Plaza Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 104.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2022-03-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespread
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1.) the emergency response system was activated to call a code, 2.) 911 was enacted, 3.) the automatic external defibrillator (AED) was utilized for a resident who was found unresponsive (Resident #7) and was a full code status (all resuscitation procedures will be provided when a person stops breathing or heart stops beating). This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for unexpected deaths and 4.) failed to ensure a system was in place to appropriately track and maintain cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certifications to ensure that staff maintain the appropriate CPR certification. The facility's system wide failure to appropriately track and maintain appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation certifications, and provide the required emergency response, posed a serious and immediate threat to the health, safety, and wellbeing of all residents who resided in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility 1.) failed to ensure: that the facility policy for Accident/Incident Reports was followed to determine the causal factor and to update interventions to prevent recurrent falls, for a visually impaired ambulatory resident who was identified as a high fall risk, and sustained multiple falls, including a fall that resulted in a head injury on [DATE], and 2.) failed to ensure; that the emergency crash cart (a set of trays /drawers /shelves on wheels) used for transportation and dispensing of emergency medications and equipment, was secured and not easily accessible to residents and non-licensed staff. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for falls and for 1 of 2 crash carts inspected (2nd floor). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 10:41 AM, the Surveyor observed a resident wandering unassisted in the hallway, holding on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure laundry staff had the proper personal protection equipment (PPE) necessary to handle linens to prevent the spread of infection. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/4/25 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor toured the laundry room along with the Infection Preventionist (IP). Upon entry to the clean laundry area, two laundry aides were emptying a dryer. The laundry room consisted of an area with two front loading washers, both which were running. There was another area with three dryers and room for folding laundry. The surveyor asked the laundry aides, what they needed to do when loading the dirty laundry into the washers. The aide explained that sometimes she finds disposable briefs in the wash when emptying the washer into the dryer. She further stated that if a brief was found, she removed them and disposed of them in the garbage. The surveyor asked if she needed to wear anything to protect her when handling the dirty linens. She repeated her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have an ongoing monitoring of bed side rails as part of their routine maintenance program for one of one resident (Resident (R)71) of 35 sample residents and 86 of 87 occupied beds reviewed for side rails. Findings include: 1. Review of R71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/12/23, located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical report (EMR), revealed R71 had an admission date of 07/07/22. There was no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score conducted and R71 had severely impaired cognition, R71 had impairment on one side to the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and on the lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot) R71 was dependent with mobility when lying to sitting on the side of the bed. Side rails were not used and R71 had diagnoses of epilepsy and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Review of R71's side rail assessment provided by the facility, dated 07/07/22, revealed 3. Does the resident has [sic] alternation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to inform the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) of one of two abuse allegations reviewed for Resident (R)73 and R41 on 05/20/23 within the mandated two-hour period of 35 sample residents. Findings include: Review of the Investigation Summary provided by the facility, dated 05/23/23, revealed the incident occurred on 05/20/23. The residents were questioned on 05/22/23. R41 had no recollection of the event and stated, I can't fight anybody. How can I hit him? R73 stated he slammed the bathroom door shut, and R41 took offense and began yelling. R73 stated he [R73] opened the door and R41 hit him [R73] in the face. The investigation concluded there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the allegation stating, No visible injury to both residents, and no witness to this incident and therefore unable to determine that there was evidence of any physical altercation. The summary was signed by the then Director of Nursing (DON)2 [no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Residents (R) 46) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) had a PASARR level one updated upon receipt of a new serious mental health diagnoses not previously identified of 35 sample residents. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and not receiving appropriate and necessary mental health support/services. Findings include: Review of R46's undated admission Record from the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab showed a facility admission date of 01/21/21 with medical diagnoses of bipolar disorder and acquired absence of limb. Review of R46's undated admission Record from the EMR Diagnosis tab revealed a diagnosis of insomnia was added on 03/10/21; bipolar disorder in partial remission, most recent episode mixed was added on 01/23/23; the diagnosis unspecified psychosis was added on 10/30/23; and the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder depressive type was added on 12/08/23. Review of R46's EMR Miscellaneous tab…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan with goals and approaches for three of three residents (Residents (R) 32, R33, and R71) reviewed for side rail use; and one of three residents (R71) reviewed for limited range of motion of 35 sample residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R32's undated admission Record from the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed a facility admission date of 10/02/19, readmission on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included bilateral below knee amputation, dementia, macular degeneration, peripheral vascular disease, and anxiety disorder. Review of R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/27/23, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, showed R32 was rarely or never understood and was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility. Review of R32's Care Plan from the EMR Care Plan tab, showed bed rails were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that three of three residents (Resident (R) 32, R33, and R71) reviewed for bed rail use of 35 sample residents had attempted alternatives documented, quarterly and annually side rail screen assessments completed according to facility policy, and the Resident or Resident Representative (RR) were advised of the risks and/or benefits of rail use with an informed consent signed prior to the installation of the bed rails. This failure had the potential for the resident, or the RR be uninformed of the risks associated with bed rail use and could put the residents at risk for injury or entrapment. Findings include: 1. Review of R32's undated admission Record from the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab showed a facility admission date of 10/02/19 and readmission on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included bilateral below knee amputation, dementia, macular degeneration, peripheral vascular disease, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-17 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility visitation process did not restrict visitation as per executive directive from Center for Medicare Services (CMS) QSO-20-39-NH revised 11/12/2021. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #5) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/28/22, at 9:45 AM the surveyor toured the second floor of the facility. Resident #5 approached the surveyor and requested information regarding visitation. On 02/28/22 at 10:28 AM, during the entrance conference with the Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that visitors must be tested for COVID-19. The LNHA interjected, and stated, that the visitor was not forced to test. On 03/03/22 at 8:08 AM, upon the Survey team entrance to the facility, the Receptionist was interviewed regarding the process for a visitor upon entrance.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-17 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct performance evaluations in a timely manner and to provide documented education for areas of improvement identified on the performance evaluations, for 4 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA #1, #2, #3, and #5) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/02/22 at 8:13 AM, the Surveyor requested the CNA performance evaluations and education information from the Registered Nurse (RN) Staff Educator. On 03/02/22 at 10:11 AM, the RN Staff Educator provided the Surveyor with some CNA competencies and nothing else. The RN Staff Educator stated that the in-services she had provided the surveyor are the yearly education for all CNAs. The Surveyor explained there was missing information. The Surveyor explained to the RN Staff Educator that the survey team needed to review the performance evaluations and the educational information for the CNAs. On 03/03/22 at 8:35 AM, the facility had not provided the information on the CNA performance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review it was determined that the inactions in administration of the facility contributed to the facility failure to ensure: a.) the visitation process did not restrict visitation and complied with executive directive from Center for Medicare Services (CMS) QSO-20-39-NH revised [DATE], b.) allegations of abuse were investigated and reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA), c.) the facility followed the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) for Abuse Identification and Prevention, d.) a system for staff education and monitoring for Basic Life Support/CPR was in place after an adverse resident event occurred, e.) that nurse aides received the minimum required number of in-service hours and annual performance evaluations, f.) the facility developed quantitative and measurable goals for Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) , and g.) Antibiotic Stewardship was being conducted to track and monitor antibiotic use. This deficient practice was evidenced by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-17 · tag F0841 — widespread
  Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility Medical Director (MD) failed to provide clinical oversight and guidance regarding resident care policies and procedures that affect resident care, medical care, and resident quality of life related to 1.) laboratory results 2.) staff training and certifications for basic life support/cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and 3.) antibiotic stewardship. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On [DATE] at 12:51 PM, the Surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #7 which revealed: A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) documented a Nurses Note (NN) on [DATE] at 16:05 (4:05 PM). The admission record for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, hyperkalemia (high potassium level) and malignant neoplasm of the prostate (prostate cancer). A Doctor's Progress note, dated [DATE] was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-25 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ