/25/24 at 11:49 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator (MDSC), who stated that the MDS under section A, which is she completes, for Resident #69 should have indicated discharge to home and that it was an error that it indicated discharge to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an intervention timely that was recommended by the wound physician. This deficient practice was identified for one of one resident (Resident #28) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/18/24 at 11:02 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident #28 lying in bed on an air mattress. The resident responded to questions in a faint voice. The resident gave permission to speak with the spouse who was in the room. The spouse stated, [The resident] came here because of a stroke about six months ago. On 3/18/24 at 11:26 AM, the surveyor interviewed the daughter who stated, [the resident] was in the hospital in New York for gastrointestinal bleed and has renal cancer that metastasized to the brain. The resident also had another brain bleed and had radiation therapy recently in the hospital. [the resident] has a sacral wound, stage four, from the hospital from a year ago. On 3/20/24 at 11:25 AM, observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) implementation of interventions designed by the occupational therapist to stimulate functional performance, and prevent further decline, and b.) the interdisciplinary team provided timely revision to the care plan (CP). This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for limited range of motion, Resident #29 and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/25/24 at 10:33 AM, the surveyor observed the resident with one foot out of the blanket, the chest, and both hands were covered with a blanket. On 3/26/24 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor and the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assigned to the resident, entered the resident's room. The resting hand splint (RHS; a medical device, functional hand brace, wrist, and finger immobilizer) was observed next to the resident's bedside table. The CNA stated that she had fed the resident, who at that time threw the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to a) follow through with the Dietitian's recommendation for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #24), b) ensure the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) was aware of the resident's significant weight loss according to the standard of clinical practice for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #24), and c) ensure that the re-weigh was done according to the standard of clinical practice and facility policy for two (2) of two (2) residents, Resident #24 and #57, reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain the necessary care and maintenance of a respiratory equipment and b.) provide a physician's order for respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one resident, (Resident #58) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/18/24 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident #58 lying in a low bed to the ground. A nebulizer mask was on the bedside table in a bag and the label on the tubing was dated 3/11/24. The resident was pleasant, alert, and oriented to person, place and time. The resident stated, I am here because I have pneumonia (an infection of the lungs) and I need to get my breathing better again. On 3/20/24 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in the therapy gym using the bike with no evidence of difficulty breathing while biking. On 3/20/24 at 11:07…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards by ensuring that an expired controlled drug (Lorazepam gel) was removed from active inventory after 1/22/24 and had accurate corresponding documentation for the removal and administration for Resident #39 in one (1) of three (3) medication carts observed during the medication storage inspection. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow professional standards and practices to accurately document in the medical record an ordered medication a resident was being administered. The concern was cited for 2 (Residents #57 and #377) of 19 residents reviewed and is evidenced by the following. 483.70(i)(1) In accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are (ii) accurately documented. 1. On 3/19/24 at 12:51 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medication orders for resident #377 in the electronic medical record (EMR). The medication orders reflected that resident #377 had a physician's order for and was being administered Lantus insulin (Lantus) (a long-acting injectable medication used to treat diabetes). On 03/20/24 at 9:51 AM, the surveyor reviewed the EMR for resident #377. The review included documentation recorded by the attending physician and associated nurse practitioners reflected as Plan of Care (POC) notes, Physician Progress Notes and Chronic Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) was completed for Resident #24. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: According to the MDS (minimum data set) 3.0 RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual included that the SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident must be completed when the IDT (interdisciplinary team) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline. A significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that: 1. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, the decline is not considered self-limiting; 2. Impacts more than one area of the resident's health status; and 3. Requires interdisciplinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional standards of clinical practice by failing to assess the fall risk for a resident that was at risk for falls and had a fall according to the facility policy for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #63). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and well being, and executing a medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to offer a resident a pneumococcal vaccine for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #63). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #63's medical record. A review of Resident #63 admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to anemia (condition in which the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin, a protein found in red blood cells, to carry oxygen all through the body), muscle weakness (decreased strength in the muscles) and dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain). A review of Resident #63's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's living environment in a clean, comfortable, homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified on 3 of 3 nursing units, (A-unit, B-unit, and C-unit) reviewed for environmental concerns and for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #63) reviewed for tube feedings. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/06/23 at 12:11 PM, the surveyor toured the C-unit, entered room C5 and observed that the white molding on the bottom of the wall which was in contact with the floor was stained with yellow and black discolorations. In addition, the top of the molding behind the bed's headboard that was positoned on the same wall as the door entryway was chipped off, exposing discolored brownish-black wood. The surveyor further observed green privacy curtains throughout room. Two of the privacy curtains were observed with brown and red stains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for 1 of 20 resident's, (Resident #8) reviewed for accurately coding the MDS. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/06/23 at 12:06 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #8 seated in his/her reclining chair in the main dining/activity room on the C unit. The resident was observed bopping their head to music that was playing in the background. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #8. Review of the resident's admission Record indicated that the resident had resided at the facility for several years and had diagnoses which included but were not limited to bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs) and hypertension. Review of the resident's September 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a Physician's Order (PO) for the dosage of a medication on the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) for several months. This deficient practice was identified during the medication pass observation for 1 of 6 residents, (Resident #16) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) properly handle and store potentially hazardous foods in a manner that is intended to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses and b.) maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a manner to prevent microbial growth and cross contamination. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 09/05/23 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Food Services Director (FSD) and observed the following: 1. On a metal rack in the refrigerator, there was an opened box labeled bacon with the inner plastic bag open and the bacon visible and exposed to air. The FSD acknowledged that the bacon should not have been exposed to air and stated that it was important to make sure the bacon was covered properly to avoid sickness. 2. On the bottom shelf on a metal rack in the freezer, there were four (4) five-pound freezer sealed bags of dark reddish chunks of meat with no label and no dates. The FSD identified the meat as cubed beef and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) appropriately label, date and store biologicals and b.) discard medications after the manufacturer specified use by date. This deficient practice was identified during 2 of 2 medication storage room (B-unit medication storage room and C-unit medication storage room) inspections and was evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 11:54 AM, the surveyor inspected the medication storage room on the B Unit. The surveyor observed one unlabeled clear orange pill bottle which contained an unidentified clear liquid. The surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) at the time of inspection who stated that she could not identify what type of liquid was being stored in the clear orange pill bottle on the counter of the medication storage room. On [DATE] at 12:56 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), Director of Nursing (DON), and Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices and perform hand hygiene as indicated during dining observation for 1 of 3 units, (B unit). The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 09/07/23, the surveyor observed the following during lunch meal pass on the B-unit: At 12:36 PM, in the pantry room, a Recreation Aide (RA) removed the ice scoop from the wall holder and scooped ice from a cooler, poured the ice into a cup, replaced the ice scoop to the holder, placed the cup on a meal tray and placed the tray on Resident #16's bedside table in his/her room. The RA returned to the pantry and retrieved a meal tray and placed it on Resident #46's side table in his/her room. In the same room, the RA then pulled the privacy curtain around Resident #57, turned, and rested her left hand on Resident #46's pillow that was behind his/her head while the resident was seated in a recliner chair. The RA pulled the recliner chair to reposition the resident in the room, moved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for a resident that was discharged from the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 unsampled resident, (Resident #31) reviewed in the Resident Assessment Task for MDS record over 120 days old. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/13/23 at 1:06 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #31's MDS history in the presence of the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC). The surveyor and MDSC reviewed the resident's medical record and identified that the MDS history did not reveal that the resident was discharged from the facility. The surveyor independently reviewed the medical record for Resident #31. Review of the resident's admission Record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility in late winter 2023 and had diagnoses which included but were not limited to: low back pain, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, lack of coordination, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-09-15 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to post the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report daily. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/05/23 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor entered the facility (on the Tuesday after Labor Day weekend) and observed that the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report posted in the front lobby was dated 09/01/23 (Friday). On 09/13/23 at 12:21 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist (LPN/IP) who stated that the Staffing Coordinator (SC) was responsible for posting the daily staffing Monday through Friday. The LPN/IP told the surveyor that on weekends the Supervisor or Receptionist would post the daily staffing. At 12:27 PM, the surveyor interviewed the SC who stated that she posted the daily staffing report in the front lobby of the facility every day, Monday through Friday. The SC told the surveyor that she would print out the weekend staffing report on Friday for the Supervisor that was on duty to post in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CRANFORD OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/31/2022
CPC600 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF40%since 04/05/2022
MRK600 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF60%since 04/05/2022
KRAUS, MORDECHAIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2022
HEALTHCARE RESOURCEOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RAMDAS, KUMARIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 17%Other / private 10%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$358per resident / day
operating cost
$10,879per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$354per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315390. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next