Roosevelt Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 284 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 123 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 161.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) consistently follow physician's orders (PO) for off-loading bilateral heels to prevent the development of a stage IV facility acquired pressure injury, b.) ensure an individualized comprehensive care plan interventions were developed and implemented to a prevent facility acquired pressure injury wound from developing, and c.) ensure a Registered Nurse assessed and documented the development of a stage IV facility acquired pressure injury identified on 10/29/21; and d.) ensure weekly skin checks were conducted according to physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 117) reviewed for pressure injury wounds. On 12/13/21 at 1:36 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 117 in bed sleeping. A low air loss mattress was in use and bilateral greenish threadbare heel booties were in use. On 12/14/21 at 11:44 AM, the surveyor observed the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure water was at a comfortable temperature in the shower rooms on the fourth floor for two (Resident (R)161 and R15) of three residents reviewed for a comfortable/homelike environment out of a total sample of 30 residents. Bathing in water that is not warm enough can have serious negative effects, particularly for those with underlying health conditions and can decrease their quality of life.Findings include:Review of Resident Council Minutes, dated 11/20/25, provided by the facility revealed under the Maintenance section Residents on the 4th floor stated, The green hallway and shower room is cold. This was adjusted.Review of Resident Council Minutes, dated 11/20/25, provided by the facility revealed under the Maintenance section Resident on N2 [second floor] and N4 [fourth floor] ask if the water can be warmer. Residents were educated that as per State Regulations, hot water boilers can only be set between 95 and 110 degrees.1. Review of R161's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an appropriate intervention to keep feet and legs elevated for a resident in a geriatric chair for one (Resident (R)106) out of a total sample of 30 residents. This failure had the potential for severe complications due to reduced circulation.Findings include:Review of R106's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 06/24/25, located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed an admission date of 10/31/25, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two out of 15 indicated R106's cognition was severely impaired, was dependent on staff for mobility, and had diagnoses of cancer, diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, and pressure ulcer.Review of R106's care plan, revised 12/07/25, located in the EMR under the Care Plan, tab revealed R106 has skin impairment and has potential for further skin breakdown r/t [related to]impaired mobility . Left Lateral Malleolus-Arterial Ulcer, Left bunion-Blanchable redness.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to F-760 Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure a.) accurate documentation of the removal of a controlled substance for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #12), reviewed for an as needed (PRN) 5/325 milligram (mg) of Oxycodone/Acetaminophen (a narcotic medication, indicated for pain), b.) accurate reconciliation and administration of narcotic medication with potential for drug diversion for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #12 and #212) reviewed for a PRN pain medicine, c.) discontinued narcotic medications were removed from active inventory and disposed of after being discontinued on 11/27/23 (5 months) for Resident #80. This deficient practice was observed during the inspection of one (1) of three (3) medication rooms, d.) a stored narcotic medication was maintained with the safety tamper seal (Resident #8), which was identified for one (1)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — widespread
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Refer to F 755 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received as needed (prn) narcotic (a controlled drug that produces pain relief) medication in accordance with the prescriber's orders and accepted professional standards. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #212) reviewed for prn narcotic administration. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/30/24 at 10:35 AM, the surveyors requested a list of all residents receiving the prn narcotic oxycodone 5/325 mg (milligrams) from Director of Nursing (DON). On 04/30/24 at 11:20 AM, the DON provided the surveyors with a list of the residents receiving prn Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (an opioid (pain-relieving medicines, narcotic) combination medication used for moderate to severe pain.). A review of the list revealed Resident #212 was receiving the above-mentioned medication. The surveyor reviewed the electronic Medical Record (eMR) for Resident #212. According to the admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to a) maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices and clean equipment, b) properly store foods in a safe manner to prevent the development of food borne illness, c) maintain 4 of 4 nursing unit kitchenettes used for residents in a sanitary manner, and d) properly dispose of used cooking oil according to regulations. These deficient practices observed as evidenced by the following: On 04/22/24 at 09:42 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and the food service manager (FSM), the surveyor toured the kitchen and observed the following: 1. In the walk-in freezer, the surveyor observed several boxes of opened food items that were opened, unlabeled and exposed to freezer with freezer burn and frost on them. Those items were as follows: fish fillets, breaded chicken patties, turkey burgers, Salisbury beef steaks, opened loose corn, and tater tots. All listed items were opened, unsealed, unlabeled with open date or expiration dates. The FSM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) the staff handled, stored, and processed linens and other supplies in a clean manner and to prevent possible contamination for two (2) of two (2) rooms (Laundry and Linen Storage) according to facility's policy and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, b) routine, ongoing, and systematic monitoring and tracking of facility's water management, and c) policy was reviewed and updated to reflect and address the need of the facility according to clinical standard of practice and CDC guidelines, d) maintain the resident's Tube Feed hydration bag with proper infection control practices for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for Tube Feeding, and e) a urinary catheter drainage bag and a urinary catheter tubing were maintained and stored in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for urinary catheter and urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for: a) two (2) of two (2) rooms (Laundry and Linen Storage) and b) two (2) of two (2) shower rooms. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/25/24 at 11:41 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Director of Housekeeping (DH) observed in the Laundry Room the following: Upon entry, there was a puddle of water near the door and the washer. There was one towel heavily wet with puddle water. The DH informed the surveyor that the puddle of water was from the washer and it was reported already to the maintenance department last week. The laundry room had one big garbage open container with stagnant water blackish in color with garbage and used surgical mask. One small garbage open container with stagnant black in color water with grayish substances. The DH stated that the grayish substance was a collection of lint. There was a big open pipe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to protect resident's privacy and independence in a dignified manner. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of 30 residents reviewed for dignity and well-being (Resident #53). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/22/24 at 10:58 AM, the surveyor observed on the front of Resident #53's room door (hallway side) signage that read, Attention, room [# redacted] [name redacted], needs to be fed by the nurse only! Please read and take note: Nurse Feeder, room [# redacted], [name redacted], dated 3/15/24. Another sign on the same door revealed, Stop and Read: Do not give [name redacted] the remote control for bed. Thank you. On 4/22/24 and 4/30/24 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #53 in bed, appeared to be asleep with the television on, the bed was equipped with an air mattress. The head of the bed (HOB) was elevated, the call bell was in reach and on the bed. The remote control for the bed was attached behind the HOB on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to address a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) (It's a medical order that instructs health care providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if a patient's breathing stops or if the patient's heart stops beating) and Do Not Intubate (DNI) (a medical document that indicates a patient does not want to be intubated or receive CPR in event of cardiopulmonary arrest) code status order signed by the resident's family and Physician with no follow-up change of the physician's order (PO) or update of the comprehensive care plan to indicate a code status change. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 33 residents, (Resident #55) reviewed for advanced directives. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 10:15 AM, the resident was observed in the day room seated in a wheelchair looking through a newspaper. The resident was receiving 2 Liters per meter (LPM) of oxygen via a nasal cannula…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 171606 REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on interviews, review of the medical records (MRs) and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) as required and according to the facility's policy for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #210 and # 211) reviewed for injury of unknown origin. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.According to the admission record (AR), Resident #210 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: Chronic kidney disease Stage 4 (a gradual loss of kidney function) and chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity (a blood clot in a deep vein that has lasted for at least a month). A review of the quarterly Minimum data set (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 12/20/2023, revealed the resident had a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) of 9 out of 15 which indicated that the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,360 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $27,360 — penalty dated 2024-05-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $250K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ