Accela Post Acute Care At Hamilton

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 395 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review and review of pertinent facility documents on 10/20/2025 and 10/24/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure that pressure ulcers were initially documented, assessed, and measured weekly as required by professional standards of practice; b.) implement and update care plans (CP) after a change in condition; c.) provide treatment and services to prevent two facility acquired pressure ulcers; one stage 3 and one stage 4.A review of Resident #3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident arrived to the facility with no evidence of a pressure ulcer. Additional review of the EMR revealed a lack of adherence to physician orders, lack of monitoring, a failure to implement CP, and a lack of assessments resulting in Resident #3 developing a stage 3 and a stage 4 pressure ulcer within 9 days of admission.This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #3). This deficient practice was evidenced by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Complaint #: 2638834Based on interview and review of facility documents on 10/20/25, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked for at least eight consecutive hours a day for 2 of 14 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for the weeks of 09/28/25 through 10/11/2025, revealed that the facility failed to provide RN coverage for all shifts on 09/28/25 and 10/06/2025.The surveyor reviewed the facility's policy titled Staffing updated October 2017 which indicated under Policy Statement: Our facility provides sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment and under Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants are available 24 hours a day to provide direct resident care services.NJAC 8:39-25.2(h)

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0836 — widespread
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Repeat Deficiency Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to notify CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and receive authorization for a change in the facility's name in accordance with 42 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 424.516. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to 42 CFR 424.516 Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling and maintaining active enrollment status in the Medicare Program: (a) Certifying compliance. CMS enrolls and maintains an active enrollment status for a provider or supplier when that provider or supplier certifies that it meets, and continues to meet, and CMS verifies that it meets, and continues to meet, all of the following requirements: (1) Compliance with title XVIII of the Act and applicable Medicare regulations. (2) Compliance with Federal and State licensure, certification, and regulatory requirements, as required, based on the type of services,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0622 — pattern
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 183474 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to document the circumstance for which randomly selected residents, from the facility provided discharge list from 9/1/24 to 2/14/25, were discharged to another long-term care (LTC) facility, for 7 of 7 residents (Resident #182, #183, #184, #185, #186, # 187, #188) reviewed.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #182. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Polyosteoarthritis, unspecified (a condition that involves break down of [NAME] in multiple joints leading to pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 8/24/24, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ00183474 Refer to F 622 Based on interviews, record review and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification of the transfer to the Office of the Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (LTCO) for 7 of 7 residents (Resident #182, #183, #184, #185, #186, # 187, #188) reviewed for transfer to another LTC facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #182. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Polyosteoarthritis, unspecified (a condition that involves break down of [NAME] in multiple joints leading to pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 8/24/24, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REFER to F756 Based on observation, interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards by adjusting medication times of administration to accommodate for dialysis (a medical treatment that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are unable to do so) scheduled times from December 2024 until surveyor inquiry February 2025. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REFER to F698 Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to respond in a timely manner to the Consultant Pharmacist's (CP) monthly recommendations from December 2024 until surveyor inquiry for one (1) of six (6) residents, (Resident #21), reviewed for medication management. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/4/25 at 10:09 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #21, who stated that they had been here (in the facility) since late November but had gone to the hospital for a week in January and returned. The resident also stated that they (the nurses) frequently run out of their medications. The resident added specifically I don't get my Renvela (Sevelamer) (a medication used to lower the amount of phosphorous in the blood when receiving dialysis). The resident also stated that they went out of the facility for dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays at approximately 10 AM. The resident added they were waiting to be picked up this morning. On 2/5/25 at 8:32 AM, during the morning medication administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) received 12 hours of mandatory in-service training as required for 3 of 5 randomly selected CNA (CNA # 3, #4, #5) files reviewed for in-service training. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/07/25 at 9:17 AM, the surveyor reviewed in-service education hours for five randomly selected CNA files which were provided by the Director of Nursing (DON). The surveyor reviewed the following for the 2023 to 2024 calendar year, corresponding with the CNA hire dates: CNA #3 was hired on 4/1/22, CNA #4 was hired on 6/15/23, and CNA #5 was hired on 1/19/23. The facility could not provide evidence of in-service education training for the current 12-month period from hire date. On 2/07/25 at 2:01 PM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), in presence of survey team, stated that the facility cannot find the education for CNAs # 3,4 and 5. The LNHA stated the responsibility for ensuring the annual education on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility it was determined that the facility failed to ensure reference checks were completed for 6 of 10 newly hired employee files reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/7/25, the surveyor reviewed Ten (10) randomly selected new employee files which revealed the following: 1. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Unit Manager with a Date of Hire (DOH) of 7/22/24, did not have a previous employee reference on file. 2. LPN #2 with a DOH of 7/22/24, did not have a previous employee reference check on file. 3. LPN/Nurse Supervisor with a DOH of 7/22/24, did not have a previous employee reference check on file. 4. Registered Nurse #1 with a DOH 7/30/24, did not have a previous employee reference check on file. 5. Physical Therapist with a DOH 6/19/24, did not have a previous employee reference check on file. 6. Dietary staff with a DOH of 11/1/24, did not have a previous employee reference check on file. On 2/7/25 at 11:04 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Human Resources/Staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ00176931 Based on interviews, record review and pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an allegation of poor nursing care for 1of 4 residents (Resident #232) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility provided Reportable Event Record Report dated 319/2024, revealed the facility reported an event alleging that the resident had poor nursing care while at the facility to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #232. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar that can affect the kidneys) and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety (a mental disorder that can cause…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the morning medication administration observation on 2/5/25, the surveyor observed three (3) nurses administer medications to five (5) residents. There were 28 opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 7.14%. The deficient practice was identified for two (2) of five (5) residents, (Resident #21 and #82), that were administered medications by two (2) of three (3) nurses that were observed. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/5/25 at 8:36 AM, during the morning medication administration pass, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) administering medications to Resident #21. The resident stated that they would like their pain medication and their cough medicine. On 2/5/25 at 8:37 AM, the surveyor observed LPN#1 preparing to administer the resident's pain medication and cough medication. LPN#1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,175 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,175 — penalty dated 2025-10-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $190K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ