Atlas Healthcare At Seashore Gardens

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 335 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 205 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 139.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: 2710717, 2791836 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to update the care plan (CP) with interventions for a resident (Resident #2) who's family expressed preferences related to incontinence care. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 5 residents reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms (enlarged prostrate that is not obstructing the urethra or irritating the bladder); muscle weakness; and cognitive communication deficit (communication difficulty caused by disrupted brain function). According to the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 01/29/2026, Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen's reach in refrigerator, ice machine, ice scoop holder, shelves, floor fan, rack, and the microwave ovens located in the pantry and snack rooms clean and sanitized. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure kitchen food preparation pans were dry when stored and failed to keep stored foods closed in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to create an environment for food-borne illnesses which could affect 139 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitation dated 11/22 indicated, Policy Statement The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. All kitchens, kitchen area and dining areas shall be kept clean . 2. All utensils, counters, shelves, and equipment are kept clean, maintained in good repair and free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks, and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning . 7. Food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 102) reviewed for choices and food preferences were honored, Specifically, 27 out of 28 residents residing in the secure dementia unit were not offered choices of food, beverages, and condiments at meals. This failure could lead to dissatisfaction with meals, weight loss, or malnutrition.Findings include:Review of R102's admission Record located under the Profile tab in his electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, mood disorder, chronic kidney disease, and anemia.Review of R102's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/07/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one out of 15 which indicated R102 had severely impaired cognition. The resident did not exhibit any mood or behavioral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, document review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure concerns regarding food temperatures voiced by eight of eight residents who participated in the Resident Council meeting (R19, R34, R43, R89, R92, R105, R129, and R143) in a total sample of 36 residents were acted upon in a timely manner in an attempt to resolve the group's concerns. This failure had the potential to lead to resident dissatisfaction with the facility's Resident Council and grievance resolution processes.Findings include:Review of the facility's April 2024 through June 2025 Resident Council meeting minutes provided on paper revealed ongoing grievances regarding palatable food temperatures:June 2024: Residents stated the food/waffles are cold. There was no follow up to this concern documented in the June 2024 or July 2024 meeting minutes/resolutions.September 2024: The food could be a lot warmer. The response, Temp [temperature] logs checked.November 2024: Residents expressed food is cold when it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and hot to three (Resident (R) 85, R158, and R159) of four residents reviewed for food palatability and eight of eight residents who participated in the Group meeting (R19, R34, R43, R89, R92, R105, R129, and R143) in a total sample of 36 residents.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food and Nutrition Services dated 10/17 indicated, Policy Statement, each resident is provided with a nourishing. Palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary need, food likes, dislike, eating habit, as well as physical, functional, and psychosocial factors that affect eating and nutritional intake and utilization. 1. Review of R85's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/14/25 located under the MDS tab indicated a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, admission agreement review and interviews, the facility failed to explicitly inform residents or their representative of their right not to sign the agreement as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, the facility; failed to explicitly state that neither the resident nor their representatives were required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, the facility; failed to ensure that the agreement was explained to the residents and their representatives in a form and manner that they understood; failed to ensure that the residents or their representatives acknowledged that they understood the agreement; failed to explicitly grant the residents or their representatives the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it for three of three (R)23, R33, and R5) reviewed for binding arbitration agreements. The failure had the potential for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0848 — pattern
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide for the selection of a neutral venue that is convenient to both parties in the binding arbitration agreement embedded in the facility's admission agreement signed by 131 of 139 residents currently residing in the facility. The failure had the potential for residents not to be aware of their legal right to have their disputes resolved in a court of law.Findings include:Review of the facility's admission Agreement revealed: .16. The Home and Resident or Resident's Representative agree that any claim, controversy, or dispute relating directly or indirectly to this Agreement, except for the Home's action to collect for non-payment of fees, shall be resolved by a single arbitrator in an arbitration association. The Arbitrator will be appointed by the mutual Agreement of the Home and Resident. If the Home and Resident cannot agree as to the identity of the Arbitrator, the Arbitrator will be appointed by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitration will be held in the county of the location of the Home. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop an effective infection surveillance program in order to conduct appropriate prevention or control activities and antibiotic stewardship for two (Resident (R)80 and R45) out of four residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This failure had the potential to cause avoidable spread of infection or increase antibiotic resistance throughout the facility.Findings include: During an interview on 07/24/25 at 3:54 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated her monthly infection surveillance included tracking of the resident's location, diagnosis, need for isolation, whether the infection was facility or community-acquired, and the antibiotic order. Review of the June 2025 Infection Control surveillance log, provided on paper, revealed a total of 37 urinary tract infections listed, and all 37 residents had documented antibiotic treatment. Of those 37, only three had the organism listed. During the interview on 07/24/25 at 3:54PM, The IP stated if no organism was listed, it meant that there was no lab…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that antibiotics were used only in the presence of a diagnosed/confirmed infection for two of four residents (Resident (R) 80 and R45) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship out of a total sample of 36 residents. These failures had the potential to lead to increased antibiotic resistance or adverse side effects related to unnecessary antibiotic usage. Findings include: 1. Review of R80's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R80's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated June 2025 and located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed a physician's order, dated 06/02/265, for Fosfomycin tromethamine (an antibiotic), 3 grams one time only on 06/02/25 for urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of R80's EMR under the Progress Notes tab revealed there was no documentation of symptoms, including increased incontinence.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an injury of unknown origin for one out of five residents reviewed for abuse (Resident (R) 97). This failure had the potential to contribute to further abuse or injury, which could result in mental anguish, physical harm, or fear. Findings include: Review of R97's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, depression, and anxiety. Review of R97's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/12/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR revealed the resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and was assessed with severely impaired cognition. The resident had short and long-term memory problems and exhibited physical behaviors toward others almost daily and other behavioral symptoms and rejection of care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $593K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ