Embassy Manor At Edison Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 280 beds and averages 223.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ182121Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report within two hours to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse for a cognitively intact resident (Resident #381) who reported being roughly handled by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #381).A review of the Progress Note (PN) dated 12/28/24 at 9:16 AM, revealed that Resident #381, a cognitively intact resident, reported to the Registered Nurse (RN #1) that they were fearful of staff and the facility due to an incident that had occurred two days prior (12/26/24). The resident reported that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) roughly repositioned the resident causing the resident's already fractured leg to have intense pain. RN #1 documented that Resident #381 had a discoloration with purple bruising (age undetermined) around the area and that she administered the prescribed pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ182121Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by thoroughly investigating an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse to a cognitively intact resident (Resident #381) who reported the allegation to the Registered Nurse (RN #1) on 12/28/24. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #381).A review of the Progress Note (PN) dated 12/28/24 at 9:16 AM, revealed that Resident #381, a cognitively intact resident, reported to the Registered Nurse (RN #1) that they were fearful of staff at the facility due to an incident that had occurred two days prior (12/26/24). The resident reported that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) roughly repositioned the resident causing the resident's already fractured leg to have intense pain. RN #1 documented that Resident #381 had a discoloration with purple bruising (age undetermined) around the area and that she administered the prescribed pain medication. RN #1 made the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain kitchen equipment in a clean and sanitary manner and b,) maintain 2 of 6 nourishment room refrigerators in a sanitary manner. The evidence was as follows: On 4/29/25 at 10:20 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and the Regional FSD, the surveyor observed the following during kitchen tour: 1. The steamer unit floor drain was filled with debris and sediment. The FSD acknowledge it was not properly cleaned according to facility policy. 2. Two convection ovens were soiled with baked on brown coloring on the glass doors and interior of the unit. The FSD acknowledged and stated, it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 3. Two steamer units were drained into a floor trap and the trap screen had debris covering it. The FSD acknowledged and stated, it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 4. The six-burner stove top and oven were covered with cooked on grease and sediment crusted around the burners. The oven had food sediment and debris on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to administer ten doses of an anti-convalescent medication (clonazepam) prescribed for seizures according to physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #47), and was evidenced by the following: On 4/29/25 at 11:324 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #47 lying in their bed with the bed positioned low with a fall mat located at the side. On 4/30/25 at 10:49 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #47. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; hypertension (high blood pressure), seizures (abnormal electrical activity in your brain that temporarily affects your consciousness, muscle control and behavior), and mood disorder (mental health condition that primarily affects your emotional state). A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed a.) to treat each resident with respect and dignity and b.) care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life recognizing each resident's individuality. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #206), and was evidenced by the following: On 4/29/25 at 11:09 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1) walking alongside Resident #206 in the hallway towards the shower room. CNA #1 and Resident #206 entered the shower room, and the door closed. The surveyor then heard Resident #206 begin to yell inside the shower room. At that time, CNA #1 opened the door and asked for the facility's translator to assist with translating the resident's needs. The Translator entered the shower room, and the surveyor observed the resident, who was still fully dressed, speaking with the Translator who then informed CNA #1 that the resident did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order to carry out a resident's wishes for code status. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 38 residents reviewed for code status and advanced directives (Residents #167 and #230), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/29/25 at 12:34 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #167's electronic medical record (EMR). A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) indicated that the resident was re-admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but were not limited to; malignant neoplasm of colon (malignant colon cancer), malignant neoplasm of the liver (liver cancer), and malignant neoplasm of the lung (lung cancer). A review of the New Jersey Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) indicated the resident's wishes were to be a Do Not attempt resuscitation (DNR) and allow natural death and Do not intubate (DNI) in the event the resident had no pulse and/or was not breathing (code…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ183871, NJ183873 Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a.) a resident who was receiving dialysis (a medical procedure that acts as an artificial kidney filtering waste and excess fluid from the blood) treatments and b.) a resident with a surgical wound. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 35 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #73 and Resident #531), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/29/25 at 12:13 PM, the Resident #73 was observed in bed with a blanket pulled over their head. The resident did not want to be interviewed. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #73. A review of the Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; end stage kidney disease, heart failure, difficulty in walking, and diabetes (high blood sugar). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure recommendations by the wound care consultant were implemented to prevent worsening of a pressure ulcer. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #333), and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #333. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; kidney failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and pneumonia. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 4/26/25, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, meaning the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Section M, Skin Conditions, reflected that the resident had a pressure ulcer upon admission to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and b.) properly store medications and maintain clean and sanitary medication storage areas. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 1 observed treatment cart and 2 of 6 observed medication carts, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/30/25 at 12:12 PM, the surveyor observed a wound treatment cart on the Second-floor nursing unit by the nurse's station in front of the elevators which was unattended and left unlocked. The surveyor remained near the treatment cart and observed two nursing staff members walk past the treatment cart and did not acknowledge or identify that the treatment cart was unsecured. On 4/30/25 at 12:29 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM), who stated that treatment carts contained medications and should be treated as medication carts and should always be locked when unattended by the nurse. At that time, the surveyor asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 observed resident pantry rooms as evidence by the following: On 5/6/25 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor toured the 1st floor Subacute unit pantry room in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD). The surveyor observed the following: the counter around the sink and backsplash had black discoloration. The caulking was peeling and blackened along the edge of the sink, behind the sink, and around the faucet. On 5/6/25 at 1:11 PM, the surveyor toured the 2nd floor, 2A, and Chinese unit pantry room, in the presence of the FSD. The surveyor observed the following: the counter around the sink and backsplash had black discoloration and caulking was peeling and blackened along the edge of the sink, behind the sink, and around the faucet, and worn-down laminate countertops exposing the wood type surface under the laminate. On 5/6/25 at 1:23 PM, the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ182121, NJ183873 Based on interview, record review, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that facility to failed to ensure residents received the appropriate pain management by a.) administering pain medications according to the physician's ordered pain level parameters and b.) obtaining and administering pain medications as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pain management (Residents #381 and Resident #531), and was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #381. A review of the admission Record face sheet (admission summary) reflected that Resident #381 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but were not limited to; unspecified fracture of the left femur (thigh bone) and age-related osteoporosis (bone disease that occurs when the body loses too much bone, makes too little bone, or both). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ160740, NJ166295, NJ167271, NJ169912 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 07/24/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications according to the acceptable standards of nursing practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) . The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Administering Medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated Title 45. Chapter 11. New Jersey Board of Nursing Statutes 45:11-23. Definitions b. The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribe by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Diagnosing in the context of nursing practice means that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$102,840 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $102,840 — penalty dated 2025-05-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ